HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary

Similar documents
Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

26,614,000. Article 1 Sec moves to amend H.F. No. 707 as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

FY 2018 Watershed-Based Funding Pilot Program Policy

HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary

FY 2016 Clean Water Fund Competitive Grants Policy

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Plan

Water Quality Improvement Program. Funding Application Guide

Grant All-Detail Report SWCD Local Capacity Services 2016

Watershed-based Funding: Pilot program

MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD. Wednesday, July 15, 2015

VILLAGE OF FOX CROSSING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

12/14/09 DRAFT -- LEGISLATIVE GUIDE FOR LEGACY FUNDS 12/14/09 DRAFT

The House and Senate overwhelmingly approved the legislation. The vote in the Senate was 91-7 and in the House of Representatives.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: NOVEMBER 9, 2015

1 Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Green Solutions Guidelines

APPENDIX J FUNDING SOURCES

1. Webinar Instructions 2. Overview of Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund 3. Review of 2016 Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund RFP 4.

FY Clean Water Fund Competitive Grants Request for Proposal (RFP)

Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota

USFWS North American Wetland Conservation Act U.S. Small Grants Program

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

1. Webinar Instructions 2. Overview of Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund 3. Review of 2017 Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund RFP 4.

ROOT RIVER SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

NH Rivers Management and Protection Program. Love Your River? Don t t Procrastinate Nominate!

Mississippi Headwaters Board

Surface Water Grants Updates. Carroll Schaal Lakes & Rivers Section Chief WI Dept. Natural Resources

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES SUSAN HARRIS MONTGOMERY COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT

TOWN OF LEXINGTON COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE

AGENDA STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE AGENDA LOCATION AGENDA REPORT #

Conservation Leadership and Innovation Program (CLIP)

OPEN SPACE, RECREATION, BAY AND WATERSHED PROTECTION BONDS 2004 OPEN SPACE BOND AUTHORIZATION $70,000,000 (Chapter 595 Public Laws 2004) PENDING

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY THERE ARE SEVERAL REVISIONS EXPANDING ELIGIBILITY

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Clean Water Assistance - Todd (SWCD)

Comprehensive Planning Grant. Comprehensive Plan Checklist

Greenways, Trails and Recreation Program (GTRP)

Watershed Restoration and Protection

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary

Executive Summary. Purpose

PART II THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT

2008 Combined Clean Water Legacy Grant Application Id#: Use TAB key to move from field to field

TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAMS

TOWN OF REHOBOTH COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE

REVISOR FULL-TEXT SIDE-BY-SIDE

Conservation News. Dorrich Dairy 1st Pope County Farm to Receive Certainty Certification from Minnesota Department of Agriculture

HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary

Members Present: Ralph Lewis District I George Aitchison District II Eldon Voigt District III Richard Dreher District IV

LAND PARTNERSHIPS GRANT PROGRAM. PROGRAM GUIDELINES April 2018

Part IV. Appendix C: Funding Sources

Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects

UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA GREENSPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Cumberland County Conservation District Strategic Plan Adopted June 23, 2009

EXCAVATION & FILL PROCEDURE 1

Level II Performance Review

Tools/Funding Opportunities. Topics to Cover

2008 Combined Clean Water Legacy Grant Application Id#: Use TAB key to move from field to field

Section F: Committee of Adjustment: Minor Variance and Consent Applications

Resources and Programs for small HRA s. NAHRO Conference September 28, 2017

King County Flood Control District 2017 Work Program

MDC Landowner Assistance Program and TRIM Grant. Angie Weber, Community Conservation Planner

CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD)

Federal and State Funding Roundtable - EFC Minnowbrook Local Leaders Conference. April 26, 2016

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

Chesapeake Bay Restoration Strategy FAQs

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

GENESEE COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. Organizational Chart

Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant application INSTRUCTIONS

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

Ontario Community Environment Fund (OCEF) Application Guide 2017 Grants

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BIG DARBY ACCORD. Proposals Due by October 25, 2004

