Data Report 2015 Indiana Nursing Licensure Survey

Similar documents
State of Indiana Floodplain Management Work Plan FFY

2016 SNAPSHOT REPORT. July for Indiana Community Foundations

IHCP bulletin INDIANA HEALTH COVERAGE PROGRAMS BT OCTOBER 13, 2015

IC Chapter 2. Indiana Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners

Transportation I H C P A n n u a l. S e m i n a r

Road Funding in Indiana

2015 Statewide Bridge Sufficiency Rating Report - Condensed

Early Education Matching Grant

Critical Shortage of Physicians and Nurses Projected for Indiana

Indiana Solid Waste Management Districts Programmatic Per Capita Spending Data

All Together or Not at All: The Snuggle for Existence

Physician Workforce Fact Sheet 2016

East Central Florida Status Report on Nursing Supply and Demand July 2016

An Overview of 2015 Licensure Renewal Data

The 2015 National Workforce Survey Maryland LPN Data June 17, 2016

American Indian and Alaska Native Total Population 2010

Northeast Florida Status Report on Nursing Supply and Demand July 2016

Running Head: NURSE-MIDWIVES IN ILLINOIS AND INDIANA

Pre-Announcement. Ohio Common Pleas Court Administrative Judges and Ohio Board of County Commissioners:

Minnesota s Registered Nurse Workforce

2016 Survey of Michigan Nurses

Northwest Region Republican 271, % Democrat 167, % Other 22, % Variance (R) 103, % Erie. Seneca. Richland.

2018 Technical Documentation for Licensure and Workforce Survey Data Analysis Addressing Nurse Workforce Issues for the Health of Florida

Minnesota s Registered Nurse Workforce

I N D I A N A U N I V E R S I T Y S C H O O L O F D E N T I S T R Y SC HOL A R SH I P C R I T E R I A

Presented by: Jill Budden, PhD

West Central Florida Status Report on Nursing Supply and Demand July 2016

Hannah Maxey, PhD, MPH, RDH Assistant Professor and Director of The Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research and Policy

2005 Survey of Licensed Registered Nurses in Nevada

Standard Penn State Poll Demographic Questions/Recodes Included in the Per Question Cost

The RN & APRN Workforce in Ohio

4/3/2017. Hospice Reimbursement Explained

Kentucky Prescription Assistance Program (KPAP)

Florida s Workforce Supply Characteristics and Trends: Registered Nurses (RN)

ADAPT Utilizing Innovative Member Engagement Programs to Educate, Involve and Empower your Members

2017 Louisiana Nursing Education Capacity Report and 2016 Nurse Supply Addendum Report

Molina HealthCare of Illinois Provider Newsletter

Survey of Nurses 2015

Appendix A Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

Predicting Transitions in the Nursing Workforce: Professional Transitions from LPN to RN

The Registered Nurse Workforce in South Carolina

Indiana s Health Care Workforce

Prevention Works. Good Behavior Game. Nurse Family Partnership. Healthy Families America. Communities That Care ...

MARIAN UNIVERSITY Indianapolis College of Graduate and Online Programs EDUCATING A NEW GENERATION OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS

2010 Indiana Mental Health Professionals Re-Licensure Survey Report

Prepared by Voinovich Center for Leadership and Public Affairs Ohio University

Physical Therapy Assistant Occupation Overview

Technical Documentation for Licensure and Workforce Survey Data Analysis

ADVANCED PRACTICE REGISTERED NURSES IN VERMONT 2013 RE-LICENSURE SURVEY

Table of Contents/Links

HOME DECORATING AND DESIGN Youth Center Thursday, July 26, 2018 Colette Masterson, Assistant Superintendent Brenda Young, Assistant Superintendent

PHARMACIST POLICY REPORT

DoDEA Seniors Postsecondary Plans and Scholarships SY

Identifying and Describing Nursing Faculty Workload Issues: A Looming Faculty Shortage

School of Public Health University at Albany, State University of New York

2017 SPECIALTY REPORT ANNUAL REPORT

Ohio Local Government Officials Leadership Training

Licensed Nurses in Florida: Trends and Longitudinal Analysis

Florida s High School Cohort Graduation Rate

Kentucky Health Information Exchange

Florida Post-Licensure Registered Nurse Education: Academic Year

Indiana County Historians (updated January 2018)

Iowa County Attorneys Association

Prepared by Voinovich Center for Leadership and Public Affairs Ohio University

RETURN TO: STATE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT 64 NORTH UNION STREET, SUITE 300 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

Minnesota s Physical Therapist Assistant Workforce, 2015

Final Report: Estimating the Supply of and Demand for Bilingual Nurses in Northwest Arkansas

NURSE PRACTITIONERS IN VERMONT 2013 RE-LICENSURE SURVEY

Minnesota s Marriage & Family Therapist (MFT) Workforce, 2015

STATE:OHIO I N C O M E L I M I T S

2017 NCLEX-PN Test Plan Overview. Kristin Singer, MSN, RN RN Test Development Associate, Examinations

Report on the SREB Council on Collegiate Education for Nursing South Carolina School of Nursing Data

Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC

INTRODUCTION nonprofit organizations are also a major force in the state s economy

Policy Report. Indiana s Physician Workforce. Connor W. Norwood, MHA Hannah L. Maxey, PhD, MPH, RDH Tracie M. Kelley, BA

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Registered Nurses. Population

Survey of Registered Nurses 2008

Table A-4 Population by County: Pennsylvania, 1990 and 1999

Pennsylvania Department of Health - Health Status Indicators - Page 18

A Guide for Members of the Military

Salary and Demographic Survey Results

Minnesota s Physician Workforce, 2015

Colorado Community College System ACADEMIC YEAR NEED-BASED FINANCIAL AID APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS BASED ON 9 MONTH EFC

