HEALTH CARE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT. Model Legislation & Policy Guide For the 2011 Legislative Year

Similar documents
HEALTHCARE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT. Model Legislation & Policy Guide For the 2013 Legislative Year

HEALTHCARE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT. Model Legislation & Policy Guide For the 2014 Legislative Year

PHARMACIST FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT. Model Legislation & Policy Guide For the 2011 Legislative Year

HEALTHCARE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT

PHARMACIST FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT. Model Legislation & Policy Guide For the 2013 Legislative Year

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 HOUSE BILL 1628

Advanced Nurse Practitioner Supervision Policy

Practice Advancement Initiative (PAI) Using the ASHP PAI Ambulatory Care Self-Assessment Survey

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

LIFE-SUSTAINING CARE ACT. Model Legislation & Policy Guide For the 2013 Legislative Year

National Committee for Quality Assurance

CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW BY STATE

Upgrading Voter Registration in Florida

Policies for TANF Families Served Under the CCDF Child Care Subsidy Program

NCHIP and NICS Act Grants Overview and Current Status

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice Readiness Assessment

Building Blocks to Health Workforce Planning: Data Collection and Analysis

SEASON FINAL REGISTRATION REPORTS

Governor s Office of Electronic Health Information (GOEHI) The National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare

Care Provider Demographic Information Update

National Association For Regulatory Administration

MEMORANDUM Texas Department of Human Services * Long Term Care/Policy

The Value and Use of CME in Medical Licensure

Poverty and Health. Frank Belmonte, D.O., MPH Vice President Pediatric Population Health and Care Modeling

Prescription Monitoring Program:

Prescription Monitoring Programs - Legislative Trends and Model Law Revision

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Robert Tagalicod, Robert Anthony, and Jessica Kahn HIT Policy Committee January 10, 2012

National Perspective No Wrong Door System. Administration for Community Living Center for Medicare and Medicaid Veterans Health Administration

BUFFALO S SHIPPING POST Serving Napa Valley Since 1992

National Provider Identifier (NPI)

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

Role of State Legislators

BEST PRACTICES IN LIFESPAN RESPITE SYSTEMS: LESSONS LEARNED & FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Developmental screening, referral and linkage to services: Lessons from ABCD

Cesarean Delivery Model Meeting the challenge to reduce rates of Cesarean delivery

2017 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to 401 STSW members and conference registrants. 181 social workers responded.

Counterdrug(CD) Information Brief LTC TACKETT

National School Safety Conference Reno, Nevada / June 24 29, 2018

The 2015 National Workforce Survey Maryland LPN Data June 17, 2016

NCCP. National Continued Competency Program Overview

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

The Association of Community Cancer Centers 2011 Cancer Program Administrator Survey

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP)

NEWS RELEASE. Air Force JROTC Distinguished Unit Award. MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. Unit OK at Union High School, Tulsa OK, has been

FIELD BY FIELD INSTRUCTIONS

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF CARE IN SOUTH CAROLINA S MEDICAID PROGRAM

How Technology-Based-Startups Support U.S. Economic Growth

United States Property & Fiscal Officer (USPFO)

2012 Federation of State Medical Boards

RECOUNT RULES & VOTING SYSTEMS

DoD-State Liaison Update NCSL August 2015

2016 STSW Survey. Survey invitations were sent to all STSW members and 2016 conference registrants. 158 social workers responded.

Advancing Self-Direction for People with Head Injuries

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS. Panelist: Dr. Donna Peebles Associate Director

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality /Survey & Certification

Defensive Documentation for Long-Term Care

The Affordable Care Act and Its Potential to Reduce Health Disparities Cara V. James, Ph.D.

College Profiles - Navy/Marine ROTC

The Next Wave in Balancing Long- Term Care Services and Supports:

Medicaid Managed Care 2012 Fiscal Analysts Seminar August 30, 2012

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services practice management

The Use of NHSN in HAI Surveillance and Prevention

131,,000 homeless veterans on any given night 300,000 homeless veterans during the year 23% of the total number of homeless people are veterans

State Partnership Performance Measures

Driving Change with the Health Care Spending Benchmark

Options Counseling in and NWD/ADRC System National, State & Local Perspectives

Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) National Science Foundation Regional Grants Conference. June 23 24, 2014

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE DRH20205-MG-112 (03/24) Short Title: Enact Death With Dignity Act. (Public)

Safe Staffing- Safe Work

SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND

Pain Advocacy: A Social Work Perspective THANK YOU! First Things First. Incidence of Pain

Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM) Corrosion Program Update. Steven F. Carr Corrosion Program Manager

Advancing Health Equity and Improving Health for All through a Systems Approach Presentation to the Public Health Association of Nebraska

