Participation Statistics of EU-based Researchers in U.S. National Programmes

Similar documents
Main Report. June Link2US G.A. n Task 1.3

The ERC funding strategy

ERC Grant Schemes. Horizon 2020 European Union funding for Research & Innovation

First quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6%

HORIZON 2020 Instruments and Rules for Participation. Elena Melotti (Warrant Group S.r.l.) MENFRI March 04th 2015

ECHA Helpdesk Support to National Helpdesks

EUREKA and Eurostars: Instruments for international R&D cooperation

A European workforce for call centre services. Construction industry recruits abroad

Implementation of the System of Health Accounts in OECD countries

The Goal: most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world

The EU ICT Sector and its R&D Performance. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 The EU ICT sector and its R&D performance

TUITION FEE GUIDANCE FOR ERASMUS+ EXCHANGE STUDENTS Academic Year

CAP GEMINI ERNST & YOUNG S OVERALL REPORT OCT 2001 OCT 2002 ONLINE AVAILABILITYOF PUBLIC SERVICES: HOW DOES EUROPE PROGRESS?

Introduction & background. 1 - About you. Case Id: b2c1b7a1-2df be39-c2d51c11d387. Consultation document

SOUTH AFRICA EUREKA INFORMATION SESSION 13 JUNE 2013 How to Get involved in EUROSTARS

Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs Users Guide

PUBLIC. 6393/18 NM/fh/jk DGC 1C LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 March 2018 (OR. en) 6393/18 LIMITE

Skillsnet workshop. "Job vacancy Statistics"

Spreading knowledge about Erasmus Mundus Programme and Erasmus Mundus National Structures activities among NARIC centers. Summary

EU RESEARCH FUNDING Associated countries FUNDING 70% universities and research organisations. to SMEs throughout FP7

TRENDS IN HEALTH WORKFORCE IN EUROPE. Gaétan Lafortune, OECD Health Division Conference, Brussels, 17 November 2017

The EUREKA Initiative An Opportunity for Industrial Technology Cooperation between Europe and Japan

Open Research Data (ORD) in a European Policy Context and Horizon 2020

Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions. Piia Heinämäki Erasmus+ Info Day, Lviv Erasmus+

ERA-Can+ twinning programme Call text

Seafarers Statistics in the EU. Statistical review (2015 data STCW-IS)

EU PRIZE FOR WOMEN INNOVATORS Contest Rules

Online Consultation on the Future of the Erasmus Mundus Programme. Summary of Results

The Voice of Foreign Companies. Healthcare Policy Agenda. Bringing the Benefits of Innovative Practices to Denmark

HEALTH CARE NON EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

Erasmus + ( ) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka

Making High Speed Broadband Available to Everyone in Finland

OPCW UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA

E u r o p e a n U n i o n f u n d i n g p r o g r a m m e s a n d n e t w o r k s

RULES - Copernicus Masters 2017

2011 Call for proposals Non-State Actors in Development. Delegation of the European Union to Russia

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Erasmus + program the way towards the global mindset (from the partner countries perspectives)

Health Professionals in EULAR December 2016

FOHNEU and THE E UR OPEAN DIME NS ION. NANTES FR ANC E 7-9 NOVEMB ER 2007 Julie S taun

COST. European Cooperation in Science and Technology. Introduction to the COST Framework Programme

HORIZON The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation

Hospital Pharmacists making the difference in medication use

EU Stress Tests and National Action Plans

APPENDIX B: Organizational Profiles of International Digital Government Research Sponsors. New York, with offices in Geneva, Vienna, and Nairobi

The Role and Responsibilities of the Medical Physicist in MRI in Europe

Unmet health care needs statistics

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS TEACHING ASSIGNMENT (STA)

Capacity Building in the field of youth

Forms of Environmental Education in the Armed Forces and their Impact on Creation of Proenvironmental

HORIZON 2020 WORK PROGRAMME

Supporting Syria and the region: Post-Brussels conference financial tracking

European competitiveness in times of change

Teaching Staff Mobility (STA)

Info Session Webinar Joint Qualifications in Vocational Education and Training Call for proposals EACEA 27/ /10/2017

Erasmus+: Knowledge Alliances and Sector Skills Alliances. Infoday. 23 November María-Luisa García Mínguez, Renata Russell (EACEA) 1

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS STAFF TRAINING (STT)

בית הספר לתלמידי חו"ל

The European Investment Advisory Hub

SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEME INCO JEUPISTE. Grant Agreement Number: D2.2 ANALYSIS OF THE EU-JAPAN COOPERATION IN FP7

Persistent identifiers the needs. Gerry Lawson (NERC), Barcelona Thursday 6th September 2012

EFLM EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE

A QUICK GUIDE TO MARIE CURIE ACTIONS 2010

ERASMUS+ INTERNSHIP MOBILITY?

FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot: Ninth Progress Report March 1st, 2017

March 9, Honourable Winston Dookeran Minister of Finance Eric Williams Finance Building Independence Square Port of Spain Trinidad and Tobago

Erasmus Student Work Placement Guide

Introduction. 1 About you. Contribution ID: 65cfe814-a0fc-43c ec1e349b48ad Date: 30/08/ :59:32

BELGIAN EU PRESIDENCY CONFERENCE ON RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES (RMD)

TRANSNATIONAL YOUTH INITIATIVES 90

Call for Nominations. CARLOS V European Award

Funded by the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union) RECIPE Course Sesimbra September 2015

Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions. Erasmus+

Internationalization of Higher Education in Croatia

Joint Research Funding Opportunities

OPCW UN JOINT MISSION IN SYRIA

***** 2 October 2018 (pre-ministerial day) *****

An action plan to boost research and innovation

EAIE FEDORA Summer University IOANNINA (Greece) June Theme : Modern Times : Counselling students in the 21st Century

European Research Day 2017 EURAXESS Event Press Release

Social Europe. Recruiting in Europe. a guide for employers

HEALTH WORKFORCE MIGRATION:

Quarterly Monitor of the Canadian ICT Sector Third Quarter Covering the period July 1 September 30

The NATO Science for Peace and Security (SPS) Programme

Birth, Survival, Growth and Death of ICT Companies

International Credit Mobility Call for Proposals 2018

Overview. Erasmus: Computing Science Stirling. What is Erasmus? What? 10/10/2012

BRIDGING GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES 2018

Mobility Project for Higher Education Students and Staff, European countries with Partner Countries (Israel)

EUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17

LEADER on the road for 20 years observations from the journey

Page 1. Yours sincerely, TIPS Consortium

The European Entrepreneur Exchange Programme. Users' Guide. European Commission Enterprise and Industry

ASTP-Proton is the premier, pan-european association for professionals involved in knowledge transfer between universities and industry.

The EUREKA Initiative. Matteo Fedeli EUREKA Secretariat

FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot: Sixth Progress Report One Year into the Initiative

Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions. Erasmus+

Network development for partnerships & cooperation programs fostering service innovation

The industrial competitiveness of Italian manufacturing

ANCIEN THE SUPPLY OF INFORMAL CARE IN EUROPE

Transcription:

Participation Statistics of EU-based Researchers in U.S. National Programmes 1

About the Link2US Project Link2US will facilitate easy access to relevant information on U.S. cooperation programmes through electronic communities such as a website, e newsletter, and virtual helpdesk and designated activities such as training workshops. The Link2US Project will: Map opportunities of U.S. federal collaborative funding schemes and rules for participation through research and analyses. Raise awareness among the European scientific community by disseminating information about programmes and funding opportunities through a multi faceted network. Identify and analyze potential obstacles to cooperation through these programmes and funding schemes so that they may be avoided and/or that solutions may be found. For more information: www.euussciencetechnology.eu/link2us/ Disclaimer The information contained within this report has been compiled from public sources and communications with funding entities. This report is not an official publication of any U.S. Federal Government Entity. Any error within the report is the fault of the author. 2

Table of Contents Executive Summary... 4 Objective... 5 Methodology... 5 Department of Energy... 5 Department of Homeland Security... 5 National Institutes of Health... 5 Results... 6 Department of Energy... 6 Department of Homeland Security... 7 National Institutes of Health... 8 Key Findings... 10 Appendices... 11 Appendix I: Department of Energy Grant Statistics for FY2009... 11 Appendix II: Department of Homeland Security Grant Statistics for FY2009... 11 Appendix III: National Institutes of Health Grant Statistics for FY2009... 12 Appendix IV: National Institutes of Health Programme Type Breakdown... 13 3

