ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTERS 2016 END-OF-YEAR SLIDES

Similar documents
Engineering Research Centers: Linking Discovery to Innovation

Study Abroad at Carnegie Mellon University Academic Year Office of International Education

Compensation. Benefits. Expatriation.

Country Requirements for Employer Notification or Approval

THE NATIONAL INVESTMENT IN RESEARCH. Professor Vicki Sara Chair, Australian Research Council

BRIDGING GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES 2018

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Global

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey

Higher Education May 2017 INTERNATIONAL FACTS AND FIGURES

Rank Name of School Score Country. 8 University of Michigan Ann Arbor United States. 9 Texas A&M University 200.

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey United States. A Manpower Research Report

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Australia

International Cooperation Types of Activities

Generosity of R&D Tax Incentives

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey

THE WORLD BANK EXPERIENCE ON RESEARCH & INNOVATION IN THE WESTERN BALKANS

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Global

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Global

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey United States

Advancement Division

Pure Michigan Export Program Opening New Doors for Michigan Exporters

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

MEASURING R&D TAX INCENTIVES

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Czech Republic

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey India. A Manpower Research Report

OCS Ministry of Economy

FPT University of Vietnam Scholarships

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey India. A Manpower Research Report

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report

International Recruitment Solutions. Company profile >

FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot: Sixth Progress Report One Year into the Initiative

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey New Zealand

Options for Attracting Research Students to Australia

DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN of CONFERENCE ATTENDEES

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Hong Kong

President Dennis Assanis

Public Private Partnership: Building Innovation Ecosystem

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey India

Andy Grove Scholarship for Intel Employees' Children Q&A

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Singapore

Best Private Bank Awards 2018

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Hong Kong

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Australia

ETH Zurich Cooperation with China

Chile: International Cooperation in S&T

Health Workforce Policies in OECD Countries

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Ireland. A Manpower Research Report

International ICT data collection, dissemination and challenges

OVERVIEW Agency for Science, Technology and Research. February 2017

OECD Information Technology Outlook 2010 Highlights

Welcome to Ascom Wireless Solutions. Integrated Workflow Intelligence. Kent Badenfors, Area Sales manager CEE and Brazil

Demographics, Skills Gaps, and Market Dynamics

7 th Model ASEM in conjunction with the 11 th ASEM Summit (ASEM11) 20 Years of ASEM: Partnership for the Future through Connectivity

INNOVATION & ECONOMIC GROWTH: RATIONALES FOR A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY

International Trade. Virginia Economic Development Partnership. Presented By: Ellen Meinhart

Knowledge Based Capital. in a Company. Stefan Dobrev OECD 13 th February Innovation Sweet-spot

Q4/13. Contents. Hong Kong Employment Outlook. Global Employment Outlook. About the Survey. About ManpowerGroup. Sector Comparisons

The Educational Activities Board and Region 10

Tier 4 visa application guidance applying outside the UK (entry clearance)

Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter Covering the period July 1 September 30

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Australia

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Second Quarter 2011

University of Wyoming End of Semester Fall 2013 Students by Country & Site

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey Global. A Manpower Research Report

Fulbright Scholar Research Opportunities

MISC PMT. Should Mean More Than Just an Anagram. Mike Konrad Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University. September 18, 2006

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey South Africa

EUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17

INCENTIVES AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS TO FOSTER PRIVATE SECTOR INNOVATION. Jerry Sheehan. Introduction

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector First Quarter 2011

THE RIGHT PLACE THE RIGHT TIME THE RIGHT PEOPLE

Intel Involved Matching Grant Program Procedure for Eligibility Application

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey New Zealand. A Manpower Research Report

Healthcare Practice. Healthcare PanelBook 2017

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter 2012

Global Workforce Trends. Quarterly Market Report September 2017

Personnel. Staffing of the Agency's Secretariat. Report by the Director General

Manpower Employment Outlook Survey Switzerland

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY REPORTING TEMPLATE

Research on the Global Impact of the Ronald McDonald House Program

The business is on a growth trajectory and central to this growth is the need to attract successful recruitment consultants.

