BELGIAN EU PRESIDENCY CONFERENCE ON RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES (RMD)

Similar documents
ECHA Helpdesk Support to National Helpdesks

Better care, better health - towards a framework for better continence solutions

First quarter of 2014 Euro area job vacancy rate up to 1.7% EU28 up to 1.6%

Document: Report on the work of the High Level Group in 2006

EUREKA and Eurostars: Instruments for international R&D cooperation

Overview on diabetes policy frameworks in the European Union and in other European countries

Capacity Building in the field of youth

EUREKA Peter Lalvani Data & Impact Analyst NCP Academy CSIC Brussels 18/09/17

Erasmus + ( ) Jelena Rožić International Relations Officer University of Banja Luka

ERASMUS+ INTERNSHIP MOBILITY?

Introduction & background. 1 - About you. Case Id: b2c1b7a1-2df be39-c2d51c11d387. Consultation document

EU PRIZE FOR WOMEN INNOVATORS Contest Rules

Info Session Webinar Joint Qualifications in Vocational Education and Training Call for proposals EACEA 27/ /10/2017

The role of the Food for Life and KBBE European Technology Platforms in the frame of Horizon2020 Bologna, 8 November 2013

Assessment of Erasmus+ Sports

Mobility project for VET learners and staff

Erasmus Student Work Placement Guide

Unmet health care needs statistics

The EUREKA Initiative An Opportunity for Industrial Technology Cooperation between Europe and Japan

Hospital Pharmacists making the difference in medication use

RULES - Copernicus Masters 2017

Information Erasmus Erasmus+ Grant for Study and/or Internship Abroad

Integrating mental health into primary health care across Europe

A European workforce for call centre services. Construction industry recruits abroad

Health Professionals in EULAR December 2016

The ERC funding strategy

Evolution of Nursing in Europe

ERC Grant Schemes. Horizon 2020 European Union funding for Research & Innovation

Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions. Piia Heinämäki Erasmus+ Info Day, Lviv Erasmus+

Young scientist competition 2016

Teaching Staff Mobility (STA)

SOUTH AFRICA EUREKA INFORMATION SESSION 13 JUNE 2013 How to Get involved in EUROSTARS

Introduction. 1 About you. Contribution ID: 65cfe814-a0fc-43c ec1e349b48ad Date: 30/08/ :59:32

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Erasmus + Call for proposals Key Action 2 Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (I)

The Voice of Foreign Companies. Healthcare Policy Agenda. Bringing the Benefits of Innovative Practices to Denmark

European Haemophilia Consortium

EU Stress Tests and National Action Plans

FOHNEU and THE E UR OPEAN DIME NS ION. NANTES FR ANC E 7-9 NOVEMB ER 2007 Julie S taun

PUBLIC. 6393/18 NM/fh/jk DGC 1C LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 March 2018 (OR. en) 6393/18 LIMITE

2017 China- Europe Research and Innovation Tour

Exploiting International Life Science Opportunities. Dafydd Davies

TUITION FEE GUIDANCE FOR ERASMUS+ EXCHANGE STUDENTS Academic Year

Implementation of the System of Health Accounts in OECD countries

The public health priorities of WHO/Europe and possible collaboration with the International Network of Health Promoting Hospitals and Health Services

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR HUNGARIAN STATE SCHOLARSHIPS 2018/2019

Online Consultation on the Future of the Erasmus Mundus Programme. Summary of Results

TRANSNATIONAL YOUTH INITIATIVES 90

Making High Speed Broadband Available to Everyone in Finland

HORIZON 2020 Instruments and Rules for Participation. Elena Melotti (Warrant Group S.r.l.) MENFRI March 04th 2015

Council of the European Union Brussels, 8 September 2014 (OR. en) Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

The Role and Responsibilities of the Medical Physicist in MRI in Europe

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS STAFF TRAINING (STT)

ERA-Can+ twinning programme Call text

APPLICATION FORM ERASMUS TEACHING ASSIGNMENT (STA)

APPENDIX B: Organizational Profiles of International Digital Government Research Sponsors. New York, with offices in Geneva, Vienna, and Nairobi

REFLECTION PROCESS on CHRONIC DISEASES INTERIM REPORT

Call for Proposals 2012

Spreading knowledge about Erasmus Mundus Programme and Erasmus Mundus National Structures activities among NARIC centers. Summary

