Oklahoma s Public Health Immunization Reporting Updates. By Brittany Curry of OSDH. An Important Reminder. For audio, you must use your phone:

Similar documents
Updates to the EHR Incentive Programs Jason Felts, MS, CSCS HIT Practice Advisor

Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. Shay Surowiak, RN, BSN, CHTS-CP HIT Practice Advisor

= AUDIO. Meaningful Use Audits for Medicare and Medicaid. An Important Reminder. Mission of OFMQ 9/23/2015. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Agenda 2. EHR Incentive Programs 3/5/2015. Overview EHR incentive programs Meaningful Use Differences between Stage 1 and Stage 2

EHR/Meaningful Use

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

Eligible Professionals. How can the West Virginia Health Information Network (WVHIN) assist you in meeting Meaningful Use requirements?

Prime Clinical Systems, Inc

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Population Health Management. Ashley Rhude RHIA, CHTS-IM HIT Practice Advisor

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals Q Update from 2013 HIE Survey Participants

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Meaningful Use 101. AIRA October 26, 2015

Meaningful Use and Care Transitions: Managing Change and Improving Quality of Care

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

MEANINGFUL USE FOR THE OB/GYN. Steven L. Zielke, MD 6/13/2014

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs HIT Policy Committee May 6, 2014

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Meaningful Use Audits Strategy for Success!

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

during the EHR reporting period.

Meaningful Use Update: Stage 3 and Beyond. Carla McCorkle, Midas+ Solutions CQM Product Lead

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

2015 Meaningful Use and emipp Updates (for Eligible Professionals)

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

CMS EHR Incentive Programs in 2015 through 2017 Overview

Meaningful Use 2015 Measures

Proposed Rules for Meaningful Use 1, 2 and 3. Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS CMIO Stratis Health

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Abstract. Are eligible providers participating? AdvancedMD EHR features streamline meaningful use processes: Complete & accurate information

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #3 Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Audit Document Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physicians Offices March 2014

HIE & Interoperability: Roadmap to Continuum of Care Michael McPherson MU Coordinator KDHE

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

Meaningful Use Stage 2 For Eligible and Critical Access Hospitals

American Recovery & Reinvestment Act

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Final Meaningful Use Rules Add Short-Term Flexibility

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

CMS Incentive Programs: Timeline And Reporting Requirements. Webcast Association of Northern California Oncologists May 21, 2013

Eligibility. Program Structure and Process for Receiving Incentives

2015 MU Reporting Overview of Requirements/Tasks

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

Challenges for National Large Laboratories to Ensure Implementation of ELR Meaningful Use

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rules Overview May 5, 2015

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

Overview of the Changes to the Meaningful Use Program Called for in the Proposed Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule April 27, 2018

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Game Plan. Meaningful Use Where are We? So is Anyone Registering? So, are EPs getting any money? $31,968,176,183

Transcription:

Oklahoma s Public Health Immunization Reporting Updates By Brittany Curry of OSDH An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906 0123. Step 2: Enter code 2071585#. Step 3: Mute your phone!!! = AUDIO 1

Mission of OFMQ OFMQ is a not for profit, consulting company dedicated to advancing healthcare quality. Since 1972, we ve been a trusted resource through collaborative partnerships and hands on support to healthcare communities. OFMQ Service Lines Analytics Case Review Education IT Consulting Health Information Technology National Quality Measures Quality Improvement 2

HIT Service Lines Security Risk Assessment Level 1, 2, and 3 Meaningful Use Assistance Meaningful Use Audit Support Risk Management Consulting and Development PQRS Consulting Staff IT Security Training Website Development IT Consulting Cloud Deployment Brittany Curry She has coordinated Meaningful Use public health efforts at the Oklahoma State Department of Health since August 2014. Brittany is a native Oklahoman and has worked in the healthcare industry for over 4 years. Two of those years have been focused on the Electronic Health Records Incentive Program or Meaningful Use. 3

Meaningful Use and Public Health Overview Public Health Measures pertaining to OSDH Immunization stage 1 & 2 public health measures Electronic Reportable Lab Results stage 1 & 2 Cancer stage 2 public health measure Stage 3 Message Requirements http://meaningfuluse.health.ok.gov 4

