Rideshare Mission Assurance on Multi-Payload Missions

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

Small Satellite Access to ESPA Standard Service

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Administrative Changes to AFI , Space Test Program (STP) Management OPR: SAF/AQSL

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

SMC/LE: Guardians of Assured Access to Space

NASA Marshall Faculty Fellowship Program

Multi-Payload Integration Lessons Learned from Space Test Program Mission S26

SMALLER is Better: Technical Considerations for ORS

Tactical Satellite 3 Mission Overview and Lessons Learned

Civil-Academic Space Test Program

AFRL Scholars Programs and University Nanosat Program

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element 1, , : Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle

IV. Organizations that Affect National Security Space

Operationally Responsive Space 1 Lessons Learned

US Military Space Organizations

Steve Greenberg, JPL System Safety Program Office June 27, 2006 SG - Page 1

Tactical Satellite 3: Requirements Development for Responsive Space Missions

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC

Earth Science Technology 59.6

RESUME. Space Shuttle Mission Controller September 1984 Dec 1988 NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX

snapshots of 17 key Air Force space programs experiments, development, production, sustainment, and upgrades. The list is not allinclusive.

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE N / Navy Meteorological and Ocean Sensors-Space(METOC)

Defense Support Program Celebrating 40 Years of Service

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Position Statement on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) FY 2016 Budget Request submitted by the ASME NASA Task Force

UNCLASSIFIED. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Section-by-Section Comparison of 1996 and 2006 National Space Policy Documents

Report of the NASA Program Definition Team for Student Collaborations

Spaceflight, Thales Alenia Space to jointly develop BlackSky geospatial-imagery satellites

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 21 R-1 Line #20

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program (SPACE) - EMD

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #188

Commercial companies are playing an increasing role in this traditionally government-led sector. Global Space Activity 2015 (Billions) 1

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Joint Military Utility Assessment

Space and Counter. AIR FORCE Magazine / June Artists s conception by Eric Simonsen

Commercial Human Spaceflight

ORS-5 Program Management Review

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element : DIGITAL BATTLEFLD COMM.

THE MINIATURE SENSOR TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION PROGRAM: AN OVERVIEW. Jason R. Feig Air Force Phillips Laboratory, Edwards AFB, CA

Waiver to Space Exploration Technologies Corporation of Acceptable Risk Limit for Launch

Plan for Operationally Responsive Space

2017 Annual Missile Defense Small Business Programs Conference

HILL AFB : UTAH. Military Asset List 2016 FAST FACTS

The Verification for Mission Planning System

Air Installations Compatible Use Zones Study. Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska

NAVIGATING THE POLICY COMPLIANCE ROADMAP FOR SMALL SATELLITES CENTER FOR SPACE POLICY AND STRATEGY NOVEMBER 2017

Department of Defense

System Engineering Challenges for Satellite Hosted Payloads

THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON. December 21, 2004

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS) High EMD. Prior Years (+) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Disruption in Aerospace/Defense

Crossing the Chasm: Leveraging University and Industry Partnerships for Success

First Announcement/Call For Papers

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Except Biotechnology)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

MOTORS CORPORATION MILWAUKEE. WISCONSIN Currently building the spacecraft guidance and navigation systems for

National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) - Archived 12/2005

Air Force Lifecycle Management Center (AFLCMC)

MILITARY STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL RELAY (MILSTAR) SATELLITE SYSTEM

This publication is available digitally on the AFDPO WWW site at:

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Report No. D December 16, Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center's Use of Undefinitized Contractual Actions

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: WEATHER SERVICE. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

OHIO Replacement. Meeting America s Enduring Requirement for Sea-Based Strategic Deterrence

University-Class Satellites: From Marginal Utility to 'Disruptive' Research Platforms

Boosting Access. to Government Rocket Science. John F. Rice. Defense AT&L: September October 2014 Defense AT&L: September October

CRS Report for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 121

USTAR INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (IPP) FY17 PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT

Joint Electronics Type Designation Automated System

ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND TASKS OF DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC SYSTEMS PROGRAMS, WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, DC

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 13 R-1 Line #33

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

January 23, Dear Government and Industry Representatives:

