Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Similar documents
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

Measure: Patient name. Referring or transitioning healthcare provider's name and office contact information (MIPS eligible clinician only) Procedures

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Quality Payment Program Year 2: 2018 MIPS Participation. An Introductory Guide for CRNAs in 2018

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Advancing Care Information Performance Category Fact Sheet

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Under the MACRAscope:

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

HIE Success - Physician Education Series

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

ONC Policy Overview. Session 66, February 21, Elise Sweeney Anthony, Director of Policy, ONC

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

March 28, Dear Dr. Yong:

How CME is Changing: The Influence of Population Health, MACRA, and MIPS

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

EHR/Meaningful Use

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

The MIPS Survival Guide

Kate Goodrich, MD MHS. Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 6, 2016

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

MIPS Scoring: Explanation and Estimation 2/7/2017 and 2/10/2017

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

The History of Meaningful Use

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

MACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition

Quality Payment Program MIPS. Advanced APMs. Quality Payment Program

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

MIPS eligibility lookup tool (available in Spring 2018):

MACRA Quality Payment Program

SVS QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES COMMITTEE (QPMC) New Member Orientation

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

June 27, CMS 5517 P Merit-Based Incentive System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

From Surviving to Thriving in the QPP World

MACRA FLEXIBILITY & THE MACRA FINAL RULE. Compliance & Opportunity for Your Practice

Medicare Quality Payment Program: Deep Dive FAQs for 2017 Performance Year Hospital-Employed Physicians

Frequently Asked Questions

Oklahoma s Public Health Immunization Reporting Updates. By Brittany Curry of OSDH. An Important Reminder. For audio, you must use your phone:

Meaningful Use Stage 2

MIPS Checkpoint. Beth Hickerson Quality Improvement Advisor. PHA Lunch and Learn May 19, Value Driven. Health Care. Solutions.

The Quality Payment Program: Overview & Roles and Responsibilities

Virtual Group Participation Overview Fact Sheet

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: 2018 Performance Year

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

AAWC ALERT Call for Action from Physicians

Moving MACRA-MIPS Forward: Role by Role

MACRA Open Call December 5 th, 2016

The Quality Payment Program Overview Fact Sheet

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

The Healthcare Roundtable

Quality Payment Program Final Rule Year 2: What s Coming in the New Year!

Table 1: MIPS Exemptions. Exemption Individual Determination Group Determination Treatment under MIPS Already Finalized EXEMPTIONS Low-Volume

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

MACRA Quality Payment Program

Using Updox to Succeed with MIPS

MIPS Advancing Care Information: Tips, Tools and Support Q&A from Live Webinar March 29, 2017

Copyright Scottsdale Institute All Rights Reserved.

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

Frequently Asked Questions

Transcription:

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period Objective: Measure: Measure ID: Public Health and Clinical Data Registry Reporting Immunization Registry Reporting The MIPS eligible clinician is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization registry/immunization information system (IIS). PI_PHCDRR_1 Definition of Terms Active engagement The MIPS eligible clinician is in the process of moving towards sending "production data" to a public health agency or clinical data registry, or is sending production data to a public health agency (PHA) or clinical data registry (CDR). Active engagement may be demonstrated in one of the following ways: Option 1 Completed Registration to Submit Data: The MIPS eligible clinician registered to submit data with the PHA or, where applicable, the CDR to which the information is being submitted; registration was completed within 60 days after the start of the MIPS performance period; and the MIPS eligible clinician is awaiting an invitation from the PHA or CDR to begin testing and validation. This option allows MIPS eligible clinicians to meet the measure when the PHA or the CDR has limited resources to initiate the testing and validation process. MIPS eligible clinicians that have registered in previous years do not need to submit an additional registration to meet this requirement for each MIPS performance period. Option 2 Testing and Validation: The MIPS eligible clinician is in the process of testing and validation of the electronic submission of data. MIPS eligible clinicians must respond to requests from the PHA or, where applicable, the CDR within 30 days; failure to respond twice within a MIPS performance period would result in that MIPS eligible clinician not meeting the measure. 1

