Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Similar documents
Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians

Iraq Casualties: U.S. Military Forces and Iraqi Civilians, Police, and Security Forces

NATO Ammunition Safety Group (AC/326) Overview with a Focus on Subgroup 5's Areas of Responsibilities

How to Improve the Gender Balance Within the National Armed Forces

Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter Covering the period July 1 September 30

Personnel. Staffing of the Agency's Secretariat. Report by the Director General

NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED Releasable to Afghanistan, Australia, Japan, Jordan, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates. 15 November 2017 IMSM

The NATO Science for Peace and Security (SPS) Programme

University of Wyoming End of Semester Fall 2013 Students by Country & Site

Iraqi Civilian, Police, and Security Forces Casualty Statistics

Forms of Environmental Education in the Armed Forces and their Impact on Creation of Proenvironmental

Advance Notification of forthcoming Market Survey APMS

EUREKA and Eurostars: Instruments for international R&D cooperation

Personnel. Staffing of the Agency's Secretariat

ERASMUS+ current calls. By Dr. Saleh Shalaby

National scholarship programme for foreign students, researchers and lecturers SCHOLARSHIP FOR STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION Guidelines 2018

Summary of the National Reports. of NATO Member and Partner Nations to the NATO Committee on Gender Perspectives

Civilian Deaths & Injuries January to September

COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (CIED) MULTINATIONAL PROGRAM

Update from the NATO EOD Working Group

Fact sheet on elections and membership

Erasmus + program the way towards the global mindset (from the partner countries perspectives)

International Assistance Spending Due to War on Terror. Anita Dancs

WikiLeaks Document Release

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT TO THE NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY S DISTINGUISHED LECTURE PROGRAM. As Prepared for Delivery on Tuesday, September 9, 2008

1. The number of known arms producers has doubled after the end of the cold war.

1 Introduction to ITC-26. Introduction to the ITC and DEPO. October 24 November 11, 2016 Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA Greg Baum

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Second Quarter 2011

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter 2012

Defense Security Cooperation Agency Overseas Contingency Operations Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

5.U.S. and European Museum Infrastructure Support Program

International Recruitment Solutions. Company profile >

Country Requirements for Employer Notification or Approval

First quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6%

WORLDWIDE MANPOWER DISTRIBUTION BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector First Quarter 2011

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter 2011

Korean Government Scholarship Program

Use of Military Force Authorization Language in the 2001 AUMF

Erasmus+ Capacity Building for Higher Education. Erasmus+

PUBLIC. 6393/18 NM/fh/jk DGC 1C LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 March 2018 (OR. en) 6393/18 LIMITE

International Trade. Virginia Economic Development Partnership. Presented By: Ellen Meinhart

25th Annual World s Best Bank Awards 2018

Session: 6, Enduring Network Operational Assessment Framework

ECHA Helpdesk Support to National Helpdesks

***** 2 October 2018 (pre-ministerial day) *****

Defense Security Cooperation Agency Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation New Dawn Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide

TUITION FEE GUIDANCE FOR ERASMUS+ EXCHANGE STUDENTS Academic Year

Information Erasmus Erasmus+ Grant for Study and/or Internship Abroad

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

International Cooperation Types of Activities

Health Workforce Policies in OECD Countries

Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan:

Compensation. Benefits. Expatriation.

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016

INFORMATION ON LICENCES ISSUED FOR BROKERING OF ARMS, MILITARY EQUIPMENT AND DUAL-USE PRODUCTS IN 2008

Call for Proposals 2012

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

Guidelines. STEP travel grants. steptravelgrants.eu

Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries ( )

Healthcare Practice. Healthcare PanelBook 2017

Study Overseas Short-term Mobility Program Scholarships

EUREKA An Exceptional Opportunity to extend Canadian company reach to Europe, Israel and South Korea

2015 Leaders Summit on Peacekeeping Summary of Member-State Commitments United Nations October 2015

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS TEACHING ASSIGNMENT (STA)

Army FY 2015 Inventory of Contracts for Services. Inventory Process

Research on the Global Impact of the Ronald McDonald House Program

Erasmus + Call for proposals Key Action 2 Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (I)

Case 1:05-cv RJL Document Filed 12/03/2008 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT A

PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT

EUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS STAFF TRAINING (STT)

Iraqi Civilian Casualties Estimates

Importance of Export Control & Japan s Export Control

Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions. Piia Heinämäki Erasmus+ Info Day, Lviv Erasmus+

EVC 2018 Statistics. EVC Participants: Geographical breakdown. EVC 2018 : 55 Countries (Total participants :1806)

Spreading knowledge about Erasmus Mundus Programme and Erasmus Mundus National Structures activities among NARIC centers. Summary

Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan:

Making High Speed Broadband Available to Everyone in Finland

Mission Network as the New Joint, Coalition Norm

Erasmus+ Benefits for Erasmus+ Students

The industrial competitiveness of Italian manufacturing

Best Private Bank Awards 2018

THE RIGHT TO CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION IN EUROPE: A Review of the Current Situation Executive Summary

Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Iraq and Afghanistan:

U.S.C ; 5 C.F.R ; 10 U.S.C.