Program Plan For the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technology Account Under New York s Clean Air Interstate Rules (CAIR)

Valuation Methodologies for Rocket Motors from Excess Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles

Welcome to GSAW2005. Collaboration and Common Solutions. Challenges and Opportunities in Transforming National Security Ground Systems

NOAA s Licensing of CubeSats as Private Remote Sensing Space Systems under the National and Commercial Space Policy Act

HR001118S0032 Broad Agency Announcement Blackjack Tactical Technology Office HR001118S0032 Amendment 01 May 25, 2018

WEAPONS SCHOOL PREPARATORY COURSE (WSPC)

2007/2008 AIAA Undergraduate Team Space Transportation Design Competition

DOD INSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF LASER ILLUMINATION OF OBJECTS IN SPACE

Appendix A. Annex N Space

Kill Vehicle Work Breakdown Structure

Request for Proposal Robotic Lunar Crater Resource Prospecting

NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

PATIENT CARE TECHNICAN PROGRAM Wallace Community College Selma APPLICATION PACKET

Headquarters U.S. Air Force. Overview of Air Force Science & Technology

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PRESENTATION TO THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON STRATEGIC FORCES SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE UNITED STATES SENATE

Why are Tech VCs Rushing into Space Investing October 12, 2016

Transcription:

Rideshare Mission Assurance on Multi-Payload Missions Andrew Read Member, Technical Staff The Aerospace Corporation Space Innovation Directorate August 12, 2015 2015 The Aerospace Corporation

Introduction Given the decreasing cost and increasing capabilities of small (<250Kg) spacecraft, the traditional One Satellite, One Launch mission is no longer a guarantee There are an increasing number of missions that are including rideshare partners, including launches in the NSS realm An established method of assessing mission risks across programs with differing levels of risk tolerance is becoming essential Rideshare Mission Assurance allows multiple programs with vastly different risk tolerances to share a single launch Especially useful when the organization responsible for certifying the entire mission does not have a Mission Assurance role for all of the spacecraft on the mission NSS: National Security Space 2

Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm Where did it come from? The AFSPC-4 mission included an SMC primary payload (GSSAP) and an AFRL provided APL (ANGELS) This created a clash of cultures between a traditionally risk averse primary payload and a much more risk tolerant APL This forced the development of a hybrid mission assurance system that would allow all mission partners to accept mission risks independently Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm (RMA/DNH) is a process by which risk acceptance can be downwardly delegated to the lowest possible authority for a given rideshare partner Allows mission partners to accept all self induced/programmatic risks without having to evaluate any circumstances beyond their direct control SMC: Space and Missile Systems Center AFRL: Air Force Research Labs GSSAP: Geosynchronous Space Situational Awareness Program APL: Auxiliary Payload ANGELS: Automated Navigation and Guidance Experiment for Local Space RMA: Rideshare Mission Assurance DNH: Do No Harm 3

Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm What Is It? A process that focuses on insuring that no payload on a rideshare mission will negatively affect the on-orbit functionality of any other payload. The Aerospace risk identification and capture process is unchanged Guides which of the identified risks require further effort/mitigation RMA/DNH does NOT take into account the on-orbit functionality of the payload being assessed 4

Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm Cradle to Grave process Design Build Test Launch Integration Launch Operations/ End of Life Design Loads Electrical inhibits Implementation of design criteria and military standards Qualification regimen Appropriate margin De-confliction of joint operations Deployment sequence Safing Disposal Deorbit 5

Mission Unique Risks RMA/DNH allows Mission Managers to break all payload related mission risks into two categories Payload Mission Success Safety of Flight Payload Mission success risks are accepted by each individual payload s Risk Acceptance Authority These risks only affect the functionality of an individual payload Risks that are generally considered mission assurance Safety of Flight risks are accepted by the mission team as a whole Only risks that pose a threat to the mission from the start of launch processing until SV separation Risks that are generally considered space safety RMA: Rideshare Mission Assurance DNH: Do No Harm 6

