UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES LONG TERM TRENDS ( )

Similar documents
ARL ACADEMIC LAW LIBRARY STATISTICS

ARL ACADEMIC HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY STATISTICS

ARL SUPPLEMENTARY STATISTICS A COMPILATION OF STATISTICS FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES

Student Tuition & Fees

Tuition, Fees, and Room & Board Rates Academic Year

CAIR Conference Anaheim, CA, Nov. 6-9, 2012

U.S. Patents Awarded in 2005 Top 20 Universities

Rankings of the States 2017 and Estimates of School Statistics 2018

Grants 101: An Introduction to Federal Grants for State and Local Governments

2013 U. of Iowa 86% 85% 87% 2014 U. of Colorado Boulder 84% 86% 86% U. of Nebraska Lincoln 84% 83% 82%

Fiscal Research Center

Institutional Directions and Challenges:

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Fiscal Research Center

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data December 2016

HOPE NOW State Loss Mitigation Data September 2014

How North Carolina Compares

Fiscal Research Center

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Unemployment Rate (%) Rank State. Unemployment

Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profits of U. S. Lotteries, FY 2002

How North Carolina Compares

Rutgers Revenue Sources

Washburn University. Faculty Salary Analysis

US News and World Report Rankings Graduate Economics Programs Ranked in 2001

REPORT ON THE STATUS OF FACULTY SALARIES AT KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY

HathiTrust Shared Print Program Report to PAN Meeting 6/23/2017. Lizanne Payne Shared Print Program Officer

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

Arizona State Funding Project: Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge Executive Summary. Research conducted by Education Resource Strategies

President Dennis Assanis

TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS

N A S S G A P Academic Year. 43rd Annual Survey Report on State-Sponsored Student Financial Aid

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PEER INSTITUTION ANALYSIS February 27, 2004

Illinois Higher Education Executive Compensation Analysis

Table 2 Overall Heterodox-Adjusted Rankings for Ph.D.-Granting Institutions in Economics

PRESS RELEASE Media Contact: Joseph Stefko, Director of Public Finance, ;

STATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INDEX

MAP 1: Seriously Delinquent Rate by State for Q3, 2008


Assist users with FAEIS Generate reports for users

Index of religiosity, by state

2015 State Hospice Report 2013 Medicare Information 1/1/15

University of Maryland-Baltimore County

Saint Louis University Library Collections: Usage and Expenditures Present

Table 8 Online and Telephone Medicaid Applications for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January 2017

2016 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

Initial (one-time) Membership Fee 10,000 Renewal Fee (every 8 years) $3500

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Aspirational and Operational Peers

Larry DeBoer Purdue University September Real GDP Growth. Real Consumption Spending Growth

Appendix A: Carnegie 2010 Classifications and SHEEO Groupings 2010 Carnegie Classification

IU Bloomington Peer Retention & Graduation Rate Comparisons

How. January. Prepared by

FOOD STAMP PROGRAM STATE ACTIVITY REPORT

Fiscal Year Tuition and Fee Comparisons for UNC Peer Institutions

EXHIBIT A. List of Public Entities Participating in FEDES Project

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

The Welding Industry: A National Perspective on Workforce Trends and Challenges (Updated in February 2010)

November 24, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

The Regional Economic Outlook

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Date: 5/25/2012. To: Chuck Wyatt, DCR, Virginia. From: Christos Siderelis

Table 1 Elementary and Secondary Education. (in millions)

Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. STATE ACTIVITY REPORT Fiscal Year 2016

2014 Salary and Benefits Report

Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 2016

The number of masters degrees awarded for all program areas at Land-grant institutions rose by 11,318 degrees (18%).

States Ranked by Annual Nonagricultural Employment Change October 2017, Seasonally Adjusted

Fiscal Year 1999 Comparisons. State by State Rankings of Revenues and Spending. Includes Fiscal Year 2000 Rankings for State Taxes Only

Selection & Retention Of State Judges. Methods from Across the Country

Weekly Market Demand Index (MDI)

Table 6 Medicaid Eligibility Systems for Children, Pregnant Women, Parents, and Expansion Adults, January Share of Determinations

Valuing the Invaluable: A New Look at State Estimates of the Economic Value of Family Caregiving (Data Update)

List of Association of American Universities (AAU) Member Institutions

Sharing of Data Between Agencies. Date: August 31, 2011 [ INSERT TOPIC NAME ] [ INSERT YEAR MONTH DD ]

