Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on State Health System Performance, Baseline

Similar documents
CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION. Medi-Cal Versus Employer- Based Coverage: Comparing Access to Care JULY 2015 (REVISED JANUARY 2016)

Health Indicators: A Review of Reports Currently in Use

NATIONAL SCORECARD ON U.S. HEALTH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE: TECHNICAL REPORT. Cathy Schoen and Sabrina K. H. How The Commonwealth Fund.

2012 Community Health Needs Assessment

CER Module ACCESS TO CARE January 14, AM 12:30 PM

The Florida KidCare Program Evaluation

King County City Health Profile Seattle

1. Measures within the program measure set are NQF-endorsed or meet the requirements for expedited review

Anthem BlueCross and BlueShield

MULTI-STAKEHOLDER APPROACH TO VALUE-BASED HEALTHCARE

NURS6029 Australian Health Care Global Context

Central Iowa Healthcare. Community Health Needs Assessment

2015 DUPLIN COUNTY SOTCH REPORT

Best Practices. SNP Alliance. October 2013 Commonwealth Care Alliance: Best Practices in Care for Frail and Disabled Medicare Medicaid Enrollees

Note: Accredited is the highest rating an exchange product can have for 2015.

Community Analysis Summary Report for Clinical Care

1. What is your ethnic origin? (Check one) 2. What is your gender? 3. What is your age? Page 1. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj. nmlkj.

Methodist McKinney Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment Overview:

Community Health Needs Assessment for Corning Hospital: Schuyler, NY and Steuben, NY:

Commission on a High Performance Health System. North Dakota Site Visit - July 18, 2007

Cleveland Clinic Implementing Value-Based Care

Anthem BlueCross and BlueShield HMO

Patient Experience Heart & Vascular Institute

BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL 2016 COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

About Minnesota s hospitals

HEALTH CARE REFORM IN THE U.S.

Allegan General Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment

Colorado Choice Health Plans

The Florida KidCare Evaluation: Statistical Analyses

Core Metrics for Better Care, Lower Costs, and Better Health

Center for Labor Research and Education University of California, Berkeley Center for Health Policy Research University of California, Los Angeles

Good day Chairpersons Gill and Vitale and distinguished committee members. Thank you for the

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

STEUBEN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE

St. Mary Medical Center, Langhorne, PA Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Strategy Fiscal Year 2018

Checklist for Ocean County Community Health Improvement Plan Implementation of Strategies- Activities for Ocean County Health Centers: CHEMED & OHI

Oregon's Health System Transformation

Oregon Health Authority Key Performance Measures Biennium

The Number of People With Chronic Conditions Is Rapidly Increasing

Continuing Certain Medicaid Options Will Increase Costs, But Benefit Recipients and the State

The Opportunities and Challenges of Health Reform

Chapter VII. Health Data Warehouse

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Quality and Leadership: Improving outcomes

CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System

Commentary for East Sussex

NYS Prevention Agenda : Progress Toward Becoming the Healthiest State

The Journey to High-Value Healthcare

ONTARIO COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Kaleida Health 2010 One-Year Community Service Plan Update September 2010

2007 Community Service Plan

School Health Program. Mecklenburg County Health Department

Welcome to BCHC Your Medical Home

Integrating Policy and Physiology Towards Optimal Hospital Discharge We Can Do It! Toni Miles, M.D., Ph.D. June 11, 2015

National Clinical Audit programme

Medicare Advantage Star Ratings

Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Substance Abuse as part of NY s Prevention Agenda Taking Action November 12, 2014

Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT)

CLOSING THE DIVIDE: HOW MEDICAL HOMES PROMOTE EQUITY IN HEALTH CARE

An Introduction to MPCA and Federally Qualified Health Centers~ Partners for Quality Care

Healthcare Workforce Planning The North Country Perspective

Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013)

California Community Health Centers

Quality of Care of Medicare- Medicaid Dual Eligibles with Diabetes. James X. Zhang, PhD, MS The University of Chicago

s n a p s h o t Medi-Cal at a Crossroads: What Enrollees Say About the Program

Brave New World: The Effects of Health Reform Legislation on Hospitals. HFMA Annual National Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada

Community Health Needs Assessment September 29, 2016

Whittington Health Quality Strategy

2005 Community Service Plan

Community Health Needs Assessment 2016

3. Expand providers prescription capability to include alternatives such as cooking and physical activity classes.

Region 1 Parish Community Health Assessment Profile: St. Bernard Parish

The Affordable Care Act and Its Potential to Reduce Health Disparities Cara V. James, Ph.D.

