Week 3: Ratios, Rates, and Proportions (Part I)

Similar documents
Dan Bronson-Lowe, PhD, CIC

Surveillance of Health Care Associated Infections in Long Term Care Settings. Sandra Callery RN MHSc CIC

Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina

Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina

Figure 1. Massachusetts Statewide Aggregate Hospital Acquired Infection Data Summary. Infection Rate* Denominator Count*

Welcome and Instructions

K-HEN Acute Care/Critical Access Hospitals Measures Alignment with PfP 40/20 Goals AEA Minimum Participation Full Participation 1, 2

Star Rating Method for Single and Composite Measures

Learning Session 4: Required Infection Reporting for Minnesota CAH

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Quality Reporting Program

Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Metrics Data to Change Clinical Practice Abigail R. Blackmore, MSN, RN Pamela W.

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

LABORATORY-IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)

NHSN: An Update on the Risk Adjustment of HAI Data

Inpatient Quality Reporting Program

Infection Prevention. Fundamentals of. March 21-23, 2017 Oregon Medical Association Portland, OR. oregonpatientsafety.org

Hospital Quality Program

Scaling Up and Validating a Nursing Acuity Tool to Ensure Synergy in Pediatric Critical Care

Disclosures Nothing to disclose

Background & Significance

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

CDC Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) Strategy: Using Data for Prevention

HealthInsight HIIN Onboarding Event: DATA, DATA, DATA. April 12, a.m. to noon PT Noon to 1 p.m. MT

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

Reducing CAUTI by Decreasing Inappropriate Catheter Utilization

CAUTI reduction at Mayo Clinic

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) CALNOC 2013 Codebook

Indicator Specification:

TECHNICAL REPORT FOR HEALTHCARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS. New Jersey Department of Health Health Care Quality Assessment

The Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program. Overview. Legislative Mandate. Anne Deutsch, RN, PhD, CRRN

LABORATORY IDENTIFIED (LABID) EVENT REPORTING MRSA BACTEREMIA AND C. DIFFICILE. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)

Local Health Department Access to the National Healthcare Safety Network. January 23, 2018

NMSA Hospital-Acquired Infection

Supplementary Online Content

Implementing a C. difficile Testing Protocol Stephanie Swanson, MPH, CIC North Memorial Health

Leveraging the Accountable Care Unit Model to create a culture of Shared Accountability

Dr. Hanan E. Badr, MD, MPH, DrPH Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University

Incentives and Penalties

Advanced Measurement for Improvement Prework

Technical Notes on the Standardized Hospitalization Ratio (SHR) For the Dialysis Facility Reports

Health Care Associated Infections in 2017 Acute Care Hospitals

BUGS BE GONE: Reducing HAIs and Streamlining Care!

Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

75,000 Approxiamte amount of deaths ,000 Number of patients who contract HAIs each year 1. HAIs: Costing Everyone Too Much

Health Watch USA 2015 Patient Safety Conference Nov. 13, 2015, Lexington Kentucky

2017 LEAPFROG TOP HOSPITALS

Welcome to the Cooper Infection Prevention Team

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

Text-based Document. Handwashing: What is Staff Using? Authors Cedeno, Denise P. Downloaded 30-Apr :14:19.

New federal safety data enables solutions to reduce infection rates

State of California Health and Human Services Agency California Department of Public Health

Infection Prevention and Control: How to Meet the Conditions of Participation for Home Health

Pricing and funding for safety and quality: the Australian approach

The Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms. Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2017 Leapfrog Hospital Survey

Performance Scorecard 2013

# KAR 2:020: The attendee will understand the new Kentucky regulatory requirements for reporting of multi-drug resistant organisms.