Erasmus+: Knowledge Alliances and Sector Skills Alliances. Infoday. 23 November María-Luisa García Mínguez, Renata Russell (EACEA) 1

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

Terms of Participation 2018

RELAUNCHED CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR STATE SCHOLARSHIPS IN HUNGARY 2017/2018

2011 Call for proposals Non-State Actors in Development. Delegation of the European Union to Russia

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS FOR STATE SCHOLARSHIPS IN HUNGARY 2018/2019

Current Trends in Mental Health Services. Nick Bouras Professor Emeritus

Skillsnet workshop. "Job vacancy Statistics"

An action plan to boost research and innovation

ANCIEN: Assessing Needs of Care in European Nations

Consultation: Transformation Health and Care in the Digital Single

RETE EUROPA 2020 DRAFT PROJECT. Planes of auto-sustainable mobility inside EU

The G200 Youth Forum 2015 has 4 main platforms which will run in tandem with each other:

Patient empowerment in the European Region A call for joint action

EFLM EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE

Erasmus+ MedCulture Regional Workshop. International Dimension. Aref Alsoufi, Erasmus+ Lebanon. Beirut, 5 April Erasmus+

Archimedes Distinctions for High-level Research Work

5.U.S. and European Museum Infrastructure Support Program

Open Research Data (ORD) in a European Policy Context and Horizon 2020

Responsible medication processes ( pharmaceutical care ) and good pharmaceutical practices for improved patients quality of life and batter healthcare

Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs Users Guide

Building the Europe of Knowledge

PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY OF CARE

7 th Model ASEM in conjunction with the 11 th ASEM Summit (ASEM11) 20 Years of ASEM: Partnership for the Future through Connectivity

LEADER approach today and after 2013 new challenges

International Credit Mobility Call for Proposals 2018

This document is a preview generated by EVS

S. Tziaferi. President FOHNEU Assistant Professor in Community Nursing Dep. of Nursing University of Peloponnese

BRIDGING GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES 2018

FOR EUPA USE ONLY ERASMUS+ PROGRAMME EN

IN-PATIENT, OUT-PATIENT AND OTHER HEALTH CARE ESTABLISHMENTS AS OF

Digital Public Services. Digital Economy and Society Index Report 2018 Digital Public Services

EU RESEARCH FUNDING Associated countries FUNDING 70% universities and research organisations. to SMEs throughout FP7

Joint Research Funding Opportunities

Meeting of the European Parliament Interest Group on Carers

ERASMUS+ Study Exchanges and Traineeships. Handbook for School/Departmental Exchange Co-ordinators

european citizens Initiative

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Report on the interim evaluation of the «Daphne III Programme »

HEALTH CARE NON EXPENDITURE STATISTICS

WHY DOES BUSINESS CARE?

Presentation of the Workshop Training the Experts Workshop Brussels, 4 April 2014

Transcription:

BELGIAN EU PRESIDENCY CONFERENCE ON RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES (RMD) Brussels, 19 October 2010 Summary Report Background and Objectives of the conference The Conference on Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, organised in collaboration with EULAR, the European League against Rheumatism, was part of the Belgian EU Presidency s initiative addressing chronic illnesses. The growing burden of these conditions in the European Union and the common challenges faced by Member States in this regard elicited the special attention of the Belgian EU Presidency to this issue. The Belgian EU Presidency thus addressed the necessity for Member States to share knowledge and best practices in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases, and that the EU institutions should play a subsidiary but relevant role in supporting Member States initiatives. Prior to the Ministerial Conference Innovative Approaches for Chronic Illnesses in Public Health and Healthcare Systems, held in Brussels on 20 October, the Belgian EU Presidency organised two supportive conferences on major chronic disorders affecting European citizens: (a) Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMD) and (b) Respiratory Diseases (RD). The pre-conferences on RMD and RD were thought to serve as pivotal examples for other chronic diseases. They aimed at feeding into the Ministerial Conference by providing conclusions and specific recommendations for further action on the prevention and management of these disorders. The resulting conclusions and recommendations of the three events will feed in the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO Council) in December 2010. Conference s goals The purpose of the Conference on Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMD) was to discuss current challenges in RMD prevention and treatment and to exchange ideas and best practices on how to improve the health of citizens affected by these disorders. The Conference on RMD pursued three main objectives: 1

