IRB 04. Research Supported by the Department of Defense

Similar documents
RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

RESEARCH SUPPORTED BY A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) COMPONENT

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements

SECNAVINST E ONR Dec 2017 SECNAV INSTRUCTION E. From: Secretary of the Navy. Subj: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM

Washington University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures. April 20, 2015

Appendix (v ) Page 1 of 7

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)

SECNAVINST D BUMED-M00R 6 November 2006

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Protection of Human Subjects and Adherence to Ethical Standards in DoD-Supported Research

Genesis Health System. Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

Chapter 2: Guiding Principles Chapter 3: Authority and Delegation

Office of Human Research Office of Human Research Policy and Procedure Manual. Version: 4/4/18

Strategies for Achieving Regulatory Compliance and Economies in DoD-Supported Research

IRB 101. Rachel Langhofer Joan Rankin Shapiro Research Administration UA College of Medicine - Phoenix

INVESTIGATOR GUIDANCE:

NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

"Getting Your Protocol Through the IRB"

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

ETHICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

University of Virginia Standard Operating Procedures for the Human Research Protection Program

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 10 SEPTEMBER 2014

The United States Army Combined Arms Center Education (CAC-E) BULLETIN 940. Research Review and Approval

Department of Defense Human Research Protection Program AF ISSUED DOD INSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT FOR INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) REVIEW (IAIR)

Purpose: To provide policy and guidelines and helpful information for conducting research at Brooks

Operational Guidelines for Scientific Review Committees (SRC) and Institutional Review Boards (IRB)

TRICARE Management Activity s Human Research Protection Program, Data Sharing Agreement Program, and the TMA Privacy Board

EMORY UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 7/01/2016

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board

University of Colorado Denver Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) Policies and Procedures for the Protection of Human Subjects

Central Michigan University Standard Operating Procedures Human Research Protection Program

A Conversation with the Department of Defense (DoD) Ms. Patty Decot Office of the Secretary of Defense Commander William Deniston

The Greenville Hospital System Office of Research Compliance and Administration HRPP Policies and Procedures

UT Southwestern Medical Center Human Research Protection Program Policy, Procedure and Guidance Documents

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH LAST REVISION DATE 5/3/17

INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS


Roles and Responsibilities of Students and Adults

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

Institutional Review Board for Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Manual for Faculty, Staff, and Student Researchers

Part 1: Employment Restrictions After Leaving DoD: Personal Lifetime Ban

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

Public Input for Changes to Reportable Events Policy

REGULATORY AND FUNDING CHANGES FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Tufts Medical Center (Tufts MC) and Tufts University Health Sciences (TUHS) IRB Western IRB (WIRB) Submission Policy

SOP Problems and Adverse Events, Record and Report

National Cancer Institute. Central Institutional Review Board. Standard Operating Procedures

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

Summary of the Common Rule Changes

10 STEPS TO IRB APPROVAL

FAQs March 12, 2012 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures

HonorHealth Research Institute. Investigator Manual. July 27, Version 3.0

(Type inside gray boxes, cells will expand) A. EIGHT POINT CRITERIA for IRB Review

Institutional Review Board Manual. University of the Incarnate Word

Institutional Review Board Application for Exempt Status Determination

Utilizing the NCI CIRB

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Setting up a CITI account for users not enrolled at or employed by Georgia Tech. Georgia Institute of Technology December 2016

DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: August 5, 2008

I. Scope This policy defines unanticipated problems and adverse events and establishes the reporting process and timeline.