Brokerage for the first ProSafe Call Dina Carrilho Call Secretariat Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portugal

ManpowerGroup Employment Outlook Survey Canada

Dietitians-nutritionists around the World

The Present State of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Russia

1 Introduction to ITC-26. Introduction to the ITC and DEPO. October 24 November 11, 2016 Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA Greg Baum

Implementation of the System of Health Accounts in OECD countries

World University Rankings

BE MOBILE! > L AUNCH BREAK < FROM 15 TH TO 30 TH NOVEMBER THE PROFESSORS PROMOTING PRESENT PARTNER SCHOOLS

Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter 2011

Q Manpower. Employment Outlook Survey New Zealand. A Manpower Research Report

Exploiting International Life Science Opportunities. Dafydd Davies

Rank Institution Name 1 California Institute of Technology 2 University of Oxford 2 Stanford University 4 Harvard University 5 Massachusetts

STATE EXPORT REPORT US-CHINA BUSINESS COUNCIL GOODS AND SERVICES EXPORTS BY US STATES TO CHINA OVER THE PAST DECADE APRIL 2018

Transcription:

ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTERS 2016 END-OF-YEAR SLIDES

i. 19 ERCs Referenced in Slides 1 5 ERC for Integrated Access Networks at the University of Arizona (CIAN) NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST) Engineering Research Center for Bio-mediated and Bioinspired Geotechnics (CBBG) Center for Biorenewable Chemicals at Iowa State University (IOWA) Lighting Enabled Systems & Applications at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (LESA) Engineering Research Center for Compact and Efficient Fluid Power at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanomanufacturing Systems for Mobile Computing and Mobile Energy Technologies (NASCENT) ERC for Revolutionizing Metallic Biomaterials at North Carolina A&T State University (NCAT) Future Renewable Electric Energy and Management Systems Center at North Carolina State University (FREEDM) ERC on Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment at Princeton University (MIRTHE) NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology Enabled Water Treatment Systems (NEWT) Power Optimization for Electro-Thermal Systems (POETS) ERC for Quantum Energy and Sustainable Solar Technologies (QESST) ERC for Re-inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure Engineering Research Center for Structured Organic Particulate Systems (C-SOPS) Synthetic Biology ERC at the University of California, Berkeley (SynBERC) NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Translational Applications of Nanoscale Multiferroic Systems (TANMS) ERC for Ultra-wide-area Resilient Electric Energy Transmission Network (CURENT) Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering (CSNE)

ii. Annualized ERCs on slides 1 5 include the 19 ERCs from the previous slide and the following additional 5 ERCs Quality of Life Technology Engineering Research Center at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Northeastern University Subsurface Sensing and Imaging Systems (CenSSIS) ERC for Biomimetic MicroElectronic Systems at the University of Southern California (USC-BMES) ERC for Extreme Ultraviolet Science and Technology (EUV) ERC for Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere at the University of Massachusetts (UMass)

1 ERC Products of Innovation, FY 1985 2016* FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY 2011-2015 Annualized FY 1985-2016 (61 ERCs) Intellectual Property Transaction Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Inventions Disclosed 82 4 106 6 2,305 Patent Applications Filed (Provisional and Full) 101 5 98 6 1,909 Patents Awarded 42 2 21 1 790 Licenses Issued 6 < 1 13 1 1,345 Economic Development Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Spinoff Companies 12 1 13 1 206 Spinoff Employees 206 11 36 2 1,333 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