ERASMUS+ INTERNSHIP MOBILITY?

International Credit Mobility Call for Proposals 2018

Erasmus + ( ) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka

The EUREKA Initiative An Opportunity for Industrial Technology Cooperation between Europe and Japan

The ERC funding strategy

Report on Countries That Are Candidates for Millennium Challenge Account Eligibility in Fiscal

FOHNEU and THE E UR OPEAN DIME NS ION. NANTES FR ANC E 7-9 NOVEMB ER 2007 Julie S taun

Transcription:

Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians Susan G. Chesser Information Research Specialist March 10, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41084

Summary This report collects statistics from a variety of sources on casualties sustained during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), which began on October 7, 2001, and is ongoing. OEF actions take place primarily in Afghanistan; however, OEF casualties also includes American casualties in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, the Philippines, Seychelles, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Yemen. Casualty data of U.S. military forces are compiled by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), as tallied from the agency s press releases. Also included are statistics on those wounded but not killed. Statistics may be revised as circumstances are investigated and as records are processed through the U.S. military s casualty system. More frequent updates are available at DOD s website at http://www.defenselink.mil/news/ under Casualty Update. A detailed casualty summary of U.S. military forces that includes data on deaths by cause, as well as statistics on soldiers wounded in action, is available at the following DOD website: http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/casualty/castop.htm. NATO s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) does not post casualty statistics of the military forces of partner countries on the ISAF website at http://www.isaf.nato.int/. ISAF press releases state that it is ISAF policy to defer to the relevant national authorities to provide notice of any fatality. For this reason, this report uses fatality data of coalition forces as compiled by CNN.com and posted online at http://www.cnn.com/specials/2004/oef.casualties/index.html. Reporting on casualties of Afghans did not begin until 2007, and a variety of entities now report the casualties of civilians and security forces members. The United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan (UNAMA) reports casualty data of Afghan civilians semiannually, and the U.S. Department of Defense occasionally includes civilian casualty figures within its reports on Afghanistan. The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, http://www.aihrc.org.af/ 2010_eng/, and the Afghan Rights Monitor, http://www.arm.org.af/, are local watchdog organizations that periodically publish reports regarding civilian casualties. From July 2009 through April 2010, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) included statistics of casualties of members of the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police in its quarterly reports to Congress. SIGAR has ceased this practice, and there is no other published compilation of these statistics. This report now derives casualty figures of Afghan soldiers and police from the press accounts of the Reuters Factbox: Security Developments in Afghanistan series and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. Both services attribute their reported information to officials of the NATO-led ISAF or local Afghan officials. Pajhwok Afghan News frequently concludes its accounts with statements from representatives of the Taliban; however, these figures are not included in this report. Because the estimates of Afghan casualties contained in this report are based on varying time periods and have been created using different methodologies, readers should exercise caution when using them and should look to them as guideposts rather than as statements of fact. This report will be updated as needed. Congressional Research Service

T he following tables present data on U.S. military casualties in Operation Enduring Freedom, deaths of coalition partners in Afghanistan, and Afghan casualties, respectively. Table 1. Operation Enduring Freedom, U.S. Fatalities and Wounded (as of March 10, 2011, 10 a.m. EST from October 7, 2001) Fatalities In and Around Afghanistan a Fatalities in Other Locations b Total Fatalities c Wounded in Action Hostile d 1,145 11 1,156 Non-Hostile e 245 86 331 Total 1,390 97 1,487 Total 10,543 Source: U.S. Department of Defense, http://www.defense.gov/news/casualty.pdf. a. Fatalities in and around Afghanistan includes casualties that occurred in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan. b. Other locations includes casualties that occurred in Guantanamo Bay (Cuba), Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, the Philippines, Seychelles, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Yemen. c. Fatalities include two Department of Defense civilian personnel. d. According to the Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, as amended through 31 August 2005, a hostile casualty is a victim of a terrorist activity or a casualty as the result of combat or attack by any force against U.S. forces, available at http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/dod_dictionary/. e. The above-named reference defines a nonhostile casualty as a casualty that is not directly attributable to hostile action or terrorist activity, such as casualties due to the elements, self-inflicted wounds, or combat fatigue. Table 2. American Casualties by Year through March 10, 2011 Year Total Deaths Total Wounded in Action 2001 11 33 2002 49 74 2003 45 99 2004 52 214 2005 98 267 2006 98 401 2007 117 750 2008 155 793 2009 311 2,144 2010 499 5,222 2011 through March 10 52 546 Source: U.S. Department of Defense, Statistical Information Analysis Division, http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/ personnel/casualty/oefmonth.pdf. Congressional Research Service 1