To present and discuss innovative approaches in the management of RMD, particularly on prevention, disease management, patient involvement, training of health professionals and equal access to care; To raise awareness at European and national levels about how life style and environmental factors impact on the development of RMD and what can be done to improve the health as well as the quality of life of people living with a RMD; To develop recommendations on initiatives that could be taken on board by the European Union and the Member States to improve prevention and management of RMD across EU countries, particularly on those initiatives that could be transferred to other chronic disease areas. Structure of the conference The conference aimed at producing concrete results and recommendations to both the EU and Member States for the improvement of the prevention and management of chronic diseases, particularly RMD. In this sense, the event combined both plenary and workshop sessions. During the two plenary sessions, experts presented on the challenges and needs in the field of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Plenary sessions were co-chaired by Prof. Paul Emery (EULAR President) and Ms. Leen Meulenbergs (Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Development, Belgian Health Ministry). The four parallel workshops focused on key issues in prevention and management of these conditions: Workshop #1: Prevention: Improving health now and in the future (education, environmental issues, early diagnosis, laboratory tests, early referral, etc.) Workshop #2: Prevention: Innovative approaches and best practices in patient involvement Workshop #3: Disease management and patient-centred partnerships Workshop #4: Chronic diseases as a challenge for health care systems and innovative models of health care delivery During the workshops, policy recommendations to EU institutions and Member States were discussed and further developed by participants. These recommendations were presented at the Ministerial Conference on Innovative Approaches for Chronic Illnesses in Public Health and Healthcare Systems on the following day. High representatives from the Belgian Presidency, the European Commission and the World Health Organisation were involved in both the opening and the closing plenary sessions. 2

Participation Representatives from EU institutions, Member States, patients and physicians organisations, academic institutions and other stakeholders participated in the event. While Brussels based institutions were of course strongly represented, conference participants came from all over Europe. Registrations by country Country Participants Country Participants Austria 2 Italy 2 Belgium 45 Latvia 2 Croatia 1 Malta 4 Cyprus 2 Netherlands 8 Czech Republic 2 Norway 4 Denmark 5 Poland 1 Estonia 2 Romania 2 Finland 1 Slovakia 1 France 4 Spain 3 Germany 4 Sweden 6 Greece 3 Switzerland 10 Hungary 4 United Kingdom 20 Iceland 1 USA 1 Ireland 3 Total 143 Summary of discussions Presentations and workshop discussions mainly focused on six issues: the recognition of the burden of RMD to both individuals and society; the recognition of the rights of people with RMD to full inclusion in society; the need to increase efforts in improving primary and secondary prevention of these disorders; the need to find innovative approaches in the management of RMD; the new roles of both patients and health professionals; and the necessity to further research on different aspects of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. The burden of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases The recognition of the socioeconomic importance of musculoskeletal diseases for both individuals and society was one of the main concerns for participants and speakers. It was pointed out that the 3

development and implementation of effective strategies to reduce the burden of RMD is only possible if policy makers and stakeholders do recognise the problem. Recognising the importance of RMD means that policy makers and stakeholders at both EU and Member States levels are aware of the burden of these diseases on the lives of dozens of millions of citizens, but also the burden on the sustainability of healthcare and social security systems and on the productivity of the overall economy. It also means acknowledging that the problem is expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades as a result of the ageing of the population, if no further actions are taken now. Therefore, positioning RMD as a priority on the policy agendas of Member States and EU institutions was mentioned as a prerequisite for an effective and coordinated action against rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions. The rights of people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases Delegates and speakers also discussed on the need to recognise and guarantee the rights of people with RMD to full inclusion in society. People affected by these disorders face unsuitable urban and working environments that limit even more their mobility. Moreover, our societies still tend to stigmatise or even discriminate people with disabilities, and our legal systems and our policies are not yet sufficiently developed to avoid these situations. The aim must be to guarantee that everyone can enjoy full participation in social and economic life. As it was stated several times, these environmental, social and institutional restrictions have severe consequences for the capacity of people with these conditions to remain and actively participate in the labour market. The improvement of the working environment, the introduction of flexible working conditions and the fight against stigmatisation were pointed out to be essential to allow people with RMD to remain in the labour market. Allowing people to remain at work not only avoids negative economic consequences; it has been proved to be also beneficial for their health and therefore, for the sustainability of health and social systems. In order to make significant improvements in the environmental, social and institutional areas, delegates pointed out that legislation needs to be reinforced and that all relevant policy areas should take into account musculoskeletal disorders. 4