Assuring Better Child Health and Development Initiative (ABCD)

Medical Orders for Life- Sustaining Treatment

Role of Emergency Responder Registries. Mary E. Clark, JD, MPH Director, Emergency Preparedness Bureau Massachusetts Department of Public Health

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BORN-ALIVE INFANT PROTECTION ACT

The Legacy of Sidney Katz: Setting the Stage for Systematic Research in Long Term Care. Vincent Mor, Ph.D. Brown University

ASA Survey Results for Commercial Fees Paid for Anesthesia Services payment and practice manaement

The Center for Law & the Public s Health

MapInfo Routing J Server. United States Data Information

Value based care: A system overhaul

FY2014 Supplemental Funding for Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Grantees


The Journey to Meaningful Use: Where we were, where we are, and where we may be going

Summary of 2010 National Radon Action Month Results

Current and Emerging Rural Issues in Medicare

Preventive Controls for Animal Food Inspections and Compliance

Director, Army JROTC Program Overview

NSF Award Cash Management $ervice (ACM$) and Financial Update. June 1, 2015

SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION STATUS REPORT NO. 2

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

Higher Education Employment Report

2010 Agribusiness Job Report

Name: Suzette Sova MA, LPC, NCC Title: Marketing MHFA and Having Successful Instructors

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Readiness Kit

Transcription:

HEALTH CARE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT Model Legislation & Policy Guide For the 2011 Legislative Year

INTRODUCTION Over the last two decades, abortion advocates and their allies have launched a concerted campaign to force hospitals, health care institutions, health insurers, and individual health care providers to provide, refer, and pay for abortions. Their determined effort to eviscerate the concept of conscience and the freedom to follow one s religious beliefs from the medical profession has resulted in the following: Catholic Charities of California and New York being forced by their respective state supreme courts to face the unenviable choice of offering health care coverage for contraceptives (even though the use of artificial contraception violates long-standing Catholic teachings) or, alternatively, offering no health care coverage to its employees. Two California physicians being sued by a lesbian couple because, based on their religious beliefs, the physicians refuse to artificially inseminate single women (regardless of their sexual preference or orientation). The California Supreme Court ruled that the physicians may not introduce their conscientious objection (to performing such procedures on any unmarried person) as a defense to liability (for illegal discrimination) in the case. Through the Governor s unilateral action, pharmacy owners in Illinois being told that they must dispense so-called emergency contraceptives, despite an existing state law purportedly protecting their rights of conscience. An ambulance driver in Illinois being fired for refusing to take a woman to an abortion clinic. In 2004, New Mexico refusing to approve a community-owned hospital lease because of the hospital s refusal to perform elective abortions. A private hospital in Texas being sued for disregarding parental objections and providing life-sustaining care to an infant born after twenty-three (23) weeks of gestation. Sadly, this represents only a small sampling of the mounting attacks on the freedom of health care professionals to provide medical care without violating their ethical or moral standards and/or their religious beliefs. 2

Moreover, in the past few years, abortion advocates and their allies have honed in on pharmacists. Their goal is to require pharmacists to dispense contraceptives, including emergency contraceptives, forcing them to choose between their livelihood and their moral, ethical, or religious beliefs. Although the U.S. Constitution protects the free exercise of religion, allowing one to follow what his or her conscience dictates, the abortion lobby is turning the debate into a referendum on alleged refusals to provide women with constitutionally-protected reproductive health services. The abortion lobby and their allies recognize that if they can establish legal precedent to coerce someone to violate their conscience regarding contraceptives, they can then easily extend that legal precedent to coerce pharmacists to dispense RU-486 (the so-called abortion pill ), to coerce medical students to participate in abortion training, and to coerce doctors to participate in surgical and medical abortions. Often thought of as a contemporary problem, the issue of freedom of conscience was referenced and considered by our Founding Fathers. For example, Thomas Jefferson wrote, No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority. But now, this founding principle is under increasing attack. To maintain and increase protection for health care freedom of conscience, AUL has drafted the, providing comprehensive protection for all health care providers. For more information and drafting assistance, please contact AUL s Legislative Coordinator at (202) 741-4907 or Legislation@AUL.org. DENISE M. BURKE, ESQ. Vice President of Legal Affairs 3