2 ERC Influence on Curriculum, FY 1985 2016* FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY 2011 2015 Annualized FY 1985 2016 (61 ERCs) Degrees Total Per Center Total Per Center Total New Full-Degree Programs Based on ERC Research 5 < 1 3 < 1 51 New Degree Minors Based on ERC Research 0 < 1 1 < 1 31 New Certificate Programs Based on ERC Research 6 < 1 3 < 1 38 Courses Total Per Center Total Per Center Total New Courses Based on ERC Research 39 2 52 3 986 Ongoing Courses with ERC Content 342 18 288 16 2,504 Course Modules Based on ERC Research 14 1 41 2 614 Textbooks Total Per Center Total Per Center Total New Textbooks Based on ERC Research 4 < 1 5 < 1 170 New Textbook Chapters Based on ERC Research 13 1 11 1 92 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

3 ERC Information Dissemination, FY 1985 2016* FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY 2011 2015 Annualized FY 1985 2016 (61 ERCs) Peer-Reviewed Publications (Total) Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Journals** 1,046 55 892 51 21,628 Conference Proceedings** 496 26 590 34 16,728 Trade Journals 8 < 1 22 1 617 Coauthored with ERC Students 623 33 675 39 11,115 Education and Outreach Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Education and Colloquia 933 49 926 53 14,271 Workshops, Short Courses and Webina 368 19 294 17 4,462 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Includes publications that result from center support, associated projects, and sponsored projects

4 Curricular Impact of ERCs, FY 2007 2016* FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY 2011 2015 Annualized FY 2007 2016** (35 ERCs) New and Ongoing Courses, Workshops, Short Courses, Webinars, and Textbooks Based on ERC Research Total Per Center Total Per Center Total With Engineered System Focus 473 25 369 21 2,896 With Multidisciplinary Content 384 20 304 17 2,541 Offered at Undergraduate Level 271 14 216 12 1,693 Offered at Graduate Level 277 15 306 17 2,317 Used at More than One ERC Institution 49 3 75 4 531 Team Taught by Faculty in More Than One Department 61 3 60 3 543 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Data collection of curricular impacts started in 2007.

5 ERC Student Degrees, FY 1985 2016* FY 2016 (19 ERCs) FY 2011 2015 Annualized FY 1985 2016 (61 ERCs) Degree Type Total Per Center Total Per Center Total Bachelors 94 5 76 4 4,171 Master's 127 7 89 5 4,064 Doctoral 163 9 148 9 4,644 Total 384 21 313 18 12,879 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

6 Degrees Granted to ERC Students vs. All U.S. Engineering Graduates, FY 2010 2016 Degrees Granted to ERC Students* (Domestic and Foreign Students) Degrees Granted From All U.S. Engineering Schools (Domestic and Foreign Students) Doctoral Degrees 40% 47% 56% 41% 45% 50% 42% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 33% 34% 34% 32% 32% 32% 32% Master s Degrees 28% 32% 24% 32% 30% 23% 33% 60% 59% 60% 61% 61% 61% 61% Bachelor s Degrees 31% 21% 20% 27% 25% 27% 24% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Degrees Granted 296 275 266 326 345 354 384 130,382 139,168 147,219 153,252 161,661 175,590 175,590 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector Data Source: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) (http://edms.asee.org)

7 ERC Graduate Employment (19 Centers), FY 2016 Where are ERC Graduates Employed? U.S. Government 5% Other U.S. Firms 136 136 Academia 34% Industry 61% Total: 289 Foreign Firms 1 1% ERC Member Firms 38 13%