STEUBEN COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Connecticut SIM: Enabling Accountable Care and Accountable Communities

Examples of Measure Selection Criteria From Six Different Programs

LIVINGSTON COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Highlands County Community Health Assessment

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Benchmark Data Sources

DHS-7659-ENG MEDICAID MATTERS The impact of Minnesota s Medicaid Program

Forces of Change- Seeing Stepping Stones Not Potholes

2016 Community Health Needs Assessment

Meaningful Use Measures: Quick Reference Guide Stage 2 (2014 and Beyond)

The State of Health in Rural C olorado

CHEMUNG COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Community Health Needs Assessment

Quality Measurement Approaches of State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Programs

Impact of Enrolling in Health Insurance on Low-Income Children that Enrolled for a Medical Reason

March of Dimes Washington State Community Grants Program. Community Award Application

Figure 1: Domains of the Three Adult Outcomes Frameworks

Health Literacy Implications of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)

MONROE COUNTY HEALTH PROFILE. Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency, 2017

Enhancing Outcomes with Quality Improvement (QI) October 29, 2015

Achieving Health Equity After the ACA: Implications for cost, quality and access

St. Jude Medical Center St. Jude Heritage Healthcare. FY 09 FY 11 Community Benefit Plan

Consumer-Centered Data and Strategies to Advance Evidence- Based Advocacy in Child Health

Community Health Improvement Plan

MEDICARE ENROLLMENT, HEALTH STATUS, SERVICE USE AND PAYMENT DATA FOR AMERICAN INDIANS & ALASKA NATIVES

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:

Transcription:

1 1 Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Health System Performance, 017 Florida Florida's Scorecard s (a) Overall Access & Affordability Prevention & Treatment Avoidable Hospital Use & Cost 017 Baseline 39 39 41 44 45 45 41 3 Healthy Lives 0 0 Equity 33 4 Number of indicators where Florida improved, worsened or stayed the same (b) Little/ 1 3 4 of 39 Total Indicators of 5 Access & Affordability Indicators 7 5 3 of 15 Prevention & Treatment Indicators of 9 Avoidable Hospital Use & Cost Indicators 1 9 Income Equity 4 1 8 1 of 10 Healthy Lives Indicators Race/Ethnicity Equity 6 5 6 9 4 1 Children ages 0 18 uninsured Adults ages 19 64 uninsured of 17 Income Equity Indicators Before and after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) coverage expansions of 14 Race Equity Indicators in past 499,891 3,6,35 3,17,860 31,193,300,40,71,65 (before ACA coverage expansions) Estimated impact of state improvement (c) 44,10 (after ACA coverage expansions) If Florida improved to the level of the best-performing state for this indicator, then: 1,745,54 more adults (age 18 and older) would have a usual source of care to help ensure that care is coordinated and accessible when needed 936,814 more adults would receive age- and gender-appropriate recommended cancer screenings more children (ages 19-35 months) would receive all recommended vaccines 76,510 4,840 10,98 fewer Medicare beneficiaries would receive an unsafe medication fewer premature deaths (before age 75) would occur from causes that are potentially treatable or preventable with timely and appropriate care fewer emergency department visits for nonemergent or primary-care-treatable conditions would occur among Medicare beneficiaries 1

Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Health System Performance, 017 Table 1. Health System Performance Indicator by Dimension Dimension and indicator ACCESS & AFFORDABILITY Adults ages 19 64 uninsured Best state 0 13 4 49 0 Substantial change over time (a) Children ages 0 18 uninsured 7 5 1 36 1 8 in past 17 13 7 48 1 16 Individuals under age 65 with high out-of-pocket medical costs relative to their annual household income -15 15 14 10 7 At-risk adults without a routine doctor visit in past two s 1 13 6 19 14 14 Adults without a dental visit in past 17 16 11 37 18 15 PREVENTION & TREATMENT Adults with a usual source of care 78 78 89 73 76 Adults with age- and gender-appropriate cancer screenings 67 68 77 8 68 69 Adults with age-appropriate vaccines 38 51 51 8 36 Children with a medical home 011/1 50 54 69 45 Children with a medical and dental preventive care visit in the past Children with emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems who received needed mental health care in the past Children ages 19 35 months who received all recommended doses of seven key vaccines Medicare beneficiaries who received at least one drug that should be avoided in the elderly Medicare beneficiaries with dementia, hip/pelvic fracture, or chronic renal failure who received a prescription drug that is contraindicated for that condition Medicare fee-for-service patients whose health provider always listens, explains, shows respect, and spends enough time with them Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, or stroke Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), Standardized Infection Ratio Hospitalized patients given information about what to do during their recovery at home Hospitalized patients who reported hospital staff always managed pain well, responded when needed help to get to bathroom or pressed call button, and explained medicines and side effects Home health patients who get better at walking or moving around Home health patients whose wounds improved or healed after an operation High-risk nursing home residents with pressure sores Long-stay nursing home residents with an antipsychotic medication 011/1 60 68 81 45 011/1 58 61 86 35 07/ - 06/ 67 7 81 46 14 13 7 38 19 18 10 75 14. 76 14.5 69 66 80 30 13.1 11 0. 8 64 68 74 45 9 90 95 5 07/010-06/ 85 87 90 41 7 8 6 6 3 6 18 17 8 34 39 65 9 70 6 6 70 16 17 1 1 76 76 13.1 13. 0.6 83 86 63 68 61 89 1

Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Health System Performance, 017 Table 1. Health System Performance Indicator by Dimension (continued) Dimension and Indicator Best state Substantial change over time (a) AVOIDABLE HOSPITAL USE & COST Hospital admissions for pediatric asthma, per 100,000 children 157 107 7 39 011 145 107 Hospital admissions among Medicare beneficiaries for ambulatory care sensitive conditions, ages 65 74, per 1,000 beneficiaries (b) 7 1 33 8 Hospital admissions among Medicare beneficiaries for ambulatory care sensitive conditions, age 75 and older, per 1,000 beneficiaries (b) 7 66 35 34 68 70 Medicare 30-day hospital readmissions, per 1,000 beneficiaries 30 7 10 31 34 34 Short-stay nursing home residents readmitted within 30 days of hospital discharge to nursing home 19 11 46 0 Long-stay nursing home residents hospitalized within a sixmonth period 16 5 47 3 17 Home health patients also enrolled in Medicare with a hospital admission 15.9 16. 13.9 16 15 16 Potentially avoidable emergency department visits among Medicare beneficiaries, per 1,000 beneficiaries 185 185 1 7 179 188 Total reimbursements per enrollee (ages 18 64) with employer-sponsored insurance $4,53 $4,569 $3,17 33 $4,459 $4,489 Total Medicare (Parts A & B) reimbursements per enrollee $10,434 $8,819 $5,59 50 $10,597 $8,854 HEALTHY LIVES Mortality amenable to health care, deaths per 100,000 population Years of potential life lost before age 75-14 80.3 84. 54.3 7 011-1 80.3 84 6575. 6447.3 4891.6 6 6555.9 641.3 Breast cancer deaths per 100,000 female population 19.7 0.6 14. 19 0.6 1.4 Colorectal cancer deaths per 100,000 population 13.3 14.3 10.9 14 13.8 14.9 Suicide deaths per 100,000 population 13.9 13.0 7.8 4 14.3 1.6 Infant mortality, deaths per 1,000 live births 6.1 6.0 4. 5 6.1 6.0 Adults ages 18 64 who report fair/poor health or activity limitations because of physical, mental, or emotional problems 6 6 0 7 8 6 Adults who smoke 16 17 9 15 17 18 Adults ages 18 64 who are obese (BMI >= 30) 7 0 15 7 Children ages 10 17 who are overweight or obese (BMI >= 85th percentile) 011/1 8 31 13 Adults ages 18 64 who have lost six or more teeth because of tooth decay, infection, or gum disease 11 10 6 34 11 10 3

Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Health System Performance, 017 Table. Equity Indicator The Equity profile displays gaps in performance for vulnerable populations for selected indicators. An equity gap is defined as the difference between the national for a particular indicator and the for the state's most vulnerable by income and race/ethnicity. For all equity indicators, lower s are better; therefore, a positive or negative gap value indicates that the state's most vulnerable is better or worse than the for a particular indicator. Equity Type and Indicator Change in vulnerable (b) LOW-INCOME Uninsured ages 0 64 33 13-0 47 46 0-6 in past 13-16 46 34 16-18 At risk adults without a doctor visit 16 13-3 5 18 14-4 Adults without a dental visit in past 8 16-1 44 5 15-10 Adults without a usual source of care 8-6 34 34 4-10 Adults without age- and gender-appropriate cancer screenings 40 3-8 40 41 31-10 Adults without age-appropriate vaccines 76 6-14 51 76 64-1 Children without a medical home 011/1 6 46-16 47 Children without a medical and dental preventive care visit in the past 011/1 48 3-16 48 Children ages 19 35 months without all recommended vaccines (c) 3 8-4 3 36 3-4 Elderly patients who received a high-risk prescription drug 18 13-5 38 19 17 - Hospital admissions for pediatric asthma, per 100,000 children 14 107-107 199 143-56 Medicare admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (d) 108 44-64 43 106 48-58 Medicare 30-day hospital readmissions, per 1,000 beneficiaries (d) 94 35-59 51 99 43-56 Potentially avoidable ED visits among Medicare beneficiaries, per 1,000 beneficiaries (d) 345 185-160 6 38 188-140 Adults with poor health-related quality of life 41 6-15 39 6-13 Adults who smoke 17-5 1 0 18 - Adults who are obese 3-3 7 33-4 Adults who have lost six or more teeth 17 10-7 3 17 10-7 RACE/ETHNICITY (e) Uninsured ages 0 64 (Hispanic ethnicity) 8 13-15 18 43 0-3 in past (other 7 13-14 44 7 16-11 At risk adults without a doctor visit (Hispanic ethnicity) 19 13-6 1 19 14-5 Adults without a dental visit in past (black 4 16-8 8 15-14 Adults without a usual source of care (Hispanic ethnicity) 3-10 11 40 4-16 Adults without age- and gender-appropriate cancer screenings (other 38 3-6 4 38 31-7 Adults without age-appropriate vaccines (Hispanic ethnicity) 80 6-18 50 76 64-1 Children without a medical home (black 011/1 68 46-4 4

Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Health System Performance, 017 Table. Equity Indicator (continued) The Equity profile displays gaps in performance for vulnerable populations for selected indicators. An equity gap is defined as the difference between the national for a particular indicator and the for the state's most vulnerable by income and race/ethnicity. For all equity indicators, lower s are better; therefore, a positive or negative gap value indicates that the state's most vulnerable is better or worse than the for a particular indicator. Equity Type and Indicator RACE/ETHNICITY (continued) Children without a medical and dental preventive care visit in the past (other Children ages 19 35 months without all recommended vaccines (Hispanic ethnicity) (c) 011/1 44 3-1 38 1 8 7 Change in vulnerable (b) 41 3-9 Mortality amenable to health care (black -14 138 84. -53.4 17 011-1 139 84-54.6 Infant mortality, deaths per 1,000 live births (black -13 1 6.0-4.5 19 010-11 1.6 6.5-6.1 Adults with poor health-related quality of life (Hispanic ethnicity) 7 6-1 4 30 6-4 Adults who smoke (other 16 17 1 5 15 18 3 Adults who are obese (black 34-5 13 35-6 Adults who have lost six or more teeth (black 10 10 0 8 1 10 - Table 3. Summary of Equity Indicator Change CHANGE IN EQUITY GAP Equity Dimension Low Income Race/Ethnicity 017 Scorecard s Indicators with trends No change in gap Gap narrowed/ vulnerable improved Gap widened/ vulnerable worsened 33 31 9 15 7 49 17 5 6 6 19 14 4 9 1 Notes: Cover Page. (a) The 017 Scorecard s generally reflect or data; Baseline s generally reflect or data. The Baseline s generally align with Baseline s reported in the December Scorecard report. The 017 Scorecard added or revised several performance measures relative to what was reported in the December Scorecard report; overall and dimension s are not strictly comparable between these reports. (b) or worsened denotes a change of at least one-half () of a standard deviation (a statistical measure of variation) larger than the indicator s distribution among all states over the two time points. No change denotes no change in or a change of less than one-half of a standard deviation. The Equity dimension is sepad into two sub dimensions, Income and Race/Ethnicity. For interpretation of changes in the Equity dimension, see Table, note (b) below. (c) The table shows the estimated impact if this state's performance improved to the of the best-performing state for selected Scorecard indicators. Benchmark states, those with the best, have an estimated impact of zero (0). Table 1. (*) not available for this state. () Historical data not available or not comparable over time. (a) Substantial change (improvement or worsening) refers to a change between the baseline and current time periods of at least standard deviations. (b) Hospital admissions among Medicare beneficiaries for ambulatory care sensitive conditions are displayed here sepaly for two age ranges, but counted as a single indicator in tallies of improvement. Table. (*) not available for this state. () Historic data not available or not comparable over time. (a) Gaps measure the difference between the most vulnerable in this state, by income or race/ethnicity, and the national for each indicator. (b) Improvement indicates that the gap between this state's vulnerable population and the has narrowed AND that the vulnerable in this state has improved. Worsening indicates that the gap between this state's vulnerable population and the has widened AND that the vulnerable in this state has worsened. No change indicates that either the gap narrowed but the vulnerable worsened, or the vulnerable improved but the gap widened. (c) Different data s were used in the equity analysis than were reported for the entire state population. (d) Measures constructed from 0% Medicare sample for the equity analysis. for equity analysis provided by A. Jha, Harvard School of Public health. Refer to the 017 Scorecard report appendix for source information for entire state population. (e) Gaps are based on the state's non white population with the largest observed difference from the. The racial/ethnic minority with the largest gap is noted for each indicator. Race/ethnicity is generally defined as white race (non-hispanic), black race (non-hispanic), Hispanic ethnicity (can include individuals of any, and other race (non-hispanic) which includes individuals who self-identify as being some race/ethnicity not otherwise categorized. 5