National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471 Phone: 617-770-3000 Fax: 617-770-0700 www.nfpa.org M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Technical Committee on Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Sarah Caldwell, Project Administrator DATE: January 3, 2017 SUBJECT: NFPA 403 Second Draft Technical Committee FINAL Ballot Results (A2017) According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary affirmative votes to pass ballot. 30 Members Eligible to Vote 3 Members Not Returned (Davidson, Deniston, Greenup) The attached report shows the number of affirmative, negative, and abstaining votes as well as the explanation of the vote for each revision. To pass ballot, each revision requires: (1) a simple majority of those eligible to vote and (2) an affirmative vote of 2 /3 of ballots returned. See Sections 3.3.4.3.(c) and 4.3.10.1 of the Regulations Governing the Development of NFPA Standards.
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 5-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. 5.3.1 ]
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM 5.3.1
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM The minimum amounts of water for foam production and the minimum amounts of complementary agents necessary shall be as specified in Table 5.3.1(a) or Table 5.3.1(b), based on the system of categorizing airports listed in Table 4.3.1. Table 5.3.1(a) Extinguishing Agents, Discharge, and Response in U.S. Customary Units Airport Category Response Phases Response (sec) AFFF MIL-F-24835 and ICAO C Required Water (U.S. gal) Discharge (gpm) Fluorine-Free Synthetic Foam, Fluoroprotein, or FFFP ICAO B Required Water (U.S. gal) Discharge (gpm) Protein Foam MIL Spec/ICAO C ICAO A Required Water (U.S. gal) Discharge (gpm) Q Q1 b 180 b 120 120 160 160 180 180 1 1 Q2 c 0 0 0 Q3 d 0 0 0 TOTAL 120 160 180 Q1 b 180 b 157 157 213 213 236 236 2 2 Q2 c 210 c 43 57 64 Q3 d 0 0 0 TOTAL 200 270 300 Q1 b 180 b 285 285 392 392 438 438 3 3 Q2 c 210 c 85 118 132 Q3 d 240 d,e 300 60 300 60 300 60 TOTAL 670 810 870 Q1 b 180 b 468 468 646 646 715 715 3 4 Q2 c 210 c 272 374 415 Q3 d 240 d,e 600 60 600 60 600 60 TOTAL 1,340 1,620 1,730 Q1 b 180 b 863 863 1,194 1,194 1,331 1,331 4 5 Q2 c 210 c 647 896 999 Q3 d 240 d,e 1,250 125 1,250 125 1,250 125 TOTAL 2,760 3,340 3,580 Q1 b 180 b 1,245 1,245 1,725 1,725 1,920 1,920 4 6 Q2 c 210 c 1,245 1,725 1,920 Q3 d 240 d,e 1,250 125 1,250 125 1,250 125 TOTAL 3,740 4,700 5,090 Q1 b 180 b 1,585 1,585 2,192 2,192 2,437 2,437 4 7 Q2 c 210 c 2,045 2,828 3,143 Q3 d 240 d,e 1,250 125 1,250 125 1,250 125 TOTAL 4,880 6,270 6,830 Q1 b 180 b 2,095 2,095 2,901 2,901 3,222 3,222 9 8 Q2 c 210 c 3,185 4,409 4,898
