Children s Multidisciplinary Specialty Nephrology Clinic

Similar documents
Analysis of Room Allocation in the Taubman Center Clinic of Internal Medicine

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction. Methods

Analyzing Physician Task Allocation and Patient Flow at the Radiation Oncology Clinic. Final Report

Pediatric Hematology / Oncology Clinic

Proceedings of the 2005 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium Ellen J. Bass, ed.

Final Report. Karen Keast Director of Clinical Operations. Jacquelynn Lapinski Senior Management Engineer

The University of Michigan Health System. Geriatrics Clinic Flow Analysis Final Report

Hospital Name. Medical Record Number: Hours/Days of Operation: Clinic: Physician: Contact Person / Title: Phone: Fax: Hours/Days of Operation:

Summer 2018 Internship Program Position Packet. Our Mission

All related UCare forms can be found, HERE, all DHS forms can be found HERE, all DHS Bulletins can be found HERE.

Medicare Advantage PPO participation Termination - Practice Name (Tax ID #: <TaxID>)

1) Goal Fellows will become competent in caring for renal transplant patients and patients with renal complications of non-renal transplants.

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

Work Effort Analysis

Henry Ford Hospital Inpatient Predictive Model

ROTATION DESCRIPTION

NURSING FACILITY ASSESSMENTS

2013 Physician Inpatient/ Outpatient Revenue Survey

Summary Report of Findings and Recommendations

Beaumont Healthy Kids Program

Analysis of Nursing Workload in Primary Care

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PARKING CONSULTANT TO THE LIBERTY STATION COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION SEPTEMBER 26 TH, 2017

Macomb County Community Mental Health Level of Care Training Manual

The Employer Perspective: Jobs Held by the Milwaukee County Single Parent Population: January 1996-March 1997

Michigan Medicine--Frankel Cardiovascular Center. Determining Direct Patient Utilization Costs in the Cardiovascular Clinic.

University of Michigan Health System. Current State Analysis of the Main Adult Emergency Department

University of Michigan Health System

Northwest Workforce Development Council POLICY AND PROCEDURE DIRECTIVE

Delgado Community College- Charity School of Nursing Fall 2018 Level III Registration Information Please note: ALL Sections are TENTATIVE and subject

CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDIT REQUEST FORMS

Collaborative Care Model. Post-Acute Care / Long-Term care / Sub-Acute Care. Proposal

Enhancing Outcomes with Quality Improvement (QI) October 29, 2015

The Patient-Centered Medical Home & You: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Patients and

Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT): Billing, Codes and Need at Adelante Healthcare

What is the QRUR? Understanding Your Annual Quality and Resource Use Report

Skilled Nursing Facilities in Pennsylvania: Analysis of Total Profit Margins for Freestanding Facilities

Internship Program. Application Submission completed form to: Monica Mitry Membership and Volunteer Coordinator

University of Michigan Health System. Inpatient Cardiology Unit Analysis: Collect, Categorize and Quantify Delays for Procedures Final Report

RPC and OMH Collaborative Care Webinar. February 1, pm

Presentation Outline

Brain Injury Fact Sheet

How High-Touch Care Improves Outcomes and Reduces Costs

Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans For 2015

Society for Health Systems Conference February 20 21, 2004 A Methodology to Analyze Staffing and Utilization in the Operating Room

Quality Improvement/PBLI in Residency Using Continuity Clinic as the Site- APPD Workshop 10

CASE for Kids PARTNERSHIP PROJECT Site Application

Improving Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Collection Rate at Penn Orthopaedics. Joseph Pecha with Finnah Pio Mentor: Patricia Sullivan, Ph.

HIV Counseling and Testing Program Participation Requirements

Neurodegenerative diseases Includes multiple sclerosis, Parkinson s disease, postpolio syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus

Executive Summary...1. Section I Introduction...3

JAMAICA HOSPITAL LAST REVIEW DATE 02/01/2017 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE NOTIFICATION TO PATIENTS POLICY & PROCEDURE

Care Plan Oversight Policy Annual Approval Date

Illinois State Board of Education

Supplementary Online Content

2016 Social Service Funding Application Non-Alcohol Funds

University of Michigan Health System Program and Operations Analysis. Analysis of Pre-Operation Process for UMHS Surgical Oncology Patients

Patient Care during the Recession Online Survey Executive Summary. May 2009

DD WAIVER. New Mexico Medicaid Utilization Review. Presented by. Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Mexico

October 30 th, :00PM EDT. Special Cases in Proposal Development: Large-Scale, Multidisciplinary and/or Multi-Organizational Proposals

University of Michigan Health System Programs and Operations Analysis. Order Entry Clerical Process Analysis Final Report

