-For Human Rights Due Diligence Disclosure

Similar documents
Occupational Health Standard

Risk Management. Policy. Table of Contents

OH&S Policy Aims. Scope and Application. Definitions

Work Health and Safety

POLICY ON LONE WORKING JANUARY 2012

CRCE Exam Study Manual Update for 2017

Loyola University of Chicago Licensee Code of Conduct

Statement of Guidance: Outsourcing Regulated Entities

Chapter 19 Section 3. Privacy And Security Of Protected Health Information (PHI)

The Offshoring of Commercial Contract Management

Banking Regulation and Policy Department Bangladesh Bank Head Office Dhaka

Steps for Conducting a Violence Risk Assessment in K-12 for Education Assistants

(1) SHORT TITLE.--This section may be cited as the "Florida Patient's Bill of Rights and Responsibilities."

Health & Safety Policy

Handout 8.4 The Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care, 1991

Safely Managing Construction/Renovation and Maintenance in Healthcare: A Facilities Management Perspective February 10, 2009

SECTION 11 JANUARy 2015

Contract Compliance Program

9. GOVERNANCE. Policy 9.13 WORK HEALTH SAFETY POLICY

General Policy. Code of Conduct

Application Guide for the Aboriginal Participation Fund

The following tables define the impact and likelihood scoring options and the resulting score: - Risk score. Category

Quality Impact Assessment Policy

Responsive, Flexible & Sensitive Domiciliary Care. Service User Handbook

Trust Quality Impact Assessment (QIA) Policy

Telecommuting Policy - SAMPLE

Work Health and Safety Church Council and Congregation Policy

Quality and Equality Integrated Impact Assessment Policy

November NHS Rushcliffe CCG Assurance Framework

2.01 All employees of the University of Windsor shall be vigilant and shall exercise appropriate due diligence to minimize risks.

Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection

Internal Compliance Programs (ICPs)

Uniform Bid Process and Contractor Relations

Sample Privacy Impact Assessment Report Project: Outsourcing clinical audit to an external company in St. Anywhere s hospital

Sentinel Scheme Rules

Risk Management Policy: overarching framework

Rules for Non Trackside Sponsors joining the Sentinel Scheme

Supply Chain Risk Management

Basic Information. Date: Patient s Name: Address:

Grant Agreement Tool Model Contract Provisions

Risk assessment form. Students under 18 at 1 October in year of entry

Safety & Risk Management

Risk Assessment Tool Training Manual

Health and Safety Strategy

Marine Corps Social Media Principles

MANAGING WORKFORCE MEDICAL CARE FOR REMOTE AND CROSS-COUNTRY PROJECTS. By David Landrum and Rene Scott

Good decision making: Investigations and threshold criteria guidance

DPAS Defense Priorities & Allocations System for the Contractor

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, INC.

Work Health and Safety Act

Writtle College Health and Safety Policy

TALENT MARKET UPDATE SINGAPORE Q2 2017

POLICY. Edith Cowan University (ECU) recognises that a safe and healthy working environment is conducive to job satisfaction and productivity.

CCIA SAFETY RECOGNITION AWARDS

SUPPORT FOR VULNERABLE GP PRACTICES: PILOT PROGRAMME

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION (ESF) 3 PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR OIL WATER SEPARATOR CLEANING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON SCOTT AFB (SAFB) 01 OCT SEP 17 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

HEALTH AND SAFETY The Higher Duty of Care An Overview Simon Lowe Presentation for the National College Thursday 15 November 2012

OSH Injuries Reports. OSH Injuries Statistics

APPENDIX A SCOPE OF WORK

Rights of Military Members

Innovative Safety Initiative Award 2013

Low Medium High Critical Business Impact: X Changes are important, but urgent implementation is not required, incorporate into your existing workflow.

The Act, which amends the Small Business Act ([15 USC 654} 15 U.S.C. 654 et seq.), is intended to:

MANUAL HANDLING GUIDANCE

Please find attached submission from Homebirth Australia to the consultation on the proposal to protect midwifery practice in South Australia.

Operational date 01 April 2012 Review date April 2014 Version Number V0.3 Supersedes

A Simple Guide to the New Zealand Health and Safety at Work Act 2015

Making a Request for records from the Buchanan County Administrator s Office

The Code of Ethics applies to all registrants of the Personal Support Worker ( PSW ) Registry of Ontario ( Registry ).

Third Party Trust Manage your outsourcing arrangements

DPAS Defense Priorities & Allocations System for the Contractor

Transparency and doctors with competing interests guidance from the BMA

Health and Safety Annual Report for

West Virginia CDBG DR Action Plan COMMUNITY BRIEFING APRIL 4, 2017 & APRIL 5, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Outsourcing Guidelines. for Financial Institutions DRAFT (FOR CONSULTATION)

Section 10: Guidance on risk assessment and risk management within the Adult Safeguarding process

Equality & Rights Action Plan

Sustainable Construction Safety and Health Rating System

You have the right to request to inspect or receive copies of public records, or both.

Standard Development Timeline

District Safety Management System. District 105M

Grievances and Resident/Family Councils

Occupational health in 21 st century the perspective of WHO Regional Office for Europe

Client name:... Billing name:... Address:... address:... ABN/ACN:... Contact name:... Phone number:... Cost register (office use):...

Document Details Title

Trust Fund Grant Agreement

Minnesota Patients Bill of Rights

Consultation on developing our approach to regulating registered pharmacies

Your guide to managing risk at events

Independent Installation Contractor 2014 Participation Agreement Cover Sheet

NEXT GENERATION INTERNET

REGISTRATION DEADLINE: Feb. 9, 2018

CONNECTICUT CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, INC.

SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN THE STATE OF THE NHS

Minnesota Patients Bill of Rights

Fieldwork Safety Guidelines

Transcription:

-For www.btsgroup.co.th- Human Rights Due Diligence Disclosure 1

Human Rights Due Diligence Process Source: UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights 2

BTS Group Human Rights Policy The scope of the human rights policy refers to BTS Group s expectation on human rights compliance not only in their own operation but also subsidiaries, joint-venture, business partners. BTS Group has made commitments in relation to the human rights focusing four areas: employees, communities, suppliers & sub-contractors and customers. Human rights topics in the policy are, for example, discrimination, working hours and remuneration child labour, force labour, employment practices, freedom of association and grievance mechanism. 3

Human Rights Risk Assessment: Risk Matrix In order to identify human rights risks and prevent human rights violations or other adverse impacts on human rights from occurring in its operations, BTS Group has performed a human rights risk assessment that covers its entire value chain. This human rights risk assessment is part of the human rights due diligence process, and allows BTS Group to identify, prevent, and mitigate human rights risks throughout the activities of its direct operations and subsidiaries. This includes both internal stakeholders such as employees, as well as external stakeholders such as suppliers, communities, and customers, and comprehensively covers vulnerable groups. The matrix below was used to rank human rights risks in terms of likelihood and severity. 4

Human Rights Risk Assessment: Coverage BTS Group Holdings PCL Mass Transit Media Services Property Development Hospitality Food E-payment Source: BTSG Annual Report 2016/2017 P.38-39 5

Human Rights Risk Assessment Criteria: Severity Severity Level Scale (seriousness of impact) Scope (How many people are or will be affected) Irremediable Nature (Difficulty to restore the people impacted to a situation before impact) Critical (4) Significant impact to health and safety: physical disability or fatality Impact to all stakeholders in the group Impossible to restore or will take longer than 5 years (>5 years) to restore the impact High (3) Moderate impact to health and safety: serious injury that needs rehabilitation (loss time injury) Impact to most stakeholders in particular stakeholder group Take 3 to 5 years (3 n<5) to restore the impact Medium (2) Slight impact to health and safety: minor injury or illness (no loss time) Impact to some stakeholders in particular stakeholder group Take 1 to 3 years (1 n<3) to restore the impact Low (1) Minor impact to health and safety: first aid case No negative impact to stakeholder Take less than a year (<1 year) to restore the impact 6

Human Rights Risk Assessment Criteria: Likelihood Likelihood level Very likely (4) Likely (3) Unlikely (2) Very unlikely (1) Likelihood Such human rights issues have occurred consistently from the past until present. Such human rights issues have happened in the past and also occurred very often at the present. Such human rights issues have happened in the past and also occurred sometimes at the present depending on operation of business units. Such human rights issues have never occurred in our business operation but have occurred in the industry of the operation. Likelihood will be considered based on the local environment or context the likelihood of a risk occurring is greater in a high risk operating environment (UN Guiding Principle 19). 7

Outcome of Human Rights Risk Assessment E1, S2, C1, P1 Health and Safety E2, S3 Working Conditions E3, C3 Discrimination/Accessibility and Inclusion E4 S1 Freedom of Association Illegal Forms of Labour S4, C2 Data Privacy P2 P3 Resettlement Environmental impacts The aforementioned criteria for severity and likelihood are used to determine both inherent and residual risks. Residual risks are risks after mitigation measures have been taken, and thus reflect the effectiveness of such mitigation measures and guides the prioritization of salient human rights risks. Through assessing human rights risks for all operation sites, the health and safety of suppliers workforce (S2) were identified as a salient human rights issues for BTS Group. 8

Supply Chain Management (Health and Safety) Description: Since business activities of some BTSG s suppliers largely involve with labour intensive activities. There is high likelihood and severity with health and safety issues of suppliers workers, for instance, work accidents during operation or maintenance works in mass transit system Activity at risk: Subcontractor s routine operation and maintenance activities in mass transit system Relevant Right Holders: Children, migrant workers, suppliers and contractors Mitigation action: Selection process and regular assessment carried out on a regular basis Regular suppliers meeting Provide safety training to contractor s staff before working in BTS system, focusing on safety and health as well as environmental impact controlling. Control site access for all activities of contractors before working in BTS system. Approve the work permit for high risk activities such as working at height, hot work, confine space. Provide APOSTLE course training to contractor s staff in order to control their works in mass transit track. Track possession control to ensure the safety for all contractor s activities in mass transit track. Discuss safety and health as well as environmental issues in the regular contractor meeting. Perform contractor change control weekly. Perform regular contractor safety inspection. Perform contractor safety audit 2 times/year. 9

Human Rights Risk in Associated Activity These salient human rights risks were identified for the following business activities: Salient Issues Associated activities Health and safety of suppliers workforce Mass Transit Media Property Services (e-payment) Total assessed where risks have been identified 1 from 6 activities Services (Food & Beverage) Services (Hospitality) 10

Result of Human Rights Risk Assessment: Own Operation 5 out of 37 BTSG s own operational sites identified with high human rights risks Mass Transit 1. Bangkok Mass Transit System PCL 2. BTS Infrastructure Services Co., Ltd. 3. BTS Infrastructure Development Co., Ltd. 4. Northern Bangkok Monorail Co., Ltd. 5. Eastern Bangkok Monorail Co., Ltd BTSG s operational sites in identified with human rights risks 86.5% 13.5% BTSG own operational sites with human rights risks BTS own operational sites without human rights risks Thus, out of 100% of operations assessed, 13.5% of operations were identified with high human rights risks. 11

Human Rights Risk Assessment: Results Summary 12

Remediation Actions Taken In 2017, BTS Group had no cases of human rights violation. Thus, there were no remediation actions taken nor necessary. 13

14