Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

Similar documents
Navy Warfare Development Command s (NWDC) Operations Research Chair of Warfare Innovation

Dr. Ray Buettner Director 2016 Year End Brief Jan 2017

Su S rface Force Strategy Return to Sea Control

Challenges and opportunities Trends to address New concepts for: Capability and program implications Text

Naval Surface and Mine Warfighting Development Center (SMWDC)

FFG(X) Update National Symposium - Surface Navy Association

DRAFT vea Target: 15 min, simultaneous translation Littoral OpTech East VADM Aucoin Keynote Address 1 Dec 2015 Grand Hotel Ichigaya

Amphibious Landings in the 21 st Century

N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL

A FUTURE MARITIME CONFLICT

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

INTRODUCTION. Chapter One

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

DATE: FY 2016 President's Budget February 2015 PRIOR YR FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 TO COMP TOTAL PROG QUANTITY

Trusted Partner in guided weapons

The Competition for Access and Influence. Seabasing

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

Statement of Vice Admiral Albert H. Konetzni, Jr. USN (Retired) Before the Projection Forces Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee

Gun and Missile Systems An Integrated Warfare Perspective

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Sea Air Space. Sea Power to the Hands of Our Sailors. RDML Jon Hill April 13, 2015

Winning in Close Combat Ground Forces in Multi-Domain Battle

ICCRTS Paper 103 Anti-submarine Warfare (ASW) Capability Transformation: Strategy of Response to Effects Based Warfare.

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

DATE: FY 2013 President's Budget February 2012 PRIOR YR FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 TO COMP TOTAL PROG QUANTITY

Agenda. DoD as an Energy Consumer. Defense Energy Challenges. Adapting to a New Environment. DoD Operational Energy Strategy. Current Initiatives

Lockheed Martin Corporation Integrating Air & Missile Defense

Virginia Ship Repair Association Commonality and Flexibility in Combat Systems

DoD and Defense Partner Wargaming at the Naval Postgraduate School

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

9 th Annual Disruptive Technologies Conference

Background Briefing: Vietnam: Evaluating its Fleet of Six Kilo-class Submarines Carlyle A. Thayer February 25, 2017

Experimenting into the future Mr Ed Gough Deputy Commander Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

OPNAVINST D N96 23 Jan Subj: SHIP ANTISUBMARINE WARFARE READINESS AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASURING PROGRAM

Future Expeditionary Armor Force Needs

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

The best days in this job are when I have the privilege of visiting our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen,

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

Aerial Targets & Unmanned Aviation

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

Unmanned Systems Interoperability Conference 2011 Integration of Autonomous UxS into USN Experiments

AVW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

NSWCCD-SSES SSES COMMAND OVERVIEW. 12 June Patricia C. Woody Department Head Machinery Research and Engineering

Strike Group Defender: PMR-51 and MIT Lincoln Laboratory

VADM David C. Johnson. Principal Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition April 4, 2017

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

ASSIGNMENT An element that enables a seadependent nation to project its political, economic, and military strengths seaward is known as 1-5.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A

Strategy and Tactics in Warfighting (WS 2017/18) Synopsis. Introduction

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare & Combating Terrorism S&T Department

ONR Command Overview. Mr. Craig A. Hughes Deputy Director of Research September Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release

Salvo Model for Anti-Surface Warfare Study

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

U.S. Pacific Command NDIA Science & Engineering Technology Conference

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

SSC Pacific is making its mark as

6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit

Sufficiency Analysis in Surface Combatant Force Structure Studies

Sea Air Space Symposium

Anti-Ship Missile Defense

Use of Modeling and Simulation (M&S) in Support of the Quantitative Assessment of FORCEnet Systems and Concepts

The Marine Corps Operating Concept How an Expeditionary Force Operates in the 21 st Century

Supporting the Army Warfighters Science and Technology Needs

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #10

II. Arms transfers and tensions in North East Asia

Systems Engineering Analysis of Unmanned Maritime Vehicles for USCG Mission Threads. LT J.B. Zorn, USCG CRUSER Group February 15, 2013

A Ready, Modern Force!

SHARPENING THE SPEAR

Missile Defense: Time to Go Big

TESTIMONY STATEMENT BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE ON RESHAPING THE MILITARY. February 16, 2017

UNCLASSIFIED. Unclassified

Air-Sea Battle: Concept and Implementation

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit)

10 August Space and Missile Defense Technology Development Panel AMRDEC Missile S&T. Mr. Jeffrey Langhout

Key Battles of WWII. How did the Allies win the war?