MEDICARE ENROLLMENT, HEALTH STATUS, SERVICE USE AND PAYMENT DATA FOR AMERICAN INDIANS & ALASKA NATIVES

Health Professions Workforce

Demographic Profile of the Officer, Enlisted, and Warrant Officer Populations of the National Guard September 2008 Snapshot

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Consortium Doctor of Nursing Practice Program Program Application Application Due March 15, 2009

The Center for Urban Policy and the Environment

Nursing Education Capacity and Nursing Supply in Louisiana 2015

AJL Reporting User Guide

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Consortium Doctor of Nursing Practice Program Program Application Application Due March 15, 2010

Patient-Centered Medical Home Program Update

State of Mississippi EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING RECORD

Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education

Conflict of Interest Statement

PROFILE OF THE MILITARY COMMUNITY

Cardinal Innovations Healthcare 2017 Needs and Gaps Analysis

The Alabama Health Action Coalition: Working Towards Improving Alabama s Health June 21 st, 2016

Position applying for: (Please print and attach supplemental questions included in the posting for which you are applying) Contact Information

Transcription:

Data Report 2015 Indiana Nursing Licensure Survey May 2016 0 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 011010 010 0 010 0 0110110 0110 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0 N U R S E S 0 010 01 0001100010010001100110001010011000100100010001101010100110001001100010010001000110110011001100010010001000110101001100010010001000110101001100010010001 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 N U R S E S 0101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 110101001100100110001001000100011010100100100110001001000100011010101001100010010001000110100100110001001000100011011101100011010010001101000110110011 1101110110 0 01N U R S E S1010 0 0110110 0110 0 010 010 0 0110 0110 0 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 0110 0 0 N U R S E S 0 100100011001100010100110001001000100011010101001100010011000101001100010010001100110001010011000100100010001101010100110001001100010010001000110110011 10 0110 0 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 0 N U R S E S10 0 010 0 0110110 0110 0110 0 0 N U R S E S101010 N U R S E S 0 010 0 011010 100010010001000110101001100010010001000110101001100010010001000110101001100100110001001000100011010100100100110001001000100011010101001100010010001000 U R S E S10 0 01101010 0110 010 0 N U R S E S10 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 N U R S E S110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0 100100110001001000100011011101100011010010001101000110101001100110001001000110011000101001100010010001000110101010011000100110001001000100011011001100 110 0 011010 0 N U R S I N G1101010 0110 0110 0 010 010 0 0110 0110 0 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0 N U R S E S10 0 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011 001001000100011010100110001001000100011010100110001001000100011010100110010011000100100010001101010010010011000100100010001101010100110001001000100011 110 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 01N U R S E S 0 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0 010011000100100010001101110110001101001000110100011010011000100100011001100010100110001001000100011010101001100010011000100100010001101100110011000100 10 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 01N U R S E S 0 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101110110 0 011010 010 0 01 010001101010011000100100010001101010011000100100010001101010011001001100010010001000110101001001001100010010001000110101010011000100100010001101001001 011N U R S E S10 0 0110 0110 0 01010 0110 0 010 01N U R S E S101010 0110 0 010 0110 0 N U R S E S110110 0110 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 01 010010001000110111011000110100100011010001101010001101100110011000100100010001101010011000100100010001101010011000100100010001101010011001001100010011 0 010 0 010 0 01N U R S E S 0 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 N U R S E S10 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110 N U R S E S 0 010 0 100100011001100010100110001001000100011010101001100010011000100100010001101100110011000100100010001101010011000100100010001101010011000100100010001101 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101110110 0 011010 010 0 011010 0 01101010 0 0110110 0110 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011N U R S E S 010 0 010 011001001100010010001000110101001001001100010010001000110101010011000100100010001101001001100010010001000110111011000110100100011010001101100100010001 1010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0 N U R S E S 0 010 0110 0 010 0110 0 010 010 0 0110 0110 0 01010 0110 N U R S E S 0110101010 0110 0 010 0110 0 010 01 010010010011000100100010001101010100110001001000100011010010011000100100010001101110110001101001000110101001100010010001100110001010011000100100010001 0 0 01N U R S E S10 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 N U R S E S 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 01N U R S E S 010 0001001000110011000101001100010010001000110101010011000100110001001000100011011001100110001001000100011010100110001001000100011010100110001001000100011 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101N U R S E S 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101110 N U R S E S 0 0 011010 0 0110110 100110010011000100100010001101010010010011000100100010001101010100110001001000100011010010011000100100010001101110110001101001000110100011010011010100 10 0 01N U R S E S10 0110 0 010 010 0 01N U R S E S 0 0 0110101010 0110 0 0 N U R S E S11010 010 0110 N U R S E S 0 01101110110 0 011010 010 0 0110 001001000100011010100110001001000100011010100110010011000100100010001101010010010011000100100010001101010100110001001000100011010010011000100100010001 110 0 0 N U R S E S10 0 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110 0 0 010 010 0 0110 0110 0 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 0110 0 010 110110001101001000110100011010010001000110101010011000100100010001101001001100010010001000110111011000110100100011010001101011010001101010010001000110 10 0 0110110 0110 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 N 010011000100100010001101001001100010010001000110111011000110100100011010001101011010100110001001000100011010100110001001000100011010100110010011000100 S 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 N U R S I N G 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101110110 0 0 N U R S E S 010 0 011010 01101010 010001101010010010011000100100010001101010100110001001000100011010010011000100100001000110101001001001100010010010001101110110001101001000110100011010 0 010 010 0 01N U R S E S10 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 001101010100110001001000100011010010011000100100010001101110110001101001000110100000100011010100100100110001001011010011010011010011000100100011001100 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101110110 0 011010 010 0 011010 0 011010 010 0 01N U R S E S 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01N U R S E S 0100110001001000100011010101001100010011000100100010001101100110011000100100010001000100011010100100100110001001101010011000100100010001101010011000100 010 0 01N U R S E S 0 0 011010 010 0 011010 0 0110101N U R S E S 0 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 010001101010011001001100010010001000110101001001001100010010001000110101010011000100100010001101001001100010010001000110111011000110100100011010001101 N U R S E S1010 010 0 011010 0 0110101101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 N U R S E S 010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011 010001100110001000100011010100100100110001001010011000100100010001101010100110001000010001101010010010011000100101100011000100011010100100100110001001 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110 N U R S E S 010 010 0 010 N U R S E S 0 0110 0 010 010 0 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 0 N U R S E S110110 0 000110101001001001100010010100100010001101100110011000100100010001101010011000100100010001101010011000100100010001100101010001101010010010011000100110 0 010 0 01101N U R S E S 0110101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101110110 0 011010 010 0 011010 0 0 0 010 0 011 110010011000100100010001100010001100001000110101001001001100010011010010010011000100101010010010011000100100010001101010100110001001000100011010010011 010 010 0110 0 010 01011010 011010 011010 0110 0 010 010 0 0110 0110 0 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 0110 0 010 010 0 100100010001101110110001101001000110100011011100110001000001000110101001001001100010011000110011000101001100010010001000110101010011000100110001001000 110110 0110 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 010 0 010 0 01N U R S E S110 0 010 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 N U R S E S 0 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010001000110101001001001100010011011001100110001001000100011010100110001001000100010001000110101001001001100010011010100110001001000100011010001000110 0 0 010 010 0 010 N U R S E S 0 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110111011N U 000100011010100100100110001001001001001100010010100110010011000100100010001101010010010011000100110100100100110001001010100100100110001001000100011010 1010 0 01101010 010 0 0110 0110 0 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 01010 0110 0 010 01N U R S E S 0 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 0 N U 001100010010001000110100100110001001000100011011101100011010010001101000110111001100010000010001101010010010011000100110001100110001010011000100100010 010 010 0110 0 010 0 N U R S E S 010 0 01101010 010 010 011N U R S E S 0 0 010 010 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 01010 010 0 010 0 0110110 0 101010100110001001100010010001000100010001101010010010011000100110110011001100010010001000110101001100010010001000100010001101010010010011000100110101 0 0 010 010 0 010 0 01N U R S E S10 0 010 0 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110 0101010 0 01101010 01N U R S E S 0 010 0110 0 010 011010 0110 0 100010010001000110100010001101010001000110101001001001100010010010010011000100101001100100110001001000100011010100100100110001001101001001001100010010 U R S E S10 0 0110 0 010 0 0110 0 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 011010 010 010 0110 0 010 0101010 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101 001001001100010010001000110101010011000100100010001101001001100010010001000110111011000110100100011010001101110011000100000100011010100100100110001001 0 0 010 010 0 0 N U R S E S110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101110110 0 011010 010 0 0110 N U R S E S110 0 010 0 0 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 0110 011001100010100110001001000100011010101001100010011000100100010001000100011010100100100110001001101100110011000100100010001101010011000100100010001000 0110 0 01010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110 N U R S E S 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 0110110 0110 0110 0 010 010 0 011010100100100110001001101010011000100100011010010010011000100101010010010011000100100010001101010100110001001000100011010010011000100100010001101110 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 N U R S E S 010 0110 0 010 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 0 010 0 01101010 0 0 001101001000110100011011100110001000001000110101001001001100010011000110011000101001100010010001000110101010011000100110001001000100010001000110101001 N U R S E S110 0 010 010 010 010 01N U R S E S 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 011N U R S E S 0 0 010 011010 010 010 0110 0 010 0 001100010011011001100110001001000100011010100110001001000100010001000110101001001001100010011010100110001001000100011010001000110101000100011010100100 0 010 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 011010 010 0110 0 N U R S E S101110110 0 011010 010 0 011010 0 01101110 01 110001001001001001100010010100110010011000100100010001101010010010011000100100011010001000110101000100011010100100100110001001001001001100010010100110 0 0 0 0 010 0 01101010 010 N U R S E S10 0 011N U R S E S110 0 010 010 0 010 0 0110101010 0110 N U R S E S10 0 010 0 01N U R S E S 010 010 010 0110 0 011000100100010001101010010010011000100110100100100110001001010100100100110001001000100011010101001100010010001000110100100110001001000100011011101100 0110 0110 0110 0 010 0 0 0 0110 0 010 0 01101010 010 N U R S E S10 01010110110 0 01101010 010 N U R S E S 0 0 011010 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 010010001101000110111001100010000010001101010010010011000100110001100110001010011000100100010001101010100110001001100010010001000100010001101010010010 R S E S10 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 0 0 0 011010 01101010 0110 0 010 010 0 01N U 000100110110011001100010010001000110101001100010010001000100010001101010010010011000100110101001100010010001000110100010001101010001000110101001001001 0 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 0110 010 0110 0 010 010 0 010 0 01101010 010 010 0110 0 010 0 0 0110 0 0 N U R S E S10 01101101010 0 0 0 0 N U R S E S