Request to Use an External IRB as an IRB of Record

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

PROCEDURES GOVERNING HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Operational Manual

Rules of Engagement: Collaborating with Non-BU/BMC Investigators. Mary A. Banks BS, BSN Director, BU/BMC IRB December 2010

Guide to Completing Medical University of South Carolina s Institutional Review Board (IRB) Continuing Review Application

New Study Submissions to the IRB

Roles and Responsibilities of Students and Adults

Study Responsibilities. Choose all that apply. f. Draw/collect laboratory specimens

Implementing the Revised Common Rule Exemptions with Limited IRB Review

IRBs IN THE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SETTING

USING SMART IRB AND SINGLE IRB REVIEW

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

U. S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQUISITION ACTIVITY GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ASSISTANCE AWARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1 May 2008

G U I D E L I N E S. for the. FGCU Institutional Review Board (IRB)

SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY ONE WASHINGTON SQUARE SAN JOSÉ, CA 95192

Standard Operating Procedure IRB Review of Research Subject to the Revised Common Rule

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

SUBCHAPTER 03M UNIFORM ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AWARDS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SECTION ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION

EXEMPT RESEARCH. 1. Overview

DO I NEED TO SUBMIT FOR THIS?... & OTHER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. March 2015 IRB Forum

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

The University of Southern Maine Policies, Procedures and Guidance For Human Subjects Research

University of Colorado Denver Human Research Protection Program Investigator Responsibilities for the Protection of Human Subjects

TWENTY BASIC RULES FOR PERSONNEL LEAVING THE ARMY RESTRICTIONS ON SEEKING EMPLOYMENT (BEFORE YOU LEAVE)

IRB Federal Regulations Comparison Table 4/24/01 as updated through 10/31/01

Submitting Requests for Exemption and Expedited Review to the IRB

Exempt & Expedited Reviews. February 2017 IRB Member Training

Policy Guidance Duplicate Reviews, Human Research Protection Official Reviews and Administrative Reviews

Biomedical IRB MS #

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Human Subjects Research Policy Update. Naomi Coll Director of Research Policy and Compliance

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

16 STUDY OVERSIGHT Clinical Quality Management Plans

Self-Monitoring Tool

Transcription:

IRB 04 Research Supported by the Department of Defense Presented by IRB Compliance Program, Human Subjects Office May 9, 2016 1

Why a New IRB? Department of the Navy (DoN) research previously sent to WIRB expensive. Reduce or eliminate costs to PI No costs for modifications Keep IRB review of all DoD-supported research inhouse. WIRB is still an option. 2

UI Information for PIs Website information - http://hso.research.uiowa.edu/irb-04-department-defense In-depth guide FAQs 3

What is DoD-Supported Research? Funded by a department or agency of the Department of Defense. Involves cooperation, collaboration, or other type of agreement with a component of the DoD. Uses property, facilities, or assets of a component of the DoD. Subject population intentionally includes personnel (military and/or civilian) from a component of the DoD. 4

Assurances Similar to UI PI Assurances, but with a DoD focus: There are separate Assurances for the Army, Navy, and the DoD Report significant changes & results of the CR to the DoD Human Research Protection Office (HRPO) Report allegations of noncompliance Component may have unique rules for recordkeeping, other than those required by UI or HIPAA DoD approval of surveys and/or interviews of DoD personnel (military or civilian) The Assurance is submitted with the scientific review form. 5

Before You Begin No secret or classified research UI policy against secret research Testing of chemical or biological warfare agents generally prohibited PI cannot be the holder of an IND or IDE (experimental drugs or devices) in DoN research.. 6

Before You Begin, cont d. Meet requirements for additional training Scientific review Previous approval needed for surveys 7

People 8

Military Participants Active duty service members or reserve component members in a federal duty status, are considered to be an adults, even if under eighteen. Investigators must provide documentation of command approval as an attached letter of agreement, indicating that the PI has permission to conduct the research at the location. 9

Military Participants Protection from Undue Influence Officers and senior non-commissioned officers: Can t influence the decision of subordinates Can t be present during recruiting Superior officers must be recruited in a separate session from subordinates. An ombudsman must be present if recruiting for greater than minimal risk studies is conducted in a group setting. 10

Vulnerable Populations In addition to protected populations, such as pregnant women and neonates, the DoD may also require additional protection for: severely ill patients employer / employee student / teacher supervisor / subordinate deployed personnel 11

Clinical Research Should include Women and Minorities This requirement may be waived by the Secretary of Defense or the DoD component if the project is: 1) inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects, 2) is inappropriate with respect to the purpose of the research, or 3) is inappropriate under such other circumstances as the Secretary of Defense may designate. 12