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Airport Category Response Phases Response (sec) AFFF MIL-F-24835 and ICAO C Required Water (U.S. gal) Discharge (gpm) Fluorine-Free Synthetic Foam, Fluoroprotein, or FFFP ICAO B Required Water (U.S. gal) Discharge (gpm) Protein Foam MIL Spec/ICAO C ICAO A Required Water (U.S. gal) Discharge (gpm) Q Q3 d 240 d,e 2,500 250 2,500 250 2,500 250 TOTAL 7,780 9,810 10,620 Q1 b 180 b 2,619 2,619 3,626 3,626 4,030 4,030 9 9 Q2 c 210 c 4,451 6,164 6,850 Q3 d,f 240 d,e 2,500 250 2,500 250 2,500 250 TOTAL 9,570 12,290 13,380 Q1 b 180 b 3,195 3,195 4,424 4,424 4,915 4,915 9 10 Q2 c 210 c 6,069 8,405 9,338 Q3 d 240 d,e 5,000 500 5,000 500 5,000 500 TOTAL 14,260 17,830 19,250 a The minimum quantity is based on ISO qualified potassium bicarbonate. Powder can be substituted by a listed agent exceeding the performance of potassium bicarbonate. b Quantity of water for foam production for initial control of the pool fire. c Quantity of water for foam production to continue control or fully extinguish the pool fire. d Water available for interior fire fighting. e The 240-second requirement begins after arrival of the first ARFF apparatus. f For multiple passenger deck aircraft within this category, the Q3 discharge capability should be increased to 375 gpm (1420 L/min) and required water increased to 3750 gal (14,195 L). Table 5.3.1(b) Extinguishing Agents, Discharge, and Response in SI Units Airport Category Response Phases AFFF MIL-F-24385 and ICAO C Fluorine-Free Synthetic Foam, Fluoroprotein, or FFFP ICAO B Protein Foam MIL Spec/ICAO C ICAO A Response (sec) Discharge Required Water (L) (L/min) Discharge Required Water (L) (L/min) Discharge Required Water (L) (L/min) Q Q1 b 180 b 450 450 600 600 700 700 4 1 Q2 c 0 0 0 Q3 d 0 0 0 TOTAL 450 600 700 Q1 b 180 b 591 591 787 787 906 906 9 2 Q2 c 210 c 159 213 244 Q3 d 0 0 0 TOTAL 750 1,000 1,150
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Airport Category Response Phases AFFF MIL-F-24385 and ICAO C Required Water (L) Discharge (L/min) Fluorine-Free Synthetic Foam, Fluoroprotein, or FFFP ICAO B Required Water (L) Discharge (L/min) Protein Foam MIL Spec/ICAO C ICAO A Required Water (L) Discharge Response (sec) (L/min) Q Q1 b 180 b 1,077 1,077 1,500 1,500 1,692 1,692 1 3 Q2 c 210 c 323 450 508 Q3 d 240 d,e 1,100 110 1,100 110 1,100 110 TOTAL 2,500 3,050 3,300 Q1 b 180 b 1,772 1,772 2,468 2,468 2,722 2,722 1 4 Q2 c 210 c 1,028 1,432 1,578 Q3 d 240 d,e 2,250 225 2,250 225 2,250 225 TOTAL 5,050 6,150 6,550 Q1 b 180 b 3,257 3,257 4,514 4,514 5,029 5,029 2 5 Q2 c 210 c 2,443 3,386 3,771 Q3 d 240 d,e 4,750 475 4,750 475 4,750 475 TOTAL 10,450 12,650 13,550 Q1 b 180 b 4,700 4,700 6,525 6,525 7,250 7,250 2 6 Q2 c 210 c 4,700 6,525 7,250 Q3 d 240 d,e 4,750 475 4,750 475 4,750 475 TOTAL 14,150 17,800 19,250 Q1 b 180 b 5,983 5,983 8,297 8,297 9,214 9,214 2 7 Q2 c 210 c 7,717 10,703 11,886 Q3 d 240 d,e 4,750 475 4,750 475 4,750 475 TOTAL 18,450 23,750 25,850 Q1 b 180 b 7,937 7,937 10,992 10,992 12,202 12,202 4 8 Q2 c 210 c 12,063 16,708 18,548 Q3 d 240 d,e 9,450 945 9,450 945 9,450 945 TOTAL 29,450 37,150 40,200 Q1 b 180 b 9,907 9,907 13,722 13,722 15,259 15,259 4 9 Q2 c 210 c 16,843 23,328 25,941 Q3 d,f 240 d,e 9,450 945 9,450 945 9,450 945 TOTAL 36,200 46,500 50,650 Q1 b 180 b 12,103 12,103 16,759 16,759 18,603 18,603 4 10 Q2 c 210 c 22,997 31,841 35,347 Q3 d 240 d,e 18,900 1,890 18,900 1,890 18,900 1,890 TOTAL 54,000 67,500 72,850 a The minimum quantity is based on ISO qualified potassium bicarbonate. Powder can be substituted by a listed agent exceeding the performance of potassium bicarbonate.