THE USE OF SIMULATION TO DETERMINE MAXIMUM CAPACITY IN THE SURGICAL SUITE OPERATING ROOM. Sarah M. Ballard Michael E. Kuhl

Children s Multi-Disciplinary Specialty Clinics, Hospitals, Local Health Departments, Medicaid Health Plans

Analysis of Cardiovascular Patient Data during Preoperative, Operative, and Postoperative Phases

Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Changes

ROTATION DESCRIPTION FORM PGY1

Peer Evaluator Team Training

Kent Developmental Assessment Clinic Report, March Bonnie Campbell, RN Barbara Corbin, Early On Coordinator Kent Intermediate School District

LIVE UNITEDTM. Community Impact Grant Application: Instructions and Guidelines FY 2013 GIVE. ADVOCATE. VOLUNTEER. United Way of Central Maryland

Licensed Nurses in Florida: Trends and Longitudinal Analysis

Nursing Manpower Allocation in Hospitals

August 25, Dear Ms. Verma:

Complex Airway Services

Inpatient IOC Checklist Clinical Record Review

Neurosurgery Clinic Analysis: Increasing Patient Throughput and Enhancing Patient Experience

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.2 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.3 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Updated Physician Practice Acquisition Study: National and Regional Changes in Physician Employment March 2018

MERMAID SERIES: SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS: TIPS AND TRICKS

Comparison of Duties and Responsibilities

2012 Report. Client Satisfaction Survey PSA 9 RICK SCOTT. Program Services, Direct Service Workers, and. Impact of Programs on Lives of Clients

Residency Programs West Los Angeles VA Health Care Center

3 Ways to Increase Patient Visits

Medicaid Managed Specialty Supports and Services Concurrent 1915(b)/(c) Waiver Program FY 17 Attachment P7.9.1

2012 QUALITY ASSURANCE ANNUAL REPORT Executive Summary

Lean Six Sigma DMAIC Project (Example)

FindACode.com Presents: Integrating NPP into E/M for Compliance and Quality Care. Excerpts from:

Five-Year Fiscal Forecast FY FY 2021

The Samuel Bronfman Department of Medicine. Carolina Department of Medicine. Luis Rivera, MBA Director of Finance

Genetics Elective Rotation Expectations and Procedures

ODP Communication Number

American Health Lawyers Association Continuing Education Request Form Annual Meeting June 25-27, 2018

MDS 3.0 Section Q Implementation Questions and Answers from Informing LTC Choice conference and s September 22, 2010

CAMBRIDGE TECHNICALS PROVISIONAL EXAMINATION TIMETABLE JANUARY 2019

Proposed Standards Revisions Related to Pain Assessment and Management

The Impact of Physician Quality Measures on the Coding Process

xwzelchzz April 20, 2009

Our Services Include. Our Credentials

New Fairfield Primary Care and Pediatrics

January 4, Dear Applicant,

MACOMB COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ANNUAL EVALUATION, FISCAL YEAR 2009 ANNUAL PLAN, FISCAL

Transcription:

Children s Multidisciplinary Specialty Nephrology Clinic The University of Michigan Health System Program and Operations Analysis Industrial and Operations Engineering 481 Kelly Wairo Joseph Hudkins Anne Braztel December 9th 1997

Executive Summary ii Introduction 1 Approaches and Methodology 2 Data Collection 2 Database Research 2 Current Situation 5 Findings and Conclusions 5 Recommendations 1 Action Plan 11 Table of Contents The University of Michigan Health System

The University of Michigan Health System Executive Summary Background The state of Michigan formed Children s Multidisciplinary Specialty (CMS) clinics for children having chronic or handicapping medical conditions. These clinics provide a coordinated interdisciplinary approach to the treatment and management of these conditions through the use of a five-member core team. The CMS Nephrology clinic has requested a study be done to quantify the amount of time in which a psychologist will be required to be present in the clinic. The Goal The goal of this study is to help in the scheduling of the psychologist that will be added to the CMS core team in the near future. This report will also serve as a base line to compare future time study data. Recommendations The following recommendations represent the best opportunity to utilize the time of the professionals associated with the Nephrology CMS core team. Employ the use of XX psychologist hours to complete required comprehensive visits Schedule comprehensive visits during predetermined clinic hours Staff psychologist only on days in which comprehensive visits wifi be preformed Explore the possibility of a single psychologist working for multiple CMS clinics Report Content The following report consists of: an analysis of the distribution of CMS visits by type, by day and by month, data regarding contact time with patient as well as patient wait time recommendations to improve utilization of resources and a general operational overview of the Nephrology CMS clinic 11