8 ERC Research and Education Personnel, by Underrepresented Group and Citizenship Status, FY 2016 Faculty Personnel Category Total Total U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents Women* Underrepresented Racial Minorities* Hispanic* Foreign Number % Number % Number % Number % Total 822 643 163 25% 56 9% 44 7% 99 12% Graduate Students Postdocs 301 111 41 37% 8 7% 4 4% 151 50% Graduate Students 1657 701 246 35% 47 7% 69 10% 715 43% Doctoral 1277 541 187 35% 31 6% 53 10% 585 46% Master's 381 161 59 37% 16 10% 16 10% 130 34% Total** 1958 812 287 35% 55 7% 73 9% 866 44% Undergraduate Students ERC Undergraduate Students (Research Assistants, Non-REU Students) 1086 638 257 40% 95 15% 108 17% 47 4% NSF REU Site Award Students 47 28 10 36% 11 39% 8 29% 0 0% ERC's Own REU Student 204 188 89 47% 45 24% 48 26% 3 1% Total** 1265 800 334 42% 137 17% 151 19% 50 4% Community College Participants in RET Program 2 2 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% K 12 Teachers K-12 RET 169 144 73 51% 19 13% 18 13% 0 0% K-12 Non-RET 124 98 61 62% 2 2% 3 3% 0 0% Total 293 242 134 55% 21 9% 21 9% 0 0% Young Scholars Total 194 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Grand Total*** 4,576 2,537 948 37% 276 11% 235 12% 1,017 23% * U.S. citizens and permanent residents only ** The sum of the number of personnel for each row may exceed the total because personnel may belong to multiple categories. *** Leadership/Administration Directors, Thrust Leaders, and Education Program Leaders are included in the Grand Total. For the Grand Total row, all columns exclude Young Scholars, except the Total column. NOTE: For years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person, data are not included.

9 Participants Impacted by ERC Engineering Education Activities, FY 2016 Outreach Participants Total Community College Events Faculty who attended ERC-Sponsored Educational outreach events Students who attended ERC-Sponsored Educational outreach events 355 1,473 Total 1,828 K-12 Events Pre-college K-12 Teachers 4,008 K-12 Students 57,481 Total 61,489 Grand Total 63,317

10 Women in ERCs, FY 2011 2016 Percentage of Women Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of Women in Engineering Programs Generally 50% Percentage of Women 40% 30% 20% 10% 21% 23% 27% 26% 25% 25% 21% 24% 20% 21% 32% 37% 30% 27% 27% 27% 27% 35% 19% 32% 33% 31% 35% 37% 39% 40% 38% 37% 38% 42% 0% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of women in ERCs Percentage of women in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Both ERC data and national statistics are for U.S. citizens and permanent residents only. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of women are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report gender. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for postdoctoral for 2011, 2013, or 2015. The percentages of personnel who did not report gender are as follows: 2011: 7.54%, 2012: 7.55%, 2013: 7.66%, 2014: 7.34%, 2015: 8.12%, 2016: 9.74%.

11 Hispanics and Latinos in ERCs, FY 2011 2016 50% Percentage of Hispanic and Latino Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos in Engineering Programs Generally Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 9% 8% 7% 5% 5% 7% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 4% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 15% 11% 13% 10% 7% 10% 13% 13% 17% 18% 19% 19% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos in ERCs Percentage of Hispanics and Latinos in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Both ERC data and national statistics are for U.S. citizens and permanent residents only. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of Hispanics and Latinos are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report ethnicity. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for postdoctoral for 2011 2015. The percentages of personnel who did not report ethnicity are as follows: 2011: 18.53%, 2012: 18.87%, 2013: 18.22%, 2014: 18.61%, 2015: 17.59%, 2016: 21.07%.

12 Underrepresented Racial Minorities in ERCs, FY 2011 2016 50% Percentage of Underrepresented Racial Minority Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of Underrepresented Racial Minorities in Engineering Programs Generally Percentage of Underrepresented Racial Minorities 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 9% 8% 8% 8% 8% 9% 0% 4% 3% 3% 5% 7% 14% 10% 10% 8% 6% 6% 13% 14% 17% 16% 20% 10% 25% 26% 22% 19% 17% 16% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of underrepresented racial minorities in ERCs Percentage of underrepresented racial minorities in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Both ERC data and national statistics are for U.S. citizens and permanent residents only. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of underrepresented racial minorities are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report race. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for postdoctoral for 2011 2015. The percentages of personnel who did not report race are as follows: 2011: 15.21%, 2012: 17.60%, 2013: 18.89%, 2014: 19.07%, 2015: 19.24%, 2016: 22.30%.

