Shared Decision Making

Similar documents
Patients in Health Decisions

Webinar Series. Effective and Compassionate Communication for Informed, Shared Decision-Making Tuesday, May 12, Audience Reminders

Don t just listen, Co-produce! November 18 th 2013 Swales stadium

Engaging patients and their family in shared decision making

Diagnosis and Initial Treatment of Ischemic Stroke

Shared Decision Making

4. Hospital and community pharmacies

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies: Improving Benefit-Risk Counseling Between Providers and Patients 4/14/2016

Tackling the challenge of non-adherence

Drug EUHM Learning Activities:

Major Change. Outline of the information that has been added to this document especially where it may change what staff need to do

Medicines New Zealand

SHARED DECISION MAKING

Liberating the NHS: No decision about me, without me Further consultation on proposals to shared decision-making

Measures of impact of pharmacovigilance processes (3.3)

Core competencies* for undergraduate students in clinical associate, dentistry and medical teaching and learning programmes in South Africa

The health coaching approach: A different way to talk with patients. Dr Andrew McDowell Director of Health Coaching The Performance Coach

ANCHOR An Interdisciplinary Community- Based Research Project in Nova Scotia: Overview & Some Preliminary Results

High level guidance to support a shared view of quality in general practice

Eating Disorder Services

National Programme to Prevent Central-Line Associated Bacteraemia. Project Charter October 2011 to April 2013

Ethical framework for priority setting and resource allocation

Patient Centred Medicine and Concordance

Apprenticeship Standard for Nursing Associate at Level 5. Assessment Plan

Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice

Applying psychological principles to help people with long-term physical health problems in the context of primary care

AQI48a: Percentage of patients, aged 18 and older, who were surveyed on their patient experience and satisfaction with anesthesia care

Out of tariff high cost drug / technology business case template

Contents. About the Pharmacists Defence Association. representing your interests

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Implementation Policy for NICE Guidelines

Job Description. Post Title Directorate Reports to Responsible for Key Relationships

Effectively implementing multidisciplinary. population segments. A rapid review of existing evidence

Informed Consent Session Goals

Shared Decision Making, Ethics, and Shared Responsibility

PAHT strategy for End of Life Care for adults

Patient-Clinician Communication:

Palliative Care Needs Assessment

Hawke s Bay District Health Board Position Profile / Terms & Conditions

Use of disease registries for benefitrisk evaluation of medicines: A regulatory perspective. DIA Europe April Basel, Switzerland

Incorporating Shared Decision Making into Informed Consent Documentation

Communication with Surrogate Decision Makers. Shannon S. Carson, MD Associate Professor University of North Carolina

Chapter 8: Teamwork and Leadership. Copyright 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

NIHR funding programmes. Twitter: NIHR YouTube: NIHRtv

Get a grip on glaucoma!

Annual Quality Account 2015/2016

Year one. Year one of Public health practice: 4233 Year 1 Proof: 4 Version: 1 Date: 12/03/10 Time: 5.30pm

MEDMARX ADVERSE DRUG EVENT REPORTING

Q12 People Powered Health

BUT. Declaring legal rights is not enough. matéria de informação e de tratamento

Challenges and Innovations in Community Health Nursing

Subject Screening, Recruitment, and Retention. Tiffany Morrison, MS, CCRP Director, Clinical Trials Rothman Institute

Corso di Informatica Medica

Successful implementation in healthcare organisations theory and examples. Prof. Dr. Michel Wensing

WHEN LESS IS BEST. What drugs are we talking about? What is deprescribing?

Patient Observation Policy

Sharing Healthcare Records

Context paper CWE Intraday

Dynamic Purchasing System. South East Regional Meeting 9 th March 2017 Chris Davison

UPMC Passavant Nursing Certification Scholarship Program

Document Details Title

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Introduction and Development of New Clinical Interventional Procedures

감염관리를위한행동변화전략 가톨릭대학교간호대학 김경미

Responses of pharmacy students to hypothetical refusal of emergency hormonal contraception

Stratified care, psychological approaches and patient outcomes. Dr Jonathan Hill NIHR Senior Lecturer in Physiotherapy Keele University UK

Chapter 2. At a glance. What is health coaching? How is health coaching defined?

Teaching Project: Pediatric Fevers Nurs 402 Career Pathways Development

Shared decision-making

Take patient engagement to the next level. INTRODUCTION BENEFITS TOOLS & SERVICES TAKE ACTION INDEX

Helping Skills and Relationships

Quality of Care Approach Quality assurance to drive improvement

Ontario Strategy for MRI

New Brunswick Association of Dietitians

Anticoagulation in a nurse-led AF-Clinic

COOK COUNTY HEALTH & HOSPITALS SYSTEM

Adopting Standardized Definitions The Future of Data Collection and Benchmarking in Alternate Site Infusion Must Start Now!

