UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE SE / Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-12) Initiative

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE T / Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing : Counter Narcotics Technology Program Office

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: National Security Space Office

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #44

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE T: Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing EF4: Integrated Broadcast System

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED United States Special Operations Command Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #208

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #77

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Biometrics Enabled Intelligence FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 12 R-1 Line #203

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Joint Command and Control. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Theater Battle Management (TBM) C4I FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element S750: Mission Training and Preparation Systems FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE T: Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY (JPRA) FY 2011 OCO Estimate. FY 2011 Total Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Defense-Wide Electronic Procurement Capabilities. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY (JPRA)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #138

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE K: Minimum Essential Emergency Communications Network (MEECN)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : Integrated Broadcast Service FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : TECH SURVEIL COUNTER MEAS EQPT. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Army Integ Military Human Resources Sys (A-IMRS)

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / International Intelligence Technology and Architectures. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #73

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #163

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #94

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Human, Social and Culture Behavior (HSCB) Modeling Advanced Development FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #89

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #152 Page 1 of 15

UNCLASSIFIED. Prior Years FY 2013 FY Total Cost FY 2015

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2011 Total Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #199

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #198

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #47

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: Project MDAP/MAIS Code(s): N42

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 20 R-1 Line #37

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: NUCLEAR WEAPON MODERNIZATION FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #189

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : TECH SURVEIL COUNTER MEAS EQPT. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #201

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Platform Electronics

UNCLASSIFIED FY Quantity of RDT&E Articles

UNCLASSIFIED FY This program develops and demonstrates advanced technologies, including Electromagnetic (EM) Rail Gun for naval weapon systems.

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #169

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #123

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Multi-Service Systems Engineering FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Transcription:

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Cost To Complete Total Program Element 12.413 6.353 5.607 5.581-5.581 5.709 6.027 6.404 6.581 Continuing Continuing 774: Defense Readiness 12.413 6.353 5.607 5.581-5.581 5.709 6.027 6.404 6.581 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This funding supports Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) directing the Department of Defense (DoD) components to develop guidelines and procedures for a comprehensive readiness reporting system that evaluates readiness on the basis of the actual missions and capabilities assigned to the forces. The Defense Readiness establishes a capabilities-based, adaptive, near real-time readiness information system for the DoD. This system is being designed to measure the readiness of military forces and supporting infrastructure to meet missions and goals assigned by the Secretary of Defense. DRRS hosts information and applications used to support the Geographic and Functional Combatant Commanders. The transformation of readiness reporting into a new, more comprehensive system presents a number of significant challenges. First, there are thousands of new potential reporting entities to include in DRRS, such as Combatant Commands, Joint Task Forces, Services, Active and Reserve component units, installations, depots, ports, and major elements of the industrial base. These entities must not only define and implement reporting based on specific readiness metrics, but they must make their readiness status continuously available in near real time to DRRS. Second, the shift from resource centric readiness reporting to a mission/ capabilities based reporting system oriented towards the National Military Strategy (NMS) makes substantially more complex demands on readiness reporting. DRRS allows the Department to assess readiness globally based on our integrated ability to project and sustain a mix of constructed forces in simultaneous engagements. Finally, the challenges associated with sourcing and evaluating the readiness of our forces engaged in on-going real operations mean that force managers need applications that will query the entire Department for suitable, available organizations to meet current needs. The need for these applications and the underlying data are a top priority for the DRRS project. The realization of DRRS requires integrating a host of key technologies in order to achieve an information system that supports distributed, collaborative, and dynamic readiness reporting in addition to continuous tool-based assessment. The primary technical goal is the creation of a highly reliable and securely integrated readiness data environment to leverage and extend current readiness information systems. This system is based on intelligent agents, dynamic databases, semantic middleware, and publish/subscribe concepts; providing a logically uniform view into the multiple databases and information sources that feed DRRS. Through this type of advanced information environment, the DRRS dramatically expands the range of readiness information available to manage the force. This environment supports a suite of analysis tools that allow users to explore the consequences of readiness deficiencies in terms of the ability to generate forces and assess transportation feasibility as it pertains to specific scenarios. These tools and tool suites harness the power of the information environment to make possible the kind of quick-turnaround, excursiondriven readiness assessment that is at the heart of DRRS. Total Cost Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #133

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 6: RDT&E Management Support B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total Previous President's Budget 6.356 5.616 5.619-5.619 Current President's Budget 6.353 5.607 5.581-5.581 Total Adjustments -0.003-0.009-0.038 - -0.038 Congressional General Reductions - - Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings -0.003 - SBIR/STTR Transfer - - Baseline Program Adjustment - - -0.038 - -0.038 FFRDC (Section 8104) - -0.009 - - - Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 2 of 5 R-1 Line #133