Option 3 Production: The MIPS eligible clinician has completed testing and validation of the electronic submission and is electronically submitting production data to the PHA or CDR. Production data Refers to data generated through clinical processes involving patient care, and it is used to distinguish between data and test data which may be submitted for the purposes of enrolling in and testing electronic data transfers. Reporting Requirements YES/NO The MIPS eligible clinician must attest YES to being in active engagement with a PHA to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization registry/immunization information system (IIS). Scoring Information BASE SCORE/PERFORMANCE SCORE/BONUS SCORE Required for the Base Score: No Percentage of Performance Score: 10% for reporting to a single registry Eligible for Bonus Score: Yes, 5% as long as credit not received under the performance score One-time bonus of 10% for MIPS eligible clinicians and groups who report using 2015 Edition CEHRT exclusively for the 2018 performance period and submit only Promoting Interoperability measures. Note: MIPS eligible clinicians must fulfill the requirements of base score measures to earn a base score in order to earn any score in the Promoting Interoperability performance category. In addition to the base score, MIPS eligible clinicians have the opportunity to earn additional credit through the submission of performance measures and a bonus measure and/or activity. Additional Information MIPS eligible clinicians can report the Promoting Interoperability objectives and measures if they have technology certified to the 2015 Edition, or a combination of technologies from the 2014 and 2015 Editions that support these measures. More information about Promoting Interoperability scoring is available on the QPP website. In order to meet this measure, the following information must be made available to patients electronically: 2

The patient must be able to access this information on demand, such as through a patient portal or personal health record (PHR) or by other online electronic means. We note that while a covered entity may be able to fully satisfy a patient's request for information through view, download or transmit (VDT), the measure does not replace the covered entity's responsibilities to meet the broader requirements under HIPAA to provide an individual, upon request, with access to PHI in a designated record set. Active engagement with a public health or clinical data registry or registries that is/are different from the agency or registry that a MIPS eligible clinician identified to earn a performance score will earn the MIPS eligible clinician a bonus of 5 percentage points. However, a MIPS eligible clinician cannot receive credit under both the performance score and bonus score for reporting to the same public health agency or registry. For the measure, a MIPS eligible clinician s health IT system may layer additional information on the immunization history, forecast, and still successfully meet this measure. Bi-directionality provides that certified health IT must be able to receive and display a consolidated immunization history and forecast in addition to sending the immunization record. MIPS eligible clinicians who have previously registered, tested, or begun ongoing submission of data to registry do not need to restart the process. When MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report as a group, data should be aggregated for all MIPS eligible clinicians under one Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). This includes those MIPS eligible clinicians who may qualify for reweighting such as a significant hardship exception, hospital or ASC-based status, or in a specialty which is not required to report data to the Promoting Interoperability performance category. If these MIPS eligible clinicians choose to report as a part of a group practice, they will be scored on the Promoting Interoperability performance category like all other MIPS eligible clinicians. Regulatory References For further discussion, please see the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) final rule: 81 FR 77229. In order to meet this objective and measure, a MIPS eligible clinician must use the capabilities and standards of CEHRT at 45 CFR 170.315 (f)(1), (f)(6) and (f)(7). Certification and Standards Criteria Below is the corresponding certification and standards criteria for electronic health record technology that supports achieving the meaningful use of this measure. 3

Certification Criteria* 170.315(f)(1) Public Health Transmission to Immunization Registries (i) Create immunization information for electronic transmission in accordance with: (A) The standard and applicable implementation specifications specified in 170.205(e)(4). (B) At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(e)(3) for historical vaccines. (C) At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(e)(4) for administered vaccines. (ii) Enable a user to request, access, and display a patient's evaluated immunization history and the immunization forecast from an immunization registry in accordance with the standard at 170.205(e)(4). 170.207(a)(3)(4) Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC ) Database version 2.40, a universal code system for identifying laboratory and clinical observations produced by the Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (incorporated by reference in 170.299). 170.207(c)(2)(3) Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC ) Database version 2.52, a universal code system for identifying laboratory and clinical observations produced by the Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (incorporated by reference in 170.299). *Depending on the type of certification issued to the EHR technology, it will also have been certified to the certification criterion adopted at 45 CFR 170.314 (g)(1), (g)(2), or both, in order to assist in the calculation of this meaningful use measure. 4

Standards Criteria 170.205(e)(3) Electronic submission to immunization registries 170.207(e)(4) Electronic submission to immunization registries HL7 2.5.1 (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Implementation specifications. HL7 2.5.1 Implementation Guide for Immunization Messaging, Release 1.4, (incorporated by reference in 170.299). HL7 2.5.1 (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Implementation specifications. HL7 2.5.1 Implementation Guide for Immunization Messaging, Release 1.5 (incorporated by reference in 170.299) and HL7 Version 2.5.1 Implementation Guide for Immunization Messaging (Release 1.5) Addendum, July 2015 (incorporated by reference in 170.299). 170.205(a)(3) HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: IHE Health Story Consolidation. The use of the unstructured document document-level template is prohibited. 170.202(a) Applicability Statement for Secure Health Transport. 170.210(g) The data and time recorded utilize a system clock that has been synchronized following (RFC 1305) Network Time Protocol, or (RFC 5905) Network Time Protocol Version 4. Additional certification and standards criteria may apply. Review the ONC 2015 Edition Final Rule for more information. 5