Provide a Vessel to Conduct Observations and Deploy Sound Source for a Behavioral Response Study of Cetaceans off Southern California in 2011

Similar documents
Support for FLIP/ORB. Fred H. Fisher. Final Report to the Office of Naval Research Contract N D-0142 (DO#26)

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

ENDANGERED SPECIES ENCROACHMENT RELIEF

Fleet Logistics Center, Puget Sound

Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program (AESOP) Spectrum Management Challenges for the 21st Century

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

at the Missile Defense Agency

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

Operational Energy: ENERGY FOR THE WARFIGHTER

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Homeland Defense and Americas Security Affairs)

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

Software Intensive Acquisition Programs: Productivity and Policy

Wildland Fire Assistance

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH. Ms. Vera M. Carroll Acquisition Branch Head ONR BD 251

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

SSgt, What LAR did you serve with? Submitted by Capt Mark C. Brown CG #15. Majors Dixon and Duryea EWS 2005

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

MK 83 WARHEAD EFFECTIVENESS TESTS

The DoD Siting Clearinghouse. Dave Belote Director, Siting Clearinghouse Office of the Secretary of Defense

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

ASNE Combat Systems Symposium. Balancing Capability and Capacity

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Shallow-Water Mine Countermeasure Capability for USMC Ground Reconnaissance Assets EWS Subject Area Warfighting

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

The Use of Sikes Act Cooperative Agreements for Implementing INRMP Projects

Make or Buy: Cost Impacts of Additive Manufacturing, 3D Laser Scanning Technology, and Collaborative Product Lifecycle Management on Ship Maintenance

Infantry Companies Need Intelligence Cells. Submitted by Captain E.G. Koob

Engineering, Operations & Technology Phantom Works. Mark A. Rivera. Huntington Beach, CA Boeing Phantom Works, SD&A

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

U.S. ARMY EXPLOSIVES SAFETY TEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Report Documentation Page


Office of Inspector General Department of Defense FY 2012 FY 2017 Strategic Plan

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

MAKING IT HAPPEN: TRAINING MECHANIZED INFANTRY COMPANIES

Joint Committee on Tactical Shelters Bi-Annual Meeting with Industry & Exhibition. November 3, 2009

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) and DoD EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD (DDESB)

IMPROVING SPACE TRAINING

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

Report Documentation Page

The Need for a Common Aviation Command and Control System in the Marine Air Command and Control System. Captain Michael Ahlstrom

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

National Guard and Army Reserve Readiness and Operations Support

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

VSE Corporation. Integrity - Agility - Value. VSE Corporation Proprietary Information

The U.S. Navy s Arctic Roadmap: Adapting to Climate Change in the High North

DoD Corrosion Prevention and Control

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

Product Manager Force Sustainment Systems

Aviation Logistics Officers: Combining Supply and Maintenance Responsibilities. Captain WA Elliott

NORMALIZATION OF EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REGULATIONS BETWEEN U.S. NAVY AND AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress

Potential Savings from Substituting Civilians for Military Personnel (Presentation)

Presented to: Presented by: February 5, Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Required PME for Promotion to Captain in the Infantry EWS Contemporary Issue Paper Submitted by Captain MC Danner to Major CJ Bronzi, CG 12 19

Systems Engineering Capstone Marketplace Pilot

Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) Patient Care Platform: Expanding Global Applications and Impact

Click to edit Master title style. How to Submit a Proposal to ONR Navy Gold Coast Small Business Procurement Event August 2012

Acquisition. Air Force Procurement of 60K Tunner Cargo Loader Contractor Logistics Support (D ) March 3, 2006

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

Developmental Test and Evaluation Is Back

DoD Cloud Computing Strategy Needs Implementation Plan and Detailed Waiver Process

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

DOD Leases of Foreign-Built Ships: Background for Congress

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

DoD Architecture Registry System (DARS) EA Conference 2012

Transcription:

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Provide a Vessel to Conduct Observations and Deploy Sound Source for a Behavioral Response Study of Cetaceans off Southern California in 2011 John Calambokidis Cascadia Research Collective 218½ W 4th Avenue Olympia, Washington 98501 phone: 360-943-7325 fax: 360-943-7026 email: Calambokidis@cascadiaresearch.org Award Number: N000141110565 http://www.socal-brs.org LONG-TERM GOALS The long term goal of the SOCAL Behavioral Response Study is to determine how cetaceans respond to naval sounds, specifically mid-frequency sonar, to better evaluate impacts and develop strategies for mitigation. SOCAL-11 was the second year of this proposed 5-year study. The goal of this specific grant was to provide a vessel to serve as an observational platform and as a base of operations for a sound source and also support for chartering a vessel for use of a towed array to be used in the Behavioral Response Study conducted off Southern California in summer 2011. Other components of this work were included in other separate grants to the various groups involved in the collaborative study and this report addresses just the vessel to serve as a base of operations and the primary platform for the observation and sound source. OBJECTIVES This was the second year of the proposed 5-year SOCAL Behavioral Response Study for southern California which began in 2010 (SOCAL-10) to examine the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on local marine mammal species and represents a collaborative effort among a number of parties including Cascadia, Southall Environmental Associates, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (WHOI), Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC), Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC), and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO). Similar studies have been conducted at the AUTEC range and are currently underway in the Mediterranean Sea, all built around a model in which species of interest are fitted with the suction cup-attached tags to record exposure to sound and detailed data on underwater behavior in reaction to these sounds. These efforts have included behavioral observation from both the tag deployment vessel and the source vessel, and in some cases passive acoustic monitoring via an instrumented range, a towed array, or both. Overall objectives of the SOCAL BRS are to obtain new data on the response of a variety of species of marine mammals to Navy sonar to aid the Navy and NOAA in assessing the impact of these activities and ways they might be mitigated. 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 30 SEP 2011 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Provide a Vessel to Conduct Observations and Deploy Sound Source for a Behavioral Response Study of Cetaceans off Southern California in 2011 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Cascadia Research Collective,218 1/2 W. 4th Avenue,Olympia,WA,98501 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 6 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

APPROACH The overall SOCAL-BRS involved a collaboration of a number of parties and a number of different components, this report is for the grant that funded several components of the project, primarily a vessel (Figure 1) from which to conduct the following: 1. Visual observations to sight target and non-target species and monitor behavior during the planned two legs of experimental operations in July-September 2011 2. Provide a platform from which to operate a sound source for use in the BRS 3. Serve as a base of operations for small boat operations to sight animals and deploy tags as well as conduct photo-id 4. Provide housing and food for up to 15 personnel participating in the BRS during the two experimental legs planned for SOCAL-11. Additionally as part of this project two other components were funded: 1. Provide platforms and an observer for operation of Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) to be operated by Southwest Fisheries Science Center (Figure 2). 2. Purchase two satellite tags for deployment on cetaceans and to aid in BRS operations and tracking of animals. The field effort was conducted in 2011 and involved the charter of the vessel Truth out of Santa Barbara, California. Similar to prior BRS studies, the overall goal of the BRS effort will be successful acoustic playbacks on tagged species of interest to document behavioral changes associated with exposure. Goals during this second year include: Expend the sample size of deployments and playbacks obtained in 2010 with additional deployments and playbacks on target species in 2011. Add acoustic monitoring with a towed array from a sailboat to improve detection, deployment, and tracking of beaked whales in areas other than the San Clement SOAR range. Towed array was operated by SWFSC. Add monitoring of blue whale prey distribution for improved understanding of blue whale movements. Expand the sample size on several odontocete species including beaked whales and Risso s dolphins. To achieve this end, operations in 2011 would be conducted in three phases (Scout, Leg 1, and Leg 2). While this configuration is similar to 2010, one major change was that all three phases were to be conducted with the primary vessel (Truth) as the base of operations (Figure 1). This vessel was chosen to meet the following requirements: Area of operations to extend from Moro Bay to San Diego and offshore to include waters west of San Clemente and around San Nicolas and Catalina Islands 2