13 Persons With Disabilities in ERCs, FY 2011 2016 50% Percentage of Persons With Disabilities in ERCs vs. Percentage of Persons With Disabilities in Engineering Programs Generally 40% Percentage of Persons With Disabilities 30% 20% 10% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 4% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of persons with disabilities in ERCs Percentage of persons with disabilities in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of persons with disabilities are calculated out of the total number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, including personnel who did not report disability status. The national percentages for persons with disabilities are for all persons, regardless of citizenship. The national percentages for doctoral students with disabilities and master s students with disabilities are from the national percentages for graduate students (master s and doctoral students combined). ASEE data are only available for faculty for 2013 and for doctorate, master's, and undergraduate for 2012. The percentages of personnel who did not report disability status are as follows: 2011: 22.92%, 2012: 24.72%, 2013: 16.15%, 2014: 20.67%, 2015: 21.86%, 2016: 24.00%.

14 U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents in ERCs, FY 2011 2016 Percentage of U.S. Citizen and Permanent Resident Personnel in ERCs vs. Percentage of U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents in Engineering Programs Generally 100% Percentage of U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 84% 82% 80% 81% 81% 78% 27% 37% 47% 44% 36% 37% 43% 46% 47% 45% 43% 42% 52% 54% 58% 47% 44% 42% 80% 72% 75% 75% 71% 63% FACULTY POSTDOCTORAL DOCTORATE MASTER S UNDERGRADUATE Percentage of U.S. citizens and permanent residents in ERCs Percentage of U.S. citizens and permanent residents in engineering programs (ASEE national engineering data) NOTES: Data from centers are not included for years in which the center entered demographic data by institution rather than per person. Undergraduates include REU students. The percentages of U.S. citizens and permanent residents are calculated out of the total number of personnel, including personnel who did not report citizenship. ASEE data are not yet available for 2016 and were not collected for faculty for 2011 2015 or for postdoctoral for 2011, 2013, or 2015. The percentages of personnel who did not report citizenship are as follows: 2011: 10.51%, 2012: 11.93%, 2013: 10.58%, 2014: 11.00%, 2015: 13.49%, 2016: 18.65%.

15 Personnel Conducting ERC Research, FY 2016 REU Students (219 total; 1% foreign) Undgergraduates (614 total; 7% foreign) 40 216 3 601 Faculty (696 total; 14% foreign) 574 95 124 107 151 Postdoctoral Students (258 total; 59% foreign) Master's Students (268 total; 46% foreign) 144 513 581 Doctoral Students (1094 total; 53% foreign) Domestic Personnel: 2,155 Foreign Personnel: 994 NOTES: The sum of the number of personnel for each category may exceed the total number of personnel because personnel may belong to multiple categories. Percentage of foreign personnel is calculated out of domestic and foreign personnel, excluding personnel who did not report citizenship.

Citizenship in ERCs, FY 2011-2016 16 357, 84% 40, 9% 30, 7% 495, 82% 61, 10% 50, 8% 652, 80% 91, 11% 75, 9% 609, 81% 91, 12% 56, 7% 605, 81% 111, 15% 30, 4% Faculty 28, 27% 63, 60% 14, 13% 71, 37% 101, 53% 18, 10% 133, 47% 133, 47% 15, 6% 134, 44% 146, 47% 28, 9% 101, 36% 154, 55% 24, 9% Postdoctoral 273, 43% 309, 48% 56, 9% 424, 46% 440, 48% 59, 6% 542, 47% 531, 46% 80, 7% 575, 45% 601, 47% 97, 8% 536, 43% 595, 48% 108, 9% Doctorate 99, 52% 73, 38% 19, 10% 111, 55% 78, 38% 15, 7% 203, 57% 127, 36% 23, 7% 163, 47% 150, 44% 32, 9% 137, 44% 133, 42% 44, 14% Master s 456, 80% 24, 4% 88, 16% 551, 72% 47, 6% 166, 22% 875, 75% 88, 8% 203, 17% 885, 75% 78, 6% 222, 19% 886, 71% 58, 5% 307, 24% Undergraduate 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 643, 78% 99, 12% 80, 10% 2016 111, 37% 151, 50% 39, 13% 541, 42% 585, 46% 151, 12% 161, 42% 130, 34% 90, 24% 800, 63% 50, 4% 415, 33% U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents Foreign Citizens Citizenship Not Reported

