ARCHIVED REPORT TPN-31 ATNAVICS/FPN-67 FBPAR

Similar documents
ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Air Traffic Control/Approach/Landing System (ATCALS) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Air Control

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Air Traffic Control/Approach/Landing System (ATCALS) FY 2012 OCO

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

ARCHIVED REPORT. USC-38/LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM Terminals - Archived 02/2008

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: RADAR DEVELOPMENT

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARCHIVED REPORT. Battlefield Airborne Communications Node (BACN)

NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM (NAS)

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

ARCHIVED REPORT. SSQ-72/108(V) (OUTBOARD/OUTBOARD II) - Archived 7/2002. Outlook. Orientation. Electronic Warfare Forecast

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 5 P-1 Line #58

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: KC-10S. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line #115

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

Air Defense System Solutions.

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : R/SAOC MODERNIZATION. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

FIGHTER DATA LINK (FDL)

ARCHIVED REPORT. APX-111(V)/113(V) (CIT) - Archived 4/2009. Outlook. Orientation. Unit Production Forecast AN Equipment Forecast

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #68

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) FY 2012 OCO

ARCHIVED REPORT. SHORTSTOP/Warlock VLQ-11(V), PLQ-7(V), GLQ-16(V) - Archived 7/2009

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

ARCHIVED REPORT. AGM-45 Shrike - Archived 10/2001

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

641 st Electronic System Squadron. 23 April ELSS Overview Brief for the CNS/ATM Conference

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: WEATHER SERVICE. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #156

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE M / (U)Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

ARCHIVED REPORT. IDECM (ALQ-214(V), ALE-55(V)) - Archived 02/2008

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Air Force

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: MQ-9 Development and Fielding. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

MQM-171 BROADSWORD IN SUPPORT OF TEST MISSIONS

GLOBAL BROADCAST SERVICE (GBS)

R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE / PROJECT NO. PE BB SOF PSYOP/D476. COST (Dollars in Millions) FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

49 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Technical Supplement For Joint Standard Instrumentation Suite Missile Attitude Subsystem (JMAS) Version 1.0

Army Ground-Based Sense and Avoid for Unmanned Aircraft

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #62

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

JOINT SURVEILLANCE TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM (JSTARS) E-8C AND COMMON GROUND STATION (CGS)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Control and Reporting Center (CRC) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

ARMY MULTIFUNCTIONAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM-LOW VOLUME TERMINAL 2 (MIDS-LVT 2)

ARCHIVED REPORT. E-2D Advanced Hawkeye - Archived 2/2007

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) - Archived 12/2005

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Own the fight forward, build Airmen in a lethal and relevant force, and foster a thriving Air Commando family

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Physical Security Equipment

The Market for U.S. Military Airborne Communications Systems

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #232

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / Other Missile Product Improvement Programs. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Fire Support Systems.

ARCHIVED REPORT. Submarine Acoustic Warfare Development Archived 12/2002

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Section 7.5 PEO LS Program GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2007

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #124

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element JA6: Joint Air-To-Ground Missile (JAGM)

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Transcription:

Radar Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 Outlook While production of the TPN-31 and FPN-67 is expected to end in 2010, the Army and Marine Corps continue to spend money on spares and upgrades Production of the TPN-31/FPN-67 continues, with a contract awarded in August 2006 Procured for U.S. Army and Marine Corps field and fixed installations; U.S. Air Force is choosing a different system 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unit Production Forecast 2008-2017 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Units 10 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Units Orientation Description. The TPN-31(V) Air Traffic Navigation, Integration and Coordination System (ATNAVICS) is a Radar Approach Control (RAPCON) and landing system. It is mounted on two HMMWVs and can be transported by a single C-130 to support operations in remote locations with no infrastructure. The FPN-67 Fixed-Base Precision Approach Radar (FBPAR) is the same radar installed in a fixed shelter. Sponsor U.S. Army Army Communications-Electronics Command (CECOM) C 4 IEW Acquisition Center Ft. Monmouth, NJ 07703-5000 USA Tel: + 1 (201) 532-2534 Web site: http://www.monmouth.army.mil Status. In production, ongoing logistics support. Application. Air traffic control at frontline battlefield locations and fixed-base facilities. It replaces the TSQ-71B. Price Range. The price of a single TPN-31 ranges from $6 million to $9 million, depending on installation and ancillary equipment/requirements. The price of a single FPN-67 ranges between $4 million and $7 million. Contractors Prime Raytheon Airspace Management and Homeland Security http://www.raytheon.com/businesses/rncs/businesses/amhs/, 1001 Boston Post Rd, Marlborough, MA 01752 United States, Tel: + 1 (508) 490-3045, Fax: + 1 (508) 490-3322, Email: Robert_W_Meyer@res.raytheon.com, Prime 2008 August 2008

