WASHINGTON DC. SUBJECT: 2005 AF Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) Site Survey Guidance

Similar documents
Department of Defense. Spiral 1.2

Air Force Reserve Facilities Update Briefing FY10

Kulis Air Guard Station and Elmendorf Air Force Base, AK

Omaha District Corps of Engineers Environmental Remediation Programs Associated General Contractors

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2006 AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND FAMILY HOUSING

Inquiry Response DCN July 2005

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE ON READINESS AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT UNITED STATES SENATE

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates AIR FORCE RESERVE FY 2011 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

Department of Defense

Headquarters U.S. Air Force. The United States Air Force

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECT-HIRE AUTHORITY

Department of Defense

SUMMARY OF REVISIONS This document is substantially revised and must be completely reviewed.

BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. June 6, 2003

BRAC 2005 Issues. Briefing to the Infrastructure Steering Group. December 12, 2003

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

Department of the Air Force

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Candidate #USAF-0102 / S904 Establish USAF Logistics Support Centers

DELIBERATIVE DOCUMENT-FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY NOT RELEASABLE UNDER FOIA DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC

The Transition from JLUS Planning to Implementation: Challenges, opportunities & examples

BRAC Briefing to the Infrastructure Executive Council. May 9, 2005

DCN: Predecisional --- For Official Use Only --- Not for Release under FOIA VIRGINIA. Ft Belvoir

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AIR FORCE MILCON EXECUTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INSTRUCTION SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE _AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Updating the BRAC Cleanup Plan:

Air Force Ozone Depleting Chemical (ODC) Interim Waiver Application, Approval Procedures, and Reporting Requirements

SECTION I - BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT SECTION II - MAKING A FOIA REQUEST

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Realignment Commission

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Air Force Materiel Command

Colonel John D. Lamontagne

MAJCOM-SPECIFIC SUPPORT

DCN: Hall, Craig, CIV, WSO-BRAC

BASE VISIT REPORT DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TX 27 JUNE 2005

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY. This publication is available digitally. There are no releasability restrictions on this publication.

1. Headquarters 497th Intelligence Group (HQ 497 IG). Provides intelligence support to HQ USAF.

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Global Hawk Main Operating Base Beddown EA

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS (DON COOP) PROGRAM

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Joint Basing and Explosives Safety from the US Navy Perspective

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Project Management Plan (PMP) ARCHIVED. FY xx Project Title Base xxxx PDC AAAA Date

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY (AFSOC)

Retain command and control of the Area of Responsibility, as designated by Air Force Mortuary Affairs.

RATPAC JUNIOR ACQUIRERS CHANGING THE AF

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Air Force Officials Did Not Consistently Comply With Requirements for Assessing Contractor Performance

U.S. Army Audit Agency

In God We Trust, All Others Must Bring Data. Installation Geospatial Information and Services in DoD

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY. SUMMARY OF REVISIONS This is the initial publication of AFI , substantially revising AFR 27-1.

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

United States Air Force Explosives Site Plan Report and Explosives Safety Program Support Initiatives

Headquarters U. S. Air Force. The Air Force s Perspective

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Getting The Boundaries Right: The DoD Real Property Inventory Mapping Pilot Project

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Spectrum of Testing. OPERATIONAL testing for the warfighter in the representative BATTLESPACE ENVIRONMENT

AF Views of Joint Basing

AIR WAR COLLEGE AIR UNIVERSITY JOINT-BASING FUNDING. Jeffrey K. McNeely, YD-03, DAF. A Research Report Submitted to the Faculty

AIR FORCE RESERVE COMMAND

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Budget Estimates AIR FORCE RESERVE FY 2014 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

OPNAVINST C N4 31 May 2012

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY. Certified by: HQ AETC/A2/3 (Mr. James T. Parris) Pages: 23

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Air Force Court-Martial Summaries

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

NAVY CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PROGRAM AND POLICY

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

FACILITIES UPDATE. Presented to: Mr. Wightman Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Materiel and Facilities

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

The Air Force Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act Implementation Plan

Subj INSTALLATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION AND SERVICES

SAAG-IMT 30 June 2004

Despite the nation s increasing

DCN: I do not believe that a move to Wright Patterson will serve the mission of our laboratory well. The following are my reasons:

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC DCN: 1436 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY 24 May 2005 MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION FROM: SAF/IEB 1665 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20330-1665 SUBJECT: 2005 AF Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) Site Survey Guidance SAF/IEB will oversee a series ofmajcom directed site surveys for bases affected by BRAC 2005 recommendations. These site surveys are the first step in identifying BRAC 2005 operational, communications and construction requirements for use in future programming actions. Attached is the installation site survey priority list (Atch I). This list has been compiled based on the complexity of the realignments, the estimated costs, or the participation of sister services or DoD agencies. Please provide me the schedule of these surveys by 27 May, so Headquarters personnel can participate as required. Once these surveys are completed, others may be accomplished as needed. The MAJCOM/XP receiving missions or functions is responsible for coordinating/scheduling the site surveys and integrating overall requirements for their installations. The MAJCOM/XP, Service and/or Agency owning the weapons system or function being realigned is responsible for conducting the site survey following the attached BRAC 2005 Site Survey Guidance (Atch 2). Each MAJCOM will brief results of their surveys to the Base Closure Executive Group (BCEG) during the summer and their complete BRAC in October 2005 after the BRAC 2005 Commission submits its report. SAF/IEB POCs are Mr. Robert Tuck, DSN 222-1111 and Mr. Roy Murray, DSN 222-5121. Attachments: 1. AF BRAC 2005 Priority Site Survey List 2. BRAC 2005 Site Survey Guidance cc: SAFlIE/IEI/IEE AFIlL/XC /d912~ GERALD F. PEAS(JR. Deputy Assistant Secretary Basing and Infrastructure Analysis

DISTRIBUTION: DCN: 1436 2 HQ ACC/XP/CE HQ AMC/ A5/A7 HQ AETC/XP/CE HQ AFSPC/XP/CE HQ AFMC/XP/CE HQ AFRC/XP/CE HQ AFSOC/XP/CE HQ NGB/XP/CE HQ PACAF/XP/CE USAFAlXP/CE AFDW /A5

Site Survey Priority List The following installations, in alphabetical order, were selected as requiring priority for site surveys during June - September 2005: Andrews AFB Atlantic City AGS Bradley AGS Dover AFB Dyess AFB Edwards AFB Eglin AFB Elmendorf AFB FE Warren AFB Hanscom AFB Kirtland AFB Lackland AFB Little Rock AFB MacDill AFB Maxwell AFB McConnell AFB Moody AFB Nellis AFB New Orleans ARS Offutt AFB Pope AFB Randolph AFB Robins AFB Selfridge ANGB Shaw AFB Tinker AFB Vandenburg AFB Westover ARB Wright Patterson AFB Atch 1

Base Realh!nment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 Site Survey Guidance 1. Purpose: Validate facility operational capability and existing physical and natural infrastructure to support gaining missions at new locations as a result of BRAC 2005. Estimate costs associated with facilities, physical infrastructure, equipment, and other requirements necessary to support BRAC basing actions. De-conflict potential shortfalls and phasing inconsistencies as well as potential overlaps of support equipment and facilities which may impact timely execution ofbrac actions. 2. Terms: a. Major Recommendation: (1). Relocation of Squadron Equivalent (or larger) equipment and personnel (2). Relocation of two of more Service(s) units (1/2 squadron size or larger) to single installation (3). Relocation of any Joint or Defense Agency function generating new construction requirements in excess of $25M (4). Any action/recommendation designated by Base Closure Executive Group (BCEG) due to political or operational concerns (5). Other actions may qualify for site survey consideration as proposed by the MAJCOM XP b. Minor Recommendation: Any action not meeting the above thresholds 3. Roles and Responsibilities: a. SAF/IEB: (1). OPR for AF BRAC analysis and implementation of realignment and closure process (2). Provides policy guidelines for new construction, siting and working with sister services, joint organizations, DoD agencies, Federal agencies, and communities (3). Provides operational guidance through Commission Recommendations and Congressional action (4). Provides site survey team member(s) as necessary to assist in operational assessment, options and validation of estimates (5). Provides coordination for sister service,joint organizations, and DoD agencies beddowns as required (6). Prepares Program Action Directive (PAD) and preliminary BRAC budget for BCEG approval (7). Resolves requirements disconnects b. AF/XP/ILIXO/DP/XC: (1). Provides operational guidelines and validates MAJCOM requirements (2). Validates construction timelines and operational impacts (3). Validates base support costs applicable to BRAC induced requirements (4). Provides site survey team members upon request by SAF/IEB 1