Primary and secondary prevention The improvement of primary and secondary prevention of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases was discussed in detail throughout the event. The debate embraced two main issues 1 : the necessity for further actions addressing the determinants of musculoskeletal disorders in order to avoid, postpone or slow down the development of these diseases; and the need to raise awareness and improve education and training. Delegates agreed on the need to reinforce actions tackling the determinants of RMD. This is particularly important with regard to some of the lifestyle determinants such as obesity, lack of physical activity, smoking or excess of alcohol. Some of these determinants are also key risk factors of other chronic diseases. Therefore, combined efforts with other stakeholders would result in more effective and efficient outcomes. Tackling other socioeconomic and working determinants is also crucial. As mentioned above, working conditions and working environments are key determinants of RMD. Addressing these factors is necessary to avoid the outbreak of these disorders among healthy people as well as the aggravation of these conditions among people who have already developed them. It was also pointed out that it should be convenient to work together with key players in other areas, such as social security, employment authorities, business and alike, in order to be more effective in tackling these determinants. Delegates of the conference also concluded that education and awareness raising should play a key role in the prevention of these disorders. Health professionals -particularly general practitioners and specialists- must be able to detect potential symptoms of these disorders at an early stage, and refer patients to specialists for diagnosis and, eventually, for treatment as soon as those symptoms are detected. Policy makers and stakeholders should also receive enough and updated information on best and innovative practices in prevention and management of these diseases in order to better design and implement policy initiatives. Furthermore, they should be aware of the need for leadership in this area as well as on the consequences of not doing enough to reduce the burden of RMD. Patients, and the overall population, should also receive information and should be aware of those factors that harm their musculoskeletal systems. Moreover, patients should have knowledge and apply self-management preventive techniques in order to avoid or slow down the development of their diseases. 1 The need to reinforce the involvement of patients as well as the need for furthering research was also discussed from the prevention perspective. Nonetheless, as they were also discussed as key elements in the management of RMD, the results of these discussions are presented under separate headings. 5

Disease management Together with prevention, the management of RMD also received significant attention from delegates. Two main topics were discussed: The right of patients to receive care from well-trained physicians; and the implementation of standards of care. One of the important desiderata in the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders is to guarantee the right of patients to receive appropriate and timely care from well-trained physicians. The underestimation of patients musculoskeletal problems by physicians in the EU healthcare systems is partly the result of inadequate education at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The little attention of these issues in the curricula of undergraduate and postgraduate programmes contrasts with the fact that musculoskeletal complaints are the second most common reason for consultation, exceeded only by disorders of the respiratory system. The importance of having specialised centres where people with musculoskeletal conditions receive specialised care and treatment was clearly demonstrated during the debates. The need for better training of physicians, and better treatment of patients in specialised centres, were two of the main conclusion in this regard. Nonetheless, it was pointed out that it is not enough to have well-trained general practitioners and specialists: healthcare systems also need to guarantee that specialists are trained in, and apply, the most effective evidence-based treatments, which should be the results of a consensus among experienced professionals. The development and implementation of standards of care throughout Europe would be a milestone in the use of treatments based on scientific evidence. It would specify a set of established, defined norms, procedures or practices to use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Moreover, it would be useful for guiding physicians in the selection and use of treatments as well as in general aspects concerning the organisation of patient care. The further development and implementation of these standards was stated to be still a pending task though. Patients involvement Delegates strongly agreed on the need to reinforce the involvement of patients in both prevention and management of RMD. This not only means assuming more responsibilities in their own treatment; it also means that their involvement would be beneficial for the design, implementation 6

