Prepared Statement. Dr. Terry A. Adirim. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Services and Policy Oversight REGARDING

Similar documents
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Report to the Congressional Committees. Consolidation of the Disability Evaluation System

THE MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM: HEALTH AFFAIRS/TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY OVERVIEW STATEMENT BY MAJOR GENERAL ELDER GRANGER, MD

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. VR&E needs 10 additional FTE to expand the Veteran Success on Campus program.

Disability Evaluation Systems (DES)

GAO. MILITARY DISABILITY EVALUATION Ensuring Consistent and Timely Outcomes for Reserve and Active Duty Service Members

OVERVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM

Required by: National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2013 (Public Law ), Section 738

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

INFORMATION PAPER. AHRC-DZB 11 April SUBJECT: Overview of the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System

Report to Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives

UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) Briefing for Soldiers and Family Members

Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) Medical Evaluation Board/Disability Evaluation System Clinic Fort Hood, Texas

TRICARE Operations Manual M, February 1, 2008 Supplemental Health Care Program (SHCP)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Guidance for the Education and Employment Initiative (E2I) and Operation WARFIGHTER (OWF)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Human Capital. DoD Compliance With the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (D ) March 31, 2003

VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OVERSIGHT PLAN

Procedures for Disability Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation

DOD INSTRUCTION THE SEPARATION HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION (SHPE) FOR THE DOD SEPARATION HEALTH ASSESSMENT (SHA) PROGRAM

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Chairman Runyan, Ranking Member Titus and Members of the Subcommittee:

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DoD)

PREPARED STATEMENT VICE ADMIRAL JOHN MATECZUN, MC, USN COMMANDER, JOINT TASK FORCE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION MEDICAL BEFORE THE

The Fleet Reserve Association

CHARLES L. RICE, M.D.

DoD Policy on Prevention and Response to Sexual Assault. January 4, 2005

DoDNA WOUNDED, ILL, AND INJURED SENIOR OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301

VETERANS' AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT of

Veterans Benefits Administration

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

13-08 April 16, 2008

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 7700 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD FALLS CHURCH VA 22042

GAO CONTINGENCY CONTRACTING. DOD, State, and USAID Contracts and Contractor Personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. Report to Congressional Committees

Management Emphasis and Organizational Culture; Compliance; and Process and Workforce Development.

a GAO GAO MILITARY PERSONNEL DOD Needs an Oversight Framework and Standards to Improve Management of Its Casualty Assistance Programs

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

ANNUAL REPORT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES. on the. Activities of the Office of Special Needs as required by

Department of Defense CHARTER

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Summary of Policy Changes: DoD Instruction , Military Family Readiness

Testimony of Patrick F. Kennedy Under Secretary of State for Management

Department of Defense Voluntary Education Program

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

OPNAVINST H N12 3 Sep 2015

WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Recommendation Follow-Up

Information System Security

DOD INSTRUCTION STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (SPP)

DOD INSTRUCTION FORCE HEALTH PROTECTION QUALITY ASSURANCE (FHPQA) PROGRAM

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

References throughout to Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR) are hereby changed to Joint Travel Regulations (JTR)

Independent Auditor s Report on the FY 2015 DoD Detailed Accounting Report for the Funds Obligated for National Drug Control Program Activities

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

DOD DIRECTIVE DIRECTOR, DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS)

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

DOD INSTRUCTION , VOLUME 543 DOD CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DOD CIVILIAN PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS PAY PLAN (PDPP)

DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

REPORT OF THE NATIONAL CONVENTION COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS AND REHABILITATION. Ralph P. Bozella (CO), CHAIRMAN

LAW REVIEW November The Physical Disability Board of Review for Medical Retirement Reevaluation

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON

GAO. DOD AND VA Preliminary Observations on Efforts to Improve Health Care and Disability Evaluations for Returning Servicemembers

Office of the Inspector General Department of Defense

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY COMMANDER NAVY RESERVE FORCE 1915 FORRESTAL DRIVE NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

Report No. DODIG U.S. Department of Defense SEPTEMBER 28, 2016

OPNAVINST A N Oct 2014

GAO IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN. DOD, State, and USAID Face Continued Challenges in Tracking Contracts, Assistance Instruments, and Associated Personnel

Chairman Runyon, Ranking Member McNerney, and Members of the Subcommittee:

PREPARED STATEMENT BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

GAO DEFENSE HEALTH CARE

MICHAEL SOPER, M.D. SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND NATIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTOR, CIGNA HEALTH PLAN BEFORE THE MEDICARE AND LONG-TERM CARE SUBCOMMITTEE

Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget

GAO. DOD AND VA Preliminary Observations on Efforts to Improve Care Management and Disability Evaluations for Servicemembers

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Homeland Security Recommendations Related to Nuclear and Radiological Terrorism

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Assistive Technology (AT) for Wounded Service Members

DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR INTELLIGENCE AND SPECIAL PROGRAM ASSESSMETS

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

PART 21 DoD GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS GENERAL MATTERS. Subpart A-Introduction. This part of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations:

Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Contracting Officer Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Estimating System Deficiencies

THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3010 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Naval Audit Service Audit Report Marine Corps Use of the Deployed Theater Accountability System

Information Technology

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Fellowships, Scholarships, Training With Industry (TWI), and Grants for DoD Personnel

STATE COURTS SYSTEM FY LEGISLATIVE BUDGET REQUEST

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1950 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

4. Responsibilities: Consistent with this MOU, it is AGREED that the Parties shall:

Department of Defense

A991072A W GAO. DEFENSE SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS Alternative to DOD's Satellite Replacement Plan Would Be Less Costly