Acknowledgements The Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research & Policy (Bowen Center) would like to extend its gratitude to all the dedicated individuals who provided valuable and timely assistance during the development of the 2015 Indiana Nursing Licensure Survey Data Report. Preparing this report required the assistance, cooperation, and effort of many individuals. The survey data and additional data elements were provided by the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency. An advisory committee comprised of individuals from the Indiana State Department of Health, the Indiana Center for Nursing, the Indiana State Nurses Association and the Council of Indiana Nursing Deans and Directors provided direction and insight regarding the data analysis and report generation. The cooperation and support of the Indiana State Department of Health was instrumental throughout this project. The Bowen Center is grateful to the Indiana State Department of Health, Family and Social Services Administration, and Department of Workforce Development for the financial commitment which supported this important health workforce data project. The Bowen Center also recognizes the collaborative support provided by the Department of Biostatistics at the Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health. Copyright: 2016 Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research & Policy Department of Family Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine 1110 W. Michigan Street, LO200 Indianapolis, IN 46202 Recommended Citation: Data Report: 2015 Indiana Nursing Licensure Survey Data Report. (2016). Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research & Policy. Indiana University School of Medicine, Permalink: http://hdl.handle. net/1805/9688 Correspondence: Please address any correspondence regarding this document to the Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research & Policy via email at bowenctr@iu.edu or by phone at 317.278.4818. 2