Project Priority Scoring System Texas Recreation & Parks Account Non-Urban Indoor Recreation Grant Program (Effective May 1, 2014)

Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Application

Water Infrastructure Funding Opportunities through The NYS Environmental Facilities Corporation

SWCDs Work with Buffer Law

Regional Parks. Policy Plan Amended June 12, 2013

Preliminary Review and. Reference Guide Sections 4.2 and 4.3

Subdivision Presubmittal Conference Submittal Package Cover Page

Trail Legacy Grants FY2015 Program Manual

Effects of the Federal Stimulus Package on Massachusetts Land Surveyors, Civil Engineers and Wetlands Scientists

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER DIVISION - WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

A Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership Proposal for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented

Annual Plan

Senate Bill 379 Land use: general plan: safety element: climate adaptation Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson

Community Development Planning

2016 Standard Application Packet for Concord Community Preservation Act Funding

Arkansas Natural Resources Commission

Friends of Rowan Creek

TOWN OF LENOX COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE APPLICATION FOR CPA FUNDING

2040 REGIONAL PARKS POLICY PLAN

San Mateo County Resource Conservation District FY 2011 Financial Budget

NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING ACTIVITIES OF THE NEBRASKA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST

ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS STRATEGIC PLAN P age 75 Years of Locally Led Conservation

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS FOR PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER PROJECTS. Clean Water State Revolving Fund Program

Annual Plan of Work. July 1, 2016 June 30, 2017

Appendix 4. Potential Greenway Funding Sources. The Whitemarsh Township Greenway Plan

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT (CPA)

Transcription:

HOUSE RESEARCH Bill Summary FILE NUMBER: H.F. 1973 DATE: April 15, 2009 Version: First committee engrossment Authors: Subject: Analyst: Wagenius and others Clean Water Fund Appropriations Janelle Taylor This publication can be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please call 651-296-6753 (voice); or the Minnesota State Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 (TTY) for assistance. Summaries are also available on our website at: www.house.mn/hrd. Section Overview This bill includes appropriations from the clean water fund established by the constitutional amendment that passed in November of 2008 and related policy statutory changes. 1 Clean water fund appropriations. Technical. 2 Department of Agriculture. Appropriates a total of $3,075,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $5,850,000 in fiscal year 2011 to the Department of Agriculture. Of this amount, $339,000 in fiscal year 2010 is for monitoring and analysis of agricultural land management practices in the Root River watershed. Requires the commissioner to submit a report on the use of these funds. 3 Public Facilities Authority. Appropriates a total of $8,125,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $17,250,000 in fiscal year 2011 to the Public Facilities Authority for: grants for wastewater treatment or storm water projects necessary under total maximum daily load (TMDL) plans; the clean water legacy phosphorus reduction grant program; and technical assistance grants, reconstruction loans, and grants for the small community wastewater treatment program. 4 Pollution Control Agency. Appropriates a total of $16,503,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $23,688,000 in fiscal year 2011 to the Pollution Control Agency, including: $9,000,000 each year for the development of TMDL studies and TMDL implementation plans; $500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $1,188,000 in fiscal year 2011 for the development of an enhanced TMDL database and rules; $1,500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $3,500,000 in fiscal year 2011 for grants under the beneficial reuse of wastewater grants program;