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 4000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C

ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA

Transcription:

Prepared Statement of Dr. Terry A. Adirim Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Services and Policy Oversight REGARDING THE INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM BEFORE THE HOUSE VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE DISABILITY ASSISTANCE AND MEMORIAL AFFAIRS SUBCOMMITTEE December 13, 2017 1

Opening Remarks Chairman Bost, Ranking Member Esty, distinguished Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the Integrated Disability Evaluation System, also known as the IDES. The IDES is a joint Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) program that achieves two primary DoD objectives: (1) ensuring the readiness of our military forces, and (2) providing timely, quality disability evaluation of wounded, ill, or injured Service members so we can assess their fitness-for-duty and, if unfit, the appropriate disability disposition and compensation. Improved IDES Performance The IDES is a success story that reflects the two Departments shared commitment to collaboratively improve the evaluation of Service members transitioning to Veteran status due to disability. Since DoD's last appearance before this subcommittee to discuss the IDES, the Department has continued to improve the efficiency and quality of the disability evaluation process. Since 2014, improved processing of nearly 22,000 physically unfit Service members per year has allowed the Military Departments to significantly reduce the amount of time Service members spend in a permanent non-deployable status and direct their resources towards accessing, training, and equipping physically ready forces. The IDES also provides improved case management and transparency for Service members undergoing evaluation due to disability. Within the IDES, there is a single point of contact for providing information to the Service member or their representative, as applicable, about the DES process. The IDES also provides a more transparent disability evaluation process by allowing Service members to receive their proposed VA disability ratings and compensation at the same time they receive their DoD physically unfit determination. This allows the member to make an informed decision about the best course of action, which is a great help to Service members who have their military career unexpectedly ended by a disabling condition. 2

Today, Active Component (AC) IDES cases average 258 days from the date of referral to notification of VA disability benefits, well within the 295-day goal. This represents a 23 percent improvement since Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 and an overall 52 percent improvement over the 540 days Service members averaged to complete the Departments separate disability processes prior to the worldwide implementation of the IDES. Similarly, Reserve Component (RC) IDES cases achieved a 22 percent timeliness improvement since FY 2014. DoD is responsible for four core IDES process steps: Referral, Medical Evaluation Board, Physical Evaluation Board, and Transition. We are outperforming the DoD core process stage goals required by DoD policy. For example, in October 2017, DoD Core Stage performance for AC disability evaluation was 104 days against a 105-day goal, while RC disability evaluation was 88 days against a 125-day goal. Although exceeding IDES performance goals, DoD is analyzing opportunities to reduce these goals to improve the readiness of our military forces and allow Service members to more quickly transition to veteran status. Improved IDES Efficiency In 2014, DoD consolidated and revised its disability evaluation issuances to provide clear policy guidance on Military Department operation of their respective DES processes. To accomplish this goal, DoD combined thirteen previous disability evaluation issuances and directive-type memoranda. A revised DoD Instruction, supported by specific topics presented in three DoD Manuals, addresses each aspect of the disability evaluation system and set requirements for each Military Department's execution of disability evaluation activities. This effort was the first attempt to establish a DoD-wide group of consolidated disability evaluation policy and procedure issuances since the 1996 publication of a legacy DES directive and instruction. As a result, the Military Departments now operate with a much-improved, welldefined set of policy and process documents. As directed by Congress in the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act, the Department implemented the DES Quality Assurance Program (QAP) in 2014. The DES QAP enables DoD to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of Military Department disability 3

determinations, the degree to which Military Departments comply with DoD policy in their disability determinations, and the duty performance of Medical and Physical Evaluation Boards and Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Officers. DoD requires a minimum 80 percent score for quality assurance measures, and uses case reviews to help assess and monitor Military Departments DES performance in those areas. DES QAP scores for FY 2017 reflect an accuracy rate of 94 percent, a consistency rate of 77 percent, and 80 percent for duty performance. Consistency scores fell under the 80% goal in FY 2017 due to a purposeful effort to increase the complexity of test case themes used to evaluate Military Departments consistent application of DoD policy. DoD increased the number of conditions for each test case, as well as the complexity of conditions presented. This added rigor in DoD s evaluation methodology identifies deficient areas so that the Military Departments ensure equitable and consistent application of DoD policy. Training remains vital to the continued success of the IDES. DoD issued, in collaboration with the Military Departments, training standards and performance objectives (TSPOs) to ensure all IDES staff are prepared to provide Service members with the critical assistance on which they depend. Collectively, these efforts ensure that disability evaluation personnel are prepared to provide final adjudicative decisions accurately and in compliance with law and DoD policy. Service Member Satisfaction DoD remains committed to continuously evaluating the IDES to enhance the experience of wounded, ill, and injured Service members as they undergo this process. Constant oversight is critical to identify needed IDES improvements, monitor implementation, and measure Military Department performance. As such, DoD surveys Service members at the end of both the Medical Evaluation Board and Physical Evaluation Board phases of the IDES process, assessing their satisfaction with DoD and VA personnel and their overall IDES experience. Survey results taken from over 9,000 Service members from April to September 2017 indicate 93 percent of Service members were satisfied with their IDES experience. DoD will continue to utilize survey information and data to identify improvements. 4

Conclusion DoD is committed to the IDES process and identifying potential improvements to the program. Moving forward, we will maintain our close collaboration with the VA to meet our shared goals of providing quality and timely integrated disability evaluations of America s wounded, ill, and injured Service members. Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Esty, and distinguished members of the subcommittee, I thank you for your unwavering support of the brave men and women that serve our nation, and your dedication to ensuring we have the most efficient systems in place to meet their evaluation and transition needs. 5