Public Health MU Measures Immunization Stage 1 & 2 (EH&EP) Electronic Lab Results Stage 1 (EH) Cancer Case Stage 2 only (EP) Syndromic Surveillance & Specialized Registry data OSDH does not accept specialized registry data or syndromic surveillance data For audit purposes, there is a statement on the website that address both of these measures 5

Immunization Stage 1 (2014 Definition) Immunization Registries Data Submission Objective Measure Exclusion Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries or immunization information systems and actual submission according to applicable law and practice. Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology s capacity to submit electronic data to immunization registries and follow up submission if the test is successful, (unless none of the immunization registries to which the EP submits such information has the capacity to receive the information electronically), except where prohibited. An EP who administers no immunizations during the EHR reporting period, where no immunization registry has the capacity to receive the information electronically, or where it is prohibited. When to attest yes and when to count an exclusion for Stage 1 only You registered intent with OSDH but did not submit a test message count exclusion You do not administer immunizations count exclusion For audit purposes if we do not have a registration on file for stage 1 we will not be able to provide an auditor any information. Examples. 6

http://meaningfuluse.health.ok.gov 7

8

Immunization Stage 2 Immunization Registries Data Submission Objective Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries or immunization information systems except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Measure Successful ongoing submission or electronic immunization data for CEHRT to an immunization registry or immunization information system for an entire EHR reporting period. 9

How to Successfully Attest The EP must attest YES to meeting one of the following criteria under the umbrella of ongoing submission. Ongoing Submission was already achieved for an EHR period in a prior year and continues throughout the current EHR reporting period using either the current standards at 45 CFR 170.314(f)(1) and (f)(2) or the standards included in the 2011 Edition EHR certification criteria adopted by ONC during the prior EHR reporting period when ongoing submission was achieved. Registration with the PHA or other body to whom the information is being submitted of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline (within 60 days of the start of the EHR reporting period) and ongoing submission was achieved. Registration of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline and the EP or hospital is still engaged in testing and validation of ongoing electronic submission. Registration of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline and the EP or hospital is awaiting invitation to begin testing and validation. Source: http://www.cms.gov/regulations and Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/Stage2_EPCore_16_ImmunizationRegistriesDataSubmission.pdf Exclusions Immunization Registries Data Submission Exclusions Any EP that meets one or more of the following criteria may be excluded from this objective: The EP does not administer any of the immunizations to any of the populations for which data is collected by their jurisdiction s immunization registry or immunization information system during the EHR reporting period; The EP operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry or immunization information system is capable of accepting the specific standards required for CEHRT at the state of their EHR reporting period; The EP operates in a jurisdiction where no immunization registry or immunization information system provides information timely on capability to receive immunization data; or The EP operates in a jurisdiction for which no immunization registry or immunization information system that is capable of accepting the specific standards required for CEHRT at the start of their EHR reporting period can enroll additional EPs. 10

Electronic Reportable Lab Results Stage 1 Electronic Reportable Lab Results Objective Capability to submit electronic data on reportable ( as required by State or local law) lab results to public health agencies and actual submission according to applicable law and practice. Measure Performed at least one test of certified EHR technology s capacity to provide electronic submission or reportable lab results to public health agencies and follow up submission if the test is successful (unless none of the public health agencies to which an eligible hospital or CAH submits such information has the capacity to receive the information electronically), except where prohibited. Exclusion No public health agency to which the eligible hospital or CAH submits such information has the capacity to receive the information electronically, or where is it prohibited. When to attest yes and when to count and exclusion for Stage 1 Only You registered intent with OSDH but did not submit a test message count exclusion No public health agency to which the eligible hospital or CAH submits such information has the capacity to receive the information electronically, or where it is prohibited. count exclusion You submit at least one test of certified EHR technology s capacity to submit electronic data on reportable lab results to public health agencies attest yes For audit purposes if we not have a registration on file for stage 1 we will not be able to provide an auditor for any information. 11