Page 2 Radar Forecast Comprehensive information on Contractors can be found in Forecast International s International Contractors series. For a detailed description, go to www.forecastinternational.com (see Products & Samples/Governments & Industries) or call + 1 (203) 426-0800. Contractors are invited to submit updated information to Editor, International Contractors, Forecast International, 22 Commerce Road, Newtown, CT 06470, USA; rich.pettibone@forecast1.com Technical Data Metric U.S. Characteristics Frequency range 2 to 4 GHz - Surveillance 1,030 and 1,090 MHz - Secondary Surveillance 9 to 9.2 GHz - Precision ASR elevation coverage To 3,048 m To 10,000 ft ASR azimuth coverage 360 deg ASR & SSR PAR Antenna elevation coverage -1 deg to +8 deg PAR azimuth coverage ± 15 deg Range Primary/secondary radar 46.3 km 25 nm Precision approach 18.5 km 10 nm Helicopter minimums Ceiling 30.4 m 100 ft Visibility 463.5 m 0.25 nm Fixed-wing minimums Ceiling 61 m 200 ft Visibility 926.6 km 0.5 nm Probability of detection ASR: 90% (3 m 2 target @ 25 mi in rain) SSR 99% (@ 25 nm in rain) PAR Update rate 90% (1 m 2 target @ 10 nm in rain) 4 sec ASR 1 sec PAR 90% (1 m 2 target @ 20 nm) MTBCF >980 hr MTTR 30 min System availability 98% Video Normal (unprocessed) MTI (processed) Display Other requirements Straight line presentation Variable range 2 to 20 nm, 1/4-nm increments Glide slope Azimuth markers Range marks Enhanced range marks Lower safe limit cursors Adjustable target size Independent operation of surveillance and precision modes Integrated positive friendly identification Ability to distinguish small aircraft at low altitudes from ground clutter and adverse weather Self-contained communications Rapid setup Minimal crew requirement for setup and operation Operator simulator training capability Design Features. The TPN-31 ATNAVICS system provides key air traffic services at U.S. Army terminal airfields and landing sites. The transportable TPN-31(V) is mounted on two High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs) and two trailers in order to provide rapid-response air traffic control services at tactical landing sites. ATNAVICS is a fully autonomous, ICAO compliant Radar Approach Control (RAPCON) system. With a August 2008