WORKING DRAFT. Standards of proficiency for nursing associates. Release 1. Page 1

MERTON CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY

Improving patient safety through education and training - Report by the Commission on Education and Training for Patient Safety

PGY1 Medication Safety Core Rotation

What You Need to Know About Documentation for the Must Pass Elements for NCQA PCMH Recognition

Patient Centred Medicine: Adherence and Concordance

The health coaching experience in NHS Midlands and East

PERSONAL HEALTH BUDGETS GUIDE. Implementing effective care planning

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Essential Ethics for the Success of Organizations and Their New Leaders

Job Specification. Specialist Palliative Care Social Worker. Job Profile

Statement on the core values and attributes needed to study medicine

AAPC Webinar 3/28/2016

orkelated tress Results of the negotiations on work-related stress

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE. Interim Process and Methods of the Highly Specialised Technologies Programme

REFLECTION PROCESS on CHRONIC DISEASES INTERIM REPORT

Location: Huntingdon with work across Cambridgeshire and Bedfordshire

A Step-by-Step Guide to Tackling your Challenges

Contemporary Psychiatric-Mental Health Nursing Third Edition. Comprehensive Assessment. Psychiatric History* 10/9/2014.

Improving teams in healthcare

Listen for cues that signal the person is at the point of decision-making, such as maybe I I don t know Someone told me I need or I

Effectiveness of Health Coaching on Health Outcomes and Health Services Utilization and Costs

Protective factors; Bridging the gap between recovery and violence risk assessment in Mental Health Nursing Jodie Alder

Process and methods Published: 23 January 2017 nice.org.uk/process/pmg31

CAPE/COP Educational Outcomes (approved 2016)

Transcription:

Shared Decision Making No decision about me, without me Pharmac Seminar Series Medicines in Healthcare August 2015

This Session Introduction to SDM what & why (disclaimer) Essential elements Communicating risks & benefits Decision Aids

Shared Decision Making Shared decision-making is a process in which clinicians and patients work together to select tests, treatments, management or support packages, based on clinical evidence and the patient s informed preferences. It involves the provision of evidence-based information about options, outcomes and uncertainties, together with decision support counselling and a system for recording and implementing patients informed preferences. Ref: Coulter & Collins, The King s Fund 2011

Shared decision-making enhances the therapeutic relationship

Benefits Win:Win potential to improve: the quality of the decision-making process for patients and ultimately, patient outcomes

Shared Decision Making Appropriate for decisions about whether to: undergo a screening or diagnostic test undergo a medical or surgical procedure participate in a self-management education programme or psychological intervention take medication (or not) attempt a lifestyle change

Essential Elements ( behaviours) of SDM Define and explain the healthcare problem, present options, discuss pros and cons (benefits, risks, costs), clarify patient values and preferences, discuss patient ability and self-efficacy, present what is known and make recommendations, check and clarify the patient s understanding, make or explicitly defer a decision, arrange follow-up

Presenting Information Patients need information presented appropriately to enable and empower participation Information based on robust research Communicate benefits AND risks Avoid overload Make use of decision aids where available

Effective Communication of Risk PRINCIPLES 1. Discuss in context of competence care and trust 2. Risks and benefits 3. Words and numbers 4. Standard taxonomy e.g. very common, common, rare 5. Absolute risks (rather than RR) 6. Consistent denominator e.g. 1 in 100 vs 1 in 500 7. Positive and negative framing e.g. compare likelihoods of having side-effects and not having side-effects contd

Effective Communication of Risk 8. Use visual aids to assist understanding and encourage discussion 9. Be honest about the uncertainties 10.Personalise the information according to an individual s age, gender, history or other relevant factors 11.Explore people s understanding, reactions and opinions about the risk information

ARR vs RRR Hypothetical drug A reduces CV events In placebo-controlled RCT over 5 years 20/100 events in the placebo arm vs 15/100 events in the active drug arm This is 25% relative risk reduction This is also 5% absolute risk reduction (5/100 less events in the active arm cf. placebo arm) NNT = 1/ARR (1/0.05) = 20 i.e. need to treat 20 patients with drug A for 5 years to prevent one event

ADRs - Standard Taxonomy of Risks Very common affects more than 1 in 10 people i.e. the risk is 10% or higher Common affects between 1 in 100 and 1 in 10 people i.e. risk is 1% to 10% Uncommon affects between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 100 people i.e. risk is 0.1% to 1% Rare affects between 1 in 10,000 and 1 in 1,000 people i.e. risk is 0.01% to 0.1% Very rare affects less than 1 in 10,000 people i.e. risk is less than 0.01%

Communicating Risk - Tools

Risk Communication Institute Paling s Palettes

Communicating Risk - Tools http://www.riskcomm.com/scales.htm

Shared Decision Making Facilitators & Barriers (EB) Barriers Time constraints Lack of applicability due to pt characteristics Lack of applicability due to clinical situation Facilitators Provider motivation Positive impact on the clinical process Positive impact on patient outcomes

Decision Aids Do NOT tell people what to do... Present evidence/facts to help people deliberate about options +ve benefits for patients (evidence from RCT and Cochrane Review 2014) Improve knowledge of options feel more informed and more clear about what matters most to them Have more accurate expectations of benefits & harms Participate more in decision making

Decision Aids Cont d Patient Decision Aid Research Group Hosts A-Z Inventory of PDAs International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration

Decision Aids Examples

Option Grids https://vimeo.com/55088088

Option Grid - Example