National Healthcare Safety Network Surgical Site Infection Reporting. Linda Johnson, MA, RN, CPHQ Felicia Alvarez, MPH Sherry Varley, RN, CIC

Better to Best Quality Excellence Achievement Awards. Recognizing Illinois Hospitals Leading in Quality and Innovation COMPENDIUM

Kathleen S. Hall-Meyer, RN, MBA, CIC Saint Luke s Health System Kansas City, Missouri

Risk of TB infection among HCWs in the era of HIV and MDR-TB. Madhukar Pai, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Epidemiology McGill University Montreal

1. Recommended Nurse Sensitive Outcome: Adult inpatients who reported how often their pain was controlled.

Introduction to Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Open Call Series #1 Surveillance

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Troubleshooting Audio

Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers. Five-Star Quality Rating System

2/24/2017. Leveraging Internal Audit to Improve Quality of Care Metrics. Internal Audit Considerations. Quality Areas of Focus

Part II Quality improvement in long-term care: Partnership of infection prevention and environmental services

The CAUTI Can-Can. Hennepin County Medical Center August Caitlin Eccles-Radtke, MD Infectious Disease and CAUTI Prevention Champion

President Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Great Gains in Quality of Care and Patient Safety: The Kaiser Permanente Experience

Facility State National

CMS and NHSN: What s New for Infection Preventionists in 2013

Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) Texas Reporting Updates

SURVEILLANCE TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGIES. Evelyn Cook, RN, CIC SPICE

Device Utilization and CAUTI Prevention. Lori Fornwalt, RN, CIC Infection Prevention Coordinator October 4, 2016

Healthcare- associated Infections in North Carolina: A Statewide Discussion

Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Nursing Homes: Results from a Prevalence Survey Pilot

Uniform Data System. The Functional Assessment Specialists. June 21, 2011

Willamette Valley Medical Center Carla Galbraith RN, BSN, CIC Manager Patient Safety/Infection Control November 1, 2013

19th Annual. Challenges. in Critical Care

Health Care Associated Infections in 2015 Acute Care Hospitals

Determining Like Hospitals for Benchmarking Paper #2778

STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE

Supplementary Online Content

SURVEILLANCE TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGIES. Evelyn Cook, RN, CIC SPICE

C. difficile Infection and C. difficile Lab ID Reporting in NHSN

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

Session 5: C. difficile LabID Event Analysis for Long-term Care Facilities Using NHSN

Disclaimer. Learning Objectives

IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO IMPLEMENT CATHETER ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT INFECTION (CAUTI) PREVENTION

Basic Skills for CAH Quality Managers

How to Add an Annual Facility Survey

Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. Hospital-Specific Report User Guide Fiscal Year 2017

Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program

Additional Considerations for SQRMS 2018 Measure Recommendations

GHS Quality and Safety Report

Learning Objectives. Medicare P4P Programs. How to Interpret Medicare s Hospital Pay for Performance Reports

APIC Questions with Answers. NHSN FAQ Webinar. Wednesday, September 9, :00-3:00 PM EST

Scoring Methodology FALL 2016

Transcription:

Week 3: Ratios, s, and Proportions (Part I) Dan Bronson Lowe, PhD, CIC Senior Clinical Manager Baxter Healthcare Corporation DISCLOSURES The speaker, Daniel Bronson Lowe, discloses no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program/presentation. The following planning staff report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this program/presentation. Carol McLay DrPH, MPH, RN, CIC Bill Bridges PhD 1

Healthcare Worker Flu Vaccination Clinic A Clinic B 20 vaccinated 5 vaccinated 100 total 5 total 20% vaccinated 100% vaccinated Counts Frequency Measures Ratios Proportions s 2

Ratios Proportions s Counts Frequency Measures Ratios Proportions s Numerator Denominator x 10n Where: 10 0 = 1 10 1 = 10 10 2 = 100 10 3 = 1,000 10 4 = 10,000 and so on Ratios Number or rate of events/items/persons/etc. in group 1 Number or rate of events/items/persons/etc. in group 2 x 10 n A hospital with 420 inpatient beds has 3 IPs. 420 / 3 (x 1) = 140 inpatient beds per IP Ratio of inpatient beds to IPs is 140:1. 3