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Future Force Capabilities

WikiLeaks Document Release

Logbook Navy Perspective on Joint Force Interdependence Navigating Rough Seas Forging a Global Network of Navies

Funafuti The Midway of the South Pacific

A European Net Assessment of the People s Liberation Army (Navy)

Recapitalizing Canada s Fleets. What is next for Canada s Shipbuilding Strategy?

CHINA S WHITE PAPER ON MILITARY STRATEGY

Unit: 1-4 Surface Warfare

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

First Announcement/Call For Papers

Status of Unmanned Systems: EXECUTING!

Transcription:

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS Professor of Practice Jeff Kline, Operations Research Captain, USN (ret) Naval Postgraduate School

Joint Campaign Analysis and Wargaming Connection Technology Injects and Concepts Summer Joint Campaign Analysis Class Maritime War 2030 Scenario Red Response Blue Concepts Fall Wargaming Class Technology Injects and Concepts Winter Joint Campaign Analysis Class 2

Expansionist Russia: Baltic Kuril Islands Pacific Arctic Ocean Scenario: Maritime War 2030 South China Sea Conflict 3

Understanding the area 4

Concept of Operations Swedish Defensive 5

Swedish Offensive Scenario Results (w/o TI): Possibly high ship losses both sides 6

Swedish Offensive Scenario Results (w/o TI): Possible high losses both sides 7

Ship to shore movement Swedish Land Forces Benefit Greatly From Finnish Support Both Benefit From Distributed Lethality 3500 Swedish & Finish Forces: No Technical Inject Swedish & Finnish Forces With Distributed Lethality Capability 3500 3000 3000 2500 2500 Force Levels 2000 1500 Force Levels 2000 1500 1000 1000 500 500 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 0 5 10 Russians Allies 30% Russian Russians Allies 30% Russian 8

Maritime War 2030 The Scenario The Chinese Navy has instituted a blockade of Okinawa to impose a weapons and fuel quarantine of the island. The United States has sent destroyers to escort commercial shipping from Guam to Okinawa in an attempt to break the blockade. 9

Takeaways A single Chinese combatant poses a significant threat but convoy tactics with mutual area defense is a viable strategy for deterring aggression The addition of CODE offers some improvement to fleet defense Installing SeaRAM on cargo ships improves the survivability of the cargo ships and lessens the number of required escort DDGs 10

Findings Scenario 1: Single Attacker, Defender, and Cargo Ship U.S. Losses Percent Chance of Mission Kill 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 DDG Cargo ship 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Missiles Targeting Cargo Ship (8 total fired) 11 The best missile employment tactics for the Chinese is to use six missiles to attack the destroyer and then two missiles in a follow-up attack on the cargo ship. These findings validate a two phase missile employment strategy by the Chinese to first disable an escort and to then attack the cargo ship In any missile employment strategy, the Chinese have a better than 50% chance of sinking the cargo ship. This suggests additional defensive measures are required.

Findings Scenario 1: Cargo ship with SeaRAM 12 The addition of SeaRAM improves the chance of the cargo ship to survive by 10% regardless of Chinese missile employment strategy. Each additional 10% improvement to SeaRAM accuracy is an 8% improvement in survivability

Fall 2012 Capstone Game Littoral Flotilla Littoral Flotilla is an exploration into the application of innovative joint and combined naval formations conducting combat operations in the littoral environment. The goal of the project is to foster international cooperation in the development of Littoral Warfare and to expand awareness of the challenges associated with operations in the global littorals. Littoral Operations Center stood up at NPS (2014) 13

WARFARE INNOVATION CONTINUUM Creating Asymmetric Warfighting Advantages 2015 Total Ships Systems Engineering Energy Logistics in Warfare Operations IW Systems Engineering Capstone Robo-Ethics Continuing Education Series SEA 23 Capstone Project 2016 Total Ships Systems Engineering FY15 Summer Qtr FY16 Fall Qtr FY16 Winter Qtr FY16 Spring Qtr July August September October November December January February March April May June E-Week E-Week Joint Campaign Analysis Warfare Innovation Workshop Wargaming Joint Campaign Analysis JC4I Capstone CRUSER Innovation Thread 4: Leveraging Unmanned Systems to Create Asymmetric Advantages in Contested Environments CRUSER Technical Continuum Search Theory SEA 23 Final Report Indonesian Littoral Conops Course TIO Course OPTECH (Japan) Ops and Technology Workshop Littoral Operations Center SE Capstone Project Electric ship Wargame Planning and Innovation Workshop

