ARCHIVED REPORT. USC-38/LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM Terminals - Archived 02/2008

Similar documents
ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS)

UNCLASSIFIED. PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Satellite Communications (Space)

ARCHIVED REPORT. Submarine Acoustic Warfare Development Archived 12/2002

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

MILITARY STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL RELAY (MILSTAR) SATELLITE SYSTEM

ARCHIVED REPORT. Battlefield Airborne Communications Node (BACN)

MILITARY STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL RELAY (MILSTAR) SATELLITE SYSTEM

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 121

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles Program MDAP/MAIS Code: 121

UNCLASSIFIED EXHIBIT R-2, FY 2003 RDT&E, N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

ARCHIVED REPORT. SSQ-72/108(V) (OUTBOARD/OUTBOARD II) - Archived 7/2002. Outlook. Orientation. Electronic Warfare Forecast

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

The Market for U.S. Military Airborne Communications Systems

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 17 R-1 Line #87

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

ARCHIVED REPORT TPN-31 ATNAVICS/FPN-67 FBPAR

ARCHIVED REPORT. IDECM (ALQ-214(V), ALE-55(V)) - Archived 02/2008

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #89

UNCLASSIFIED. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

ARCHIVED REPORT. Defense Satellite Communications System - Archived 03/2003

DATE: FY 2016 President's Budget February 2015 PRIOR YR FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 TO COMP TOTAL PROG QUANTITY

ARCHIVED REPORT. AGM-45 Shrike - Archived 10/2001

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface Ship Torpedo Defense FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. COST ($ in Millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Christine Anderson, SES Program Director MILSATCOM Joint Program Office

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

ARCHIVED REPORT. SHORTSTOP/Warlock VLQ-11(V), PLQ-7(V), GLQ-16(V) - Archived 7/2009

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION N/Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Support

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #176

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Headquarters, Department of the Army

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

DATE: FY 2013 President's Budget February 2012 PRIOR YR FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 TO COMP TOTAL PROG QUANTITY

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 7 P-1 Line #10

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 24 R-1 Line #206

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Net Centricity FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 5 of 10 P-1 Line #11

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (User Equipment) (SPACE) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

WikiLeaks Document Release

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) - Archived 12/2005

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: SATCOM Ground Environment (SPACE) FY 2012 OCO

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Amended Budget Estimates

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

DATE: FY 2012 President's Budget February 2011

The Market for Airborne and Space-Based Electro-Optical Systems

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Satellite Communications (Space) FY 2012 OCO

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

snapshots of 17 key Air Force space programs experiments, development, production, sustainment, and upgrades. The list is not allinclusive.

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008

ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

ARCHIVED REPORT. APX-111(V)/113(V) (CIT) - Archived 4/2009. Outlook. Orientation. Unit Production Forecast AN Equipment Forecast

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE K: Long Haul Communications. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Airborne Reconnaissance Advanced Development (ARAD)

MOBILE TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS, THE ROLE OF THE UHF FOLLOW-ON SATELLITE CONSTELLATION AND ITS SUCCESSOR, MOBILE USER OBJECTIVE SYSTEM

FY 2016 President's Budget February Electronics (NOTIONAL): N/A. RCS (Radio Communication System) Turnkey 216 M CANES 32 M

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE BB: Special Operations Aviation Systems Advanced Development

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSFIED UNCLASSIFIED. EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7

General Dynamics Awarded $66 Million for Planning Yard Services for DDG 51 and FFG 7 Ships

Bath Iron Works Awarded Potential $102 Million Navy Contract for Post Shakedown Availabilities on DDG 51-Class Ships in West Coast Homeports

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2017 Base FY 2017 OCO

CRS Report for Congress

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

NAWCWD Long Range Acquisition Forecast (LRAF) Requirements. Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited.