HEALTH CARE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE ACT HOUSE/SENATE BILL No. By Representatives/Senators Section 1. Title. This Act may be known and cited as the. Section 2. Legislative Findings and Purposes. (a) It is the public policy of [Insert name of State] to respect and protect the fundamental right of conscience of all individuals who provide health care services. (b) Without comprehensive protection, health care rights of conscience may be violated in various ways, such as harassment, demotion, salary reduction, transfer, termination, loss of staffing privileges, denial of aid or benefits, and refusal to license or refusal to certify. (c) It is the purpose of this Act to protect as a basic civil right the right of all health care providers, institutions, and payers to decline to counsel, advise, pay for, provide, perform, assist, or participate in providing or performing health care services that violate their consciences. Such health care services may include, but are not limited to, abortion, artificial birth control, artificial insemination, assisted reproduction, human cloning, euthanasia, human embryonic stem-cell research, fetal experimentation, physician-assisted suicide, and sterilization. (d) Accordingly, it is the purpose of this Act to prohibit all forms of discrimination, disqualification, coercion, disability, or liability upon such health care providers, institutions, and payers that decline to perform any health care service that violates their consciences. Section 3. Definitions. (a) Health care service means any phase of patient medical care, treatment, or procedure, including, but not limited to, the following: patient referral, counseling, therapy, testing, diagnosis or prognosis, research, instruction, prescribing, dispensing or administering any device, drug, or medication, surgery, or any other care or treatment rendered by health care providers or health care institutions. 4

(b) Health care provider means any individual who may be asked to participate in any way in a health care service, including, but not limited to, the following: a physician, physician s assistant, nurse, nurses aide, medical assistant, hospital employee, clinic employee, nursing home employee, pharmacist, pharmacy employee, researcher, medical or nursing school faculty, student or employee, counselor, social worker, or any professional, paraprofessional, or any other person who furnishes, or assists in the furnishing of, health care services. (c) Health care institution means any public or private organization, corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, association, agency, network, joint venture, or other entity that is involved in providing health care services, including but not limited to: hospitals, clinics, medical centers, ambulatory surgical centers, private physician s offices, pharmacies, nursing homes, university medical schools and nursing schools, medical training facilities, or other institutions or locations wherein health care services are provided to any person. (d) Health care payer means any entity or employer that contracts for, pays for, or arranges for the payment of, in whole or in part, any health care service or product, including, but not limited to: health maintenance organizations, health plans, insurance companies, or management services organizations. (e) Employer means any individual or entity that pays for or provides health benefits or health insurance coverage as a benefit to its employees, whether through a third party, a health maintenance organization, a program of self insurance, or some other means. (f) Participate in a health care service means to counsel, advise, provide, perform, assist in, refer for, admit for purposes of providing, or participate in providing any health care service or any form of such service. (g) Pay or payment means pay, contract for, or otherwise arrange for the payment of in whole or in part. (h) Conscience means the religious, moral or ethical principles held by a health care provider, the health care institution, or health care payer. For purposes of this Act, a health care institution or health care payer s conscience shall be determined by reference to its existing or proposed religious, moral, or ethical guidelines, mission statement, constitution, bylaws, articles of incorporation, regulations, or other relevant documents. 5

Section 4. Freedom of Conscience of Health Care Providers. (a) Freedom of Conscience. A health care provider has the right not to participate, and no health care provider shall be required to participate in a health care service that violates his or her conscience. (b) Immunity from Liability. No health care provider shall be civilly, criminally, or administratively liable for declining to participate in a health care service that violates his or her conscience. (c) Discrimination. It shall be unlawful for any person, health care provider, health care institution, public or private institution, public official, or any board which certifies competency in medical specialties to discriminate against any health care provider in any manner based on his or her declining to participate in a health care service that violates his or her conscience. For purposes of this Act, discrimination includes, but is not limited to, the following: termination, transfer, refusal of staff privileges, refusal of board certification, adverse administrative action, demotion, loss of career specialty, reassignment to a different shift, reduction of wages or benefits, refusal to award any grant, contract, or other program, refusal to provide residency training opportunities, or any other penalty, disciplinary, or retaliatory action. Section 5. Freedom of Conscience of Health Care Institutions. (a) Freedom of Conscience. A health care institution has the right not to participate, and no health care institution shall be required to participate in a health care service that violates its conscience. (b) Immunity from Liability. A health care institution that declines to provide or participate in a health care service that violates its conscience shall not be civilly, criminally, or administratively liable if the institution provides a consent form to be signed by a patient before admission to the institution stating that it reserves the right to decline to provide or participate in health care services that violate its conscience. (c) Discrimination. It shall be unlawful for any person, public or private institution, or public official to discriminate against any health care institution, or any person, association, corporation, or other entity attempting to establish a new health care institution or operating an existing health care institution, in any manner, including but not limited to the following: any denial, deprivation or disqualification with respect to licensure; any aid assistance, benefit, or privilege, including staff privileges; or any authorization, including authorization to create, 6

