COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE

Similar documents
Counter Improvised Explosive Devices

The C-IED COE What we have been up to

May 2012 Jim Blackburn, Project Officer CIED. European Defence Agency CIED briefing to the Global EOD Conference

COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (CIED) MULTINATIONAL PROGRAM

C-IED Working Group Update to the C-IED Conference. COL Juan GÓMEZ MARTIN C-IED WG Chairman

EOD publications - overview

Update from the NATO EOD Working Group

NATO UNCLASSIFIED. 6 January 2016 MC 0472/1 (Final)

Version January 2015

COE-DAT Course Catalog. Introduction

MILENG contribution to C-IED in art 5 & NATO Response ops

NATO JOB DESCRIPTION PART I - POST IDENTIFICATION. EOD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTNENT BRANCH or equivalent: EOD DEVELOPMENT BRANCH SERVICE/ENVIRONMENT:

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

EOD Courses ATOM Training Ltd Courses 2018

The Challenging Scope of the. Improvised Explosive Device Battlespace. Commander ADF Counter-IED Task Force Brigadier Wayne Budd.

2009 ARMY MODERNIZATION WHITE PAPER ARMY MODERNIZATION: WE NEVER WANT TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS INTO A FAIR FIGHT

DOD STRATEGY CWMD AND THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF EOD

Enhancing Multinational Force Capability through Standardization and Interoperability

THE MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA

NATO MEASURES ON ISSUES RELATING TO THE LINKAGE BETWEEN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM AND THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Student Guide: Introduction to Army Foreign Disclosure and Contact Officers

Captain DEU Navy Lutz PANKNIER Executive Director

DoD CBRN Defense Doctrine, Training, Leadership, and Education (DTL&E) Strategic Plan

CYBER SECURITY PROTECTION. Section III of the DOD Cyber Strategy

Michael Brown ECJ4-EN May Elizabeth Powell TetraTech,EMI May This briefing is classified: UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

The first EHCC to be deployed to Afghanistan in support

DSMA NOTICE 01. Military Operations, Plans & Capabilities

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Electronic Warfare (EW) and Command and Control Warfare (C2W) Countermeasures

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary. For Immediate Release December 5, 2016

The State Defence Concept Executive Summary

National Military Strategy

Joint IED Defeat Organization

The Partnership for Peace - hierarchy

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON D.C ` MCO 3502.

Headline Goal approved by General Affairs and External Relations Council on 17 May 2004 endorsed by the European Council of 17 and 18 June 2004

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE 19

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA. The State Defence Concept

Deputy Director, C5 Integration

Optimizing Interoperability since 1947

Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Executing Navy s Maritime Strategy

Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence

Defense Strategies Institute professional educational forum:

Relationship matters

150-MC-0006 Validate the Protection Warfighting Function Staff (Battalion through Corps) Status: Approved

CBRNe Summit March 2014 Brno, Czech republic. Explosive Ordnance Disposal Centre of Excellence

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

NORTH ATLANTIC MILITARY COMMITTEE COMITE MILITAIRE DE L ATLANTIQUE NORD

2nd OIE Global Conference on Biological Threat Reduction Ottawa, 31 October-2 November 2017

GAO WARFIGHTER SUPPORT. Actions Needed to Improve Visibility and Coordination of DOD s Counter- Improvised Explosive Device Efforts

2015 Leaders Summit on Peacekeeping Summary of Member-State Commitments United Nations October 2015

Joint Improvised-Threat Defeat Organization - Mission -

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Subj: MARINE CORPS POLICY ON ORGANIZING, TRAINING, AND EQUIPPING FOR OPERATIONS IN AN IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE (IED) ENVIRONMENT

ALLIANCE MARITIME STRATEGY

5 th Annual EOD/IED & Countermine Symposium

The EU comprehensive approach and the Fight Against Piracy. Briefing for the PMAR Workshop

THE DEFENSE PLANNING SYSTEMS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS

NATO MOuNTAiN WArfAre CeNTre Of excellence

Engineer Doctrine. Update

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-4. Subject: National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Remarks by Brigadier General Robert Walters Deputy Director for Operations and Intelligence. Delivered at. Pakistan Counter-IED Symposium

EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL OPERATIONS DECEMBER 2011

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Budget Estimates

Statement of. Michael P. Downing Assistant Commanding Officer Counter-Terrorism/Criminal Intelligence Bureau Los Angeles Police Department.

