Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018

Similar documents
Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

EHR/Meaningful Use

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Troubleshooting Audio

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

2016 Requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs: EligibleProfessionals

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

The History of Meaningful Use

Proposed Rules for Meaningful Use 1, 2 and 3. Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS CMIO Stratis Health

MACRA & Implications for Telemedicine. June 20, 2016

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use Overview for Program Year 2017 Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

THE ECONOMICS OF MEDICAL PRACTICE UNDER HIPAA/HITECH

Recent and Proposed Rule Changes for Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Promoting Interoperability Measures

Meaningful Use Stage 2

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

AHA Survey on Hospitals Ability to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Programs

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

Understanding MU 3 Requirements

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use and How it Relates to the Quality Payment Program. Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Advancing Care Information Performance Category Fact Sheet

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Copyright. Last updated: September 28, 2017 MicroMD EMR Objective Measure Calculations Manual: Performance Year 2017

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

CMS Modifications to Meaningful Use in Final Rule. Slide materials and recording will be available after the webinar

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

during the EHR reporting period.

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Alaska Medicaid Program

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

Meaningful Use Roadmap

HIE Implications in Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Meaningful Use: Today and in the Future VMGMA Spring Conference Richmond, VA March 21, 2016

Transcription:

Final Meaningful Use Stage 3 Requirements Released August 2018 Earlier this month, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final Stage 3 requirements for the program formerly known as Meaningful Use for calendar years 2019 and 2020. The changes revolve around modifications to specific requirements as well as reporting and scoring methodologies, with scoring changes marking a major change in direction by CMS. Over the last seven years, reporting and qualifying for incentives (or avoiding penalties) has been an allor-nothing, threshold-based proposition. If an entity met the minimums for all criteria, it qualified for an incentive payment (or avoided a penalty). If it did not meet all minimums, it didn t receive an incentive payment (or incurred a penalty). With the approved changes, CMS has moved to a performance-based methodology, in which there are four requirements and six measures an entity must meet. These measures are given point values determined by level of compliance with each measure. Points are totaled and entities with 50 points or above avoid penalty, but those entities with fewer than 50 points will incur a penalty. 50 points or above = No Penalty 50 points or less = Penalty GENERAL CHANGES TO STAGE 3 REQUIREMENTS: The name of the program has changed to Promoting Interoperability (PI). This has already occurred, and you will begin to see references to both PI and MU. This change was made to reflect the program s focus on interoperability and patient access to their health information. Starting in 2019, hospitals will be required to utilize a 2015 edition certified EHR. Among other reasons, the 2015 edition requires Application Programming Interface (API) functionality that will support patient access and improved interoperability. For 2019 and 2020, the reporting period has been reduced from 365 days to any continuous 90 day period. These changes apply only to hospitals (including critical access hospitals [CAHs]). Clinics and individual providers are covered under MACRA. Changes in requirements apply to hospitals participating as Medicare only and dual eligible (Medicare and Medicaid) organizations. Hospitals and CAHs participating solely as a Medicaid only facility will be subject to each state s decision to adopt or not adopt the approved changes. 1 P a g e

WITH STAGE 3, THE NUMBER OF MEASUREMENTS IS REDUCED FROM 16 TO 6 THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM STAGE 3 FOR 2019 AND 2020. Patient education part of the Patient Electronic Access to Health Information Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement, all three measures: o View, Download, Transmit, VDT o Secure Messaging o Patient Generated Health Data The electronic prescribing objective is now composed of the previous stage 3 eprescribing measure (10 point maximum) with two additional measures. THE TWO NEWLY PROPOSED MEASURES INCLUDE: Query of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) (5 bonus points) For at least one patient, perform a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) query for a Schedule II opioid prior to submission of an erx for a Schedule II opioid This measure is optional for 2019 and required for 2020 Verify Opioid Treatment Agreement (5 bonus points) For at least one patient who has at least 30 cumulative days of a Schedule II opioid prescription within the previous six months, identify the existence of a signed opioid treatment agreement This measure is optional for both 2019 and 2020 THE HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE REQUIREMENT INCLUDES TWO MEASURES: The Send a Summary of Care measure has been renamed to Support Electronic Referral Loops by Sending Health Information (20 point maximum) The previous two measures, Request/Accept a Summary of Care, and Clinical Information Reconciliation have been combined into a new measure, Support Electronic Referral Loops by Receiving and Incorporating Health Information (20 point maximum) If a site is not capable of receiving a summary of care and/or performing a reconciliation of clinical information on patient admission, it may take an exemption from reporting this measure, but the maximum points allowed for transmitting a summary of care will double to a maximum of 40 2 P a g e

PROVIDE PATIENT ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO HEALTH INFORMATION (40 POINTS) The measure to provide patients access to their health information has not changed from previous Stage 3 requirements The previous Stage 3 requirements had a 2 nd measure that addressed the provision of patient specific education. As noted earlier, the education measure has been removed from these approved requirements If requested by the patient, access to their health information through use of an API will need to be met by the facility PUBLIC HEALTH AND CLINICAL DATA EXCHANGE (10 POINTS) Yes/no response Two measures required from: o Syndromic Surveillance Reporting o Immunization Registry Reporting o Reportable Laboratory Result Reporting o Electronic Case Reporting o Public Health Registry Reporting o Clinical Data Registry Reporting Failure to report will result in a score of zero for this objective, as well as a total score of zero for the entire PI program If the hospital claims an exemption for either or both measures, the 10 points would be applied to the Provide Patients Electronic Access to Health Information measure, bringing its maximum points to 50 3 P a g e