Executive Summary The United States (U.S) national science and technology system is highly decentralized, with funding authority spread across a dozen or more executive agencies, cabinet departments, and sub units. Out of the numerous entities, eleven U.S. programmes covering three agencies have funding programmes that are open to European Union (EU) based researchers/institutions. In the context of this report, open refers to a programme that EU based researchers/institutions can submit applications to directly receive funding. The Participation Statistics of EU Based Researchers in U.S. National Programmes report focuses primarily on statistics collected from three U.S. federal entities, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Statistics for these entities were collected for U.S. fiscal year (FY) 2009. Entities surveyed were identified based on a prior review by the Link2US project of U.S. federal programmes open to EU based researchers/institutions. The Link2US review surveyed the largest, non defence related U.S. federal entities that fund research through extramural grants. Results showed that out of the twenty seven EU Member States (MS), fourteen received funding from the three U.S. entities. On average, 20 30% of the total number of awards given to internationally based institutions/researchers were awarded to MS, worth $49,921,464 USD. NIH awarded the highest number of awards and largest funding total. Out of the fourteen MS receiving funding, the United Kingdom received the highest number of awards, both in total number and from all three agencies, worth $22,268,251 USD 1. Only one other MS, Germany, received funding from all three entities, worth $9,495,639 USD. Italy was the only MS to receive funding from two federal entities, DHS and NIH, worth $1,186,794 USD. The ten other states received funding only from NIH, worth $16,970,781 USD. 1 Due to a shared award between the United Kingdom and Italy awarded by the Department of Homeland Security, half of the total amount was allocated into the total awarded FY2009 amount for each MS. 4

Objective The United States (U.S) national science and technology system is highly decentralized, with funding authority spread across a dozen or more executive agencies, cabinet departments, and sub units. Out of the numerous entities and programmes, twelve U.S. funding programmes, covering three entities, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), are open for European Union (EU) based researcher/institution participation. In the context of this report, open refers to a programme that EU based researchers/institutions can submit applications to directly receive funding. The main objective of the Participation Statistics of EU Based Researchers in U.S. National Programmes is to track the number, funding amount, type of grant, and country breakdown, where available, of EUbased researchers/institutions receiving grants. This report is the first of two reports that seek to track these statistics over thirty six months for fiscal years (FY) 2 2009 2011. Methodology Participation Statistics of EU Based Researchers in U.S. National Programmes focuses on statistics collected from U.S. federal entities for FY2009. Data for the first half of FY2010 was not consistently available across surveyed entities and therefore is not included in this report but will be included in the next report. Entities surveyed were identified based on a prior review by the Link2US project of U.S. federal programmes open to EU based researchers/institutions. The Link2US review surveyed the largest, non defence related U.S. federal entities that fund research through extramural grants. 3 Department of Energy Data from DOE was received from its centralized procurement office. Available information includes a breakdown of grants by country, funding amount, and number of grants. Individual principal investigator (PI) data was not consistently available. While multiple sub programmes within DOE are open to EU based researchers/institutions, grant information was not available by individual programme. Department of Homeland Security Data for DHS was received from the Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate s International Cooperative Programmes Office (ICPO). This was the only programme surveyed within DHS. Due to restricted information access, only the country breakdown and grant amount per year were made available. PI information is not publicly accessible. National Institutes of Health NIH makes all grant statistics publicly available on its official website. 4 Grant information regarding internationally based researchers/institutions includes a breakdown of awards by country, type, funding amount, number of grants, and number of individual researchers. As NIH periodically updates information online throughout the year, statistics used within this report are based on data available for FY2009, last updated on 31 July 2010. 2 The U.S. fiscal year (FY) begins 1 October of the previous year and ends 30 September of the given year. For example, FY2009 is 1 October 2008 30 September 2009. 3 The completed survey can be found in database or catalogue format at http://www.euussciencetechnology.eu/link2us/fundingopportunities.html. 4 NIH grant award recipient information can be found at http://report.nih.gov/index.aspx. 5

Results DOE, DHS, and NIH all have programmes that are open to EU based researchers/institutions. Combined, the three entities make available twelve programmes to which EU based researchers/institutions can directly apply for funding. Department of Energy DOE s overarching mission is to advance the national, economic, and energy security of the U.S., to promote scientific and technological innovation in support of that mission, and to ensure the environmental cleanup of the national nuclear weapons complex. Three funding programmes are open to EU based researchers/institutions: Office of Science Financial Assistance Programme, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and Office of Fossil Energy. Germany: 2 ($388,353) United Kingdom: 5 ($593,298) Other International: 23 ($4,217,096) Figure 1.1: DOE FY2009 International Grants by Number of Grants Awarded (Total Funding Amount) Twenty three grants, totalling $5,198,747 USD, were awarded to non U.S. based institutions in FY2009. EU based researchers/institutions received seven grants. Figure 1.1 shows the breakdown of EU grants awarded versus those awarded to the other countries internationally. The EU received over a quarter of the international grants, approximately receiving $981,651 USD or 30% of the total funding of the international grants. The seven grants were awarded to only two EU Member States (MS). The United Kingdom received the most grants, with five, followed by Germany, which received two grants. For further information on specific funding amounts, please see Appendix I. 6