Mission Unique Risks Overlapping and separating risks Some risks are clearly safety of flight risks Underqualified bus structure Weak inhibit strategy, etc. Some risks are clearly performance risks Solar Array not power-positive Some risks overlap Unable to control a SV in active GEO orbit Good engineering can help separate risks Separating risk-tolerant SV into GEO disposal orbit Once SV checkout is complete, SV moves to GEO orbit 7 Safety of Flight Risks Safety of Flight Risks GEO: Geosynchronous Orbit SV: Space Vehicle * Dead satellite in GEO * Performance Risks Deploy satellite in disposal orbit Performance Risks

Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm Example SMC-provided launch Multiple SV s from different providers Some SV s have hosted payloads SMC/CC is Risk Acceptance Authority for the mission Secondary Payload Government Rideshare Partner (provided by NASA) Hosted Payload Government Experiment (provided by Naval Research Lab) SMC: Space and Missile Systems Center SMC/CC: Space and Missile Systems Center Commander SV: Space Vehicle NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration 8 Launch Vehicle procured by SMC DoD Primary Payload (provided by Air Force) Secondary Payload Commercial Rideshare Partner (provided by commercial agency)

Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm Certification DoD Primary provided by Air Force SV Certification: Air Force Sponsoring Agency DNH Mission Assurance: SMC Commercial Rideshare Satellite SV Certification: Commercial Company DNH Mission Assurance: SMC Gov t Rideshare Satellite provided by NASA SV Certification: NASA Sponsoring Agency DNH Mission Assurance: SMC Hosted Payload provided by Navy Hosted PL Certification: Navy via hosting agency DNH Mission Assurance: SMC Integrated Stack Risk Acceptance Authority: SMC Launch Vehicle LV Certification: SMC Full Mission Assurance DoD: Department of Defense SV: Space Vehicle SMC: Space and Missile Systems Center NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration PL: Payload 9

Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm Summary Each agency provides its own Mission Assurance and certification letter for their own spacecraft Verification artifacts are provided with the certification letter to provide inputs to the DNH analysis SMC with Aerospace support provides the Do No Harm mission assurance assessment for the payload stack SMC/CC will provide certification for the mission as a whole DNH: Do No Harm SMC: Space and Missile Systems Center SMC/CC: Space and Missile Systems Center Commander 10

Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm Expanded System Example: STP-2 The STP-2 Mission 2 Co-prime Missions DSX Provided by AFRL Formosat-7/COSMIC-2 Provided by NSPO (Taiwan) with US Air Force instruments 6 Auxiliary Payloads NASA Surrey Satellite Technologies US Georgia Tech Michigan Tech US Air Force Academy Naval Postgraduate School 24U of Cubesats Photo courtesy of SpaceX AFRL: Airforce Research Labs NSPO: National Space Organization (Taiwanese Space Agency) NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration STP: Space Test Program DSX: Demonstration Science Experiment COSMIC: Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate 11

DNH Relevant Testing Random Vibration Generally tested to proto-qual (MPE +3dB) Acoustic Also tested to proto-qual Can be waived if SV does not have acoustically driven components Shock Measured against industry standard 50in/sec line Outgassing & Contamination Primary concern is to protect optics EMI/EMC Focused on ground operations in co-processing facilities Inhibits Three required for all critical functions EMI: Electromagnetic Interference EMC: Electromagnetic Compatibility MPE: Mean Predicted Environment 12

Lessons Learned RMA / DNH process must be agreed to early in the program I&T methods must be detailed to the program office to ensure that sound designs are not compromised by inadequate processes All post test changes to the SV (Component Remove & Replace, new/differing payloads etc) must be vetted by the Rideshare Mission Assurance authority PRIOR to implementation Adequate do no harm test levels not always clear cut For STP-2, the Falcon Heavy has not yet launched, so environments are uncertain Many secondary / rideshare spacecraft are designed and sometimes built before a launch vehicle is identified Assumptions must be made about launch loads / environments Conservative assumptions drive cost; relaxed environments drive risk RMA: Rideshare Mission Assurance DNH: Do No Harm SV: Space Vehicle STP: Space Test Program 13

Conclusion Rideshare Mission Assurance/Do-No-Harm allows mission partners to accept all internal risks at the program level while elevating only the safety risks to the mission level The RMA process as developed by Aerospace is currently being implemented and refined on both STP-2 and an upcoming Air Force Space Command mission Questions? 14

Questions? Andrew Read andrew.read@aero.org 15