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM b Quantity of water for foam production for initial control of the pool fire. c Quantity of water for foam production to continue control or fully extinguish the pool fire. d Water available for interior fire fighting. e The 240-second requirement begins after arrival of the first ARFF apparatus. f For multiple passenger deck aircraft within this category, the Q3 discharge capability should be increased to 375 gpm (1420 L/min) and required water increased to 3750 gal (14,195 L). Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Curt Floyd Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Oct 05 15:18:05 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Ballot Results This item has passed ballot Column heading change based on PI-14/FR-10 direction from the committee to reflect ICAO designations. 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 3 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A. Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Colet, Ralph I agree. Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. PC4 should have been accepted
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 1-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. 8.1.2.1 ] 8.1.2.1 The Staffing levels shall be established through a task resource analysis based on the needs and demands of the airport, but shall not be lower than the values specified in Table 8.1.2.1 for the minimum total number of ARFF- trained personnel responding to an initial alarm, based on the minimum response times in Chapter 9 and extinguishing agent discharge rates and quantities required in Chapter 5, shall be in accordance with Table 8.1.2.1. Table 8.1.2.1 Minimum Required ARFF Personnel at Airports Airport Category 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 3 5 6 6 9 7 12 9 8 12 9 15 10 15 ARFF Personnel Note: Variations to staffing levels can be done through a task resource analysis based on the needs and demands of the airport See also Annex D. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Curt Floyd Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Fri Sep 30 14:37:17 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: The committee agrees that a staffing level should be completed. A defined minimum staffing requirement is necessary to ensure firefighting tasks can take place in a timely manner. A task analysis should be utilized to determine additional personnel, but should not be used to go below an accepted minimum level. This revision is aligned with the public input and clarifies that the committee did want to hold the minimum levels specified in the table. The staffing requirements for Category 7 airports was reduced from 12 to 9 to follow the rationale of A 8.1.2, in response to the reduction of required apparatus in a previous edition of NFPA 403.. Response Message: Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 403-2016 [Section No. 8.1.2.1]
of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A. Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment
0 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Colet, Ralph I agree. Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Negative with Comment Scheffey, Joseph L. PC 6 should have been accepted. By keeping specific staffing levels, the committee has contradicted its stated goal of having requirements more stringent than FAA/ICAO (see committee statement to PC 7 and SR7)
1 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 7-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. 9.1.3.1 ] 9.1.3.1* The response time of the first-arriving ARFF vehicle to reach any point on the operational runway and begin agent application shall be within 3 minutes of the time of the alarm. Supplemental Information File Name SR-7_A.9.1.3.1.docx Description Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Sonia Barbosa Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Oct 18 17:16:46 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: Each revision of NFPA 403 comes with a heavy debate on response time requirements. Early response time requirements were based on capabilities of the ARFF vehicles and the time an external fuel fire could breach or burn through the fuselage. FAA studies have shown that new aircraft construction materials such as composite materials have produced greater burnthrough resistance. As these materials are phased into the construction of new aircraft, older aircraft will have to meet new thermal acoustic barrier requirements which research has shown also increases burnthrough times of the fuselage. The process of receiving the emergency call, donning the minimum necessary PPE and responding in the ARFF vehicle to any point on the operational runway on the airport in 2 minutes is not practical in many airports. In cases where airports are regulated by FAA, EASA or ICAO standards, these response time requirements must be demonstrated on an annual basis. By passing a new response time requirement in NFPA 403 that is significantly more difficult to meet than current international regulatory standards, there would be no reason for an airport to adopt a standard that exceeds their regulatory requirement. By adding the proposed language to the Annex material, we are encouraging airports to strive for a higher standard while adopting one that is achievable to a greater number of airports. This proposal matches the same intent of the ICAO Annex 14 standard where below the requirement there is a recommendation for an operational goal which exceeds the standard. Public Comment No. 7-NFPA 403-2016 [New Section after A.9.1.3] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All
2 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM 2 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A. Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. The committee has conceded, with this Annex insertion, the technical validity of the 2 minute response requirement. The committee supporting statement for annex inclusion instead of a requirement states "By passing a new response time requirement in NFPA 403 that is significantly more difficult to meet than current international regulatory standards, there would be no reason for an airport to adopt a standard that exceeds their regulatory
3 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM requirement." This suggests that NFPA 403 should be a guidance document or recommended practice, instead of a standard. I recommended acceptance of PC 2/3/4; I vote affirmatively since the annex material at least demonstrates the technical validity of the 2 minute requirement. Negative with Comment Colet, Ralph I do not agree to lessen standard with the rationale that it is to conform with others.