17 ERC Industrial/Practitioner Members and Supporting Organizations, FY 2010 2016* 100% 9 27 41 33 30 50 78 Contributing Organizations 75% 50% 137 9 49 162 171 224 15 12 7 68 84 79 218 199 10 9 81 69 170 13 69 Funders of Associated Projects Funders of Sponsored Projects 25% 227 250 253 305 345 333 301 Foreign Industrial/Practitioner Members U.S. Industrial/Practitioner Members 0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (Totals) (431) (522) (561) (648) (684) (660) (631) * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

18 ERC Industrial/Practitioner Members and Supporting Organizations, FY 2010 2016* FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Organization Type Contributing Organizations 9 27 41 33 30 50 78 Funders of Associated Projects 137 162 171 224 218 199 170 Funders of Sponsored Projects 9 15 12 7 10 9 13 Foreign Industrial/Practitioner Members 49 68 84 79 81 69 69 U.S. Industrial/Practitioner Members 227 250 253 305 345 333 301 Total Number of Organizations 431 522 561 648 684 660 631 Total Number of Centers 15 14 17 20 20 17 19 Average Number of Organizations per Center 29 37 33 32 34 39 33 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector

19 Industrial/Practitioner Member Support by Year, FY 2010 2016* Type of Support FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016** Total Membership Fees $3,990,050 $4,261,082 $4,542,049 $4,942,433 $4,747,675 $4,309,666 $4,422,334 Member-Sponsored Projects Total Dollar Amount Member-Associated Projects Total Dollar Amount Member In-Kind Total Dollar Amount*** Total Dollar Amount, Industrial/Practitioner Member Support to Center $728,000 $462,911 $1,018,645 $311,757 $285,000 $182,000 $538,019 $3,579,699 $4,560,092 $6,877,611 $8,239,885 $4,508,750 $8,308,585 $4,033,479 $1,493,709 $2,477,725 $2,155,791 $3,284,191 $2,685,819 $2,954,553 $2,628,437 $9,791,458 $11,761,810 $14,594,096 $16,778,266 $12,227,244 $15,754,804 $11,622,269 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support received by the end of the current reporting year. Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE). *** Data for this row are from the In-Kind Support reported in the Organizations section.

20 Industrial/Practitioner Member Support by Year, FY 2010 2016* $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016** Total Membership Fees Member-Sponsored Projects Total Dollar Amount Member-Associated Projects Total Dollar Amount Member In-Kind Total Dollar Amount*** * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support received by the end of the current reporting year. Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE). *** Data for this line are from the In-Kind Support reported in the Organizations section.

21 Distribution of Industrial/Practitioner Members by Industry Size, FY 2012 2016 Small Medium Large 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 48% 48% 48% 44% 46% 42% 42% 44% 47% 46% 9% 9% 8% 9% 8% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Large Medium Small NOTES: The total number of firms is as follows: 2012: 306, 2013: 337, 2014: 364, 2015: 342, 2016: 322. Industry sizes are as follows: Small = <500 employees, Medium = 500 1,000 employees, Large = >1,000 employees.