and evaluation of healthcare services, as well as for the design and implementation of policy initiatives. The traditional role of patients, as passive receivers of treatments with no voice and limited rights and responsibilities, is no longer functional for their own treatments and might be eventually harmful. In the treatment of these diseases, patients strong commitment and responsibility are needed in defining what is best for them, in partnership with medical doctors. Speakers and delegates stressed the need of a new relationship between health professionals and patients, whish should focus on structured self-management as a means of complementing support provided by health professionals: a move from the expert patient to the responsible patient. Greater selfdetermination provided more control, more confidence and higher levels of independence However, structured self-management is not the only area were their involvement is required. Given their experience in dealing with their diseases and with different treatments, their input is important for improving the delivery of healthcare services. From discussions among delegates, three things stood out regarding patient empowerment. First, it is necessary that health professionals, and particularly physicians, recognise that patients are experts in living with their conditions. Second, it is necessary to validate tools to support common decisionmaking between patients and doctors. This would guarantee that decisions are taken on the basis of shared and sufficient information concerning the characteristics of alternative treatments and their potential consequences. Finally, more research is needed to estimate the real impact of patient involvement in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. The results of this research would be beneficial to design innovative partnerships between doctors and patients, as well as to draft better self-management practices. Research Fostering research was one of the main demands of participants. Further investigation on the causes of all rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases should be a priority for funding bodies and researchers. A better understanding of these elements would significantly contribute to the improvement of diagnostic techniques, for which further research is also needed. Altogether, the results of this research would considerably reduce the development of musculoskeletal conditions in the population. Funding bodies and researchers should also further support research on disease management, particularly on the development of innovative therapies and treatments. So far, medical sciences and healthcare institutions can only offer limited help or relief to the millions of people affected by these disorders. Developing better therapies and treatments would considerably reduce the impact of these diseases on individuals lives as well as on healthcare and social security systems. 7

Beyond fostering research on prevention and treatment, other managerial and organisational aspects should also need further investigation, as for example the involvement of patients in prevention and management and the improvement of the working environments. Participants pointed out that more funding is certainly needed for research on these diseases. Nonetheless, they also underlined the importance of setting appropriate research agendas as well as better coordinate and integrate research activities. In spite of the progress made in recent decades in research, delegates agreed that efforts are still insufficient. Without a strong commitment of Member States, the EU and private actors this work is not possible. Conclusions and recommendations As a result of these debates, participants further developed a set of recommendations and proposed a number of specific initiatives for their implementation. The final recommendations agreed by delegates are as follows: 1. The European Union and its Member States should recognise the socioeconomic importance of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases of all ages and assign them appropriate priority 2. There is an urgent need to prioritise basic and clinical research regarding the causes, predictors, management and impact of these chronic diseases 3. The European Union and Member States should ensure that people with disabilities related to rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases have the right to full inclusion in society; this encompasses optimisation of environmental and life-style factors, the availability of selfmanagement tools, and respect for the right to a flexible education and work environment 4. People with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases should receive prompt access to high quality care, ideally in specialised centres, thus maximising long-term quality of life 5. Management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases should be in accordance with evidence-based recommendations in every European Union Member State 6. People with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases are experts in living with their condition and should be involved in the design, delivery and evaluation of their services Participants also proposed specific initiatives for the implementation of each of the recommendations at both the EU and Member States levels. The proposed initiatives are mentioned below. 8

1. The European Union and its Member States should recognise the socioeconomic importance of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases of all ages and assign them appropriate priority. Member States level Member States including regions to develop frameworks for RMD / national strategies tackling RMDs Ministers of Health/Social Affairs to create national clinical direction of RMDs and appoint a director Patients Groups, rheumatologists, orthopaedics, health professionals, governments to include RMDs in top 5 list of major diseases in every member state (1) European Union level European Commission to develop a European Strategy on RMDs European Commission to mainstream/ standardise data format for Member States to allow for data comparison, underline issues and measure impact of RMDs European Commission to gather more socio economic data at EU level EU Council to include specific recommendations in Council Conclusions e.g. European Strategy (1) Example of Ireland. Other countries have a similar position for cancer. 2. There is an urgent need to prioritise basic, and clinical research regarding the causes, predictors, management and impact of these chronic diseases. Member States level EULAR to co-ordinate visits to national key stakeholders including ministers for research and briefing so that these key decision makers can exercise their influence in the Research Council Ministries, funding bodies, public health institutes, patients organisations, universities and research institutes to further fund research on RMDs set appropriate research agendas better coordinate and integrate research European Union level European Commission to further define research agenda, including RMDs as a priority European Commission to further fund research on RMDs European Commission to equally fund research on RMDs and research on other chronic diseases as for example cardiovascular or neurologic diseases European Commission to provide financial incentives, e.g. funding streams European Commission (DG Research) to include RMDs in more FP7 calls 9