THE STATE OF GRANTSEEKING FACT SHEET

Fathers of Neoliberalism:

National Study of Nonprofit-Government Contracts and Grants 2013: State Profiles

Louisville Cardinal Editors. Dr. James Ramsey, President, University of Louisville

5 x 7 Notecards $1.50 with Envelopes - MOQ - 12

Interstate Pay Differential

Percentage of Enrolled Students by Program Type, 2016

Registration Priority for Athletes -- Survey of Universities Updated February 2007 Alice Poehls, UNC Chapel Hill

50 STATE COMPARISONS

WIA STATE ALLOCATION REPORT

Estimated Economic Impacts of the Small Business Jobs and Tax Relief Act National Report

Yes, institutions can nominate a person who was previously nominated, provided they still meet the eligibility requirements of the program.

Artist Grant Program 2018

Education and Related Spending per Completion

COMPARING COLLEGES. Allergic Living compares the food allergy and celiac practices of 32 universities and colleges across the United States.

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES LONG TERM TRENDS (2006-2015) Based on ARL and IPEDS Statistics Prepared by Strategic Assessment Unit, ULS August 2016 1

2 Summary University of Pittsburgh data includes ULS, Law and Health Services libraries Most analyses show data for 2006-2015. Small number of analyses include data for 2012-2015 or 2015 only (to reflect new data points collected by ARL* and IPEDS) Pitt data is also shown in context of selected peer and aspirational peer institutions *ARL Statistics Analytics. ARL Statistics 2014-15. August 10, 2016. Distributed by the Association of Research Libraries: Washington, DC, https://www.arlstatistics.org/ analytics. The data presented in these charts is not an attempt to measure a library s services, quality of collections, or success in meeting the needs of users. In comparing any individual library to ARL medians or other ARL members, evaluations must always be made within the context of local goals and characteristics."

ARL INVESTMENT INDEX 3

4 ARL Investment Index University of Pi.sburgh ARL Investment Index Rank: 2006-2015 Rank Linear (Rank) 1 6 11 ARL Rank 16 21 31 31 30 31 29 36 34 33 33 33 26 31 36

5 ARL Investment Index Ranking AspiraDonal Peers ARL Investment Index Rank: 2006-2015 Rank 1 6 11 16 21 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA 26 PITTSBURGH 31 VIRGINIA 36 WISCONSIN

6 ARL Investment Index Ranking Peers ARL Investment Index Rank: 2006-2015 1 11 21 DELAWARE MARYLAND Rank 31 41 51 61 71 OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 81 SUNY-BUFFALO

EXPENDITURES 7

8 Expenditures 1 $35,000,000.00 Pitt Nominal and Inflation Adjusted (CPI) Total Expenditure $30,000,000.00 $25,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $15,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $5,000,000.00 Total Expenditure (Nominal) Expenditure adjusted for inflation (to 2004 values) $- 2004 2005

9 Expenditures 2 Pi. Nominal Expenditures by Category: 2006-2015 $18,000,000 $16,000,000 Collections Staff Operations $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0

10 Expenditures 3 Pi. Expenditure by Category as Percentage of Total: 2006-2015 60.00 50.00 Collections Staff Operations % of Total Expenditure 40.00 30.00 20.00 47.14 41.03 48.30 40.11 46.93 39.60 47.13 42.73 49.81 38.68 48.35 41.49 45.82 37.36 47.70 38.19 52.01 37.89 49.15 38.32 10.00 11.82 11.59 13.47 10.14 11.50 10.16 16.82 14.11 10.10 12.53 0.00

11 Expenditures 4 InflaDon Adjusted Expenditure per Student, 2006-2015, adjusted to 2006 values) Total Expenditure Linear (Total Expenditure) $1,000 $800 $600 811.7 811.3 805.5 769.8 766.6 698.0 735.3 747.8 728.2 776.2 $400 $200 $0

12 Expenditures: peer comparison 1 $60,000,000 Peers: Total Expenditure 2006-2015 DELAWARE $50,000,000 MARYLAND $40,000,000 OHIO STATE $30,000,000 $20,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $10,000,000 RUTGERS $0 SUNY-BUFFALO

13 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 1 AspiraDonal Peers: Total Expenditure 2006-2015 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH $20,000,000 VIRGINIA $10,000,000 WISCONSIN $0

14 Expenditures: peer comparison 2 Peers: Total Materials Expenditure 2006-2015 $25,000,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND $20,000,000 OHIO STATE $15,000,000 $10,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $5,000,000 RUTGERS $0 SUNY-BUFFALO