Table of Contents Acknowledgements...2 Executive Summary...5 Introduction...6 Methods...6 Survey Administration...6 Dataset Construction...6 Figure 1.1 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria......7 Practice Address Verification... 7 Data Sources... 7 Validation of Practice Address through Geocoding... 7 FTE Assignment...8 Table 1.1: FTE Calculation for Reported Hours per Week in Patient Care...8 Rurality...8 Limitations...8 Supplemental Data Tables...9 Registered Nurses Workforce Highlights...10 Figure 2.1 Percentage of Registered Nurses Included in Report...10 Geographic Workforce Distribution...11 Table 2.1 Registered Nurses, Distribution...11 Map 2.1 Population per RN FTE... 12 Demographic Characteristics... 13 Table 2.2 Registered Nurses, Age/Gender... 13 Table 2.3 Registered Nurses Race/Ethnicity... 13 Education/Training Characteristics... 14 Table 2.4 Education and Training Characteristics... 14 Employment/Practice Setting Characteristics... 15 Table 2.5 Employment Characteristics... 15 Specialties... 16 Table 2.6 Registered Nurses, Employment Specialty... 16 3

Table of Contents Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce Highlights... 17 Figure 3.1 Percent of Nursing Workforce with an APN... 17 Figure 3.2 Breakdown of APN Type... 17 Geographic Workforce Distribution... 18 Table 3.1 Advanced Practice Nurses, Distribution... 18 Map 3.1 Population per APN FTE... 20 Demographic Characteristics... 21 Table 3.2 Advanced Practice Nurses, Age/Gender... 21 Table 3.3 APN Race/Ethnicity... 21 Education/Training Characteristics...22 Table 3.4 Advanced Practice Nurses, Education and Training Characteristics...22 Employment/Practice Setting Characteristics...23 Table 3.5 Advanced Practice Nurses, Work Setting Characteristics...23 Specialties...24 Table 3.6 Advanced Practice Nurses, Employment Specialty...24 Closing Summary...25 4

Executive Summary The mission of the Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research & Policy (Bowen Center) is to improve population health by contributing to informed health workforce policy through data management, community engagement, and original research. The Bowen Center has a rich history of collecting, analyzing, and disseminating health workforce data and research for the State of Indiana. These health workforce data are important to informing health workforce policy and planning efforts throughout Indiana. The nursing workforce represents the largest segment of the health workforce and works in a variety of settings to fulfill direct patient care, coordination of care, administrative and research roles. 1 In fact, in 2015 Indiana had over 104,000 registered nurses (RNs) renew their professional license. Furthermore, as the number of medical students choosing to specialize in primary care continues to decline, the number of advanced practice nurses (APNs) has more than doubled over the past 20 years. 2 Understanding the supply and distribution of the RN and APN workforce is critical for understanding their capacity to meet health care needs and improve population health. The 2015 Indiana Nursing Licensure Survey Data Report presents key information and data collected from the registered nurse re-licensure survey administered by the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency (IPLA) during nurses biennial license renewal. As of 2015, 104,475 RNs were licensed to practice in the state of Indiana. Of these, 67,554 RNs reported having an Indiana practice address and were included in this report. In five rural Indiana counties, there are more than 200 residents per RN full-time equivalent (FTE). 3 Additionally, the number of residents per APN FTE ranges from 839 to 26,295 residents per APN FTE. Almost one-half (48.2%) of RNs reported working at least 37 hours per week, with the highest proportion (20.4%) of those RNs report working in an acute/critical care setting. Over one-third of APNs (34.5%) reported working with an adult health/family physician in an ambulatory care setting. Although the median age for RNs is 45 and APNs 51.8, Indiana s nursing workforce is young: the highest proportion (27.1%) of RNs are under 35 years of age. The data presented in this report provide a snapshot of key demographic and practice characteristics of the RN and APN workforce to provide stakeholders with information needed to improve the quality and accessibility of health care through policymaking, workforce development, and resource allocation. Additional analyses and reports may be made available through the Bowen Center s website (http://family.medicine.iu.edu/hws/workforce-form/). 1 Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2011). The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 2 Ibid. 3 Full-time equivalent (FTE) is a measure used to indicate the workload of an employed person in order to make workloads comparable. An FTE of 1.0 is equivalent to a full-time worker or student, while an FTE of 0.5 signals half of a full workload. Zimmermann, P. (2002). Nursing management secrets; 974(13) of Secrets series. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 55 5

Introduction The Bowen Center for Health Workforce Research & Policy (Bowen Center) aims to improve population health by informing health workforce policy through data management, community engagement, and original research. Formerly known as the Bowen Research Center, the Bowen Center has a rich history of collecting, analyzing, and disseminating health workforce data and research for the State of Indiana. Understanding the status of Indiana s health care workforce is critical to ensuring that Indiana residents have access to high quality care, developing programs that will train practitioners to meet future needs, and recruiting and retaining health care professionals in Indiana. Indiana s nursing workforce is a fundamental part of Indiana s overall health care workforce, filling positions in a wide array of occupations and work settings. The 2015 Nursing Licensure Survey Data Report presents data collected from the nursing re-licensure survey administered by the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency (IPLA) during the biennial license renewal period. The report includes data on the nursing professional workforce that may be used to promote meaningful policy discussion and to inform evidence-based policy development. Data in this report are presented in two sections: (1) registered nurses (RN) and (2) advanced practice nurses (APN). Both sections describe demographic and professional characteristics as well as geographic distribution information (supply). Methods Survey Administration Indiana s nursing re-licensure survey was adapted from the nursing Minimum Data Set (MDS) created by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. HRSA has established MDS tools for many licensed health professionals to facilitate the establishment of national databases with consistent core data elements covering demographic, educational, credentialing, and practice characteristics of the health professions. Indiana s nursing re-licensure survey was administered by the IPLA during the biennial licensure renewal period. Only nurses who renewed their license electronically (n=102,093) were invited to complete the voluntary survey. Dataset Construction The data used for this report were extracted from the nursing base license and the nursing survey data files provided by the IPLA through the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH). The base license file contains administrative data such as license status, expiration date, license number, and date of birth. The base license file was merged with the nurse survey file by unique license number. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the survey response data to define the sample of nurses actively practicing in Indiana. Therefore, the following inclusion criteria were applied: 1. Nurse renewed license online (electronically) in 2015; 2. Nurse responded to the 2015 re-licensure survey; 3. Nurse holds an active, valid to practice while reviewed or probationary license; 4. Nurse reported actively working in nursing; and 5. Nurse reported an Indiana practice address. Nurses who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded from the sample. Figure 1 provides a diagram of inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study sample. The final sample includes 67,554 RNs who held an active, valid to practice while under review or probationary license, reported actively working in nursing, and provided an Indiana practice location which could be verified. 6

