Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Similar documents
Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Measure: Patient name. Referring or transitioning healthcare provider's name and office contact information (MIPS eligible clinician only) Procedures

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2016 Tipsheet

during the EHR reporting period.

EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide 2016 Edition Updated July 2016

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Physician Office October, 2012

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

Measures Reporting for Eligible Hospitals

Measures Reporting for Eligible Providers

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for 2017

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage Alternate Exclusions and/or Specifications

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 2

The History of Meaningful Use

2015 MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

Meaningful Use Stage 2

FINAL Meaningful Use Objectives for

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Meaningful Use Virtual Office Hours Webinar for Eligible Providers and Hospitals

MEANINGFUL USE 2015 PROPOSED 2015 MEANINGFUL USE FLEXIBILITY RULE

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Travis Broome AMIA

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version 1.0

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

Meaningful Use What You Need to Know for December 6, 2016

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

EHR/Meaningful Use

PROPOSED MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

Practice Director Modified Stage MU Guide 03/17/2016

How to Participate Today 4/28/2015. HealthFusion.com 2015 HealthFusion, Inc. 1. Meaningful Use Stage 3: What the Future Holds

Alaska Medicaid Program

Meaningful Use Hello Health v7 Guide for Eligible Professionals. Stage 1

Meaningful Use Reporting period for 2017: Change: Any consecutive 90 days in 2017 for Medicaid customers only.

HSX Meaningful Use Support of Transitions of Care

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Meaningful Use Participation Basics for the Small Provider

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule published August, 2012

of 23 Meaningful Use 2015 PER THE CMS REVISION TO THE FINAL RULE RELEASED OCTOBER 6, 2015 CHARTMAKER MEDICAL SUITE

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core and Menu Measures. User Manual/Guide for Attestation using encompass 3.0

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Meaningful Use Basics and Attestation Process Guide for Medicare and Medi-Cal. Lori Hack & Val Tuerk, Object Health

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule CPeH Advocacy Opportunities

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

HITECH* Update Meaningful Use Regulations Eligible Professionals

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Pennsylvania ehealth Initiative All Committee Meeting November 14, 2012

Welcome to the MS State Level Registry Companion Guide for

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program What You Need to Know about Program Year 2016

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Texas Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

Stage 1 Changes Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

REQUIREMENTS GUIDE: How to Qualify for EHR Stimulus Funds under ARRA

Meaningful Use Stages 1 & 2

Transforming Health Care with Health IT

Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

CMS EHR Incentive Programs Overview

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

9/28/2011. Learning Agenda. Meaningful Use and why it s here. Meaningful Use Rules of Participation. Categories, Objectives and Thresholds

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Stage 2 Final Rule Updates October 2, 2012 Rick Hoover & Andy Finnegan

The HITECH EHR "Meaningful Use" Requirements for Hospitals and Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Roadmap

HIE Success - Physician Education Series

New Hampshire Guidelines for Program Year 2016: Meaningful Use and Clinical Quality Measure Supporting Documents

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

INTERGY MEANINGFUL USE 2014 STAGE 2 USER GUIDE Spring 2014

Overview of the EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule

A complete step by step guide on how to achieve Meaningful Use Core Set Measures in Medgen EHR.

Medicaid Provider Incentive Program

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Transforming Data to Knowledge. Guide to Preparing for Meaningful Use Stage 1

Core Measure Set. Status. MU1 Increase from 30% New. Computerized Physician Order Entry Use computerized provider order. NextGen EHR Medication Module

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

Meaningful Use for 2014 Stag St e ag 1 Or Or Stag St e ag e 2 For Fo r 2014? Meaningful Meaningful Use: Stag St e ag e 1 1 Fo r Fo 2014

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #5 Health Information Exchange (Summary of Care) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program

Medicaid Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use. Lisa Reuland, Program Manager October 15, 2015

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Webinar #5 Meaningful Use: Looking Ahead to Stage 2 and CPS 12

Agenda. Meaningful Use: What You Really Need to Know. Am I Eligible? Which Program? Meaningful Use Progression 6/14/2013. Overview of Meaningful Use

Under the MACRAscope:

Transcription:

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017 The Health Information Exchange (HIE) objective (formerly known as Summary of Care ) is required for all Eligible Professionals (EPs) and eligible hospitals participating in the Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. For Stage 3, the objective includes three measures for all participants. Providers must attest to all three measures and must meet the thresholds for at least two measures to meet the objective. Overview of Health Information Exchange Objective: The EP, eligible hospital, or critical access hospital (CAH) provides a summary of care record when transitioning or referring their patient to another setting of care, receives or retrieves a summary of care record upon the receipt of a transition or referral or upon the first patient encounter with a new patient, and incorporates summary of care information from other providers into their EHR using the functions of Certified EHR Technology (CEHRT). Measures: Measure 1: For more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals, the EP, eligible hospital or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care: (1) creates a summary of care record using CEHRT; and (2) electronically exchanges the summary of care record. Measure 2: For more than 40 percent of transitions or referrals received and patient encounters in which the provider has never before encountered the patient, the EP, eligible hospital or CAH incorporates into the patient s EHR an electronic summary of care document. Measure 3: For more than 80 percent of transitions or referrals received and patient encounters in which the provider has never before encountered the patient, the EP, eligible hospital, or CAH performs a clinical information reconciliation. The provider must implement clinical information reconciliation for the following three clinical information sets: (1) Medication. Review of the patient s medication, including the name, dosage, frequency, and route of each medication. (2) Medication allergy. Review of the patient s known medication allergies. (3) Current Problem list. Review of the patient s current and active diagnoses. Attestation Requirements: Measure 1 Denominator: Number of transitions of care and referrals during the EHR reporting period for which the EP or eligible hospital or CAH inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) was the transferring or referring provider. Numerator: The number of transitions of care and referrals in the denominator where a summary of care record was created using certified EHR technology and exchanged electronically. Threshold: The percentage must be more than 50 percent in order for an EP, eligible hospital or CAH to 1

Exclusion: A provider may exclude from the measure if any of the following apply: Any EP who transfers a patient to another setting or refers a patient to another provider less than 100 times during the EHR reporting period. Any EP that conducts 50 percent or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the HER reporting period may exclude the measures. Any eligible hospital or CAH will be excluded from the measure if it is located in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of their housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC at the start of the EHR reporting period. Measure 2 Denominator: Number of patient encounters during the EHR reporting period for which an EP, eligible hospital, or CAH was the receiving party of a transition or referral or has never before encountered the patient and for which an electronic summary of care record is available. Numerator: The number of patient encounters in the denominator where an electronic summary of care record received is incorporated by the provider into the certified EHR technology. Threshold: The percentage must be more than 40 percent in order for an EP, eligible hospital or CAH to Exclusion: A provider may exclude from the measure if any of the following apply: Any EP, eligible hospital or CAH for whom the total of transitions or referrals received and patient encounters in which the provider has never before encountered the patient, is fewer than 100 during the EHR reporting period is excluded from this measure. Any EP that conducts 50 percent or more of his or her patient encounters in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of its housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC on the first day of the HER reporting period may exclude the measures. Any eligible hospital or CAH will be excluded from the measure if it is located in a county that does not have 50 percent or more of their housing units with 4Mbps broadband availability according to the latest information available from the FCC at the start of the EHR reporting period. Measure 3 Denominator: Number of transitions of care and referrals during the EHR reporting period for which the EP or eligible hospital or CAH inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23) was the recipient of the transition or referral or has never before encountered the patient. Numerator: The number of transitions of care or referrals in the denominator where the following three clinical information reconciliations were performed: Medication list, medication allergy list, and current problem list. Threshold: The percentage must be more than 80 percent in order for an EP, eligible hospital or CAH to 2

Exclusion: Any EP, eligible hospital or CAH for whom the total of transitions or referrals received and patient encounters in which the provider has never before encountered the patient, is fewer than 100 during the HER reporting period is excluded from this measure. NOTE: There are changes to the measure calculations policy, which specifies that actions included the numerator must occur within the EHR reporting period if that period is a full calendar year, or if it is less than a full calendar year, within the calendar year in which the EHR reporting period occurs. Summary of Care Documents All summary of care documents used to meet this objective must include the information outlined in Table 1 (if the provider knows it). In circumstances where there is no information available to populate one or more of the fields listed, either because the provider can be excluded from recording such information or because there is no information to record (e.g., laboratory tests), the provider may leave the field(s) blank and still meet the objective and its associated measure. Note: The current problem list, current medication list, and current medication allergy list may not be left blank. These fields must include the most recent information known by the EP or eligible hospital as of the time of generating the summary of care document, or include a notation of no current problem, medication and/or medication allergies. Table 1: What to Include in Summary of Care Documents Patient name Care plan field, including goals and instructions Referring or transitioning provider's name and Care team, including the primary care provider of office contact information (EP only) record and any additional known care team Procedures members beyond the referring or transitioning Encounter diagnosis provider and the receiving provider. Immunizations Discharge instructions (Hospital Only) Laboratory test results Reason for referral (EP only) Vital signs (height, weight, blood pressure, BMI) Summary of care documents must also include:* Smoking status Current problem list (providers may also include Functional status, including activities of daily historical problems at their discretion) living, cognitive and disability status Current medication list (a list of medications that a Demographic information (preferred patient is currently taking) language, sex, race, ethnicity, date of birth) Current medication allergy list (a list of medications to which a given patient has known allergies) * An EP or eligible hospital must verify these three fields for current problem list, current medication list, and current medication allergy list are not blank and include the most recent information known by the EP or hospital as of the time of generating the summary of care document Note about Lab Results: The final rule for Stage 3 requires a provider to have the ability to send all laboratory test results in the summary of care document. However, the provider may work with their system developer to establish clinically relevant parameters based on their specialty, patient population, or for certain transitions and referrals that allow for clinical relevance to determine the most appropriate results for given transition or 3