c. MAJCOM/XP: (1). MAJCOM (AF organization), Service (non-af Military Department), or Agency (DoD or Joint Activity) owning the weapons system or function being moved or fielded as part of the BRAC process: (a). Conducts the site survey, programming, and execution actions with support and coordination from the Host MAJCOM (b). Determines operating and facility requirements to implement the realignment action. Operating and facility requirements include mission requirements, validation of manpower, MILCON and O&M submittals and overall program management associated with implementation of the BRAC action (c). Coordinates with host MAJCOM and gaining installation for construction, siting and environmental factors (d). Coordinates with Headquarters Air Force, other services, DoD and Federal agencies when involved in a multiple beddown on a singe installation (e). Compiles and briefs their mission BRAC construction program, time phasing, costs, etc., to BCEG (2). MAJCOM of installation receiving systems or functions: (a). Integrates overall beddown and phasing requirements (b). Ensures base support facility projects required by BRAC actions are captured in the site surveys conducted by the MAJCOM, Service, and lor Federal Agency who owns the mission (c). Coordinates and schedules site surveys involving multiple MAJCOMs, Services, and/or Federal Agencies (d). Ensures operational issues such as range operations, frequency spectrum allocations, safety issues, etc., are considered during site survey (e). Ensures appropriate siting, architectural, environmental, and master plan integration are completed during site survey, project programming, and execution (t). Serves as lead for National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance to include data gathering via site surveys 4. Site Survey Timelines a. 23-27 May: MAJCOMS submit initial schedules b. 27 May and beyond: Installations support site surveys c. 31 May - 2 Jun: Schedules de-conflicted and revised to include Sister "'. Services/JCSG actions. SAF/IEB coordinates with MAJCOM/XP, sister Services, joint organizations, and DoD Agencies d. 5 Jun - 8 Sep: Conduct site surveys (Breaks for 4th of July Weekend/Labor Day Weekend) 2

5. Fundin2 for Site Surveys: a. Major Recommendations: (1). MAJCOM submits budget request to SAF/IEB (2). SAF/IEB will fund up to 4 MAJCOM personnel/week (3). MAlCOM may send more personnel, if desired, to the priority installations at their own expense. MAlCOMs will Emergency and Special Program (ESP) code all additional TDY costs, and based on the availability of funds SAF/IEB may reimburse MAlCOMs b. Minor Recommendations: MAJCOM funds 100% 6. Documentation: a. Site Survey Report and Supporting Documents: MAlCOM XP who conducted the site survey must produce the standard site survey report law with MAlCOM policy and submits to SAF/IEB and AF/ILE immediately after conclusion of site survey. Documents to be included are: (1). DD Forms 1391, 1391c, site plans, and draft certificates of compliance (2). AF Forms 1178, Costing Data or PACES (Parametric Cost Engineering System) (3). Proposed top-level construction/move timeline with critical path identified. Include beddown and phasing requirements for other mission being gained by the base to include other Services, Defense Agencies, Medical, DECA, and AAFES b. Multiple Beddowns: Host MAJCOM with two or more major or minor BRAC 2005 realignment recommendations for an installation will prepare a beddown master plan that integrates all BRAC and BOS requirements, regardless of source and provide to all participating MAlCOMs, Services, DoD agencies, and other Federal agencies as well as SAF/IEB c. Line Item Review and MAlCOM BCEG pre-brief: (1). SAF/IEB in conjunction with MAJCOM/XP and AF/IL will conduct lineitem review for all BRAC 2005 submittals prior to scheduled BCEG Brief (2). Each DD Form 1391 and all supporting documents will be reviewed for clarity, validity, consistency, and accuracy 7. MAJCOM Presentation to BCEG: a. Workaround Requirements: Identify workaround and value (i.e. this recommendation enables closure six months sooner) b. PersonnellEquipment Issues: Identify shortfalls or issues to be resolved. Identify potential excess major equipment items c. Natural InfTastructureItems: Identify timeline and any issues related to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation and compliance. Identify and note environmental compliance, pollution prevention, natural resources, restoration, or other issues or operational- constraints. For installations with property transfer, identify timeline and environmental restoration impact in conjunction with the AF Real Property Agency (AFRPA) 3

8. Approval: a. Conflicts and Questions identified during site survey process will be elevated to SAF/IEB for resolution b. Results of site survey, timelines and issues/concerns will be briefed to and approved by the BCEG in October 2005 9. Additional Guidance: a. Facility Design/Construction Guidance: (1). Use Architectural compatibility and maintainability standards of host MAJCOM (2). Deviations from AFH 32-1084, Standard Facility Requirements, must be justified, validated by AF/ILE, and approved by SAF/IEB (3). Host command provides requirements baseline for installation support service facilities (4). Requiring command XP/CE, or equivalent, coordinates schedules/requirements between programmatic needs/construction with BRAC driven activities b. Site surveys should be supplemented with the use of geospatial information to the maximum extent feasible. The Common Installation Picture (CIP) provides the foundation for the AF GeoBase program and contains 38 layers overlaid with I-meter resolution imagery 4