Figure 1.1: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Practice Address Verification Validation of License Address through Geocoding For this report, the address to which a nurse s license is mailed was used to determine the nurse s county location. Addresses were first cleaned by correcting spelling of street names and removing suite, building, apartment and room numbers. After cleaning, addresses were analyzed through a geocoding program in SAS 9.4. This program matched the license address to an address in a TIGER/Line file and returned the geographical coordinates and county FIPS 4 code for each address. Addresses returned with geographic coordinates were considered valid. Addresses returned without geographic coordinates were considered invalid and excluded from the analysis sample. 4 Federal Information Processing Standard. See www.census.gov/geo/reference/geocodes.html for more information. 7

FTE Assignment A full-time equivalent (FTE) was assigned to each individual based on his or her survey response indicating the average number of hours per week spent in direct patient care. FTEs were assigned to each individual in order to accurately map the distribution of the RN workforce providing FTE through direct patient care throughout Indiana. Individuals in each hourly category were assigned an FTE as shown in Table 1.1. Those individuals who have not reported any hours in direct patient care have been assigned 0.0 FTE but are included in this report as they may be working in roles such as teaching or administration. Geographic information system (GIS) maps present the distribution of the workforce by FTE throughout the report. Table 1.1: FTE Calculation for Reported Hours per Week in Patient Care. Hours per Week in Patient Care Assigned FTE 0 0.0 1 4 0.1 5 8 0.2 9 12 0.3 13 16 0.4 17 20 0.5 21 24 0.6 25 28 0.7 29 32 0.8 33 36 0.9 37 40 1.0 40 or more 1.0 Rurality Rurality was determined by whether an area is considered rural as defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB defines an area as a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) with the following definition: 5 one city with a population of 50,000 or more; or an urbanized area (as defined by the Bureau of the Census) with a population of at least 50,000 and a total MSA population of at least 100,000. Each MSA must include the county in which the central city is located and additional contiguous counties (fringe counties), if they are economically and socially integrated with the central county. Any county not included in an MSA is considered non-metro or rural. For this report, counties that meet the criteria as a metropolitan statistical area are considered urban. Metro and non-metro county designations were derived from the 2013 OMB delineation files. Limitations The analyses and data presented in this report have several key limitations that should be taken into account when utilizing and interpreting these data. The information in this report was gathered as self-reported responses to a voluntary survey. As is the case with all survey research, it is likely that there is some level of response bias. In this case, it is possible responses to a question do not reflect the absolute practice characteristics of a provider. Although, self-reported data may not be considered absolute provide a best estimate of a provider s practice characteristic and should only be used to inform policy discussion. 5 See https://www.census.gov/population/metro/ for further information. 8

Additionally, the data presented in this report only represent a sample of the entire nursing workforce. Due to missing data and the voluntary nature of the survey some nurses are not represented in the final sample of this report. Although, only a sample is present in these data, it is a fairly large sample of the nursing workforce and may be valuable in informing health workforce policies. Lastly, the nursing licensure survey has been updated several times over the years in order to meet the needs of the State of Indiana. Therefore, trend analyses on these data are not presented in this report due to changes in the data collection process and questions asked on the survey. Supplemental Data Tables The primary purpose of the 2015 Indiana Nursing Licensure Survey Data Report is to provide a snapshot of key information pertaining to the nursing workforce in Indiana. This report only presents highlights of the 2015 nursing survey data. Additional data tables and reports may be made available online or may be requested through the Bowen Center website s Data-Technical Assistance Request Form. 9

The nursing workforce makes up the largest sector of the health workforce. It is comprised of a diverse group of professionals with a wide range of credentials working in a variety of settings. Although 104,475 RNs renewed their license in 2015, only 67,554 RNs reported actively working in nursing in Indiana and had a valid Indiana practice address (Figure 2.1). This section focuses on demographic and practice characteristics of the RN workforce, including RNs who also are credentialed as an APN. A subsequent section will examine characteristics of the APN workforce. Highlights Registered Nurses Workforce With the exception of urban LaPorte County, rural counties have the highest number of residents per RN FTE (Crawford, LaGrange, Noble, Orange) The respondent sample contains more than 15 times as many female RNs vs. male RNs Over 90% of respondents identified as White non-hispanic Nearly one-half (48.2%) of RNs reported working at least 37 hours per week The highest proportion (20.4%) of RNs reported working in acute care/critical care specialties Registered Nurses Workforce Figure 2.1 Percentage of Registered Nurses Included in Report 36,921; 35% 36,921; )!#*+,&')$(' 35% 67,554; 65%!"#$$%&'!$(' 67,544; 65% Included Not Included Comparison of the proportion of licensed RNs in Indiana who have been included in this report. 10