Page 2 $750,00 in fiscal year 2010 and $1,500,000 in fiscal year 2011 for groundwater assessment and drinking water protection; $348,000 in fiscal year 2010 to retest the lower Minnesota River that was tested under the Minnesota River Assessment Project; $2,500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $7,500,000 in fiscal year 2011 for the clean water partnership program; $1,000,000 in fiscal year 2010 to establish a network of monitoring sites adjacent to wastewater treatment facilities to assess the levels of endocrine disruptors and other compounds as required under section 15 of this bill; $155,000 in fiscal year 2010 for coal tar notification and the development of best management practices as required under section 16 of this bill, and $1,000,000 in fiscal year 2011 is to develop a model coal tar ordinance and provide grants to local governments to help clean up storm water ponds; and $750,000 in fiscal year 2010 for a restoration project in the lower St. Louis River and Duluth harbor. 5 Department of Natural Resources. Appropriates a total of $5,208,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $9,566,000 in fiscal year 2011 to the Department of Natural Resources, including: a number of appropriations for water quality assessment, TMDL studies and implementation of TMDL plans, and watershed restoration and protection; $375,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $750,000 in fiscal year 2011 for drinking water planning and protection; $2,500,000 each year for high-resolution digital elevation data (LIDAR) to be used in mapping; $225,000 each year for rulemaking for the Mississippi River corridor critical area (as required under section 14 of this bill); and $1,875,000 in fiscal year 2011 for the county geologic atlas program. 6 Board of Water and Soil Resources. Appropriates a total of $7,500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $15,937,000 in fiscal year 2011 to the Board of Water and Soil Resources, including: $1,500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $5,000,000 in fiscal year 2011 to acquire and restore permanent conservation easements on riparian buffers; $1,500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $4,424,000 in fiscal year 2011 for grants to watershed districts and watershed management organizations for water retention, including rain gardens; $1,500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $4,500,000 in fiscal year 2011 for nonpoint source pollution reduction and restoration grants for additional projects to keep water on the land; $500,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $1,500,000 in fiscal year 2011 for permanent

Page 3 conservation easements on wellhead protection areas under the Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) reserve program (modified to add wellhead protection areas in sections 10 and 11 of this bill); and $1,000,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $2,000,000 in fiscal year 2011 for feedlot water quality improvement grants. Requires the board to contract with the Minnesota Conservation Corps for at least $1,000,000 over the biennium. Requires, to the extent possible, restorations funded under this section to plant vegetation or sow seed only of ecotypes native to Minnesota and preferably of the local ecotype. 7 Department of Health. Appropriates a total of $1,250,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $2,500,000 in fiscal year 2011 to the Department of Health for drinking water source protection activities and for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in drinking water. 8 University of Minnesota. Appropriates a total of $750,000 in fiscal year 2010 to develop a 25 year framework for sustainable water resources (as required under H.F. 1031), and $820,000 in fiscal year 2011 for the county geologic atlas program. 9 Legislature. Appropriates $117,000 in fiscal year 2010 and $99,000 in fiscal year 2011 to the legislature for the Legislative Coordinating Commission to establish and operate the new Office of Public Accountability for Constitutionally Dedicated Funding and to the legislative auditor to conduct restoration audits (as required in H.F. 1086). 10 Eligible land. Amends 103F.515, subd. 2. Adds wellhead protection areas that have a wellhead protection plan approved by the commissioner of health to the list of lands eligible for the RIM reserve program and makes changes to the RIM reserve program also proposed in H.F. 591 (currently on the General Register). 11 Nature of property rights required. Amends 103F.515, subd. 4. Permits the harvest of native grasses for use in seed production of bioenergy on wellhead protection area lands in the RIM reserve program and makes changes to the RIM reserve program also proposed in H.F. 591 (currently on the General Register). 12 Clean water fund. Amends 114D.50. Subd. 1. Establishment. Technical. Subd. 2. Sustainable drinking water account. Establishes a sustainable drinking water account within the clean water fund. Subd. 3. Purpose. States that the clean water fund may only be spent to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams, to protect groundwater from degradation, and to protect drinking water sources and lists activities allowed (the list is similar to the list for the clean water legacy account with the addition of groundwater degradation prevention). States that the funds must supplement traditional sources of funding for these purposes. 13 Coal tar. Adds 116.201. Prohibits a state agency from purchasing undiluted coal tar