Compensation for Research Using DoD Employees People: Active duty military or DoD civilian employees Off duty Process: Blood draw Other research - as approved by the IRB. Payment from a federal contractor or non-federal source is permissible, but not directly from a federal source. Current details are in the Guide. 13

Processes 14

Requirements for Additional Training The Navy requires additional certification modules offered through the CITI program. Other training or recertification may be necessary. Check with your DoD contact. Directions on accessing the CITI training will be on the website. Plan for it the CITI modules will take time. 15

Scientific Review Rationale: When a non-dod institution is conducting nonexempt research involving human subjects, the IRB review must consider the scientific merit of the research, as required by section 219.111 of Title 32 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) (the Common Rule ). The Scientific Review form is attached to the Assurance. 16

Selected Reviewer Considerations: Team member expertise Valid research hypothesis and/or appropriate objectives Study design is likely to achieve study objectives Could the question be investigated without using human subjects? Is target subject group appropriate? Could risks be further reduced? 17

Reviewer Recommendations Submitted to IRB as currently written. Revise for a second review prior to submission. Submit to IRB after revision and re-review. Rejected due to lack of scientific merit. Only submit studies that have passed scientific review. 18

Research Monitor Research with greater than minimal risk requires a research monitor approved by the IRB. Role: Subject/patient advocate, independent of the investigative team Can stop research in progress and/or remove a subject from the study Protects the safety and well-being of subjects until the IRB can assess the monitor s report Reports observations and findings to the IRB or other designated official 19

Research Monitor, cont d. The PI provides the monitor s name and a summary of the monitors duties, authorities, and responsibilities to the IRB. The research monitor provides documentation stating that he or she agrees to these responsibilities. The document is submitted as an attachment. 20

Survey Approval Research involving surveys or interviews with DoD military or civilian personnel or their families may require DoD approval. Check with the DoD contact for additional requirements and whether the approval is required before or after IRB review. 21

Collaboration Collaborating institutions in multi-site research must have a federalwide assurance (FWA). Investigators must provide documentation of IRB approval or an IRB Authorization Agreement for collaborators. The roles and responsibilities of each institution must be specified in the Agreement, along with a statement indicating that the parties agree to comply with any special DoD requirements. 22

Unique Limitations on Waivers of Informed Consent In addition to the Common Rule requirements for waiving consent, the IRB may waive informed consent for certain minimal risk DoD research. Informed Consent may be waived by the Asst. Sec. of Defense for Research and Engineering if these conditions are met: The research is necessary to advance the development of a medical product for the Military Services. The research may directly benefit the individual experimental subject. The research is conducted in compliance with all other applicable laws and regulations. 23

Reporting The IRB and the PI must report these events to the DoD within 30 days of the event: Determinations of serious or continuing noncompliance Unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others Study suspensions or terminations Audits, inspections, or investigations 24

Reporting, cont d. Results of the IRB Continuing Review Changes to the reviewing IRB IRB-approved substantive amendments to the protocol must be reviewed and approved by the HRPO prior to implementation. 25

Recordkeeping Keep research records for the time required by UI or federal policy, usually 3-6 years. DoD components may have additional requirements, including transferring records to the DoD component. A research record should be retained at UI unless there is an executable data usage agreement specifying otherwise. Retained records shall be made accessible for inspections and copying by authorized representatives of the DoD. 26

After IRB Review and Approval Submit application to the applicable DoD Human Research Protection Office (HRPO) for administrative review. HRPO may require changes to the research. DO NOT begin research until this review is completed. 27

IRB 04 Review Process All IRB 04 studies will have initial full board review. After the initial approval, an expedited review will be considered if appropriate. Board meetings will be convened on an as needed basis. 28

Monitoring All DoD supported research is monitored by the UI IRB. Structured visit Did PI and IRB adhere to rules for DoD-supported research? Were active and off-duty military personnel and civilian employees adequately protected? Opportunities for education from HSO / IRB. During the monitoring process, the study may continue as approved. 29

Thank You! For more information: http://hso.research.uiowa.edu/irb- 04-department-defense 30