Table 2.1: Registered Nurses, Distribution County Rurality Population per RN FTE Adams Rural 135 Allen Urban 113 Bartholomew Urban 151 Benton Urban 205 Blackford Rural 149 Boone Urban 86 Brown Urban 118 Carroll Urban 115 Cass Rural 164 Clark Urban 144 Clay Urban 127 Clinton Rural 157 Crawford Rural 222 Daviess Rural 136 DeKalb Rural 148 Dearborn Urban 195 Decatur Rural 134 Delaware Urban 142 Dubois Rural 103 Elkhart Urban 182 Fayette Rural 147 Floyd Urban 117 Fountain Rural 178 Franklin Rural 148 Fulton Rural 136 Gibson Rural 122 Grant Rural 116 Greene Rural 136 Hamilton Urban 80 Hancock Urban 83 Harrison Urban 130 Hendricks Urban 74 Henry Rural 127 Howard Urban 119 Huntington Rural 138 Jackson Rural 178 Jasper Urban 142 Jay Rural 166 Jefferson Rural 131 Jennings Rural 188 Johnson Urban 87 Knox Rural 95 Kosciusko Rural 195 LaGrange Rural 347 LaPorte Urban 666 Lake Urban 32 Lawrence Rural 155 County Rurality Population per RN FTE Madison Urban 148 Marion Urban 149 Marshall Rural 158 Martin Rural 109 Miami Rural 145 Monroe Urban 155 Montgomery Rural 176 Morgan Urban 126 Newton Urban 196 Noble Rural 211 Ohio Urban 163 Orange Rural 215 Owen Urban 196 Parke Rural 173 Perry Rural 172 Pike Rural 129 Porter Urban 107 Posey Urban 126 Pulaski Rural 131 Putnam Urban 130 Randolph Rural 146 Ripley Rural 114 Rush Rural 119 Scott Urban 185 Shelby Urban 123 Spencer Rural 121 St Joseph Urban 140 Starke Rural 142 Steuben Rural 183 Sullivan Urban 115 Switzerland Rural 184 Tippecanoe Urban 151 Tipton Rural 126 Union Rural 115 Vanderburgh Urban 125 Vermillion Urban 152 Vigo Urban 128 Wabash Rural 199 Warren Rural 152 Warrick Urban 91 Washington Urban 161 Wayne Rural 131 Wells Urban 111 White Rural 158 Whitley Urban 111 Notes: Urban and rural classification based on Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions. 11 Registered Nurses Workforce

Map 2.1 Population per RN FTE Registered Nurses Workforce Population per RN FTE 32.50-96.61 96.62-136.5 136.6-176.4 176.5-347.0 347.1-668.0 12

Demographic Characteristics Table 2.2: Registered Nurses, Age/Gender Gender Female Male Non-Respondents Total Age Category N % N % N % N % Under 35 16,981 26.9 1,162 29.3 186 34.3 18,329 27.1 35-44 15,244 24.2 1,132 28.5 101 18.6 16,477 24.4 45-54 15,128 24.0 957 24.1 85 15.7 16,170 23.9 55-64 13,368 21.2 603 15.2 126 23.2 14,097 20.9 65 and Older 2,243 3.6 106 2.7 30 5.5 2,379 3.5 Non-Respondents 81 0.1 7 0.2 14 2.6 102 0.2 Total 63,045 100.0 3,967 100.0 542 100.0 67,554 100.0 Notes: The Indiana Professional Licensing Agency (IPLA) did not provide gender data for every respondent. Age was calculated by measuring the difference between the date of birth provided by IPLA and the survey completion date. Registered Nurses Workforce Table 2.3: Registered Nurses Race/Ethnicity Race N % White 61,834 91.5 Black or African American 2,656 3.9 Asian 804 1.2 Multiracial 668 1.0 American Indian or Alaska Native 103 0.2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 51 0.1 Other 850 1.3 Non-Respondents 588 0.9 Total 67,554 100.0 Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino 65,068 96.3 Hispanic or Latino 1,421 2.1 Non-Respondents 1,065 1.6 Total 67,554 100.0 13

Education/Training Characteristics Table 2.4: Education and Training Characteristics First Qualifying Education Program Location N % Indiana 54,831 81.2 Other U.S. State 10,919 16.2 Non-Respondents 1,804 2.7 Total 67,554 100.0 Highest Education Vocational/Practical Certificate - nursing 8 0.0 Diploma - nursing 2,500 3.7 Associate Degree - nursing 22,301 33.0 Baccalaureate Degree - nursing 26,046 38.6 Master s Degree - nursing 6,291 9.3 Doctoral Degree - nursing 417 0.6 Associate Degree - other field 302 0.5 Baccalaureate Degree - other field 3,246 4.8 Master s Degree - other field 1,532 2.3 Doctoral Degree - other field 193 0.3 Non-Respondents 4,718 7.0 Total 67,554 100.0 Registered Nurses Workforce 14

Employment/Practice Setting Characteristics Table 2.5: Registered Nurses, Work Setting Characteristics Paid Positions N % 1 position 56,121 83.1 2 positions 5,827 8.6 3 positions 557 0.8 4 or more positions 227 0.3 Non-Respondents 4,822 7.1 Total 67,554 100.0 Primary Work Setting N % Hospital 39,914 59.1 Ambulatory Care Setting 6,009 8.9 Nursing Home/Extended Care Facility/Assisted Living Facility 5,029 7.4 Other 4,754 7.0 Home Health 4,058 6.0 School Health Service 1,393 2.1 Community Health 1,375 2.0 Academic Setting 1,313 1.9 Insurance Claims/Benefits 1,033 1.5 Public Health 704 1.0 Occupational Health 578 0.9 Correctional Facility 303 0.5 Policy/Planning/Licensing Agency 26 0.0 Non-Respondents 1,065 1.6 Total 67,554 100.0 Primary Practice Hours N % 0 hours per week 261 0.4 1-4 hours per week 570 0.8 5-8 hours per week 845 1.3 9-12 hours per week 879 1.3 13-16 hours per week 935 1.4 17-20 hours per week 1,359 2.0 21-24 hours per week 3,311 4.9 25-28 hours per week 2,776 4.1 29-32 hours per week 2,923 4.3 33-36 hours per week 9,225 13.7 37-40 hours per week 21,191 31.4 41 or more hours per week 11,325 16.8 Non-Respondents 11,954 17.7 Total 67,554 100.0 Registered Nurses Workforce 15