Cruising speed of at least 10 knots and range of 400 nmi of more. Operations generally involve daylight ops (12 hours) but transits occurring at night as needed to either return to a sheltered area or harbor or shift to a new area. Occasional night operations tracking a tagged whale. Most overnights will be spent either in harbor, anchored, or drifting with up to half the nights underway most of the night either transiting or tracking a whale. Fuel usage averaging 200 gal/day (adequate for average of 100 nmi per day travel) included in charter with additional fuel charged as a surcharge. Ability to put 3 observers on top of wheelhouse with unobstructed visibility forward and to the sides with a 3-4 foot railing added for safety with canvas to provide wind break on railing and intercom or other means of easy communication with bridge and sundeck area behind bridge. Carry at least 150 gallons of gasoline (in bladders, drums, or fuel caddies) in a location that allows refueling RHIBs at night while at anchor or at dock (gasoline itself will be paid for by research group) Provide adequate bunks for 15 personnel plus crew. Provide adequate food and cook to feed number of people specified above including accommodating special dietary needs. Figure 1. Vessel Truth chartered under this grant for leg 1 and 2 of the SOCAL-11 BRS showing scientific crew that based on the vessel and observation platform added above the bridge. Truth served as the observation platform, sound source deployment vessel, and base of operations for the work. 3

Figure 2. Sailboat Jenny Lane charterd for Leg 2 of the SOCAL-11 BRS with towed PAM operated by SWFSC. WORK COMPLETED The SOCAL-11 BRS was completed successfully in three phases in 2011: Scouting leg involving the Truth and one RHIB from 15-26 July 2011 (14 July set up) Leg 1 involving the Truth, 2 RHIBs, and PAM sailboat Green Dragon from 29 July to 7 August 2011 Leg 2 involving the Truth, 2 RHIBs, and Pam sailboat Jenny Lane from 17-30 September 2011 Support for Truth in Leg 1 and Leg 2 as well as the PAM sailboat came from this grant. Overall the work completed during these legs was more successful than had been anticipated. The platform Truth chartered under this grant met all the requirements and was an outstanding platform that helped make the cruise as successful as it was. I allowed the BRS to be conducted over wide-ranging areas with a flexible itnirary to best take advantage of weather openings and encounters with different species (Fiigure 3). We again utilized the excellent observation platform that was constructed above the brige for this project and served as an excellent sighting platform. The sailboat PAM work was successfully conducted by SWFSC using the charters. This aided in the key success with beaked whales on leg 2, where a tag was successfully deployed and playback conducted on a Cuvier s beaked whale (Figure 4). The speed of the sailboat was slower than the other platforms due to it s limitations as well as the need to avoid interference with the PAM and reduced their ability to operate with the other platforms especially on leg 1. Additionaly two satellite tags for use on the BRS were purchased under this grant. One was successfully deployed on a Risso s dophin during the BRS and the other was unfortunately lost during a second deployment attempt where the tag did not attach. 4

While results of the observations, tag deployments, and playbacks completed will be more appropriately covered under reports for other components of the overall BRS project but some of the key accomplishments of the work completed are briefly covered below. Figure 3. Map of survey effort and Controlled Exposrue Experiments in Leg 2 of the SOCAL-11 BRS. Figure 4. RHIB approaching group of Cuvier s beaked whales shortly before succseesful deployment of a Dtag and playback on 24 September 2011. 5

RESULTS This was the first year of an anticipated 5-year study with this grant representing just one component of a larger collaborative effort. Results of the Behavioral Response Study will be the focus of analysis in coming months under other grants. Analysis and reporting will be being conducted under other grants and continued studies that are part of the Behavioral Response Study. IMPACT/APPLICATIONS Like SOCAL-10, the SOCAL-11 effort demonstrated a successful model for conducting BRS studies and showed that both the BRS team, the region, and the methods employed were ideal and achieved a much higher level of success than had been anticipated. The study promises to provide important new data on the behavioral response of cetaceans to Navy sonar and other sounds. TRANSITIONS Work will be continuing on ths anticipated 5-year project. Enough data was gathered in 2010 and 2011 to allow analysis and presentation of some of the findings to scientific conferences including the Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals in Tampa in November and December 2011. Several publications are in difference stages of preparation. RELATED PROJECTS This specific grant was to provide vessels to serve as an observational platform and as a base of operations for a sound source to be used in the SOCL-11 Behavioral Response Study conducted off Southern California in summer 2011. Other components of this work were included in other separate grants to the various groups including Cascadia Research, Southall Environmental Associates, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (WHOI), Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC), Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC), and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO). Similar studies have been conducted at the AUTEC range and are currently underway in the Mediterranean Sea, all built around a model in which species of interest are fitted with the suction cup-attached tags to record exposure to sound and detailed data on underwater behavior in reaction to these sounds. 6