Department of Homeland Security DHS s S&T Directorate seeks to improve homeland security by providing state of the art technology. The S&T Directorate s International Cooperative Programmes Office (ICPO) just began its programme targeting international research in 2007. The programme is open to EU based researchers/institutions. Germany: $200,000 (1) Italy/United Kingdom: $199,405 (1) Other International: $1,196,866 (6) Figure 1.2: DHS ICPO FY2009 Research Grants by Amount Funded (Number of Awards) The ICPO awarded eight grants in FY2009. Total funding amounted to $1,596,271 USD. Of the eight grants awarded, two were given to EU based researchers/institutions totalling $399,405 USD. Figure 1.2 compares the funding for the EU versus other international researchers/institutions. Germany received one award while Italy and the United Kingdom shared a second. Both awards were approximately $200,000 USD each. 7

National Institutes of Health NIH is part of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and is the primary U.S. federal entity for conducting and supporting medical research. In 2008, the then Director of NIH Elias Zerhouni and European Commissioner for Research Janez Potocnik agreed to the mutual openness of NIH funding programmes and the Framework Programme for biomedical and health research. 5 For FY2009, NIH awarded 50,616 awards to U.S. and internationally based researchers/institutions, totaling $21,703,918,711 USD. Out of this total, 538 were awarded to internationally based institutions. EU based institutions received 24%, or 131, of the international grants totaling $48,540,408 USD. By funding amount, EU based institutions received 22% of the total international grants and 0.22% of the overall NIH grants. France: 11 ($5,058,784) Germany: 11 ($8,907,286) Hungary: 6 ($243,012) Ireland: 3 ($561,660) Italy: 6 ($1,087,091) Finland: 2 ($3,518,769) Denmark: 3 ($1,402,953) Czech Republic: 1 ($51,202) Netherlands: 8 ($1,348,573) Poland: 2 ($101,962) Spain: 3 ($584,048) Belgium: 4 ($1,432,085) United Kingdom: 64 ($21,575,250) Sweden: 7 ($2,667,733) Figure 1.3: NIH FY2009 Awards to MS by Number of Grants Awarded (Total Funding Amount) Fourteen EU MS received the 131 grants. Figure 1.3 shows the distribution among EU MS. The United Kingdom received the most awards and total grant funding, with almost half of the EU awards totaling $21,575,250 USD. France and Germany each received eleven awards. Others received fewer than ten awards. For further details regarding the breakdown of funding and awards, please see Appendix III. 5 E.A. Zerhouni, J. Potocnik, Science 322; 1048 (2008). 8

Number of Awards 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 R01 R03 R21 R33 U01 U10 U19 U54 Grant Type Figure 1.4: NIH EU Award Breakdown by Grant Type NIH data can be further broken down into the specific type of awards that EU based researchers/institutions received. Please see Appendix IV for a description of award types. Figure 1.4 shows that the majority of the 131 grants were Research Grant Programme (R01) awards. The Research Project Cooperative Agreement (U01) was the second most used mechanism with 22, or 17%. Other grant mechanisms were used on a significantly smaller scale. To compare to the EU, the European Research Council (ERC), in the area of life sciences, funded 74 projects worth 164,319,512 EUR from MS (an additional 39,999,460 EUR for 17 projects from association countries to the Framework Programme) in the 2009 Advanced Grant Call. 6 ERC, a component of the Ideas Programme of the EU s Seventh Research Framework Programme (FP7), supports investigator driven frontier research in MS and FP7 associated countries. NIH funded 131 projects worth approximately 37,338,775 EUR 7 from MS in FY2009. 6 Further details about the Advanced Grant Call Programme can be found at: erc.europa.eu/indec.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&topicid=66. Data available at: erc.europa.eu/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&topicid=518; CORDIS. 7 Using 1.3 USD/EUR exchange rate. 9