Proportions events/persons with a particular characteristic Total number of events/persons (of which the numerator is a subset) x 10 n During 2015 a hospital had 50, of which 18 were in male patients. 18 / 50 (x 100) = 36 in males per 100 = 36% of were in males s Number or rate of events during the time period Number or rate of events/items/persons/etc. at risk during the time period x 10 n A hospital with 80,000 admissions in 2014 had 120 cases of healthcare acquired C. difficile infections in 2014. 120 / 80,000 (x 1) = 0.0015 infection per admission per year 120 / 80,000 (x 10,000) = 15 infections per 10,000 admissions per year So What is It? 1. Is it based on (Numerator/Denominator) x 10 n? No = Not a Ratio. Stop here. Yes = Ratio. Go to Question 2. Example A 24 patients Example C Example B 16 males / 8 females = 2 males per female Example D 16 males/24 patients (x100) = 67% 8patients per day 4

So What is It? 2. Is the Numerator a subset of the Denominator? No = Not a Proportion. Go to Question 3. Yes = Proportion. Go to Question 3. Example B 16 males / 8 females = 2 males per female Example C 16 males/24 patients (x100) = 67% Example D 8patients per day So What is It? 3. Is time part of the Denominator? No = Not a. Stop here. Yes =. Stop here. Example B 16 males / 8 females = 2 males per female Example C 16 males/24 patients (x100) = 67% Example D 8patients per day Mortality or Cure Prevalence 5

Prevalence Prevalence = existing cases at a given point in time Total population at a given point in time Point Prevalence Specific point in time Period Prevalence Specific period in time Point vs. Period Data by minute Point = one minute Period = multiple minutes (hour/day/week/ ) Data by day Point = one day Period = multiple days (week/month/year/ ) Point Prevalence Prevalence = isolation patients on W on June 4th Total population on W on June 4th 6

Patients on Isolation on W June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Patient Presence on W June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Point Prevalence Prevalence = isolation patients on W on June 4th Total population on W on June 4th Prevalence = 5 isolation patients 7 patients total Prevalence = 0.71 71% 7

Period Prevalence Prevalence = isolation patients on W in June Total population on W in June Patients on Isolation on W June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Patient Presence on W June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month 8

Period Prevalence Prevalence = isolation patients on W in June Total population on W in June Prevalence = 8isolation patients 12 patients total Prevalence = 0.67 67% = new cases during a given time period Total at risk population (or time) observed Proportion Cumulative Person based; uses people at risk Density Time based; uses time at risk Proportion Proportion = new cases during a given time period Total at risk population observed 9

CAUTI Events on Z June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Patient Presence on Z June 2015 Foley Catheter Use on Z June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Proportion Proportion = Proportion = new cases during a given time period Total at risk population observed 3 new in June 12 patients in June = 0.25 25% Proportion 10

Proportion Proportion = Proportion = new cases during a given time period Total at risk population observed 3 new in June 9 patients with urinary catheters in June = 0.34 34% Proportion Foley Catheter Use on Z June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month = new cases during a given time period Total at risk time observed 11

CAUTI Events on Z June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Foley Catheter Use on Z June 2015 Patient A B C D E F G H I J K L 1 7 14 21 28 Day of the Month Catheter Days 11 0 4 7 30 6 0 0 14 30 3 9 114 = new cases during a given time period Total at risk time observed = 3 new in June 114 urinary in June = 0.026 per catheter day = 26 per 1000 12

Attack Attack = new cases during a given time period Total at risk population observed Overall Attack = 8 new cases of norovirus this week 420 in patients Overall Attack = 0.02 2% Attack Attack = new cases during a given time period Total at risk population observed Food Specific Attack = Food Specific Attack = 7 new cases of norovirus this week (ate salad) 120 in patients (ate salad) 0.06 6% Mortality Mortality = deaths Total at risk population observed x10 n (per year) Crude Mortality = 100 deaths 20,000 total population x1,000 (per year) Crude Mortality = 5 deaths per 1,000 population per year 13