22 Total ERC New Cash Support, FY 2016 (19 ERCs) University 7% Other Sources 4% Industry 7% ERC Awards 43% Non-NSF Government 25% Other NSF 13% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $159.1 million NOTES: Percentages shown are Direct and Associated Support combined. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

23 Functional Budgets of ERCs in the Aggregate, FY 2016* Indirect Cost 12.8% New Facilities/ New Construction 0.1% General and Shared Equipment 1.0% Leadership/ Administration/ Management 7.7% Center-Related Travel 1.2% Industrial Collaborations/ Innovation Programs 2.6% Research 67.5% Education Programs 7.0% Direct Support total: $165,516,303 * Includes in-kind support but not residuals

24 Industrial/Practitioner New Support to 19 ERCs, FY 2016 Visiting Personnel, 3.9% 2015 = 2.8% Other Assets, 14.1% 2015 = 13.1% New Facilities in Existing Buildings, 0% 2015 = 0% Equipment, 15.8% 2015 = 23.7% New Construction, 0.8% 2015 = 0% Cash Support, 65.4% 2015 = 60.3% Total value of support: $7.6 million

25 Government Support by ERC Technology Sector, FY 2010-2016 *, **, *** Advanced Manufacturing Biotechnology and Healthcare $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $750,000 $750,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $3,000,000 $2,250,000 Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure $3,000,000 $2,250,000 Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $750,000 $750,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support includes Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, and In-Kind Support. *** Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE)

26 Industry Support by ERC Technology Sector, FY 2010-2016 *, **, *** Advanced Manufacturing Biotechnology and Healthcare $7,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 * Does not include centers from the Earthquake Technology Sector ** Support includes Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, and In-Kind Support. *** Includes data for centers that have entered partial data during a no-cost extension (NCE)

27 FY 2016 Sources of Support to 19 ERCs, by Technology Sector Advanced Manufacturing 30% Biotechnology and Healthcare 12% Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology Direct Support Associated Support Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure 33% Total value of support: $168.3 million NOTE: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included.

28 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Advanced Manufacturing Sector: 5 Centers (Iowa, Minnesota, NASCENT, Rutgers, SynBERC) Other Sources University 8% 6% ERC Awards 29% Industry 9% Non-NSF Government 32% Other NSF 16% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $50.9 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

29 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Biotechnology and Healthcare Sector: 3 Centers (ASSIST, NCAT, WashSNE) University 16% Other Sources 5% Industry 4% Non-NSF Government 7% Other NSF 3% ERC Awards 65% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $20.1 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

30 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure Sector: 6 Centers (CBBG, NCSU, QESST, NEWT, ReNUWIt, CURENT) University 8% Other Sources 11% Industry 7% ERC Awards 41% Non-NSF Government 21% Direct Support Other NSF 12% Associated Support Total value of support: $55.2 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

31 FY 2016 Support to ERCs in Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology Sector: 5 Centers (CIAN, LESA, POETS, MIRTHE, TANMS) Non-NSF Government 27% Industry 9% University 6% Other Sources 3% Other NSF 11% ERC Awards 44% Direct Support Associated Support Total value of support: $42.1 million NOTES: Sources of Support include Unrestricted Cash, Restricted Cash, In-Kind, and Associated Projects. Residuals are not included. Non-NSF Government includes U.S. Government (not NSF), State government, local government, foreign government, and quasi-government research organizations. Other Sources includes medical facilities, nonprofit organizations, private foundations, venture capitalists, and other sources.

32 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: All ERCs 100% $426,681 $491,206* All ERC Expenditures 75% $15,657,325 50% $52,471, 641 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects 25% $8,473,683 $28,921,307 0% Translational Research (21%) Non-Translational Research (79%) Total value of support: $112 million * $491,206 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

33 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Advanced Manufacturing 100% $53,914* $161,225** Advanced Manufacturing Expenditures 75% 50% 25% $7,064,347 $19,738,887 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects $9,325,170 0% $1,164,984 Translational Research (22%) Non-Translational Research (78%) Total value of support: $38 million * $53,914 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size. ** $161,225 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

