Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Aegis International & BMD: A New Interoperability Network

Presentation to the Advanced Planning Briefing for Industry. Dr. Dale Klein

DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2008 Exhibit R-2

Advanced Explosive Ordnance Disposal Robotic System (AEODRS)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

Enabling Multinational Communications with CENTRIXS

Systsms Contsr PACIFIC. America s Navy, A Global Force For Good

Naval Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Anti-Ship Missile Defense

Tactical Technology Office

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #162

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Adaptable Autonomous Systems. Dr. Jason Stack

Annual Naval Technology Exercise ANTX 2016 Overview NUWC Division Newport

DRAFT vea Target: 15 min, simultaneous translation Littoral OpTech East VADM Aucoin Keynote Address 1 Dec 2015 Grand Hotel Ichigaya

Air Force Research Laboratory

17 th ITEA Engineering Workshop: System-of-Systems in a 3rd Offset Environment: Way Forward

REQUIREMENTS TO CAPABILITIES

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Unmanned Systems. Northrop Grumman Today Annual Conference

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #16

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #29

Mission Integration Management NDAA 2017 Section 855

Subj: CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND NUCLEAR DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL FLEET READINESS

Force 2025 Maneuvers White Paper. 23 January DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release.

Status of Unmanned Systems: EXECUTING!

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING GROUP & NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Armed Unmanned Systems

COMMITMENT. & SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do. MUM-T for the Abrams Lethality Enabler UNPARALLELED

Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Department ONR Code 30 Dr. John Pazik Department Head

STATEMENT OF DR. STEPHEN YOUNGER DIRECTOR, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY BEFORE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE

6 th Annual DoD Unmanned Systems Summit

Sea Air Space Symposium

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #73

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

OPNAVINST DNS-3 17 Sep Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

We acquire the means to move forward...from the sea. The Naval Research, Development & Acquisition Team Strategic Plan

First Announcement/Call For Papers

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

Future of MIW from the LCS Platform

Freedom Variant (LCS 1) Littoral Combat Ship Launch and Handling System Lessons Learned November 2012

NORAD and USNORTHCOM J8 Science & Technology

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2008/2009 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2007 Exhibit R-2

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

STRATEGIC PLAN. Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head EOD Technology Division. Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM

Cybersecurity United States National Security Strategy President Barack Obama

Subj: ELECTRONIC WARFARE DATA AND REPROGRAMMABLE LIBRARY SUPPORT PROGRAM

The Coastal Systems Station Strategic Perspective

Navy Radiological Systems Performance Evaluation Manual

UNCLASSIFIED FY Due to the number of efforts in this PE, the programs described herein are representative of the work included in this PE.

STATEMENT OF RADM ANTHONY L. WINNS DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE AND BGEN MARTIN POST ASSISTANT DEPUTY COMMANDANT

Unmanned Systems and Mine Warfare RADM Matthew Klunder Chief of Naval Research November 5, 2014

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

Office of Naval Research: Organization and Funding Opportunities

Navy Warfare Development Command s (NWDC) Operations Research Chair of Warfare Innovation

Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program

F oreword. Working together, we will attain the greatest degree of spectrum access possible for the current and future Navy/Marine Corps team.

5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium

From Stove-pipe to Network Centric Leveraging Technology to Present a Unified View

navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance navy strategy For AChIevIng InFormAtIon dominance Foreword

N/SHIP SELF DEFENSE - DEM/VAL

Global EOD Symposium & Exhibition

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

Navy Information Warfare Pavilion 19 February RADM Matthew Kohler, Naval Information Forces

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

The Rebalance of the Army National Guard

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates

GOOD MORNING I D LIKE TO UNDERSCORE THREE OF ITS KEY POINTS:

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Logbook Adm. Greenert and Gen. Amos: A New Naval Era Adm. Greenert and Gen. Welsh: Breaking the Kill Chain

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #211

TECHNICAL SUPPORT WORKING GROUP. Perry Pederson Infrastructure Protection Subgroup

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Achieving Information Dominance: Unleashing the Ozone Widget Framework

Subj: NUCLEAR SURVIVABILITY POLICY FOR NAVY AND MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

Assessing Technologies using Campaign Analysis and War Gaming: The Warfare Innovation Continuum at NPS

Air Force WALEX Applications

TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. SEGA DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING

August 2, Subject: Cancellation of the Army s Autonomous Navigation System

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #9

Transcription:

Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Opportunities Topic 9: C2 Architectures and Technologies Mr. José Carreño Mr. George Galdorisi Mr. Steven Koepenick Ms. Rachel Volner

May 14, 2010 2

My view is that technology sets the parameters of the possible; it creates the potential for a military revolution. Max Boot War Made New May 14, 2010 3

Outline UAVs Have Paved the Way UMVs Are Coming On Strong The Total Ownership Cost (TOC) Challenge Lab-based Initiatives Into the Future

The The combat vision of potential the DoD of is UV s that unmanned (unmanned systems vehicles) will is virtually provide unlimited flexible options There across is no operating question domains, that the Fleet/Force enabling the of the warfighter s future will execution be heavily of dependent assigned upon Creation missions. UVs. Unmanned of substantive systems will be autonomous integrated systems/platforms across warfare Naval domains Research within and each Advisory with domain manned Committee will systems, (NRAC) create resourcing providing the and Joint Roles leadership of Force Unmanned Commander challenges Vehicles, (JFC) March Trust 2003 with of unmanned decisive capabilities. systems is still in its infancy in ground and The National Defense Authorization Act for FY2007 maritime FY 2009-2034 systems Unmanned Unmanned Systems systems Integrated are Roadmap still a called for the DoD to establish a policy on relatively new concept As a result, there is a fear of unmanned systems, some key points of which new and unproven technology. included identifying a preference for unmanned FY 2009-2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap systems in acquisitions of new systems. FY 2009-2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap

UAVs Have Paved the Way May 14, 2010 6

By performing tasks such as surveillance; signals intelligence (SIGINT); precision target designation; mine detection; and chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear (CBRN) reconnaissance, unmanned systems have made key contributions to the Global War on Terror (GWOT). As of October 2008, coalition unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have flown almost 500,000 flight hours in support of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. FY 2009-2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap 7

UAVs Have Paved The Way UAVs explosive growth since the Gulf War has created myriad opportunities, for unmanned systems in all domains These opportunities have been inculcated in official policy but UAVs extensive use has not come without costs. May 14, 2010

UMVs Are Coming On Strong May 14, 2010 9

Unmanned maritime vehicles (UMVs) present new opportunities to augment our naval forces and maintain maritime superiority around the world. FY 2009-2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap May 14, 2010 10

UMVs Are Coming On Strong Cultural / organizational challenges persist Technical challenges force innovation TOC issues present a challenge and an opportunity for UMVs May 14, 2010

The TOC Challenge May 14, 2010 12

The largest single component of life-cycle cost for a naval ship is acquiring, training, assigning, and supporting manpower for ship operations, maintenance, and support. The primary benefits of optimized crewing are the significant reduction in ownership costs and improved total system performance. Patricia Hamburger, Robert Bost and Jennifer McKneely Optimized Crewing for Surface Ships May 14, 2010 13

The TOC Challenge The irony of unmanned systems TOC issue intensified by increasing manpower costs, rise of optimally manned ships Follow the Firescout model C4 technological innovation a prerequisite for success May 14, 2010 14

Lab-Based Initiatives May 14, 2010 15

We will win or lose the next series of wars in our nation s laboratories. Admiral James Stavridis SOUTHCOM Commander Deconstructing War U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings December 2005 May 14, 2010 16

Lab-Based Initiatives Multi-Robot Operator Control Unit (MOCU) Joint Collaborative Technologies Experiment (JCTE) Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) UV Sentry May 14, 2010 17

Representative Lab Efforts Robotic Systems Pool In-Theater Combat Support Platoon Networked Remotely Operated Weapons Common Operator Control Unit (Common OCU) Air, Land, & Sea Mobile Robot Knowledge Base Mobile Detection, Assessment, & Response Adaptive Mission Planning UGV-UAV-UMV Collaboration Technology Transfer Automatically Deployed Communication Relays Man-Portable Robots Unmanned Surface Vehicle Technologies May 14, 2010

Multi-Robot Operator Control Unit (MOCU) MOCU is a flexible software framework capable of monitoring and controlling unmanned systems across multiple domains. Modular, open architecture Government developed and owned Widely adopted May 14, 2010

MOCU Multiple UxV Control MOCU was designed from the ground-up to control multiple heterogeneous vehicles MOCU is not tied to any specific vehicle, vehicle type, or protocol May 14, 2010 Modularity, scalability and flexible display enable control of a wide range of vehicles

Joint Collaborative Technologies Experiment (JCTE) A two year joint (Navy, Army, Air Force) effort to demonstrate multiple unmanned systems operating in collaboration in multiple domains to accomplish select missions MOCU is the operator interface for all JCTE unmanned systems May 14, 2010 21

Joint Collaborative Technologies Experiment (JCTE) May 14, 2010

UV Sentry An autonomous capability for long-term, persistent and accurate surveillance, detection, identification and engagement of threats that spans large geographical space and media. Ties together existing disparate unmanned systems Keeps personnel out of hazardous areas Reduce system response time Reduce operator workload and bandwidth requirements UV Sentry will address a variety of Naval missions May 14, 2010 23

UV Sentry is a game-changing, disruptive technology: Innovative response to current and emerging threats Minimally manned and highly autonomous Cuts across multiple organizations: ONR Departments PEOs Warfare Centers Why now? Why UV Sentry? Emerging operational problems compel novel, timely solutions Addresses emerging emphasis on force and infrastructure protection missions Leverage numerous, recent S&T developments May 14, 2010 24

Into the Future May 14, 2010 25

To change anything in the Navy is like punching a feather bed. You punch it with your right and you punch it with your left until you are finally exhausted, and then you find the damn bed just as it was before you started punching. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt May 14, 2010 26

Into The Future UxVs ability to deliver revolutionary change is real but to be realized, this vision must be supported by commitment at the top levels of naval leadership, and by leadership and stewardship at the programmatic level A way ahead: operationalize the mandate of the Department of Defense FY2009-2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap to expedite the transition of unmanned technologies from research and development activities into the hands of the Warfighter. May 14, 2010 27

cent experience suggests that the right technology, ed intelligently, makes sheer numbers irrelevant. e tipping point was the Gulf War in 1991. When the war s over, the United States and its coalition partners d lost just 240 people. Iraq suffered about 10,000 ttle deaths, although no one will ever really be sure. e difference was that the Americans could see at night, ive through the featureless desert without getting t, and put a single smart bomb on target with a 90 rcent probability. Bruce Berkowitz The New Face of War