The University of Michigan Health System Introduction and Background The state of Michigan formed Children s Multidisciplinary Specialty (CMS) clinics for recipients of Medicaid and Children s Special Health Care Services (CSHCS). CMS clinical services are reserved for patients whose medical condition is of a severe and chronic or handicapping nature where complex coordinated assessment and management is required. CMS clinics provide a coordinated interdisciplinary approach to assessment and management of some complex medical conditions through the use of a core staff team. The core team consists of a doctor, nurse, dietitian, social worker and psychologist. Children receiving care through the CMS clinic service begin their treatment with a comprehensive visit. During the comprehensive appointment, the child meets with all five members of the core team. After which, the core team compiles an integrated report outlining the course of action or plan for treatment for the next year. Throughout the year, patients will return for Management and Support visits. During a management visit, the child meets with the doctor or nurse, and two other members of the core team; while during a support visit, the patient meets with only one member of the team. Currently, there are 15 different specialized Pediatric clinics at the University of Michigan Health System. These clinics occupy the same area as Pediatric clinics that are not associated with CMS. The Pediatric Nephrology clinic and the CMS Nephrology clinic see patients at the same time. The CMS clinics have requested studies in several areas including: billing procedures evaluation of patient projections how to schedule the clinics how to identify CMS patients Due to the short time frame available to accomplish this project, the team narrowed the objective and concentrated on quantifying the amount of time when a psychologist must be present. However, while collecting data, observations were made in an attempt to identify future projects, and findings of relevant data are noted. The purpose of this project was to study and document the work flow and work requirements within the CMS clinic. This project analyzed the operations performed by each core staff member. The project team determined the amount of time a psychologist is needed for comprehensive visits.

The University of Michigan Health System Approach and Methodology In determining the need for a psychologist in the CMS Nephrology Clinic, the team collected direct time data observations and analyzed historical clinic appointments. Direct time data collections occurred over 9 observation sessions between Thursday October 23, 1997 and Tuesday, November 18, 1997. The team observed 7 of 19 comprehensive visits (36.8%) and 8 of 33 management visits (24.2%) during this time frame. The historical data was obtained from the CMS Nephrology clinic and contained information on the date and type of CMS visits that have occurred from when the clinic opened in July 1996 through October 1997. Data Collection Time ladders generated during data collection, begin when the patient entered the room and indicate the times when a medical professional would enter or leave the room (Figure 1). From these, the time each patient spent in the clinic, the amount of waiting time and the amount of contact time with each professional could be quantified. The CMS Nephrology clinic estimates only five management or support visits have required the use of a psychologist since the clinic opened in July of 1996; Therefore, recommendations will focus on the comprehensive data. Figure 1. Example Time Ladder; source: Direct Observation Oct. 23 Thursday Comprehensive Patient Enter 1:15 Nurse Enter 1:2 Diet Enter 1:25 Diet Exit 1:27 Diet Enter 1:38 Diet Exit 1:39 Nurse Exit 1:37 Dr. Enter 1:45 Dr. Exit 1:54 SW Enter 1:55 SW Exit 11:5 Patient Exit 11:7 Database Research The Nephrology database contained information on 113 CMS visits from July 1, 1996 through October 23, 1997. This information was used to determine any possible patterns in appointment types and to determine the distribution of CMS visits. This information is summarized in Table 1 and shown graphically in Figure 2. Tuesdays averaged the highest number of CMS visits; followed by Monday and Thursday respectively. 2

Table 1. Summary of CMS visits. Source: CMS Nephrology database The University of Michigan Health System Average Minimum Maxim urn Standard Deviation Total All CMS Comprehensive Management visits I month per month per month 69.88 15.81 25.13 17 1 6 96 39 47 18.94 1118 9.67 253 1.7 42 Support per month 29. 1 56 15.8 464 Figure 2. Average visits per day; CMS Nephrology, July 96 October 97. Source: CMS Nephrology Clinic. Ava cdistribitiad CMS Visits thrcuxut the Week, ) > I 1 a,. E z 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. 3.768.333 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Day of the Week The number of Management and Support visits has been rising linearly throughout the 1997 calendar year (Figures 3 and 4). However, a slightly cyclical trend has developed for Comprehensive visits. This may be explained by the large influx of Comprehensive visits when the clinic first opened, and the required yearly renewal of Comprehensive visits for these patients (Figure 5). 3

The University of Michigan Health System Figure 3. Management visits by month. Source: CMS Nephrology clinic database. 5 4 - /\ 3 T otol M anagement Visits Per M onth ZN 2 1 qb qb q qb qb cc cc cc cc.y C I 4 c Month qa Figure 4. Support visits by month. Source: CMS Nephrology clinic database. Total Support Visits Per Month Month cf FigureS. Comprehensive visits by month. Source: CMS Nephrology clinic database. C, 4. Td Oni emtsmi1h >43 o3d I.1o CD CD CO CD CD CD t - F t F F.- 1 F. F.- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 - I I i i i. i i i, i i i ) - ) Ci > C.) C. > C C3). D Cl) Cl) ccl ) J (Cl, (1) o <U) Z ) LL < <U) Q bih 4