referral. A provider who limits the results in a summary of care document must send the full results upon the request of the receiving provider or upon the request of the patient. The Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) is the standard adopted for EHR technology certification for summary of care documents. In this final rule, all the required data elements for the C-CDA remain as previously finalized. Transitions of Care and Referrals A transition of care is defined as the movement of a patient from one setting of care (hospital, ambulatory primary care practice, ambulatory specialty care practice, long-term care, home health, rehabilitation facility) to another. At a minimum, this includes all discharges from the inpatient department and after admissions to the emergency department when follow-up care is ordered by an authorized provider of the hospital. Referrals are cases where one provider refers a patient to another, but the referring provider maintains their care of the patient as well. In addition: Transition of care for electronic exchange has been further defined as one where the referring provider is under a different billing identity within the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs (such as a different National Provider Identifier [NPI] or hospital CMS Certification Number [CCN]) than the receiving provider and where the providers do not share access to the EHR. In cases where the providers do share access to the EHR, a transition or referral may still count toward the measure if the referring providers creates the summary of care document using CEHRT and sends the summary of care document electronically. If a provider chooses to include such transitions to providers where access to the EHR is shared, they must do so universally for all patients and all transitions or referrals. In cases where a provider has a patient who seeks out and receives care from another provider without a prior referral, the first provider may include that transition as a referral if the patient subsequently identifies the other provider of care. Electronic Transmission of Summary of Care Documents For the EHR Incentive Programs in 2017, the HIE measure simply states that a provider is required to create the summary of care records using CEHRT and to transmit the summary of care record electronically. The intent is to promote and facilitate a wide range of options for the transmission of an electronic summary of care document. The initiating provider must send a C CDA document that the receiving provider would be capable of electronically incorporating as a C CDA on the receiving end. In other words, if a provider sends a C CDA and the receiving provider converts the C CDA into a pdf or a fax or some other format, the sending provider may still count the transition or referral in the numerator. If the sending provider converts the file to a format the receiving provider could not electronically receive and incorporate as a C CDA, the initiating provider may not count the transition in their numerator. The provider may use a third party to send the summary of care record, but it is not required. 4

In instances where a third party organization that plays a role in determining the next provider of care and ultimately delivers the summary of care document is involved, the service the third party provides does not have to be certified for the transmission to be counted in the numerator for measure 2. There are also no specific requirements around the technical standards or methods by which the third party delivers the summary of care document to the receiving provider (e.g., SOAP, secure email, fax). Acceptable Electronic Transmission Methods Examples of acceptable transmission methods include secure email, Health Information Service Provider (HISP), query-based exchange or use of third party HIE. There are many other options in addition to the examples listed, as well as opportunities for developers and vendors to utilize innovation and creativity. The provider must ensure that the transmission methods are in compliance with HIPAA requirements. Note: Faxing in general is not acceptable since it is not in C-CDA format. It is only acceptable when a third party is used to transmit the summary of care record and they must convert the transmission to fax because that is the only way the receiving provider can accept the transmission. Additionally, the conversion to fax by the third party must not be a default approach. To count in the numerator, the sending provider must have reasonable certainty of receipt of the summary of care document. This means that a push to an HIE, which might be queried by the recipient, is insufficient. Instead, the referring provider must have confirmation that a query was made to count the action toward the measure. (This could be a call to the receiving provider or email confirmation from the HIE itself in instances where a third party is used.) The exchange must comply with the privacy and security protocols for ephi under HIPAA. An EP and eligible hospital must use the capabilities and standards of as defined in CEHRT at 495.4. For More Information Visit the CMS EHR Incentive Programs website to learn more about the requirements for the EHR Incentive Programs. 5