Dan Bronson-Lowe, PhD, CIC

Similar documents
Week 3: Ratios, Rates, and Proportions (Part I)

Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina

Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Quality Reporting Program

NHSN: An Update on the Risk Adjustment of HAI Data

K-HEN Acute Care/Critical Access Hospitals Measures Alignment with PfP 40/20 Goals AEA Minimum Participation Full Participation 1, 2

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Surveillance of Health Care Associated Infections in Long Term Care Settings. Sandra Callery RN MHSc CIC

CDC Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) Strategy: Using Data for Prevention

Figure 1. Massachusetts Statewide Aggregate Hospital Acquired Infection Data Summary. Infection Rate* Denominator Count*

Reducing CAUTI by Decreasing Inappropriate Catheter Utilization

Welcome and Instructions

LABORATORY-IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)

Infection Prevention. Fundamentals of. March 21-23, 2017 Oregon Medical Association Portland, OR. oregonpatientsafety.org

HealthInsight HIIN Onboarding Event: DATA, DATA, DATA. April 12, a.m. to noon PT Noon to 1 p.m. MT

How to Add an Annual Facility Survey

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

BUGS BE GONE: Reducing HAIs and Streamlining Care!

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

75,000 Approxiamte amount of deaths ,000 Number of patients who contract HAIs each year 1. HAIs: Costing Everyone Too Much

Welcome to the Cooper Infection Prevention Team

National Healthcare Safety Network Surgical Site Infection Reporting. Linda Johnson, MA, RN, CPHQ Felicia Alvarez, MPH Sherry Varley, RN, CIC

Healthcare-Associated Infections in North Carolina

Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018

Learning Session 4: Required Infection Reporting for Minnesota CAH

Exemplary Professional Practice CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM(S)

Kathleen S. Hall-Meyer, RN, MBA, CIC Saint Luke s Health System Kansas City, Missouri

Star Rating Method for Single and Composite Measures

Overview of the Hospital Safety Score September 24, Missy Danforth, Senior Director of Hospital Ratings, The Leapfrog Group

LABORATORY IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)

Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. Hospital-Specific Report User Guide Fiscal Year 2017

Troubleshooting Audio

Focus on Action, Performance Leadership and Setting Expectations

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

1. Recommended Nurse Sensitive Outcome: Adult inpatients who reported how often their pain was controlled.

Uniform Data System. The Functional Assessment Specialists. June 21, 2011

WAHU Quality Presentation 4/6/2017

Leveraging the Accountable Care Unit Model to create a culture of Shared Accountability

Healthcare-Associated Infections in North Carolina

Nurse staffing, burnout linked to hospital infections

Clinical Intervention Overview: Objectives

TECHNICAL REPORT FOR HEALTHCARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS. New Jersey Department of Health Health Care Quality Assessment

Contributions of the three domains to total HACRP score were examined for each hospital. Several hospital characteristics were also examined to

National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Reporting for Inpatient Acute Care Hospitals

Spectrum Health Infection Control and Prevention Review of Program Plan & Goals 2013

New federal safety data enables solutions to reduce infection rates

Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) Texas Reporting Updates

Facility State National

June 24, Dear Ms. Tavenner:

CMS and NHSN: What s New for Infection Preventionists in 2013 Part II

Health Care Associated Infections in 2017 Acute Care Hospitals

Introduction to Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Open Call Series #1 Surveillance

Healthcare- associated Infections in North Carolina: A Statewide Discussion

HIMSS Submission Leveraging HIT, Improving Quality & Safety

FY 13 Pillar Goal Update and FY 14 Pillar Goals

The Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program. Overview. Legislative Mandate. Anne Deutsch, RN, PhD, CRRN

Hospital Quality Program

Objectives. IPC Open calls - bi-weekly series. Introduction to Infection Prevention & Control (IPC) Open Call Series

CAUTI reduction at Mayo Clinic

Tuberculosis: Surveillance and the Health Care Worker

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

Scoring Methodology FALL 2016

The Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms. Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2017 Leapfrog Hospital Survey

Annual Report. Healthcare-Associated Infections In Alabama

APIC NHSN Webinar. Kathy Allen-Bridson, Janet Brooks, Cindy Gross, Denise Leaptrot, Susan Morabit, & Eileen Scalise Subject Matter Experts

SURVEILLANCE TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGIES. Evelyn Cook, RN, CIC SPICE

NMSA Hospital-Acquired Infection

Disclosures Nothing to disclose

2014 Partnership in Prevention Award. November 21, :00-1:00PM EST. Introduction

Dr. Hanan E. Badr, MD, MPH, DrPH Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University

Incentives and Penalties

Supplementary Online Content

SURVEILLANCE TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGIES. Evelyn Cook, RN, CIC SPICE

New Jersey State Department of Health and Senior Services Healthcare-Associated Infections Plan 2010

2015 Executive Overview

Better to Best Quality Excellence Achievement Awards. Recognizing Illinois Hospitals Leading in Quality and Innovation COMPENDIUM

Appendix A: Encyclopedia of Measures (EOM)

Hospital-Acquired Infections Prevention is in Your Hands. Rachel L. Stricof

Scoring Methodology FALL 2017

Local Health Department Access to the National Healthcare Safety Network. January 23, 2018

SOAP- UP : Improving Hand Hygiene as a Comprehensive Infection Prevention Strategy

Nurse Staffing and Quality in Rural Nursing Homes

MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MBQIP)

Infection Prevention and Control: How to Meet the Conditions of Participation for Home Health

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Metrics Data to Change Clinical Practice Abigail R. Blackmore, MSN, RN Pamela W.

