University of Kentucky UKnowledge Health Management and Policy Presentations Health Management and Policy 5-10-2013 Next Generation Public Health Delivery: Optimizing Health and Economic Impact Glen P. Mays University of Kentucky, glen.mays@uky.edu Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits you. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/hsm_present Part of the Health Economics Commons, and the Health Services Research Commons Repository Citation Mays, Glen P., "Next Generation Public Health Delivery: Optimizing Health and Economic Impact" (2013). Health Management and Policy Presentations. 23. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/hsm_present/23 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Health Management and Policy at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Health Management and Policy Presentations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact UKnowledge@lsv.uky.edu.
Next Generation Public Health Delivery: Optimizing Health and Economic Impact Glen Mays, PhD, MPH University of Kentucky glen.mays@uky.edu Arkansas Public Health Association Annual Meeting Hot Springs, AR 10 May 2013
Failures in health system performance WHO 2010
Failures in health system performance Source: Commonwealth Fund 2012
Resource allocation & health system failures >75% of national health spending is attributable to conditions that are largely preventable Cardiovascular disease Diabetes Lung diseases Cancer Injuries Vaccine-preventable diseases and sexually transmitted infections <5% of national health spending is allocated to public health and prevention CDC 2008 and CMS 2011
Resource allocation & public health 6 5 4 Governmental Expenditures for Public Health Activity, USDHHS National Health Expenditure Accounts Percent of NHE (x100) Percent of GDP (x1000) Per capita ($100s nominal) Per capita ($100s constant) 3 2 1 0 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Chief Actuary
Who pays for public health? Billions $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $- Governmental Expenditures for Public Health Activity, USDHHS National Health Expenditure Accounts Serie State and local s3 Serie Federal s2 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Chief Actuary
Mismatch between resources & responsibilities Organized programs, policies, and laws to prevent disease and injury and promote health on a population-wide basis Epidemiologic surveillance & investigation Community health assessment & planning Communicable disease control Chronic disease and injury prevention Health education and communication Environmental health monitoring and assessment Enforcement of health laws and regulations Inspection and licensing Inform, advise, and assist school-based, worksitebased, and community-based health programming and roles in assuring access to medical care
Challenges in public health delivery Lack of clear, coherent mission and expectations Complex, fragmented, variable delivery systems Resources ǂ preventable disease burden Large inequities in resources & capacity Variable productivity and efficiency Gaps in evidence base for public health delivery Inability to demonstrate value/return on investment
Public health delivery systems National Longitudinal Survey of Public Health Systems, 2012
National Longitudinal Survey of Public Health Systems Delivery of recommended public health activities % of activities 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Assurance Policy Assessment 1998 2006 2012 10% 5% National Longitudinal Survey of Public Health Systems, 2012
Organizations engaged in local public health delivery % Change 2006-2012 Scope of Delivery 2012-50% -30% -10% 10% 30% 50% Local health agency Other local government State health agency Other state government Hospitals Physician practices Community health centers Health insurers Employers/business Schools CBOs National Longitudinal Survey of Public Health Systems, 2012
% of communities Seven types of public health delivery systems 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1998 2006 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scope High High High Mod Mod Low Low Centralization Mod Low High High Low High Low Integration High High Low Mod Mod Low Mod Comprehensive Conventional Limited Source: Mays et al. 2010; 2012