COST ($ in Millions) 774: Defense Readiness Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Cost To Complete 12.413 6.353 5.607 5.581-5.581 5.709 6.027 6.404 6.581 Continuing Continuing Quantity of RDT&E Articles - - - - - - - - - - A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This funding supports Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) directing the Department of Defense (DoD) components to develop guidelines and procedures for a comprehensive readiness reporting system that evaluates readiness on the basis of the actual missions and capabilities assigned to the forces. The Defense Readiness establishes a capabilities-based, adaptive, near real-time readiness information system for the DoD. This system is being designed to measure the readiness of military forces and supporting infrastructure to meet missions and goals assigned by the Secretary of Defense. DRRS hosts information and applications used to support the Geographic and Functional Combatant Commanders. The transformation of readiness reporting into a new, more comprehensive system presents a number of significant challenges. First, there are thousands of new potential reporting entities to include in DRRS, such as Combatant Commands, Joint Task Forces, Services, Active and Reserve component units, installations, depots, ports, and major elements of the industrial base. These entities must not only define and implement reporting based on specific readiness metrics, but they must make their readiness status continuously available in near real time to DRRS. Second, the shift from resource centric readiness reporting to a mission/ capabilities based reporting system oriented towards the National Military Strategy (NMS) makes substantially more complex demands on readiness reporting. DRRS allows the Department to assess readiness globally based on our integrated ability to project and sustain a mix of constructed forces in simultaneous engagements. Finally, the challenges associated with sourcing and evaluating the readiness of our forces engaged in on-going real operations mean that force managers need applications that will query the entire Department for suitable, available organizations to meet current needs. The need for these applications and the underlying data are a top priority for the DRRS project. The realization of DRRS requires integrating a host of key technologies in order to achieve an information system that supports distributed, collaborative, and dynamic readiness reporting in addition to continuous tool-based assessment. The primary technical goal is the creation of a highly reliable and securely integrated readiness data environment to leverage and extend current readiness information systems. This system is based on intelligent agents, dynamic databases, semantic middleware, and publish/subscribe concepts; providing a logically uniform view into the multiple databases and information sources that feed DRRS. Through this type of advanced information environment, the DRRS dramatically expands the range of readiness information available to manage the force. This environment supports a suite of analysis tools that allow users to explore the consequences of readiness deficiencies in terms of the ability to generate forces and assess transportation feasibility as it pertains to specific scenarios. These tools and tool suites harness the power of the information environment to make possible the kind of quick-turnaround, excursiondriven readiness assessment that is at the heart of DRRS. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Title: 774 Defense Readiness Reporting System 6.353 5.607 5.581 Total Cost Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 3 of 5 R-1 Line #133

B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Description: DRRS is the primary means by which Defense components (Combatant Commands, Services, Agencies and their subordinate elements and units) report their readiness. The system measures readiness of the Department's components to execute the full range of missions assigned by the Secretary of Defense. The Defense Readiness establishes a capabilities-based, adaptive, near real-time readiness information system for DoD. DRRS measures the readiness of military forces and supporting infrastructure to meet missions and goals assigned by the Secretary of Defense. The realization of DRRS required integrating a host of key technologies to achieve an information system that supports distributed, collaborative, and dynamic readiness reporting in addition to continuous tool-based assessment. The primary technical goal was the creation of a highly reliable and securely integrated readiness data environment to leverage and extend current readiness information systems. DRRS contains readiness metrics and supporting data for forces and support organizations. FY 2014 Accomplishments: Achieved Full Operational Capability (FOC) Continued Software lifecycle support Continued to assist the Services using DRRS to support their Component Commanders and the COCOMS Continued refinement of data architecture and integration of GFM DI within DRRS Implemented PKI authentication within the DRRS application Continued implementing functionality to facilitate the retirement of legacy systems and automate potions of the Air Force reporting process. Continued necessary system testing by outside agencies FY 2015 Plans: Continue Software lifecycle support Continue to assist the Services, CCDRs and Combat Support Agencies fully integrating DRRS Continue refinement of data architecture Continue full integration of GFM DI within DRRS Support the integration of JPES and integration with APEX Continue development and integration with Interagency readiness and preparedness systems outside DoD. Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 4 of 5 R-1 Line #133

B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Complete Joint Interoperability testing through the Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) Plans: Continue refinement of data architecture Continue development and refinement of the Air Force Input Tool Continue full integration of GFM DI within DRRS Complete development required to support the readiness enterprise transition to DRRS as the source for SORTS data Support the integration of JPES and integration with APEX Continue development and integration with Interagency readiness and preparedness systems outside DoD. Complete Joint Interoperability Testing through the Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) N/A Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy N/A Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 6.353 5.607 5.581 E. Performance Metrics Readiness Transformation - Accurate and timely Mission Readiness Assessment and Reporting Capability Readiness Reporting and Assessment - Operational commonality of mission based capability readiness reporting and assessment DRRS Operational Performance - Single integrated Readiness system capability for the Department Achieving Reliable Data Architecture and Interoperability - Seamless integration with the departments readiness architecture and compatible with emerging adaptive planning systems Transition to one readiness reporting system for DoD. Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 5 of 5 R-1 Line #133