15 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 2 $30,000,000 AspiraDonal Peers: Total Materials Expenditure 2006-2015 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA $15,000,000 $10,000,000 PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $5,000,000 $0

16 Expenditures: peer comparison 3 Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages 2006-2015 $14,000,000 DELAWARE $12,000,000 MARYLAND $10,000,000 OHIO STATE $8,000,000 $6,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $4,000,000 RUTGERS $2,000,000 SUNY-BUFFALO $0

17 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 3 $16,000,000 AspiraDonal Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages 2006-2015 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $0

Expenditures: peer comparison 4 18

19 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 4

COLLECTIONS 20

21 Collections 1 Pittsburgh Collections 2015* Collections Physical Digital Books 5,854,062 1,367,915 Databases N/A 565 Media 455,126 73,695 *as reported to IPEDS

22 Collections 2 Peers: Volumes Held 2006-2015 Volumes Held 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 1,000,000 0 SUNY-BUFFALO

23 Collections 3 AspiraDonal Peers: Volumes Held 2006-2015 16,000,000 14,000,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN 12,000,000 Volumes Held 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA 0 WISCONSIN

24 Collections 4 Peers: E-book Holdings 2012-2015 1,400,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 PITTSBURGH MARYLAND OHIO STATE SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS PENNSYLVANIA STATE

25 Collections 5 AspiraDonal Peers: E-book Holdings 2012-2015 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 MICHIGAN NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH WISCONSIN ILLINOIS, URBANA MINNESOTA VIRGINIA

26 COLLECTIONS USE AND DELIVERY

27 Circulation 1 Pittsburgh Circulation in 2015 Physical items E-books and digital media 175,898* 2,932,028+ *excludes ILL, reserves and renewals + as reported to IPEDS

28 Circulation 2 14.00 Pi. Library CirculaDon per Student: 2006-2015 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 12.82 10.49 9.94 10.14 8.28 8.29 6.92 6.26 4.86 5.04 0.00 2015 circulation of E-books and digital media was 83.9 per student

29 Circulation 3 700,000 600,000 500,000 Peers IniDal CirculaDons: 2006-2015 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE Circulations 400,000 300,000 200,000 PENNSYLVAN IA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 100,000 0 SUNY- BUFFALO % change since 2006 Delaware Maryland Ohio State Pennsylvania State Pittsburgh Rutgers SUNY- Buffalo 31.2 58.9 15.6 45.5 58.9 37.0 60.9

30 Circulation 4 AspiraDonal Peers IniDtal CirculaDons: 2006-2015 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN % change since 2006 Illinois, Urbana Michigan Minnesota North Carolina Pi.sburgh Virginia Wisconsin 23.4 30.5 45.7 33.3 58.9 63. 1 44.4

31 Inter Library Loans 1 80000 Pi.sburgh ILL Lending and Borrowing: 2006-2015 70000 Lending Borrowing Number of ILL transactions 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013* 2014 2015 *2013 data not available

32 Inter Library Loans 2 Peers: ILL Lending: 2006-2015 180,000 DELAWARE ILL Transactions 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANI A STATE PITTSBURGH 40,000 20,000 RUTGERS 0 SUNY- BUFFALO 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

33 Inter Library Loans 3 AspiraDonal Peers: ILL Lending: 2006-2015 ILL Transactions 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA 20,000 0 WISCONSIN 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

34 Inter Library Loans 4 Peers: ILL Borrowing: 2006-2015 ILL Transactionsis 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 10,000 0 SUNY-BUFFALO 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

35 Inter Library Loans 5 AspiraDonal Peers: ILL Borrowing: 2006-2015 ILL Transactions 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURG H VIRGINIA 10,000 0 WISCONSIN 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

36 Downloads 1 10,000,000 9,000,000 Peers: Successful Full-text ArDcle Requests 2012-2015 8,000,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 - PITTSBURGH MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS DELAWARE

37 Downloads 2 AspiraDonal Peers: Full-text ArDcle Requests 2012-2015 12,000,000 10,000,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH WISCONSIN NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA MINNESOTA ILLINOIS, URBANA

38 Downloads 3 Peers: Successful Full-text ArDcle Requests per Patron 2012-2015 300.0 250.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 234.1 254.4 249.9 272.3 130.7 130.3 119.2 99.2 122.6 97.2 88.6 87.7 PITTSBURGH MARYLAND SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE 39.8 101.2 30.3 36.7 93.4 91.0 74.9 70.7 53.1 47.3 40.9 43.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A DELAWARE