Most Recent Workshop Creating Asymmetric Warfighting Advantages 21-24 September 2015 Will emergent technologies (unmanned systems, advanced computing power, automation, advanced sensor capabilities, laser weapons etc.) allow us to fight effectively in the complex and an electromagnetically contested littoral environment against sea denial forces? 15

CRUSER Innovation Thread A two-year event thread begins with a Warfare Innovation Workshop (WIW) and culminates with a research presentation at ONR showcasing the results Fall Year 1 Spring Year 1 Spring Year 2 Summer Year 2 Warfare Innovation Workshop Technical Continuum Field Experiment Research Expo Teams of junior officers and early career engineers propose concepts within a scenario Review of Technical Papers and proposals for concepts selected from Warfare Innovation Workshop. Includes a Research Fair Testing of physical models as a follow-on to the Tech Continuum Expo to showcase the results of the Innovation Thread Concept to Experimentation 16

2011 2016 2011 2013 Thread #1 UxS Employment in Naval Operations WIW (SEP 11) TechCon (APR 12) Field Exp. (APR 13) 2014-2016 Thread #5 Creating Asymmetric Warfighting Advantages WIW (SEP 15) 2012-2014 Thread #2 - Advancing the Design of Undersea Warfare WIW (SEP 12) TechCon (APR 13) Field Exp. (APR 14) 2013-2015 Thread #3 - Distributing Future Naval Air and Surface Forces WIW (SEP 13) TechCon (APR 14) Field Exp. (APR 15) WIW (SEP 14) 2014-2016 Thread #4 - Warfare in a Contested Littoral TechCon (APR 15) Field Exp. (APR 16) Consortium for Robotics and Unmanned Systems Education and Research 17

Prior Outcomes and Related work Swarm vs. Swarm UAS concepts Network Optional Warfare Achieved swarm of 50 networked UAVs on 27 August 2015 QR code communications Undersea Garages (stowed power) 18

BACKUP AND DISCUSSION 19

Okinawa Methods, Models and Tools Scenario 1 Single Attacker, Defender, and Cargo ship A single DDG escorting a cargo ship is attacked by a Chinese Sovremenny. Two phases of combat: Phase 1 The Sovremenny fires at the DDG to try and destroy the shield Phase 2 The Sovremenny fires at the cargo ship 20

Okinawa Methods, Models and Tools Scenario 2 SAG vs SAG A Sovremenny, two Type-52 and two Type-54 attack three DDGs escorting a 10 cargo ship convoy Two phases of combat: Phase 1: The Chinese SAG fires at the DDGs The DDGs fire some SM-2 in self defense The DDGs fire some SM-2 at the Chinese SAG Phase 2: The remaining Chinese ships fire at the cargo ships The DDGs fire remaining SM-2 at the incoming missiles 21

Okinawa Methods, Models and Tools Data Analysis A binomial model was used to determine attrition during each phase of combat Optimization software found the Chinese tactics for number of missiles to target the escorts vs the cargo ships. In addition, various US tactics were tested as counter-measures. 22

Constraints and Limitations Constraint 1 The engagement is restricted to US and Chinese forces Limitation 1 Only surface ships on a single route were considered in the model Extending the types of platforms on multiple routes made target assignment intractable Limitation 2 Solving the missile allocation is a nonlinear problem Different starting values were used for each run 23

Assumptions Assumption 1 All ships are within range of all other ships Assumption 2 Threat axis is know and all DDG s are placed in front of the convoy Assumption 3 DDGs can provide covering fire for themselves and all other ships Assumption 4 All Chinese missile types can be represented by a single missile type Assumption 5 Sufficient time exists for all defensive missiles to fire Assumption 6 Chinese are aware of US doctrine and act optimally in response Assumption 7 Chinese missiles are uniformly distributed among all cargo ships 24

Excursion 1 CODE CODE allows for a network of UAVs to operate under the control of a single operator who approves their actions. These UAVs would autonomously act to collect targeting information under established rules of engagement. In this model, CODE increased the probability of hit for SM-2 targeting both Chinese ships and incoming missiles. 25

Excursion 2 SeaRAM The SeaRAM combines the radar and electro-optical system of the Phalanx CIWS with an 11-cell RAM launcher to provide an autonomous system which can be fitted to any class of ship. Scenarios 1 and 2 were rerun with one SeaRAM system installed on each cargo ship. 26