promote innovation liaise with funding bodies about the inclusion of RMDs Member States to further fund and researchers and patients organisations to further research on: Care Early childhood Causes of RMD Clinical issues Health care systems Health professionals and patients organisations to inform patients on ongoing research issues in a user friendly way European Commission (DG Research) to include RMDs as a major disease area on its own and significantly increase the amount of funding in FP8 European Commission to promote country collaboration/set up of network and partnership on RMDs European Commission to develop multidisciplinary legal framework for all member states needed for primary and secondary prevention European Commission, WHO to further collect information and data on RMDs European Commission, WHO to make relevant information available Public health institutes, patients organisations and physicians to further collect information on RMD Ministries, patients organisations, scientific organisations to make relevant information available Member States and national stakeholders to advocate for inclusion of RMDs in FP7 calls and other funding opportunities Member States and national stakeholders to lobby for the inclusion of RMDs in FP8 Insurance companies to pay for research and prevention programmes All stakeholders to emphasize burden (awareness-raising, appropriate communication, dissemination of information) 10

3. The European Union and Member States should ensure that people with disabilities related to rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases have the right to full inclusion in society; this encompasses optimisation of environmental and life-style factors, the availability of selfmanagement tools, and respect for the right to a flexible education and work environment. Member States level Health Services and patients organisations to provide selfmanagement tools Governments to legislate on accessibility Member States to implement Work Charter Employers, trade unions to guarantee and promote sustainable enterprising Media to promote positive messages and attitudes European Union level European Union to develop and adopt legislation and other initiatives for the promotion of social inclusion of people with chronic conditions European Union to enhance accessibility for funding and knowledge European Union to fund dissemination of information across Europe European Commission to enhance NGO and government coordination Member States to translate EC recommendations into national law 4. People with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases should receive prompt access to high quality care, ideally in specialised centres, thus maximising long-term quality of life. Member States level Member States to promote the use of best practices and benchmarking Member States and umbrella organisations to promote continuous learning Member States, insurers, medical associations etc. to disseminate information All stakeholders to raise awareness and to inform the general public European Union level European medical associations with the support of the European Union to develop standards of care Industry with the support of the EU and medical associations to develop ehealth tools All stakeholders to promote the use of new media (technology), e.g., selfdiagnosis 11

5. Management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases should be in accordance with evidence-based recommendations in every European Union Member State. Member States level Member States to define needs (profession-specific, region-specific etc.) Member States and their health authorities to promote multidisciplinary treatment European Union level European Union bodies to promote research for all groups European Commission to support pilot projects on sharing of information between GPs and specialists Member States and their health authorities to guarantee access to information Member States to promote audits Member States to promote continuous improvement of evidence-based recommendations Member States to promote research for all groups Member States and their health authorities as well as medical associations to promote sharing of information between GP and specialists 12

6. People with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases are experts in living with their condition and should be involved in the design, delivery and evaluation of their services. Member States level Politicians, service providers and researchers to consult patients organisations Insurance companies, media and pharmaceutical companies to support and encourage patients organisations Governments to set up an agenda to consult patients organisations Health services, ministries and patients organisations to develop national strategic plans for users involvement Research funding bodies to initiate research on users involvement Health care systems to make information available Health care systems to guarantee accessibility to services All stakeholders to promote multidisciplinary, integrated approaches All stakeholders to initiate user groups National governments to fund national and regional patient organisations National governments and insurers to promote access to self-management on local level European Union level European Commission to provide information on patients organisations and involvement European Union to take initiatives to ensure patients involvement EULAR to consult and bring together patients organisations European Union and medical associations such as EULAR to promote the involvement of patients in research European Union and medical associations such as EULAR to promote the involvement of patients in decision making processes European Union and stakeholder organisations to promote education of EU citizens on RMDs European Union and stakeholder organisations to promote multidisciplinary, integrated approaches European Union and stakeholder organisations to develop an expert patient partners platform European Union to fund European patient organisations National governments and insurers to facilitate self-management programmes National governments and insurers to enhance practical support for carers 13