Radar Forecast Page 3 simplified setup, reliable operation, and sturdy enclosures, the system can withstand the most demanding environments, and is ideally suited to rapid deployment anywhere in the world. ATNAVICS is contained in two four-wheel drive HMMWVs and two towed power generator trailers. The vehicles, and hence the system, are airliftable by fixed-wing or rotary-wing aircraft (such as the C-130 or CH-47) and can be rapidly deployed to forward airstrips. It can be set up in less than 60 minutes with just three people. The system is made up of an S-band air surveillance radar, an L-band secondary surveillance radar/identification Friend or Foe system, and an X-band precision approach radar, along with Raytheon s AutoTrac air traffic management system. The system provides full surveillance out to 25 nautical miles and precision approach coverage out to 10 nautical miles in all weather conditions. The system architecture is flexible and can be modified to meet other applications. Advanced display automation software and secure ground-to-air/ground-to-ground communications and precision approach radar were developed to provide the needed information for controlling and landing all fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft within a 25-nautical-mile radius. In addition, the use of secondary surveillance radar data can extend the system s surveillance range out to 60 miles. It can interface with the National Airspace System (NAS), as well as with Forward Area Air Defense (FAAD) systems, to provide a truly integrated battlefield air traffic management system. The FPN-67(V) fixed-base precision radar can be installed at terminal airfields. It incorporates a remote automation system in which six air traffic control (ATC) operator positions can be located up to 35,000 feet from the unmanned radar units. The FBPAR system can provide traffic control and landing services at Army fixed airfields, and shares common equipment, such as modules and line replaceable units (LRUs), with the transportable version, since the components are built on the same production line. Developed in conjunction with ATNAVICS and using the same hardware and software, the FBPAR provides a transportable precision aircraft control system where rapid mobility is not required. FBPAR uses a pedestalmounted antenna that rotates to cover six predetermined runway approaches and a standard ISO container to house the PAR electronics. Remote controller displays can be located up to 35,000 feet away. The precision approach radar features a phased-array antenna that uses I-band monolithic microwave integrated circuits identical to those provided for the U.S. Army ground-based radar. The surveillance radars are based on off-the-shelf, solidstate ATC sensors in service with international customers. Second- and third-generation NDI/COTS subsystems mounted in ruggedized enclosures were part of a cost-effective design solution that would both meet performance requirements and be able to operate in various environmental conditions worldwide. Operational Characteristics. The ATNAVICS provides air traffic control and precision approach control capabilities at frontline battlefield locations or fixed-base airfields. It provides departure, approach, and landing services for helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft in both good and adverse weather conditions. The system enables operators to establish separation, sequencing, and IFR/GCA landing operations at unprepared field locations. The fixed-base version will be installed at established Army air fields. The system is transportable in a single C-130 and can be set up in less than 60 minutes by a crew of four. It eliminates the tedious survey work necessary to properly site current equipment, and is designed to be self-sited accurately and quickly using reflectors set up along the landing strip. The TPN-31(V) can be slungcarried by CH-47 helicopters. Continuous on-line monitoring and extensive built-in fault monitoring quickly isolate and identify failed LRUs, improving reliability. 2008 August 2008

Page 4 Radar Forecast FPN-67(V). This is a fixed-base version of the radar for use in aircraft recovery operations during adverse weather at Army airfields. In 1988, the U.S. Army announced plans to upgrade the air traffic control systems used at both fixed-base and forward locations. The new equipment replaced the TSQ-71B Landing Control Central used at Army airfields and landing areas at the echelon above corps, corps and division levels. The FBR-67(V) replaced the GPN-22(V), FPN-40(V), CR-62, and FPN-63(V). In June 1993, the Army announced its intention to meet the ATNAVICS and FBPAR requirements with a nondevelopmental item (NDI) acquisition using a dedicated engineering effort to integrate proven components into ATNAVICS and FBPAR configurations, and to adapt/modify software in order to ensure that the total system meets established requirements with minimum risk and cost. The transportable TPN-31(V) and FPN-67(V) fixedbase systems were developed to capitalize on state-ofthe-art technology in order to provide equipment that can be readily moved to new battlefields or frontline locations. RFP Released A Request for Proposals was issued in March 1994, and in May 1995, CECOM awarded Raytheon a preproduction contract to provide one ATNAVICS and one FBPAR system to the U.S. Army Aviation Systems TPN-31(V) Source: Raytheon Co Variants/Upgrades Program Review TPN-31(V). This is the tactical version of the precision approach radar for installation at Army and other airfields. Command by April 1997. The contract included options for an additional 63 systems to be produced from 1997 to 2003. In September 1998, Raytheon completed demonstrations that included flight testing the ATNAVICS radar coverage, accuracy, resolution, detection, and tracking. Testing was performed at the Raytheon test facility in Bedford, Massachusetts, adjacent to the active runways at Hanscom AFB. It used aircraft scheduled as part of the test, as well as targets of opportunity (aircraft flying in the area of the radar that were not scheduled to be part of the test). FAA Certification Received As part of the demonstration, the Federal Aviation Administration performed a flight inspection of the precision approach radar using FAA aircraft and found its performance met or exceeded all requirements. This FAA flight check validated the equipment to be commissioned into formal air traffic control service. FAA flight certification was issued in December 1999. The Army has begun a series of modernization efforts for ATNAVICS that will run through FY11. Upgrades will add the capability to interface with other ATC equipment and Army systems. Integration of the Air Defense Integrator will make it possible for August 2008