Training and Evaluation Outline Report

The 8 th International Scientific Conference DEFENSE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE 21st CENTURY Braşov, November 14 th 2013

NMIOTC Commandant s Foreword

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12333: UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

30 OCT Command Overview

Combating Terrorism: Prevention, Protection & Response

International Specialist Training Course for States & Other Stakeholders

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD COUNTERING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (WMD) POLICY

Capability Solutions for Joint, Multinational, and Coalition Operations

Italy s air CBRN mindset

ESTONIA. National annual report

COURSE CATALOGUE. Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defence Centre of Excellence VYSKOV, CZECH REPUBLIC JCBRN COE

NDIA Ground Robotics Symposium

New Tactics for a New Enemy By John C. Decker

The 19th edition of the Army s capstone operational doctrine

SACT s remarks to UN ambassadors and military advisors from NATO countries. New York City, 18 Apr 2018

DANGER WARNING CAUTION

December 21, 2004 NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE NSPD-41 HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE HSPD-13

Navy Biometrics at Sea A Maritime Approach to Detection and Deterrence

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

U.S. Army Nuclear and Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction Agency

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Asset Management and Risk Control Forum

Strong. Secure. Engaged: Canada s New Defence Policy

Capital Offence June www orld.com.cbrnew

DOD DIRECTIVE DOD POLICY AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO SECURITY COOPERATION

Moldova. NATO s essential purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of. Cooperation with the Republic of

UN/CCW Protocol V Norway 2009

Prepare to Respond Prague 2008

San Francisco Bay Area

THE 2008 VERSION of Field Manual (FM) 3-0 initiated a comprehensive

Transcription:

COUNTER IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE UN CCW APII Experts meeting Major Niels van Bekkum C IED COE Opertaions Officer 09 th 09 th April 2013

Agenda Who are we? What are we doing? Observations on biggest lessons in C IED Best Practices

C IED COE Mission To provide subject matter expertise in order to support the Alliance, its Partners, and the International Community in the fight against IED and co operate operate to increase security of Allied Nations and troops deployed in theatres of operations, reducing or eliminating the threats from improvised explosive devices used or for use, in particular by terrorists or insurgents.

NATO Counter IED Approach Counter IED approaches the IED as a systemic problem and C IED actions aim to defeat the IED System. The C IED approach aims to defeat an adversary s IED System with three mutually supporting and complementary pillars of activity which are: Attack the Networks (AtN); Defeat the Device (DtD); Prepare the Force (PtF). These are all underpinned by understanding and intelligence.

C IED COE structure Independent International Military Organisation Not inside NATO NATO accreditation

Manning 47 persons 34 Subject Matter Experts Framework nation is Spain Other nations: In process of joining Support by

Manning Law Enforcement and Intel Agencies add value to to the Centre Added value SPAIN 50% MULTINATIONAL 50%

Worldwide Relationships

C IED COE s activities Represented and active in all key C IED forums (NATO C IED Task Force. NATO C IED Working Group, EDA C IED Project Team) Support to NATO C IED training and courses and in the future become a focal point for content of NATO Education and Training Theatre C IED Staff Assistance Visits UNIFIL April 2012 Africa NATO/EU Operations, CJTF HOA, French Operations & FBI (Feb13) KFOR (feb 2012 and possibly 2013) ISAF (Nov 2011 and Oct 2013)

C IED COE s Activities Human Network Analysis & Targeting (HNAT) Course Interagency workshops, connecting international and national organizations and provide recommendations to enhance the fight against IED networks Support and assess C IED enabler development and interoperability (EOD, CBRN, Mil Eng, MWD, Route Clearance) Support doctrinal and concept development Analysis of IED threats

Biggest Lessons From C-IED COE and its Sponsor Nations perspective Lesson: C IED crosses multiple disciplines resulting in communication challenges across nations Lesson: Lack of information exchange among organisations services, nations and interagency hampers the C IED effort Lesson: Stay in your lane?! C IED principles useful for many threats, not everyone sees that..political guidance needed

Biggest Lessons From C-IED COE and its Sponsor Nations perspective Lesson: Exploitation & Biometrics are crucial in all Armed Forces for Attacking the Network, sharing is paramount to support this effort. Lesson: Lesson: Don t Set patterns, be unpredictable needs to be constantly emphasised Lesson: Every soldier is a sensor! Well trained personnel enhances success in C IED

Best Practices Nov 2012; Interagency Workshop at the C IED COE Military, law enforcement, homeland security, counter terrorist organisations Subjects: Sharing / classification of documents / biometrics Some findings:

Best Practices Not being aware of existing processes; To actually share information To address shortfalls and possible improvements Better use of liaisons and disclosure officers Question possible sharing before a (multinational) military operation Education to writers what consequences are of (over) classification Classify more accurate (paragraphs not the whole document) Sharing agreement between NATO and Interpol for Piracy is good example

Questions?