Applying the Army Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel Methodology to Analyses of Alternatives

Similar documents
AMERICA S ARMY THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION

Sustainment for the Army of 2020

OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

As we close the book on one of America s longest military

US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

DRAFT. Finding of No Significant Impact. For Converting and Stationing an. Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) to an

BALANCING RISK RESOURCING ARMY

Questions are welcome during the session, please type them into the DCS Chat Window

Army Fiscal Programming For Equipment

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

DoD Analysis Update: Support to T&E in a Net-Centric World

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Guest Presenter Jay Bottelson

The Rebalance of the Army National Guard

We are often admonished to improve your foxhole

Side-By-Side Comparison of Mobile Force Modeling Methods for Operational Effects and Virtual Prototyping

Analyzing the Costs of Alternative Army Active/Reserve Force Mixes. Interim Report INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES

Army Water Sustainment: An Analysis of Capabilities and Capacities

Strategy Research Project

Agenda. DoD as an Energy Consumer. Defense Energy Challenges. Adapting to a New Environment. DoD Operational Energy Strategy. Current Initiatives

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Brigade Combat Team Commander: How Do You Plan to Sustain a Partnered Multinational Formation?

DIVISION OPERATIONS. October 2014

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

FEATURES. 26 Army SustainmentST

Analysis of Precision Mortar fires for the IBCT

THE STRYKER BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM INFANTRY BATTALION RECONNAISSANCE PLATOON

Joint Test & Evaluation Program

COL Michael Milner Project Manager Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle

APPENDIX A Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS and Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS

CHAPTER 4 DETERMINATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR BASE DEVELOPMENT

Sustaining the Force Forward

FM References-1

Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 322. Study of Future DoD Depot Capabilities

2012 Secretary of Defense Environmental Award Submission: Environmental Excellence in Weapon System Acquisition, Large Program

FY19 President s Budget Request

Legislative Report. President s Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2018 OVERVIEW. As of June 8, 2017

1. Purpose. To define and implement a comprehensive approach to the conduct of force structure assessments.

Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Energy Strategy. More Fight Less Fuel

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

TABLES OF ORGANIZATION AND EQUIPMENT

RECORD VERSION STATEMENT BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL JAMES O. BARCLAY III DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE ARMY, G-8 BEFORE THE

HQMC 7 Jul 00 E R R A T U M. MCO dtd 9 Jun 00 MARINE CORPS POLICY ON DEPOT MAINTENANCE CORE CAPABILITIES

Organization of Marine Corps Forces

Welcome to the 2006 Combat Vehicles Conference

Preparing to Occupy. Brigade Support Area. and Defend the. By Capt. Shayne D. Heap and Lt. Col. Brent Coryell

U.S. Army s Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION P2.C GENERAL 3 SECTION P2.C MILITARY SUPPORT TO CIVIL AUTHORITIES 3 (MSCA) POLICY

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION:

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Maintenance Operations and Procedures

Mission Based T&E Progress

(QJLQHHU 5HFRQQDLVVDQFH FM Headquarters, Department of the Army

5. TRAC-WSMR POC is Major Gregory Lamm, ATRC-WB, (DSN 258),

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL THESIS

U.S. Army representatives used the venue of the 2012

Life Cycle Maintenance in a War- Time Environment

Ideas on Cavalry. by CPT Joshua T. Suthoff and CPT Michael J. Culler

Organization of Marine Corps Forces

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) Analysis Center (TRAC)

Demystifying the Correlation

EXPANDING FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT CAPABILITY IN US ARMY AVIATION OPERATIONS

Obstacle Planning at Task-Force Level and Below

Setting and Supporting

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE A / ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS)

The 16th Sustainment Brigade Sustains a Strong Europe

Department of Defense SUPPLY SYSTEM INVENTORY REPORT September 30, 2003

U.S. ARMY AVIATION AND MISSILE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT COMMAND

TWV Fleet Maintenance Challenges

CBO TESTIMONY. Statement of Douglas Holtz-Eakin Director

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #152

UNCLASSIFIED OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

CONTRACTOR SUPPORT OF U.S. OPERATIONS IN THE USCENTCOM AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Concepts Experimentation Program FY 2012 OCO