Radar Forecast Page 5 ATNAVICS to share data with field artillery and air defense systems. Ultimately, ATNAVICS will feed positioning and identification data on friendly air vehicles (fixed-wing, rotary-wing, and UAVs) into the Single Integrated Air Picture (SIAP) for improved situational awareness, track continuity, airspace deconfliction, and fratricide prevention. In August 2006, Raytheon was awarded a contract with a potential value of $200 million for 30 TPN-31s and 9 FPN-67s. This follows an initial contract in which Raytheon provided the U.S. Army with 24 ATNAVICS and 18 FBPAR systems. Under the new procurement, the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps plan to procure 12 ATNAVICS for Marine Expeditionary Force use. The U.S. Army continues to spend money on spares and upgrades for its TPN-31 and FPN-67 radars. In November 2007, the Army released a solicitation for spare parts for the two systems. The solicitation notice also stipulates that changes to the existing software may be needed. Contracts/Orders & Options Award Contractor ($ millions) Date/Description Raytheon 20.8 Apr 2002 Option to a previously awarded contract for production of two TPN-31(V) ATNAVICS and six FPN-67(V) FBPAR systems. Raytheon 16.9 Mar 2003 Mod to FFP contract for three Air Traffic Control and Landing Systems (ATCALS) and six fixed-base precision approach radar systems. Completed Apr 2004. (DAAB07-95-C-B001) Raytheon 2.1 Sep 2003 Contract for production of spare parts. (NDAAB07-95-C-B001) Raytheon 200 Aug 2006 Contract to provide the U.S. Army and Marines with 30 TPN-31s and nine FPN-67s. Currently, $36 million has been awarded for four TPN-31s. The contract is expected to be completed by 2011. Timetable Month Year Major Development Sep 1988 Draft Operational and Organizational Plan released Sep 1991 Operational and Organizational Plan approved Sep 1992 Draft specification Mar 1993 RFP announced Apr 1995 Pre-production development contract awarded Apr 1997 Pre-production development scheduled for completion Sep 1998 Flight test demonstration, FAA certification Oct 1998 First delivery planned Dec 1999 FBPAR flight tests completed 2-4Q FY99 ATNAVICS developmental/operational testing completed 3-4Q FY99 Close out of ATNAVICS EMD, transition to production Mar 2000 Milestone III production decision 1Q FY02 Start of P 3 I 2005 Production ends 2Q-4Q FY07-11 Modernization Worldwide Distribution/Inventories This is currently a U.S.-only program. International interest is possible, but strong competition from Euro-produced systems will impact marketing. 2008 August 2008

Page 6 Radar Forecast A contract awarded to Raytheon in 2006 breathed new life into the TPN-31/FPN-67 program. Prior to the award, production had been expected end. With the contract, production is now expected to continue through 2010. Systems Serve U.S. Army and Marines Other than the Army and the Marine Corps, no service has expressed interest in the system. The U.S. Air Force is using its MPN-25 MACS to fill a similar role. Internationally, competition in this market is fierce. Although Foreign Military Sales are possible, no nation Ten-Year Outlook Forecast Rationale outside the U.S. has openly expressed interest in the system. While production of the TPN-31 and FPN-67 is expected to end in 2010, the Army and Marine Corps continue to spend money on spares and upgrades. These systems will continue to serve the U.S. military for the foreseeable future and will generate a number of contracts for spare parts and maintenance. Through 2010, 20 TPN-31s and six FPN-67s are expected to be produced. At this time, it is believed that the U.S. military will accept all options. ESTIMATED CALENDAR YEAR UNIT PRODUCTION Designation or Program High Confidence Good Confidence Speculative Thru 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Raytheon Airspace Management and Homeland Security FPN-67 <> United States <> Army and Marine Corps 21 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 TPN-31 <> United States <> Army and Marine Corps 34 8 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Subtotal 55 10 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Total 55 10 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 August 2008