34 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Biotechnology and Healthcare 100% $56,559 $0 Biotechnology and Healthcare Expenditures 75% 50% 25% $813,599 $1,221,974 $2,282,314 $5,925,605 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects 0% Translational Research (20%) Non-Translational Research (80%) Total value of support: $10 million

35 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure 100% $0 $158,007* Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure Expenditures 75% 50% 25% $6,689,994 $3,812,904 $13,662,963 $6,689,994 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects 0% Translational Research (26%) Non-Translational Research (74%) Total value of support: $33 million * $158,007 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

36 FY 2016 Expenditures by Type of Research: Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology 100% $316,208 $171,974* Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology Expenditures $1,089,385 75% 50% 25% 0% $2,273,821 $16,787,477 $10,207,699 Sponsored Projects Associated Projects Center-Funded Projects Translational Research (13%) Non-Translational Research (87%) Total value of support: $31 million * $171,974 corresponds to Sponsored Projects expenditures for Non-Translational Research. Area is not visible due to the small relative size.

37 All ERC Disciplines, FY 2016 Social Sciences 1% Other Engineering 13% Other 7% Mechanical Engineering 9% Agriculture 1% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 15% Chemical Engineering 6% Civil Engineering 3% Computer Science 4% Education 1% Mathematics and Physical Sciences 7% Health 2% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 31% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 690

38 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Advanced Manufacturing, FY 2016 Mathematics and Physical Sciences 1% Health 1% Mechanical Engineering 18% Other 9% Other Engineering 4% Social Sciences 1% Agriculture 1% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 6% Education 0% Computer Science 0% Civil Engineering 0% Chemical Engineering 23% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 36% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 146

39 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Biotechnology and Healthcare, FY 2016 Mathematics and Physical Sciences 0.5% Health 6% Mechanical Engineering 16% Other 4% Other Engineering 6% Social Sciences 1% Agriculture 0% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 30% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 29% Education 2% Chemical Engineering 2% Civil Engineering 0% Computer Science 4% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 133

40 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Energy, Sustainability, and Infrastructure, FY 2016 Other Engineering 30% Social Sciences 1% Agriculture 2% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 4% Chemical Engineering 3% Other 11% Civil Engineering 10% Mechanical Engineering 1% Mathematics and Physical Sciences 4% Health 0% Computer Science 3% Education 1% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 30% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 194

41 Disciplines by Technology Sector: Micro/Optoelectronics, Sensing, and Information Technology, FY 2016 Mathematics and Physical Sciences 18% Health 3% Mechanical Engineering 6% Other Other Engineering Social Sciences 4% 7% 0% Agriculture 1% Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering 0% Chemical Engineering 1% Civil Engineering 0% Computer Science 9% Education 1% Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering 50% Total number of Project Investigators (PIs): 217

42 Country of Citizenship of ERC Foreign Personnel, FY 2016

43 Locations of the Active ERCs, FY 2016

44 Locations of Foreign Participating Organizations, FY 2016

45 Locations of Foreign Participating Institutions, FY 2016

46 Number of Institutions and Organizations With Financial Headquarters Abroad Collaborating With ERCs, by Country of Origin, FY 2016*, ** United Arab Emirates Taiwan Spain South American Countries, Other Poland Norway New Zealand Mexico Malawi Israel Hong Kong Greece Belgium Austria Ireland Georgia Turkey Sweden Denmark Brazil Australia Singapore Netherlands Italy India Finland Canada Switzerland France South Korea United Kingdom Japan Germany China 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 * Displays counts of Industrial/Practitioner members, Funders of Associated Projects, Funders of Sponsored Projects, Contributing Organizations, Collaborating Institutions, Non-ERC Institutions Providing REU Students, and Foreign Partner Institutions ** Community college and Pre-college institutions are excluded.

47 Comparisons by Member Firms of the Performance of ERC Hires vs. Non-ERC Hires*