Specialties Table 2.6: Registered Nurses, Employment Specialty Employment Specialty N % Acute Care/Critical Care 13,794 20.4 Other 12,282 18.2 Medical Surgical 8,136 12.0 Geriatric/Gerontology 4,398 6.5 Pediatrics/Neonatal 3,604 5.3 Adult Health/Family Health 3,186 4.7 Maternal and Child Health 3,114 4.6 Home Health 3,065 4.5 Psychiatric/Mental Health/Substance Abuse 2,108 3.1 Oncology 1,902 2.8 Trauma 1,649 2.4 Rehabilitation 1,487 2.2 Women s Health 1,465 2.2 School Health 1,260 1.9 Community 809 1.2 Palliative Care 776 1.2 Anesthesia 674 1.0 Public Health 659 1.0 Occupational Health 647 1.0 Non-Respondents 2,539 3.8 Total 67,554 100.0 Registered Nurses Workforce 16

Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce Highlights Switzerland County has no reported APN FTE. Like the RN nursing supply, except for LaPorte County, the counties with the highest population per APN are rural (Benton, Crawford, LaGrange, Orange). The counties with the least population per APN FTE are urban (Boone, Hamilton, Hendricks, Lake, Warrick). The highest proportion of APNs are 45-54 years old 92.4% of APNs identified as non-hispanic White Over one-third (34.3%) of APNs reported working in an ambulatory care setting with a physician specializing in adult health/family health (34.5%). Figure 3.1 Percent of Nursing Workforce with an APN Credential 3,363; 5% 64,191; 95% 133; 4% 75; 2% Figure 3.2 Breakdown of APN Type Registered Nurses Advanced Practice Nurses Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce Nurse Practitioner Certified Nurse Specialist Certified Nurse Midwife 3,155; 94% 17

Geographic Workforce Distribution Table 3.1: Advanced Practice Nurses, Distribution County Rurality Certified Nurse Midwife Population to Provider Ratio Clinical Nurse Specialist Nurse Practitioner Adams Rural - - 3,422 Allen Urban 87,965 54,132 1,883 Bartholomew Urban 76,484 40,255 2,771 Benton Urban - - 8,671 Blackford Rural - - 6,162 Boone Urban - 28,689 1,010 Brown Urban - - 2,049 Carroll Urban - - 2,044 Cass Rural - 18,912 2,741 Clark Urban 121,727-2,846 Clay Urban 43,912-2,462 Clinton Rural - - 8,067 Crawford Rural - - 26,295 Daviess Rural - - 1,747 DeKalb Rural 37,987-2,713 Dearborn Urban - - 5,464 Decatur Rural - - 2,552 Delaware Urban 109,269-2,620 Dubois Rural - - 2,675 Elkhart Urban 40,603 194,894 3,303 Fayette Rural - 47,184 2,247 Floyd Urban - - 1,863 Fountain Rural - - 3,648 Franklin Rural - - 5,207 Fulton Rural - - 1,931 Gibson Rural - 32,607 3,432 Grant Rural - - 3,507 Greene Rural - - 3,705 Hamilton Urban 78,021 22,116 1,032 Hancock Urban - 173,775 1,655 Harrison Urban - - 7,016 Hendricks Urban 60,487 37,223 1,280 Henry Rural 65,659-3,148 Howard Urban - 54,178 2,630 Huntington Rural - - 3,125 Jackson Rural - - 2,556 Jasper Urban - 64,668 3,717 Jay Rural - - 2,685 Jefferson Rural - - 5,601 Jennings Rural - 27,866 2,933 Johnson Urban - 138,325 1,948 Knox Rural - 35,387 2,661 Kosciusko Rural 38,013 76,026 5,354 LaGrange Rural - - 11,944 LaPorte Urban 976,448 488,224 17,313 Lake Urban 27,035 7,037 839 Lawrence Rural - 25,149 3,234 18 Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce

Table 3.1: Advanced Practice Nurses, Distribution, Continued County Rurality Certified Nurse Midwife Population to Provider Ratio Clinical Nurse Specialist Nurse Practitioner Madison Urban 45,926 124,001 2,551 Marion Urban 94,016 31,449 2,430 Marshall Rural 35,610-1,987 Martin Rural - - 1,846 Miami Rural - - 2,558 Monroe Urban 28,425 39,084 1,727 Montgomery Rural - - 3,224 Morgan Urban - - 2,086 Newton Urban - - 5,368 Noble Rural 46,458-3,904 Ohio Urban - - 5,946 Orange Rural - - 9,224 Owen Urban - - 3,751 Parke Rural - - 2,790 Perry Rural - - 2,359 Pike Rural - 13,929 7,835 Porter Urban 62,020 179,168 2,631 Posey Urban - 25,426 3,101 Pulaski Rural - - 7,609 Putnam Urban - - 2,399 Randolph Rural 12,766-2,128 Ripley Rural - - 3,753 Rush Rural - - 2,534 Scott Urban - - 2,536 Shelby Urban 21,797 43,594 1,839 Spencer Rural - - 2,514 St Joseph Urban 72,678 133,881 2,590 Starke Rural - 46,186 5,020 Steuben Rural - - 3,601 Sullivan Urban - 19,040 2,608 Switzerland Rural - - - Tippecanoe Urban 67,377 34,405 2,142 Tipton Rural - - 2,083 Union Rural - - 2,220 Vanderburgh Urban - 86,600 2,052 Vermillion Urban - - 3,023 Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce Vigo Urban - 98,481 2,122 Wabash Rural - - 2,477 Warren Rural - - 4,171 Warrick Urban - 12,820 1,305 Washington Urban - - 1,723 Wayne Rural 73,128 15,670 2,561 Wells Urban - - 4,823 White Rural - - 3,955 Whitley Urban - - 4,309 Notes: Urban and rural classification based on Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions. 19