Electronic Reportable Lab Results Stage 2 (Eligible Hospital) Electronic Reportable Lab Results Objective Capability to submit electronic reportable laboratory results to public health agencies, where except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Measure Successful ongoing submission of electronic reportable laboratory results from Certified EHR Technology to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period. How to Successfully Attest Eligible hospitals or CAHs must attest YES to meeting one of the following criteria under the umbrella of ongoing submission: Ongoing submission was already achieved for an EHR reporting period in a prior year and continues throughout the current EHR reporting period. Registration with the public health agency or other body to whom the information is being submitted of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline (within 60 days of the start of the EHR reporting period) and ongoing submission was achieved. Registration of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline and the EP or hospital is still engaged in testing and validation of ongoing electronic submission. Registration of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline and the EP or hospital is awaiting invitation to begin testing and validation. Source: http://www.cms.gov/regulations and Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/Stage2_HospitalCore_14_SubLabResults.pdf 12

Exclusions Electronic Reportable Lab Results Exclusion Any eligible hospital or CAH that meets one or more of the following criteria: Operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency is capable of receiving electronic reportable laboratory results in the specific standards required for Certified EHR Technology at the start of their EHR reporting period. Operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency provides information timely on capability to receive electronic reportable laboratory results. Operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency that is capable of accepting the specific standards required by Certified EHR Technology at the start of their EHR reporting period can enroll additional eligible hospitals or CAHs. Report Cancer Cases Stage 2 only (Eligible Professional Report Cancer Cases Objective Measure Capability to identify and report cancer cases to a public health central cancer registry, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice Successful ongoing submission of cancer case information from CEHRT to a public health central cancer registry for the entire EHR reporting period. 13

How to Successfully Attest EPs must attest YES to successful ongoing submission of cancer case information from certified electronic health record technology (CEHRT) to a public health central cancer registry for the entire EHR reporting period. Ongoing submission was already achieved for an EHR reporting period in a prior year and continues throughout the current EHR reporting period. Registration with the PHA or other body to whom the information is being submitted of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline (within 60 day of the start of the EHR reporting period) and ongoing submission was achieved. Registration of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline and the EP or hospital is still engaged in testing and validation of ongoing electronic submission. Registration of intent to initiate ongoing submission was made by the deadline and the EP or hospital is awaiting invitation to begin testing and validation. Source: http://www.cms.gov/regulations and Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/Stage2_EPMenu_5_ReportCancerCases.pdf Report Cancer Cases Exclusion Exclusions Any EP that meets at least 1 of the following criteria may be excluded from this objective: The EP does not diagnose or directly treat cancer; The EP operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency is capable of receiving electronic cancer case information in the specific standards required for CEHRT at the beginning of their EHR reporting period; The EP operates in a jurisdiction where no PHA provides information timely on capability to receive electronic cancer case information; or The EP operates in a jurisdiction for which no public health agency that is capable of receiving electronic cancer case information in the specific standards required for CEHRT at the beginning of their EHR reporting period can enroll additional EPs. 14

Stage 3 & Public Health OSDH Message Requirements Message Process Message standards HL7 v2.5.1 VXU HL7 v2.5.1 ORU^R01 Object Identifiers Sending facility Sending application System Specific ID s Transport standards PHINMS (for now) 15

Need Additional Assistance? If you have any questions about the meaningful use public health measures please send an email to meaningfuluse@health.ok.gov Questions & Answers If you re interested in improving your practice and office efficiency through EHR software use or our service lines, contact us! Email: ofmqhit@ofmq.com Call: (877) 963 6744 Visit: www.ofmq.com 16

ICD 10 Training in OKC & Tulsa Our workshop provides assistance from AHIMA approved ICD 10 CM trainers to help you learn how to successfully transition from ICD 9 to ICD 10 coding. Tulsa, July 23 OKC, July 28 OKC, August 4 6 OKC, August 20 Tulsa, August 26 Choose a date & register at www.ofmq.com/events month Upcoming WebEx Seminar Register at www.ofmq.com/event month Wed, July 8 12:15pm (Central Time) Website Development: The Growing Impact on Patients & Your Practice 17

Thank you! 18