expand, improve, acquire, or affiliate or merge with any health care institution, because such health care institution, or person, association, or corporation planning, proposing, or operating a health care institution declines to participate in a health care service which violates the health care institution s conscience. (d) Denial of Aid or Benefit. It shall be unlawful for any public official, agency, institution, or entity to deny any form of aid, assistance, grants, or benefits, or in any other manner to coerce, disqualify, or discriminate against any person, association, corporation, or other entity attempting to establish a new health care institution or operating an existing health care institution because the existing or proposed health care institution declines to participate in a health care service contrary to the health care institution s conscience. Section 6. Freedom of Conscience of Health Care Payers. (a) Freedom of Conscience. A health care payer has the right to decline to pay, and no health care payer shall be required to pay for or arrange for the payment of any health care service or product that violates its conscience. (b) Immunity from Liability. No health care payer and no person, association, corporation, or other entity that owns, operates, supervises, or manages a health care payer shall be civilly or criminally liable by reason of the health care payer s declining to pay for or arrange for the payment of any health care service that violates its conscience. (c) Discrimination. It shall be unlawful for any person, public or private institution, or public official to discriminate against any health care payer, or any person, association, corporation, or other entity (i) attempting to establish a new health care payer or (ii) operating an existing health care payer, in any manner, including but not limited to the following: any denial, deprivation, or disqualification with respect to licensure, aid, assistance, benefit, privilege, or authorization, including but not limited to any authorization to create, expand, improve, acquire, or affiliate or merge with any health care payer, because a health care payer, or a person, association, corporation, or other entity planning, proposing, or operating a health care payer declines to pay for or arrange for the payment of any health care service that violates its conscience. (d) Denial of Aid or Benefits. It shall be unlawful for any public official, agency, institution, or entity to deny any form of aid, assistance, grants, or benefits, or in any other manner to coerce, disqualify, or discriminate against any health care payer, or any person, association, corporation, or other entity attempting to establish a new health care payer or operating an existing health care 7

payer because the existing or proposed health care payer declines to pay for or arrange for the payment of any health care service that is contrary to its conscience. Section 7. Civil Remedies. (a) Civil Action. A civil action for damages or injunctive relief, or both, may be brought for the violation of any provision of this Act. It shall not be a defense to any claim arising out of the violation of this Act that such violation was necessary to prevent additional burden or expense on any other health care provider, health care institution, individual, or patient. (b) Damage Remedies. Any individual, association, corporation, entity, or health care institution injured by any public or private individual, association, agency, entity, or corporation by reason of any conduct prohibited by this Act may commence a civil action. Upon finding a violation of this Act, the aggrieved party shall be entitled to recover threefold the actual damages, including pain and suffering, sustained by such individual, association, corporation, entity, or health care institution, the costs of the action, and reasonable attorney's fees; but in no case shall recovery be less than $5,000 for each violation in addition to costs of the action and reasonable attorney's fees. These damage remedies shall be cumulative, and not exclusive of other remedies afforded under any other state or federal law. (c) Injunctive Remedies. The court in such civil action may award injunctive relief, including, but not limited to, ordering reinstatement of a health care provider to his or her prior job position. Section 8. Severability. Any provision of this Act held to be invalid or unenforceable by its terms, or as applied to any person or circumstance, shall be construed so as give it the maximum effect permitted by law, unless such holding shall be one of utter invalidity or unenforceability, in which event such provision shall be deemed severable here from and shall not affect the remainder hereof or the application of such provision to other persons not similarly situated or to other, dissimilar circumstances. Section 9. Effective Date. This Act takes effect on [Insert date]. 8

STATE OF THE STATES: WHERE ARE WE NOW? RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE OVERVIEW Two states protect the civil rights of all health care providers, whether individuals, institutions, or payers (public or private) who conscientiously object to participating in any health care procedure or service: LA and MS. Forty-five states protect the civil rights of only certain health care professionals and/or institutions from participating in specific procedures (usually abortion only): AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MO, MT, NE, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, WV, and WY. Three states provide no protection for the civil rights of health care providers, institutions, or payers: AL, NH, and VT. 9

More detailed information about the need and justification for rights of conscience protections for health care providers can be found in AUL s annual publication Defending Life 2010: A State by State Legal Guide to Abortion, Bioethics, and the End of Life. Defending Life 2010 is available online at AUL.org or for purchase at Amazon.com. For further information regarding this or other AUL policy guides, please contact: AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE 655 15 th Street NW, Suite 410 Washington DC 20005 202.289.1478 Fax 202.289.1473 Legislation@AUL.org www.aul.org 2010 This policy guide may be copied and distributed freely as long as the content remains unchanged and is referenced as the creator and owner this content. 10