Map 3.1 Population per APN FTE Population per APN FTE 729.1-2865 2866-5207 5208-9224 9225-16440 16450-26300 No APN FTE Reported Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce Notes: Population to APN FTE could not be calculated in counties with no reported FTE. 20

Demographic Characteristics Table 3.2: Advanced Practice Nurses, Age/Gender Gender Female Male Non-Respondents Total Age Category N % N % N % N % Under 35 665 20.9 25 15.2 0 0.0 690 20.5 35-44 817 25.7 47 28.5 1 6.7 865 25.7 45-54 863 27.1 58 35.2 5 33.3 926 27.5 55-64 707 22.2 29 17.6 9 60.0 745 22.2 65 and Older 131 4.1 6 3.6 0 0.0 137 4.1 Non-Respondents 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total 3,183 100.0 165 100.0 15 100.0 3,363 100.0 Notes: The Indiana Professional Licensing Agency (IPLA) did not provide gender data for every respondent. Age was calculated by measuring the difference between the date of birth provided by IPLA and the survey completion date. Table 3.3: APN Race/Ethnicity Race N % White 3,107 92.4 Black or African American 114 3.4 Multiracial 37 1.1 Asian 33 1.0 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2 0.1 American Indian or Alaska Native 2 0.1 Other 37 1.1 Non-Respondents 31 0.9 Total 3,363 100.0 Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino 3,265 97.1 Hispanic or Latino 60 1.8 Non-Respondents 38 1.1 Total 3,363 100.0 Source: Indiana Nursing Re-Licensure Survey, 2015 21 Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce

Education/Training Characteristics Table 3.4: Advanced Practice Nurses, Education and Training Characteristics First Qualifying Education Program Location N % Indiana 2,664 79.2 Other U.S. State 29 0.9 Non-Respondents 670 19.9 Total 3,363 100.0 Highest Education Vocational/Practical Certificate - nursing 1 0.0 Diploma - nursing 1 0.0 Associate Degree - nursing 1 0.0 Baccalaureate Degree - nursing 83 2.5 Master s Degree - nursing 2,841 84.5 Doctoral Degree - nursing 157 4.7 Associate Degree - other field 0 0.0 Baccalaureate Degree - other field 1 0.0 Master s Degree - other field 72 2.1 Doctoral Degree - other field 26 0.8 Non-Respondents 180 5.4 Total 3,363 100.0 Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce 22

Employment/Practice Setting Characteristics Table 3.5: Advanced Practice Nurses, Work Setting Characteristics Paid Positions N % 1 position 2,652 78.9 2 positions 515 15.3 3 positions 89 2.6 4 or more positions 28 0.8 Non-Respondents 79 2.3 Total 3,363 100.0 Primary Work Setting N % Ambulatory Care Setting 1,152 34.3 Hospital 910 27.1 Other 536 15.9 Community Health 287 8.5 Nursing Home/Extended Care Facility/Assisted Living Facility 141 4.2 Occupational Health 102 3.0 Academic Setting 76 2.3 Home Health 61 1.8 School Health Service 31 0.9 Public Health 28 0.8 Correctional Facility 18 0.5 Insurance Claims/Benefits 2 0.1 Policy/Planning/Licensing Agency 0 0.0 Non-Respondents 19 0.6 Total 3,363 100.0 Primary Practice Hours N % 0 hours per week 16 0.5 1-4 hours per week 24 0.7 5-8 hours per week 64 1.9 9-12 hours per week 57 1.7 13-16 hours per week 75 2.2 17-20 hours per week 139 4.1 21-24 hours per week 186 5.5 25-28 hours per week 142 4.2 29-32 hours per week 222 6.6 33-36 hours per week 368 10.9 37-40 hours per week 1,105 32.9 41 or more hours per week 888 26.4 Non-Respondents 77 2.3 Total 3,363 100.0 Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce 23

Specialties Table 3.6: Advanced Practice Nurses, Employment Specialty Employment Specialty N % Adult Health/Family Health 1,161 34.5 Other 473 14.1 Acute Care/Critical Care 365 10.9 Pediatrics/Neonatal 272 8.1 Psychiatric/Mental Health/Substance Abuse 205 6.1 Women s Health 205 6.1 Geriatric/Gerontology 133 4.0 Occupational Health 92 2.7 Oncology 62 1.8 Medical Surgical 54 1.6 Community 52 1.5 Palliative Care 51 1.5 Maternal and Child Health 43 1.3 Trauma 39 1.2 Home Health 21 0.6 School Health 14 0.4 Anesthesia 13 0.4 Public Health 11 0.3 Rehabilitation 9 0.3 Non-Respondents 88 2.6 Total 3,363 100.0 Advanced Practice Nurses Workforce 24

Closing Summary The data presented in this report provides information on demographics and practice characteristics for the nursing workforce. Of the total nursing workforce renewing their license, 64.7% of nurses reported working in Indiana and were included in the analysis for this report. The sample included in this report demonstrated more than one-fourth of nurses (27.1%) are under 35 years of age. The nursing workforce also showed a lack of diversity as 91.5% identified as non-hispanic white. Regarding practice characteristics, over half of the nursing workforce (59.1%) reported working in a hospital and the highest proportion (20.4%) reported their practice specialty as acute care/critical care. Nearly one-half (48.2%) of nurses reported spending at least 37 hours/week in direct patient care. Understanding the characteristics of the nursing workforce is important for informing policy and improving health care needs. Implications and recommendations from the data provided in this report are provided in the 2015 Nursing Policy Report. 25 Closing Summary