39 Downloads 4 AspiraDonal Peers: Successful Full-text ArDcle Requests per Patron 2012-2015 300.00 250.00 2012 2013 2014 2015 200.00 150.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 234.07 254.38 249.92 272.32 226.03 165.55 172.44 203.43 PITTSBURGH MICHIGAN WISCONSIN ILLINOIS, URBANA 170.25 143.53 162.36 135.99 #N/A 63.64 110.72 165.15 128.08 144.70 104.86 160.40 NORTH CAROLINA 91.55 101.16 106.82 #N/A VIRGINIA 39.42 #N/A 116.98 MINNESOTA

40 Database searches 1 Peers: Database Searches 2012-2015 14,000,000 12,000,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - MARYLAND OHIO STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO PENNSYLVANIA STATE DELAWARE

41 Database searches 2 AspiraDonal Peers: Database Searches 2012-2015 60,000,000 50,000,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 ILLINOIS, URBANA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA MINNESOTA

42 Database searches 3 Peers: Databse Searches per Patron 2012-2015 350.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0-285.0 332.6 323.7 327.1 236.0 198.5 227.7 111.4 166.0 155.2 161.3 159.7 157.1 147.2 137.4 MARYLAND PITTSBURGH SUNY-BUFFALO OHIO STATE DELAWARE RUTGERS PENNSYLVANIA STATE 106.5 71.4 75.0 73.4 52.0 34.6 45.0 96.6 147.5 37.8 40.4 #N/A 5.2

43 Database searches 4 AspiraDonal Peers: Database Searches per Patron 2012-2015 1,200.0 1,000.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 800.0 600.0 400.0 200.0-286.2 489.5 509.2 473.2 265.8 328.6 287.9 798.4 WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH NORTH CAROLINA 236.0 198.5 227.7 111.4 220.7 249.0 197.0 296.0 54.5 98.7 137.1 95.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A 163.0 #N/A 1249.45 1023.09 VIRGINIA MINNESOTA ILLINOIS, URBANA 948.71

44 INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTION SERVICES

45 Reference 1 200,000 Pi.sburgh Reference TransacDons, 2006-2015 180,000 160,000 140,000 PITTSBURGH Linear (PITTSBURGH) 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 -

46 Reference 2 Peers: Reference TransacDons: 2006-2015 Transactions 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANI A STATE PITTSBURGH 100000 RUTGERS 50000 SUNY- BUFFALO 0 % change from 2006 or earliest available data* DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE* PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO 9.0 95.6 64.3 71.0 70.7 48.1 51.1

47 Reference 3 AspiraDonal Peers: Reference TransacDons: 2006-2015 300,000 250,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Transactions 200,000 150,000 100,000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH 50,000 VIRGINIA - WISCONSIN % change from 2006 or earliest available data* ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN* MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN* 60.5 39.7 80.8 37.4 70.7 45.0 11.0

48 Presentations 1 Peers: PresentaDons to Groups: 2006-2015 Presentations 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO

49 Presentations 2 AspiraDonal Peers: PresentaDons to Groups: 2006-2015 3000 2500 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Presentations 2000 1500 1000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH 500 VIRGINIA 0 WISCONSIN

50 Presentations 3 Peers: PresentaDon ParDcipants: 2006-2015 100,000 90,000 DELAWARE Participants 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 10,000 - SUNY-BUFFALO

51 Presentations 4 AspiraDonal Peers: PresentaDon ParDcipants: 2006-2015 45,000 40,000 35,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Participants 30,000 25,000 20,000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA 15,000 PITTSBURGH 10,000 5,000 VIRGINIA - WISCONSIN

STAFF 52

53 Staff 1 Pi. Staffing Levels, 2006-2015 350 300 Support Staff Professional Staff 250 Number of Staff 200 150 172 174 173 171 155 144 138 138 137 139 100 50 120 122 120 121 118 122 118 113 110 105 0

54 Staff 2 Peers: Professional and Support Staff 2006-2015 600 DELAWARE 500 MARYLAND 400 OHIO STATE Totstf 300 200 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 100 SUNY-BUFFALO 0

55 Staff 3 $16,000,000 AspiraDonal Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages 2006-2015 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $0

56 Staff 4 Peer insdtudons: % professional staff 2006-2015 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO 0.0

57 Staff 5 AspiraDonal peer insdtudons: % professional staff 2006-2015 70.0 60.0 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN 50.0 MINNESOTA 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN 0.0