A.9.1.3.1 The operational objective of the first-responding ARFF vehicle should be to reach any point on the operational runway and begin agent application within 2 minutes of the time of the alarm, in optimum visibility and surface conditions.
4 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 8-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. 9.1.3.2 ] 9.1.3.2* The response time of the first-arriving ARFF vehicle to reach any point remaining within the on-airport portion of the RRA with improved surface conditions shall be within 4 minutes from the time of the alarm. Supplemental Information File Name SR-8_A.9.1.3.2.docx Description Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Sonia Barbosa Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Oct 18 17:18:53 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: By adding the proposed language to the Annex material, we are encouraging airports to strive for a higher standard while adopting one that is achievable to a greater number of airports. This proposal matches the same intent of the ICAO Annex 14 standard where below the requirement there is a recommendation for an operational goal which exceeds the standard. Public Comment No. 8-NFPA 403-2016 [New Section after A.9.1.3] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A.
5 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. See comment to SR7 Negative with Comment Colet, Ralph I do not agree to lessen standard with the rationale that it is to conform with others.
A.9.1.3.2 The operational objective of the first-arriving ARFF vehicle to reach any point remaining within the on-airport portion of the RRA should be within 3 minutes from the time of the alarm, in optimum visibility and surface conditions.
6 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 9-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. 9.1.3.3 ] 9.1.3.3* The response time of the first-arriving ARFF vehicle to reach any passenger boarding areas with improved surface conditions shall be within 4 minutes from the time of the alarm. Supplemental Information File Name SR-9_A.9.1.3.3.docx Description Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Sonia Barbosa Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Oct 18 17:22:20 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: By adding the proposed language to the Annex material, we are encouraging airports to strive for a higher standard while adopting one that is achievable to a greater number of airports. This proposal matches the same intent of the ICAO Annex 14 standard where below the requirement there is a recommendation for an operational goal which exceeds the standard. Public Comment No. 9-NFPA 403-2016 [New Section after A.9.1.3] Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 2 Affirmative with Comments 1 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A.
7 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. See comment to SR7 Negative with Comment Colet, Ralph I do not agree to lessen standard with the rationale that it is to conform with others.
A.9.1.3.3 The operational objective of the first-arriving ARFF vehicle to reach any passenger boarding areas should be within 3 minutes from the time of alarm, in optimum visibility and surface conditions.