Fixed-effects models control for population size, density, age composition, poverty status, racial composition, and physician supply Changes in health associated with delivery system Percent Changes in Preventable Mortality Rates by System Typology 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Infant Deaths/1000 Live Births Births 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0-2.0-4.0-6.0 2.0 1.0 0.0-1.0 Cancer deaths/100,000 population Clusters Systems 1-3 3 Clusters Systems 4-5 System Cluster 6 System Cluster 77 Influenza Deaths/100,000-0.1 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Clusters Systems Cluster 1-3 1-3 3 Clusters Systems 4-5 4-5 System Cluster 6 System Cluster 7 Heart Disease Deaths/100,000 Clusters Systems 1-3 1-3 3 Clusters Systems 4-5 4-5 Cluster System 6 System Cluster 7 Infectious Disease Deaths/100,000-2.0 0.0 Clusters Systems 1-3 3 Clusters Systems 4-5 System Cluster 6 System Cluster 7 7 Clusters Systems 1-3 1-3 3 Clusters Systems 4-5 4-5 System Cluster 6 System Cluster 7
Variation in Local Public Health Spending Percent of communities 0.05.1.15 Gini = 0.485 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 Expenditures per capita, 2010
Changes in Local Public Health Spending 1993-2010 Percent of communities 0.05.1.15.2.25 38% decline 62% growth -100-50 0 50 100 Change in per-capita expenditures ($)
2 Mortality reductions attributable to local public health spending, 1993-2008 Infant mortality Heart disease Diabetes Cancer Influenza All-cause Alzheimers Injury 1 0-1 Percent change -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 -8-9 Hierarchical regression estimates with instrumental variables to correct for selection and unmeasured confounding Mays et al. 2011
Medical cost offsets attributable to local public health spending, 1993-2008 For every $10 of public health spending, $9 are recovered in lower medical care spending over 15 years Public health spending/capita ($). 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Public health spending/capita Medicare spending per recipient 7200 7000 6800 6600 6400 6200 6000 5800 Medical spending/person ($). Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 Mays et al. 2009, 2013 Quintiles of public health spending/capita
100% 90% 80% Economies of scale and scope in public health delivery systems Jurisdiction Size 500k+ 70% 60% 50% 50k 499k 40% 30% 20% 10% <50k 0% % of Agencies % of Population Served Source: 2010 NACCHO National Profile of Local Health Departments Survey
Cost ($1000s) $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 Economies of scale and scope in public health delivery Scale (Population in 1000s) Scope (% of Activities) $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Quality (Perceived Effectiveness) $2,000 Cost ($1000s) $1,500 $1,000 $500 Mays et al. 2013 $0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Gains from regionalizing public health delivery 15% 10% Percent Change 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% Mays et al. 2013 Per Capita Cost Scope Quality <25,000 <50,000 <100,000 <150,000 Regionalization Thresholds
Next generation public health delivery Public health agency as chief health strategist Articulate population health needs & priorities Engage community stakeholders Plan with clear roles & responsibilities Recruit & leverage resources Develop and enforce policies Ensure coordination Promote evidence-based practices Monitor and feed back results Mobilize performance improvement Ensure transparency & accountability: resources, results, ROI
Why change now? Next Generation Public Health Delivery
Toward a rapid-learning system in public health Green SM et al. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(3):207-210
Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) First cohort (December 2008 start-up) Second cohort (January 2010 start-up) Affiliate/Emerging PBRNs (2011-13)
PBRNs and Delivery System Change Local Health Departments Engaged in Research Implementation & Translation Activities During Past 12 months PBRN Agencies National Sample Activity Percent/Mean Percent/Mean Identifying research topics 94.1% 27.5% *** Planning/designing studies 81.6% 15.8% *** Recruitment, data collection & analysis 79.6% 50.3% ** Disseminating study results 84.5% 36.6% ** Applying findings in own organization 87.4% 32.1% ** Helping others apply findings 76.5% 18.0% *** Research implementation composite 84.04 (27.38) 30.20 (31.38) ** N 209 505
The bottom line Business as usual is increasingly not an option Someone must assume responsibility for leading the public health delivery system A focus on catalytic functions can improve public health delivery Fundamentally, it s about equity in public health protection If not governmental public health, then who?
For More Information Supported by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Glen P. Mays, Ph.D., M.P.H. glen.mays@uky.edu Email: publichealthpbrn@uky.edu Web: www.publichealthsystems.org Journal: www.frontiersinphssr.org Archive: works.bepress.com/glen_mays University of Kentucky College of Public Health Lexington, KY