Table 3. Deaths of Coalition Partners in Afghanistan Country a # of Deaths Country # of Deaths Australia 23 Lithuania 1 Belgium 1 Netherlands 24 Canada 155 New Zealand 3 Czech Republic 3 Norway 9 Denmark 39 Poland 25 Estonia 8 Portugal 2 Finland 2 Romania 17 France 55 South Korea 1 Georgia 6 Spain 30 Germany 48 Sweden 4 Hungary 4 Turkey 2 Italy 33 United Kingdom 359 Latvia 4 Total Non-U.S. Coalition Fatalities 858 Sources: CNN Casualties in Afghanistan, http://www.cnn.com/specials/war.casualties/table.afghanistan.html; Canada s Department of National Defence, http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/news-nouvelles/fallen-disparus/indexeng.asp; United Kingdom Ministry of Defense, http://www.mod.uk/defenceinternet/factsheets/ OperationsFactsheets/OperationsInAfghanistanBritishFatalities.htm; Australia s Department of Defence, http://www.defence.gov.au/op/afghanistan/info/personnel.htm; Factbox: Military Deaths in Afghanistan, Reuters News, February 15, 2011. a. Countries listed indicate the nationality of the military forces, not of the individuals. For example, Fijians who were killed while fighting in French forces are counted as French. Similarly, citizens of other nations who fight in American military forces are counted as Americans. Table 4. Afghan Casualties Group Period # of Casualties Note Afghan Civilians January 2011 a 74 killed 116 injured 2010 b 2,777 killed 4,343 injured These deaths include a member of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and her family, as well as the deputy governor of Kandahar province. Three attacks by suicide bombers or roadside bombs resulted in 50 deaths. Anti-government elements (AGEs), which include the Taliban and other individuals or groups who engage in armed conflict with the government of Afghanistan or members of the International Military Forces, were reported responsible for 75% of the civilian deaths and 78% of civilian injuries. The number of civilians assassinated by AGEs increased 105%, to 462 persons, compared with civilian assassinations in 2009. Congressional Research Service 2

Group Period # of Casualties Note Afghan National Army Afghan National Police 2009 c 2,412 killed 3,566 injured 2008 d 2,118 killed 2007 d 1,523 killed January 2011 e 3 killed 4 wounded 2010 806 killed f 775 wounded g 2009 h 292 killed 859 wounded 2008 i 259 killed 875 wounded 2007 i 278 killed 750 wounded January 2011 e 7 killed 5 wounded 2010 j 1,250 killed 743 wounded 2009 k 639 killed 1,145 wounded 2008 l 724 killed 1,209 wounded 2007 l 688 killed 1,036 wounded 67% of civilian deaths were attributed to actions of AGEs (78% of these deaths were caused by improvised explosive devices and suicide attacks). 25% of civilian deaths were attributed to pro-government forces. 8% of civilian deaths were the result of cross-fire or improperly detonated ordnance. Information released by General Zahir Azimi, spokesman for the Afghan Defence Ministry. Source: Compiled by the Congressional Research Service from noted sources. a. Press reports from Reuters, the Pajhwok Afghan News agency, the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, and Family Vanishes in Attack on Market, The New York Times, January 30, 2011. b. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2010, March 2011, p. i-1, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/ UNAMA/human%20rights/March%20PoC%20Annual%20Report%20Final.pdf. c. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2009, January 2010, p. I, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/ UNAMA/human%20rights/Protection%20of%20Civilian%202009%20report%20English.pdf. Congressional Research Service 3

d. United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, Human Rights Unit, Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2008, January 2009, p. 12, http://unama.unmissions.org/portals/ UNAMA/human%20rights/UNAMA_09february-Annual%20Report_PoC%202008_FINAL_11Feb09.pdf. e. Press reports from Reuters and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. f. Afghan Army Casualties Increase, Pajhwok Afghan News, December 22, 2010; More Than 800 Afghan Soldiers Killed This Year, Army Says, Trend News Agency [Azerbaijan], December 22, 2010. g. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, April 30, 2010, p. 58, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/apr2010/sigarapril_lores.pdf; response via e-mail from the staff of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, August 9, 2010; and press reports from Reuters and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. h. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 55. http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf; Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, October 30, 2009, p. 62, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/ Oct09/pdf/SIGAROct2009Web.pdf; and Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, January 30, 2010, p. 64, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/ quarterlyreports/jan2010/pdf/sigar_jan2010.pdf. i. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 55, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf. j. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, April 30, 2010, p. 64, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/apr2010/sigarapril_lores.pdf; response via e-mail from the staff of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, August 9, 2010; Blast Leaves 2 Afghan Soldiers Dead in Logar, Pajhwok Afghan News, January 8, 2011, and press reports from Reuters and the Pajhwok Afghan News agency. k. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 60, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf; Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, October 30, 2009, p. 66, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/ Oct09/pdf/SIGAROct2009Web.pdf; and Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, January 30, 2010, p. 69, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/ quarterlyreports/jan2010/pdf/sigar_jan2010.pdf. l. Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Quarterly Report to the United States Congress, July 30, 2009, p. 60, http://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/jul09/pdf/report_-_july_2009.pdf. Author Contact Information Susan G. Chesser Information Research Specialist schesser@crs.loc.gov, 7-9547 Congressional Research Service 4