AMC s Fleet Management Initiative (FMI) SFC Michael Holcomb

Maneuver-Owned Logistics: Re-emergence of the Support-Platoon Concept in Stryker Maneuver Battalions

4.6 NOISE Impact Methodology Factors Considered for Impact Analysis. 4.6 Noise

Department of the Army *TRADOC Regulation 71-4 Headquarters, United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Fort Monroe, VA

JAGIC 101 An Army Leader s Guide

GAO. FORCE STRUCTURE Capabilities and Cost of Army Modular Force Remain Uncertain

Forward-Support Company Employment in a Decisive- Action Environment

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS FIELD MEDICAL TRAINING BATTALION Camp Lejeune, NC

NEWS FROM THE CTC March 2018

ORGANIZATION AND FUNDAMENTALS

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 1 DOD MANAGEMENT OF ENERGY COMMODITIES: OVERVIEW

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

How Can the Army Improve Rapid-Reaction Capability?

LESSON 2 INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD OVERVIEW

Andrew M. Harris - 1 -

USAREUR Announces FY07 Transformation actions

Merging Operational Realism with DOE Methods in Operational Testing NDIA Presentation on 13 March 2012

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Review completed by the AMRDEC Public Affairs Office 16 Nov 2009; FN4324. DISCLAIMER: Reference

An Interview With BG(P) Charles A. Cartwright. Meg Williams

Over the next two decades, U.S. forces will operate in a

ARMY G-8

Munitions Operations and Distribution Techniques. September 2014

CHAPTER 2 FIRE SUPPORT DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Transcription:

Applying the Army Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel Methodology to Analyses of Alternatives Dave Hull Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Cost and Economics (ODASA-CE) 31 March 2010

Agenda Bottom Line Up Front Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel: What It Is and Why We Are Doing It OSD CAPE Seven Step FBCF Methodology FBCF Defined From an Army Perspective Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Guidance FBCF Challenges Peacetime FBCF Calculations for AoAs Wartime FBCF Calculations for AoAs: Where to Start Process for Calculating FBCF in AoAs: Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Example Displaying FBCF AoA Results to Decision Makers Path Ahead 2

Bottom Line Up Front This methodology is intended specifically for Acquisition System Analyses of Alternatives (AoAs) Question this methodology is intended to answer: What is the Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel for a specific acquisition system? Types of questions this methodology is not intended to answer: What is the Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel of a unit currently operating in a wartime theater? What are the Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel implications of moving a unit from one theater to another? 3

Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel (FBCF) Defined: The Defense Energy Support Center (DESC) standard price for fuel plus apportioned costs of everything needed to get fuel to a system Why We Are Doing It: Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel: What It Is and Why We Are Doing It Our large logistical tails in Iraq and Afghanistan are being attacked by the enemy Fuel Inefficiency is thought to be one reason our logistical tails are so large Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (DUSD(AT&L)) issued a Policy Memorandum, 10 April 2007, calling for FBCF inclusion in all acquisition trade analyses to improve energy efficiency and cost effectiveness Office of Secretary of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (OSD CAPE) Office conducted a pilot FBCF study in 2007 on the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) system FY2009 National Defense Authorization Act calls for incorporation of Energy Efficiency Requirements into Key Performance Parameters for fuel consuming systems 4

OSD CAPE Seven Step FBCF Methodology Step Burden Element 1 DESC Commodity Cost of Fuel 2 Primary Fuel Delivery Asset O&S Cost 3 4 Depreciation Cost of Primary Fuel Delivery Assets Direct Fuel Infrastructure O&S and Recapitalization Cost 5 Indirect Fuel Infrastructure O&S Cost 6 Environmental Cost 7 Other Costs (i.e. Force Protection) 5

FBCF Defined From an Army Perspective Sustainment Base Pipeline/Hoseline X SUST SBCT II BSB ++ TSC PPTO Port Facilities Pipeline II HBCT BSB OPDS II IBCT BSB TSC = Theater Support Command PPTO = Petroleum Pipeline Terminal Operating Battalion OPDS = Offshore Petroleum Discharge System SUST = Sustainment Brigade SBCT = Stryker Brigade Combat Team HBCT = Heavy Brigade Combat Team IBCT = Infantry Brigade Combat Team BSB = Brigade Support Battalion 6

Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Guidance DAG guidance requires all future trade-off analyses for acquisition systems to include FBCF estimates For all future AoAs, cost analysts are being required to: Develop both a wartime and peacetime estimate Allocate fuel down to specific systems 7

FBCF Challenges Since this is a relatively new requirement that has not been implemented to date, incorporating FBCF presents challenges: How does an analyst calculate a peacetime FBCF estimate? How does an analyst properly apportion fuel delivery and force protection assets to a specific system? Where does an analyst start when they are required to produce a wartime FBCF estimate? How can FBCF results be displayed so that they will be meaningful to decision makers? 8

Peacetime FBCF Calculations for AoAs Following the OSD CAPE 7 Step Methodology: DESC price Calculate Operation and Support (O&S) and Depreciation Costs for fuel truck convoys and associated units (Brigade Support Battalions and Sustainment Brigades) Calculate Direct and Indirect Fuel Infrastructure costs of fuel infrastructure on military posts that are not operated by DESC Environmental Costs Force Protection Costs are not included in peacetime FBCF calculations Properly allocate fuel to specific acquisition systems by analyzing fuel usage of various Brigade Combat Teams: Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) Heavy Brigade Combat Team (HBCT) Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) Aviation Brigade 9

Start with the Effectiveness Scenario that is being run for the AoA and cost the scenario Following the OSD CAPE 7 Step Methodology: DESC price Wartime FBCF Calculations for AoAs: Where to Start Calculate Operation and Support (O&S) and Depreciation Costs for fuel truck convoys and associated units (Brigade Support Battalions Sustainment Brigades, and Theater Support Commands) and include attrition Calculate Direct and Indirect Fuel Infrastructure costs of fuel infrastructure on Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) Environmental Costs Calculate Force Protection Costs of armored vehicles and any attack aircraft that protect the convoys Fuel allocation is conducted using the same methodology used by the peacetime FBCF calculations 10

Process for Calculating FBCF in AoAs: Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Example DASA-CE will work with TACOM to decide on the wartime to peacetime ratio that will be used for the O&S portion of the JLTV AoA LCCE DASA-CE will work TRAC-FLVN, TRAC- LEE, TRAC-WSMR, AMSAA, CASCOM, and G-4 to ensure wartime cost input metrics and assumptions are in accordance with doctrine and approved Defense Planning Scenarios utilized during the JLTV AoA DASA-CE will take all input metrics and assumptions and calculate both wartime and peacetime JLTV FBCF factors using the following 7 Step Methodology: Step Burden Element 1 DESC Commodity Cost of Fuel 2 3 4 Primary Fuel Delivery Asset O&S Cost Depreciation Cost of Primary Fuel Delivery Assets Direct Fuel Infrastructure O&S and Recapitalization Cost 5 Indirect Fuel Infrastructure O&S Cost 6 Environmental Cost 7 Other Costs (i.e. Force Protection) DASA-CE will provide TACOM with the wartime and peacetime FBCF factors to be input into the JLTV AoA LCCE DASA-CE will provide a write-up on the FBCF methodology for the JLTV AoA final report 11

Displaying FBCF Results to Decision Makers Results are envisioned to presented as follows: Course of Action (COA) Wartime FBCF Cost Per Gallon (BY10$) Base Case $8.40/Gallon $5.80/Gallon COA 1 $8.65/Gallon $6.15/Gallon COA 2 $9.20/Gallon $7.55/Gallon COA 3 $7.75/Gallon $5.35/Gallon Peacetime FBCF Cost Per Gallon (BY10$) Course of Action (COA) Total Wartime BCT FBCF Cost Per Year (BY10$K) Total Peacetime BCT FBCF Cost Per Year (BY10$K) Base Case $280.5K $167.9K COA 1 $302.3K $192.1K COA 2 $421.7K $265.8K COA 3 $248.4K $129.6K Total Lifecycle FBCF POL Costs in the bottom chart are only the costs that would fall under CES Element 5.05 POL after the fuel cost has been burdened Note: All costs are notional 12

Path Ahead FBCF will be included in a few near-term AoAs: Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) AoA Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) AoA Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) AoA Fully Burdened Cost of Alternate Forms of Energy 13