8 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 6-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. 9.1.3.4 ] 9.1.3.4 All response times shall be in optimum conditions of visibility and surface conditions. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Curt Floyd Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Oct 05 15:50:22 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Staff change to reflect similar change made in Annex Section A.9.1.3.1 Response Message: Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 3 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A. Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil
9 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Colet, Ralph I agree. Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. I recommended acceptance of PC3
0 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 12-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.1 ] A.3.3.1 Aerobatic Box. The two-dimensional parameters of the aerobatic box are defined by the bright pink line. In addition to these two dimensions, there is a third dimension to the aerobatic box that ensures that the airspace in which air show flight operations are conducted is sterile. That third dimension varies (based primarily on the types of aircraft that are performing) from as low as 3000 ft to as high as 20,000 ft. The aerobatic box is the sterile area in which air show flight operations are conducted. The boundaries, dimensions, and parameters of the aerobatic box are clearly and specifically defined as part of the application that air show organizers submit to the FAA to receive authorization to conduct an air show. This box begins at the appropriate CAT I/II/III show line shown in Figure A.3.3.1. The aerobatic box is the area in which air show flight operations are conducted. The boundaries, dimensions, and parameters of the aerobatic box are clearly and specifically defined as part of the application that air show organizers submit to the AHJ to receive authorization to conduct an air show. Supplemental Information File Name A.3.3.1_Aerobatic_Box_text.docx Description New text to replace the existing text. For staff use Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Ken Holland Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Thu Nov 03 10:21:32 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: Response Message: The committee has made this change in order to provide further clarification to the end user. Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 3 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned
1 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A. Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Colet, Ralph I agree. Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. No comment - voting affirmative was not an option in Terra System when commenting on other SRs
2 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 10-NFPA 403-2016 [ Section No. E.1 ] E.1 ARFF Training Program Objectives. A carefully organized training program should be developed to meet the qualification requirements of NFPA 1003 and follow the guidance within NFPA 405. The following guidelines are offered for structuring such a program. The objectives of a training program for aircraft rescue and fire-fighting (ARFF) personnel at airports should be to accomplish the following: (1) Teach the safe application of recognized practices and procedures (2) Develop and maintain the confidence and competency of all personnel assigned ARFF duties (3) Instill the concept of professionalism (4) Serve as a source of accurate technical information whereby the lessons gained from aircraft accidents or incidents are properly analyzed and the information disseminated to others concerned with ARFF operations (5) Enhance the esprit de corps of ARFF personnel by creating an appreciative awareness of the hazards and dangers they could face in carrying out ARFF operations Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Ken Holland Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Mon Oct 31 15:07:15 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: This change was editorial in nature. Response Message: Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 3 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A.
3 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A. Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Colet, Ralph I agree. Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. No comment - voting affirmative was not an option in Terra System when commenting on other SRs
4 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Second Revision No. 11-NFPA 403-2016 [ New Section after F.1.2.6 ] F.1.2.7 Standards Council of Canada Publications. Standards Council of Canada, 600-55 Metcalfe Street, Ottawa, ON K1P 6L5, Canada. CAN/BNQ 1923-410, Fire Fighting Protective Helmets, 1995. CAN/CGSB-155.1, Firefighters Protective Clothing for Protection Against Heat and Flame, 1998. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Ken Holland Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Tue Nov 01 14:00:27 EDT 2016 Committee Statement Committee Statement: These changes were editorial in nature. Response Message: Ballot Results This item has passed ballot 30 Eligible Voters 3 Not Returned 24 Affirmative All 3 Affirmative with Comments 0 Negative with Comments 0 Abstention Not Returned Davidson, Ross A. Deniston, Hanh Greenup, Michael A. Affirmative All Bagot, Keith W. Colton, Bradford Costa, Howard Day, Graeme
5 of 25 1/3/2017 11:58 AM Gravel, Martin Gray, Neil Heitman, Denny J. Hendel, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ronald E. Kann, Duane F. Lanter, D. Scott Listerman, Stephen Maddox, John Anderson Major, William K. Matheson, Graydon L. Mathis, Robert C. McDonald, John W. Petit, Kevin J. Phillips, Pam L. Pierce, Danny M. Shively, Jason Souza, Jeremy Tonnacliff, Marc S. Toten, Christopher A. Affirmative with Comment Colet, Ralph I agree. Mangels, Douglas C. I am in agreement with this as written and discussed Scheffey, Joseph L. No comment - voting affirmative was not an option in Terra System when commenting on other SRs