Key Findings Out of the twenty seven EU MS, fourteen received funding from DOE, DHS, or NIH. On average, 20 30% of the total number of awards given to internationally based institutions/researchers were awarded to MS, worth $49,921,464 USD. NIH awarded the highest number of awards and largest total funding. NIH provided by far the largest extramural grant funding of EU based institutions/researchers, compared to DOE and DHS. EU based institutions receiving U.S. funding are led by the United Kingdom, Germany, and France; unsurprisingly given these MS are the largest science investors in the EU (they also lead the ERC grantees) 8. Out of these fourteen MS receiving funding, the United Kingdom received the highest number of awards, both in total number and from all three agencies, worth $22,268,250.5 USD 9. Only one other MS, Germany, received funding from all three entities, worth $9,495,639 USD. Italy was the only MS to receive funding from two federal entities, DHS and NIH, worth $1,186,793.5 USD. The ten other states receiving funding, saw funding only from NIH, when combined worth $16,970,781 USD. 8 Data available at: Erc.europa.eu/pdf/Statistics_AdG09.pdf. 9 Due to a shared award between the United Kingdom and Italy, awarded by the Department of Homeland Security, only half of the total amount was figured into each MS total awarded amount for FY2009. 10

Appendices Appendix I: Department of Energy Grant Statistics for FY2009 EU Participation Statistics: Department of Energy (DOE) Directorate: All Offices Source: DOE Headquarters Procurement Office Yearly Aggregate Totals Fiscal Year 2009 Total Researchers Total Awards 5* 7 Individual Member State Totals by Year Total Funding $981,651 Member State Fiscal Year Total Researchers Total Awards Total Funding Germany 2009 United Kingdom 2009 Totals N/A** 5 5 2 5 7 $388,353 $593,298 $981,651 *Based on available individual PI data **Name of PI was unavailable. Only institution was given. Appendix II: Department of Homeland Security Grant Statistics for FY2009 EU Participation Statistics: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Directorate: Science and Technology Directorate, International Cooperative Programmes Office (ICPO) Source: ICPO Program Manager Yearly Aggregate Totals Fiscal Year 2009 Total Researchers Total Awards Total Funding N/A 3 $399,405 Individual Member State Totals by Year Member/Associated Fiscal Year Total Researchers Total Awards Total Funding Germany 2009 N/A 1 $200,000 Italy/United Kingdom* 2009 N/A 1 $199,405 Totals 2 $399,405 *Shared award 11

Appendix III: National Institutes of Health Grant Statistics for FY2009 EU Participation Statistics: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Directorate: All NIH Institutes/Centers Source: NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool (RePORT) Yearly Aggregate Totals Fiscal Year 2009 Total Researchers Total Awards Total Funding 116 131 $48,540,408 Individual Member State Totals by Year Member State Fiscal Year Total Researchers Total Awards Total Funding Award* Type Number BELGIUM 2009 3 4 $1,432,085 R01 2 R21 1 U10 1 CZECH REPUBLIC 2009 1 1 $51,202 R01 1 DENMARK 2009 3 3 $1,402,953 R01 1 R21 1 U19 1 FINLAND 2009 2 2 $3,518,769 U01 1 FRANCE 2009 10 11 $5,058,784 R01 6 R03 1 U01 4 GERMANY 2009 11 11 $8,907,286 R01 5 R03 1 R21 1 U01 3 HUNGARY 2009 6 6 $243,012 R01 3 R03 3 IRELAND 2009 3 3 $561,660 R01 3 ITALY 2009 6 6 $1,087,091 R01 5 U01 1 NETHERLANDS 2009 7 8 $1,348,573 R01 4 R21 1 U01 3 POLAND 2009 2 2 $101,962 R01 2 SPAIN 2009 3 3 $584,048 R01 3 SWEDEN 2009 7 7 $2,667,733 R21 1 U01 1 UNITED KINGDOM 2009 52 64 $21,575,250 R01 46 R03 3 R21 4 R33 1 U01 8 U54 2 Totals 116 131 $48,540,408 *See Appendix III: NIH Programme Type Breakdown for full award name 12

Appendix IV: National Institutes of Health Programme Type Breakdown National Institutes of Health (NIH) Programme Type Breakdown Directorate: All NIH Institutes/Centers Source: NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool (RePORT) Programme Name NIH Research Grant Programme NIH Small Grant Programme NIH Support for Conference and Scientific Meetings NIH Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Award Exploratory/Developmental Grants Phase II NIH Clinical Trial Planning Grant Programme Research Project Cooperative Agreement Cooperative Clinical Research Specialised Center Cooperative Agreement Acronym R01 R03 R13/U13 R21 R33 R34 U01 U10 U54 13