Page 4 sealant. 14 Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area. Amends 116G.15. Makes a number of changes to the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Areas program by codifying existing requirements, and requiring the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to adopt new rules for the program, including new districts within the area and the development of new guidelines and standards within each district. The program is currently administered by the DNR and provides coordinated planning and management for a portion of the Mississippi River corridor (from Ramsey and Dayton, to the southern boundary of Dakota County) in order to protect and preserve the corridor. Executive Order 79-19 provides the guidelines and standards currently being used for planning and managing the area. Subd. 1. Establishment; purpose. Removes obsolete language and codifies the purpose of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area as originally detailed in Executive Order 79-19. Subd. 2. Administration; rules. Allows the commissioner of natural resources to adopt rules necessary to administer the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area program and codifies the reorganization order that transferred administration of the program from the Environmental Quality Board to the DNR. Requires the commissioner to work in consultation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the National Park Service, the Metropolitan Council, and others. (The program was originally administered by the Environmental Quality Board but was changed by the executive order to the DNR.) Establishes the general management guidelines of the program established in Executive Order 79-19 as management duties of the commissioner and adds protects and preserves the biological and ecological functions of the corridor to the list of duties. Requires the Metropolitan Council to incorporate standards established under the program into its planning, and work with local units of government and the commissioner to insure adoption and implementation of the standards. Subd. 3. Districts. Requires the commissioner to establish districts with the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area and provides direction on what the commissioner shall consider when establishing the districts. (Currently there are four districts for the program, rural open space, urban diversified, urban developed, and urban open space.) Requires the commissioner to minimize the number of districts within any one municipality and take into account existing ordinances. Subd. 4. Standards. Requires the commissioner to establish minimum guidelines and standards for each of the districts established in subdivision 3, including the key resources to be protected and the land uses to be allowed in the district. Requires the commissioner to take into account existing ordinances in developing the guidelines and standards. Allows the commissioner to provide certain exceptions. Requires the guidelines and standards to protect or enhance certain key resources and features, such as wetlands, bluffs, shorelines and riverbanks, scenic views, and water quality. Requires the commissioner to map the bluffs and bluff related features and provide a preliminary map based on definitions provided for bluff face/bluff, bluff line, base of bluff, steep slopes, and very steep slopes. Requires the rulemaking process to allow the preliminary map to be refined and requires the adoption of a final map. Subd. 5. Application. Requires the program s standards to be used by local units

Page 5 of government, state and regional agencies, the Metropolitan Council, and the commissioner. Subd. 6. Notification; fees. Requires local units of government or regional or state agencies to notify the DNR of all developments in the corridor that require discretionary action (defined as all actions that require a public hearing, including variances, conditional use permits, and zoning amendments) at least ten days before taking action on the application, and establishes a late fee of $50. Allows the commissioner to exempt certain types of applications from the notification requirement. Requires the commissioner to recover the costs of reviewing the notification information. Subd. 7. Rules. Requires the commissioner to adopt rules to meet the requirements of this section and start the rulemaking process no later than January 15, 2010. States that the program shall be administered in accordance with Executive Order 79-19 until the rules are adopted. 15 Endocrine disruptor monitoring. Requires the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency to establish a network of water monitoring sites near wastewater treatment facilities to assess levels of endocrine disrupting compounds, antibiotic compounds, and pharmaceuticals. Requires the sites to provide enhanced monitoring of the effluent at the discharge point, and above and below the discharge point. Requires the sites to be located throughout the state and represent a variety of wastewater treatment facilities. Requires the commissioner to consult with the commissioners of health and natural resources and others and requires the initial monitoring network to include at least ten sites. Specifies requirements for the monitoring and requires the monitoring to begin no later than November 1, 2009. Requires the information collected to be made available on the agency s Web site and requires the commissioner to submit a preliminary and final report to the legislature. 16 Coal tar; notification, inventory, and best management practices. Requires the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency to notify state agencies and local units of government of the potential for contamination of storm water ponds with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the use of coal tar pavement products by January 15, 2010. Defines storm water ponds for purposes of the section. Requires the commissioner to establish a schedule, by January 15, 2010, that requires state agencies and local units of government regulated under NPDES/SDS permits to report the total number of storm water ponds under their jurisdiction. Requires the commissioner to develop best management practices for state agencies and local units of government to use in cleaning up contaminated storm water ponds, make those best management practices available on the agency s Web site, and incorporate them into their next permitting cycle.