APIC Questions with Answers. NHSN FAQ Webinar. Wednesday, September 9, :00-3:00 PM EST

CMS and NHSN: What s New for Infection Preventionists in 2013

How We Rate Hospitals

Health Care Associated Infections in 2015 Acute Care Hospitals

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) CALNOC 2013 Codebook

State of California Health and Human Services Agency California Department of Public Health

Conducting antibiotic surveillance in a long term care facility. By Holly Montgomery RN,WCC

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Reducing HCAI- What the Commissioner needs to know.

Willamette Valley Medical Center Carla Galbraith RN, BSN, CIC Manager Patient Safety/Infection Control November 1, 2013

NHSN: Information for Action

Pricing and funding for safety and quality: the Australian approach

HOSPITAL ACQUIRED COMPLICATIONS. Shruti Scott, DO, MPH Department of Medicine UCI Hospitalist Program

Transcription:

Dan Bronson-Lowe, PhD, CIC Senior Clinical Manager Baxter Healthcare Corporation No conflicts of interest to disclose.

Clinic A Clinic B 20 vaccinated 5 vaccinated 100 total 5 total 20% vaccinated 100% vaccinated

Counts Ratios Proportions Rates Numerator Denominator x 10n Where: 10 0 = 1 10 1 = 10 10 2 = 100 10 3 = 1,000 10 4 = 10,000 and so on

Number or rate of events/items/persons/etc. in group 1 Number or rate of events/items/persons/etc. in group 2 x 10 n A hospital with 420 inpatient beds has 3 IPs. 420 / 3 (x 1) = 140 inpatient beds per IP Ratio of inpatient beds to IPs is 140:1.

Number of events/persons with a particular characteristic Total number of events/persons (of which the numerator is a subset) x 10 n During 2015 a hospital had 50 CAUTIs, of which 18 were in male patients. 18 / 50 (x 100) = 36 CAUTIs in males per 100 CAUTIs = 36% of CAUTIs were in males

Number or rate of events during the time period Number or rate of events/items/persons/etc. at risk during the time period x 10 n A hospital with 80,000 admissions in 2014 had 120 cases of healthcare-acquired C. difficile infections in 2014. 120 / 80,000 (x 1) = 0.0015 infection per admission per year 120 / 80,000 (x 10,000) = 15 infections per 10,000 admissions per year

1. Is it based on (Numerator/Denominator) x 10 n? No = Not a Ratio. Stop here. Yes = Ratio. Go to Question 2. Example A 24 patients Example B (Ratio) 16 males / 8 females = 2 males per female Example C 16 males/24 patients (x100) = 67% Example D (Ratio) 8 patients per day

2. Is the Numerator a subset of the Denominator? No = Not a Proportion. Go to Question 3. Yes = Proportion. Go to Question 3. Example B 16 males / 8 females = 2 males per female Example C 16 males/24 patients (x100) = 67% Example D 8 patients per day

3. Is time part of the Denominator? No = Not a Rate. Stop here. Yes = Rate. Stop here. Example B 16 males / 8 females = 2 males per female Example C 16 males/24 patients (x100) = 67% Example D 8 patients per day

Incidence Mortality or Cure Prevalence

Prevalence = Number of existing cases at a given point in time Total population at a given point in time Point Prevalence Specific point in time Period Prevalence Specific period in time

Prevalence = Number of isolation patients on Unit W on June 4th Total population on Unit W on June 4th

Patients on Isolation on Unit W - June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Patient Presence on Unit W - June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Prevalence = Number of isolation patients on Unit W on June 4th Total population on Unit W on June 4th Prevalence = 5 isolation patients 7 patients total = 0.71 71%

Prevalence = Number of isolation patients on Unit W in June Total population on Unit W in June

Patients on Isolation on Unit W - June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Patient Presence on Unit W - June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Prevalence = Number of isolation patients on Unit W in June Total population on Unit W in June Prevalence = 8 isolation patients 12 patients total = 0.67 67%

Incidence = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk population (or time) observed Incidence Proportion Cumulative Incidence Person-based; uses people at risk Incidence Rate Incidence Density Time-based; uses time at risk

Incidence Proportion = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk population observed

CAUTI Events on Unit Z - June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L Foley Patient Catheter Presence Use on Unit Z -- June 2015 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Incidence Proportion = Incidence Proportion = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk population observed 3 new CAUTIs in June 12 patients in June = 0.25 25%