Mortality Mortality = deaths Total at risk population observed x10 n (per year) Cause Specific Mortality = 2 tuberculosis deaths 20,000 total population x100,000 (per year) Cause Specific Mortality = 10 TB deaths per 100,000 population per year Crude vs. Category-Specific s Hospital A Hospital B 25 11 8000 8000 3.1 per 1,000 1.4 per 1,000 Hospital A Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Hospital B Medical 8 2000 4.0 Rehab 3 6000 0.5 Total 11 8000 1.4 14

Hospital A Hospital B ICU 12 6000 2.0 Medical 3 1000 3.0 Oncology 3 1500 2.0 Ortho 0 750 0.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Stepdown 3 1500 2.0 Surgical 18 3000 6.0 Telemetry 0 250 0.0 Total 40 16000 2.5 ICU 2 200 10.0 Medical 3 3000 1.0 Oncology 10 2500 4.0 Ortho 1 450 2.2 Rehab 0 1200 0.0 Stepdown 0 50 0.0 Surgical 10 15000 0.7 Telemetry 1 80 12.5 Total 27 22480 1.2 Direct Standardization Standardization Your Population Category Specific s Standard Population Indirect Standardization Your Population Category Specific s Standard Population Direct Standardization Hospital A s Hospital B s Standard Population denominator (e.g. ) Infections for Standard Population using Hospital A rates versus Infections for Standard Population using Hospital B rates 15

Hospital A Direct Standardization Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Standard Hospital Medical 4000 Rehab 4000 Total 8000 Hospital B Direct Standardization Medical 8 2000 4.0 Rehab 3 6000 0.5 Total 11 8000 1.4 Standard Hospital Medical 4000 Rehab 4000 Total 8000 Hospital A Hospital B 25 11 8000 8000 Crude : 3.1 per 1,000 Standardized : 2.3 per 1,000 Crude : 1.4 per 1,000 Standardized : 2.3 per 1,000 16

Indirect Standardization Hospital A s Hospital B s Hospital A denominator (e.g. ) Actual Infections for Hospital A versus Infections for Hospital A using Hospital B rates Hospital A (Standardized) Indirect Standardization Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Hospital B (Standard Population) Medical 8 2000 4.0 Rehab 3 6000 0.5 Total 11 8000 1.4 Hospital A (Expected) Indirect Standardization Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 Hospital A (Observed) Medical 24 6000 4.0 Rehab 1 2000 0.5 Total 25 8000 3.1 17

Standardized Infection Ratio SIR = Observed number of infections Expected number of infections Better Same Worse 0 1 2 SIR Standardized Infection Ratios Null hypothesis: Your infection rate and the benchmark infection rate are the same. Alternative hypothesis: Your infection rate and the benchmark infection rate are different. Better Same Worse 0 1 2 SIR Standardized Infection Ratios α = 0.05 CABG Related Surgical Site Infections Procedures Expected SIR 95% Confidence Facility Performed Infections Infections SIR p value Interval for SIR A 290 1 5.8 0.2 0.03 0.0, 0.9 B 80 4 1.5 2.6 0.65 0.7, 6.7 C 1500 75 28.5 2.6 0.01 2.1, 3.3 Better Same Worse 0 1 2 SIR 18

Standardized Infection Ratios α = 0.05 95% Confidence Facility SIR SIR p value Interval for SIR A 0.2 0.03 0.0, 0.9 B 2.6 0.65 0.7, 6.7 C 2.6 0.01 2.1, 3.3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SIR Crude s Category Specific s Standardized s 19

Module 3 Takeaways It takes more than one measure to get the whole story. Nomenclature is iffy. Focus on what s actually being calculated rather than what it is called. Watch out for confounding if the denominators of the groups are different. 20