- The University of Michigan Health System Current Situation State requirements assert that a Doctor, Nurse, Dietitian, Social Worker and Psychologist must see patients during a CMS Nephrology comprehensive visit. Currently, the state allows the CMS team to use a survey to complete a psychological evaluation. This survey is given to the parents and patients that are at least nine years of age and serves as a supplement to actually seeing the psychologist. For the patient s convenience, current scheduling practices allow Comprehensive visits to be scheduled at any time the CMS clinic is open (Figure 6). Figure 6. Shaded areas indicate times when CMS Nephrology clinic sees patients. DAY Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Morning Afternoon *The first Thursday morning of the month is a special clinic for Hypertension; the third Thursday of the month is a special clinic for PKD and the fourth Thursday clinic is for Nephrology/Rheumatology patients. Findings and Conclusions Analysis of the database yielded information on the number of CMS visits that have occurred during the last 15 months. Figure 6 shows the number of comprehensive visits that occurred each day. Figures 7 and 8 show the number of management and support visits, respectively. Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday have the highest demand for all CMS and particularly comprehensive visits. While there have been a few visits on Wednesdays and Fridays, these numbers are much lower. 5

The University of Michigan Health System Figure 6. Comprehensive Visits by day of the week. Source: CMS Nephrology database. Average distribution of Corn prehensive visits throughout the Week 5. 4. 3. 2 1217 E.855.783 Z Z V...87 1 2 3 4 5 Average Number per Day Figure 7. Management Visits by day of the week. Source: CMS Nephrology database Average Distribution of Management Visits Throughout the Week I, 5. 4. 3. 2 1.435 :J L.i.638 1,.145 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Average Number per Day Figure 8. Support Visits by day of the week. Source: CMS Nephrology database Average Distribution of Support Visits Throughout the Week 5. 4. 3. 2. z 1.522.11. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Day 6

The University of Michigan Health System Figure 9. Total CMS Visits by month. Source: CMS Nephrology database Total Visits Per Month.s c c Month? *October data estimated through end of month. Figure 9 shows the monthly distribution of all CMS visits. The number of visits during August 1996 appears to be an outlier and the October 1997 available data ended on the 23 and was pro-rated to the end of the month. Additionally, the number of CMS visits per month has been relatively constant since February 1997. However, the types of visits have fluctuated. Since September 1996, the number of comprehensive visits has remained below 2 per month (Figure 1). With the exception of October 1997, the average number of comprehensive visits is less than five per week. Figure 1. Number of Comprehensive visits per month. Source: CMS Nephrology database. Total Comprehensive Visits Per Month 5 / * October data estimated through end of month. Month The state requires a certain amount of contact time for each type of visit. Contact time has been defined here as the total time spent with each professional. Therefore, if two professionals were present in the room at the same time, then contact time may exceed the time spent in the room. A comprehensive visit must include at least one hour with medical professionals, and management and support visits must be at least 3 minutes of contact time. Figure 11 shows each visit observed as a percentage of the 7

Support 57.15% 5.% 5.% Type of Visit Table 2. Compliance with State Requirements. Source: Direct Observations. required time. From this, one can see that some patients did not receive the required amount of contact time (Table 2). During comprehensive visits, the axidition of a face-toface visit with the psychologist is expected to. increase the total contact time. Figure 11. Contact time vs. State requirements. Source: Direct Observations. Contact Time State Required Percentage of Visits Percentage of Total Patient wait time refers to the time in which the patient was alone in the examination room without a professional present. The total amount of patient wait time Minutes Table 3. Patient Wait Time in Examination Room. Source: Direct Observations. is quantified in Table 3 and shown graphically in Figurel2 and 13. 36.8% 24.2% 8.% Visits Observed Patient Visits Meeting State Required Amount of Time The University of Michigan Health System 3.% 25.% 2.% o E 15.% C 5.%.%. 1.% Minimum 4 Maximum 47 Average 2 Standard Deviation 1.566 3 Minutes 3 Minutes Comprehensive Management 6 Minutes Meeting State Requirement ±I ij UiIiIUJii+II 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 111121314151617 8 Lii Ii

C Figure 12. Figure 13. 2 E2:O :5 :43 :36 :28 Patient Wait time in Examination Room The University of Michigan HealthSystem I- I.! 1:3 Patient Wait Time Vs. Time With at Least One Professional Type of Visit (Support, Management, Comprehensive) : S S MM M MM C :7 :14 :21 MMMCCC CCC 3: 2:3. 1: :3 : S S M M M N M M M M C C C C C C C Type of Visit (Support, Management, Comprehensive) I Time with at Least One Professional Patient Wait Time 9