Incidence Proportion = Incidence Proportion = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk population observed 3 new CAUTIs in June 9 patients with urinary catheters in June = 0.34 34%

Foley Catheter Use on Unit Z - June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Incidence Rate = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk time observed

CAUTI Events on Unit Z - June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month

Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L Foley Catheter Use on Unit Z - June 2015 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Catheter- Days 11 0 4 7 30 6 0 0 14 30 3 9 114

Incidence Rate = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk time observed Incidence Rate = 3 new CAUTIs in June 114 urinary catheter-days in June = 0.026 CAUTIs per catheter-day = 26 CAUTIs per 1000 catheter-days

Attack Rate = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk population observed Overall Attack Rate = 8 new cases of norovirus this week 420 in-patients = 0.02 2%

Attack Rate = Number of new cases during a given time period Total at-risk population observed Food-Specific Attack = Rate 7 new cases of norovirus this week (ate salad) 120 in-patients (ate salad) = 0.06 6%

Mortality Rate = Number of deaths Total at-risk population observed x10 n (per year) Crude Mortality Rate = 100 deaths 20,000 total population x1,000 (per year) = 5 deaths per 1,000 population per year

Mortality Rate = Number of deaths Total at-risk population observed x10 n (per year) Cause-Specific Mortality = Rate 2 tuberculosis deaths 20,000 total population x100,000 (per year) = 10 TB deaths per 100,000 population per year

Hospital A Hospital B 25 CAUTIs 11 CAUTIs 8000 catheter-days 8000 catheter-days 3.1 CAUTIs per 1,000 catheter-days 1.4 CAUTIs per 1,000 catheter-days

Hospital A Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Hospital B Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 8 2000 4.0 Rehab 3 6000 0.5 Total 11 8000 1.4

Hospital A Hospital B Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days ICU 12 6000 2.0 Medical 3 1000 3.0 Oncology 3 1500 2.0 Ortho 0 750 0.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Stepdown 3 1500 2.0 Surgical 18 3000 6.0 Telemetry 0 250 0.0 Total 40 16000 2.5 Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days ICU 2 200 10.0 Medical 3 3000 1.0 Oncology 10 2500 4.0 Ortho 1 450 2.2 Rehab 0 1200 0.0 Stepdown 0 50 0.0 Surgical 10 15000 0.7 Telemetry 1 80 12.5 Total 27 22480 1.2

Direct Standardization Your Population Category-Specific Rates Standard Population Indirect Standardization Your Population Category-Specific Rates Standard Population

Hospital A Direct Standardization Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Standard Hospital Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days Medical 4000 Rehab 4000 Total 8000 CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days

Hospital B Direct Standardization Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 8 2000 4.0 Rehab 3 6000 0.5 Total 11 8000 1.4 Standard Hospital Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days Medical 4000 Rehab 4000 Total 8000 CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days

Hospital A Hospital B 25 CAUTIs 11 CAUTIs 8000 catheter-days 8000 catheter-days Crude Rate: 3.1 CAUTIs per 1,000 catheter-days Unit-Standardized Rate: 2.3 CAUTIs per 1,000 catheter-days Crude Rate: 1.4 CAUTIs per 1,000 catheter-days Unit-Standardized Rate: 2.3 CAUTIs per 1,000 catheter-days

Hospital A (Standardized) Indirect Standardization Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Hospital B (Standard Population) Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 8 2000 4.0 Rehab 3 6000 0.5 Total 11 8000 1.4

Hospital A (Expected) Indirect Standardization Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Hospital A (Observed) Unit Number of CAUTIs Number of Catheter-Days CAUTI rate per 1,000 catheter-days Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1

SIR = Observed number of infections Expected number of infections Better Same Worse 0 1 2 SIR

Crude Rates Standardized Rates Category-Specific Rates

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that an infection preventionist in possession of a good dataset must be in want of an interpretation.

Sensitivity 100% Specificity 100% No HAI HAI 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Disease No Disease Positive Test True Positive False Positive Total Positives Negative Test False Negative True Negative Total Negatives Total Diseased Total Disease-Free Total Population Number of True Positives Sensitivity = (x 100) Total Number of Diseased

Disease No Disease Positive Test True Positive False Positive Total Positives Negative Test False Negative True Negative Total Negatives Total Diseased Total Disease-Free Total Population Number of True Negatives Specificity = (x 100) Total Number Disease-Free

Disease No Disease Positive Test True Positive False Positive Total Positives Negative Test False Negative True Negative Total Negatives Total Diseased Total Disease-Free Total Population Number of True Positives PPV = (x 100) Total Number with Positive Tests

Disease No Disease Positive Test True Positive False Positive Total Positives Negative Test False Negative True Negative Total Negatives Total Diseased Total Disease-Free Total Population Number of True Negatives NPV = (x 100) Total Number with Negative Tests

Sensitivity: 80% Specificity: 91% Positive predictive value: 85% Negative predictive value: 87%

PPV = 8% PPV = 85%

NPV = 99% NPV = 87%