PROTECT PATIENT HEALTH INFORMATION (HIPAA SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT) Required but no associated points Can be performed outside the 90-day reporting period but within the calendar year The requirement covers all systems that contain electronic PHI If audited, site will need to provide documentation of the assessment as well as documentation showing remediation plans and progress towards mitigation SUBMISSION OF CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQM) If submitting electronically, hospitals will need to report on four of 16 permitted CQMs in QRDA-1 format through QualityNet (QNET) Under certain circumstances, hospitals may be able to submit their CQMs manually. If they do submit manually, hospitals will need to report on 16 CQMs Response at attestation will be a yes or no answer, with no associated metrics or points Hospitals should look at measures being proposed for removal in 2020; it may be worthwhile choosing four that will remain in use THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONTENT OF THE CONTINUITY OF CARE DOCUMENT (CCD) HAVE NO PROPOSED CHANGES BUT IT IS WORTH REITERATING THE CHANGES THAT WILL NEED TO BE MADE: Assessment Care Plan is Removed for 2019 NEW Required Components Plan of Treatment Goals Health Concerns Impantable Devices 4 P a g e

SCORING Instead of the existing compliance minimums for each criterion and the all or nothing threshold for incentives and penalties, the finalized changes include a scoring methodology which allows for some flexibility in the manner compliance may be achieved. Here are the basics: Calculation of compliance percentages is for each required measure and objective. A points system is being used, with points calculated based on the maximum point total for each measure and the hospital s compliance percentage. When the individual criteria points are summed, a minimum of 50 points is required to avoid the penalty of a reduction in the CMS annual Medicare increase. 1 3 5 eprescribing erx - 10 points maximum Query Prescription Drug Monitoring program/database - if performed one time, 5 bonus points Verify Opioid Treatment Agreement, if performed one time, 5 bonus points Provide Patient Electronic Access to Health Information 40 points maximum HIPAA Security Risk Analysis Yes/no answer No associated points, but submission is required 2 4 6 Health Information Exchange Transmitting a CCD on discharge for every patient - 20 points maximum Receiving a CCD on admission. For patients never seen at the facility, perform reconciliation on meds, med allergies, problems - 20 points maximum If site can t receive a CCD, transmitting a summary of care becomes 40 points maximum Two Public Health Submissions 10 points Clinical Quality Measures No Electronic submission required on four CQMs No associated points, but submission is required SCORING EXAMPLES: Below are scoring examples of two hospitals compliance levels. Scoring Example Hospital Can Receive CCD Max Current Site Measure Points Compliance % Points erx 10 64 % 6.4 Transmit CCD 20 80 % 16 Receive CCD 20 0 % 0 Patient Access 40 87 % 34.8 Public Health 10 100 % 10 Total Points 67.2 Scoring Example Hospital Cannot Receive CCD Max Current Site Measure Points Compliance % Points erx 10 64 % 6.4 Transmit CCD 40 80 % 32 Receive CCD 0 0 % 0 Patient Access 40 87 % 34.8 Public Health 10 100 % 10 Total Points (no summary of care) 83.2 Both hospitals are able to achieve a total score greater than 50 and would not receive a penalty for 2019. 5 P a g e

CONCLUSION Overall, the changes in the Stage 3 requirements for 2019 and 2020 support CMS s directions of increasing patient access to their health information, increasing interoperability and sharing of health data between hospitals and providers, and increasing the utilization level of electronic health records. The change to a 90-day reporting period and reduction in number of requirements and measures should help to reduce the time hospitals will need to dedicate to meeting PI requirements. The new performance-based scoring methodology should allow facilities to direct their clinical efforts to improving their processes rather than simply trying to meet compliance minimums. About Since our inception in 2001, NHA s sole focus has been providing solutions that maximize the value of your MEDITECH EHR. The experience we gained along the way has made us the largest and most respected MEDITECH consulting firm in North America. Our exclusive focus has allowed us to provide clients with greater insight and understanding of MEDITECH s capabilities and the expertise to better deliver innovative tools, solutions, and strategies that improve your operational performance and enhance patient care quality. Our proven track record has positioned us to become MEDITECH s first and most experienced READY-certified consulting firm. Our staff not only makes up the largest MEDITECH consulting team available, it is also comprised of the most experienced professionals in the industry. By leveraging the combined expertise of our consulting team, NHA stands second to none and is uniquely positioned to meet the needs of any organization utilizing the MEDITECH EHR. For more information or assistance with Stage 3 planning, contact us at (888) 837-1300 or visit us at www.navinhaffty.com. 1900 West Park Drive, Suite 180 Westborough, MA 01581 Tel: (888) 837-1300 Fax: (781) 878-8703 www.navinhaffty.com 6 P a g e