STATEMENT OF. MICHAEL J. McCABE, REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY DIRECTOR, AIR WARFARE DIVISION BEFORE THE SEAPOWER SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Shopping List No EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2006

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Transcription:

Electronic Systems Forecast ARCHIVED REPORT For data and forecasts on current programs please visit www.forecastinternational.com or call +1 203.426.0800 USC-38/LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM Terminals - Archived 02/2008 Outlook Raytheon Technical Services awarded USC-38 logistics support contract Production of USC-38 terminals should end in May 2006 All USC-38 terminals will be phased out and replaced by Navy Multi-band Terminals (NMTs) Baring further activity, Forecast International will archive this report in February 2008 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 Funding Production Forecast 2007-2016 0.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 US$M 6.31 6.31 6.31 6.31 3.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 US$M Description. Extremely high frequency (EHF) satellite communications terminals designed for U.S. naval ships, submarines, and shore stations. Sponsor Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command 4301 Pacific Hwy San Diego, CA)92110-3127 USA Web site: http://enterprise.spawar.navy.mil Status. In service and ongoing maintenance. Total Produced. As of January 2007, approximately 356 USC-38 terminals had been delivered to the U.S. Prime Orientation Contractors Navy. This number is from FY07 U.S. Navy budget documentation. Application. The USC-38 is used on board U.S. Navy ships and submarines and at shore stations to provide survivable, secure, jam-resistant satellite communications. Price Range. According to U.S. budget documentation, the unit cost of the USC-38 ranges between $986,000 and $1.8 million, depending on variant and quantity purchased. Raytheon Command & Control Systems (C2S) http://www.raytheon.com/businesses/rncs/businesses/c2s/, 1001 Boston Post Rd, Marlborough, MA 01752-3789 United States, Tel: + 1 (508) 490-1000, Fax: + 1 (508) 490-2822, Prime

Page 2 Electronic Systems Forecast Raytheon Technical Services http://www.raytheon.com/businesses/rts/, 12160 Sunrise Valley Dr, Suite 500, Reston, VA 12160 United States, Tel: + 1 (703) 295-2535, Email: Stephen_S_Teel@raytheon.com, Program Participant (Logistics Support ) Comprehensive information on Contractors can be found in Forecast International s International Contractors series. For a detailed description, go to www.forecastinternational.com (see Products & Samples/Governments & Industries) or call + 1 (203) 426-0800. Contractors are invited to submit updated information to Editor, International Contractors, Forecast International, 22 Commerce Road, Newtown, CT 06470, USA; rich.pettibone@forecast1.com Design Features. As part of the Navy EHF SATCOM Program (NESP), the USC-38 provides voice, data, and information-exchange communications with anti-jam, low-probability-of-intercept, lowprobability-of-detec-tion, and anti-scintillation capabilities. The NESP terminal is interoperable with Air Force and Army terminals deployed with EHF packages on Fleet Satellite, UFO, and MILSTAR satellites. The USC-38 is designed to accommodate a variety of command and control communications (i.e., secure Technical Data voice, teletype, data, and Fleet broadcast systems). Under the NESP program, the USC-38 terminal had been developed, produced, and installed to provide the Fleet with hard-core communications capabilities for worldwide command and control communications. USC-38 terminals currently have physical and electromagnetic survivability, are resistant to jamming and electromagnetic interference, and have lowprobability-of-intercept detection capabilities against the current and projected threats at data rates of 75 to 2,400 bits per second (bps). Dimensions High power amplifier Communications equipment group Performance Uplink frequency Uplink bandwidth Downlink frequency Downlink bandwidth RF amplifier Waveforms Data rates Prime power HPA CEG U.S. 54 in x 18.75 in x 24 in 67.5 in x 24 in x 24 in 44.5 GHz 2.0 GHz 20.7 GHz 1.0 GHz 250 W coupled cavity TWT FEP/MILSTAR compatible 75-2,400 bps up to 12 active channels 2,600 W 2,310 W (ship) 1,625 W (sub) 2,100 W (shore) The USC-38 comes in three variants: (V1) submarines, (V2) ships, and (V3) shore terminals. LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM Terminal. The LDR/ MDR is a Follow-On Terminal (FOT) that replaced the legacy terminals. This upgraded capability increased protected (jam resistant and low probability of Variants/Upgrades interception and detection) MDR communications from 4.8 kilobits per second (Kbps) to 1.544 megabits per second (Mbps). The first article production unit was delivered to the government in August 1999 and MDR patches were procured and retrofitted into existing LDR terminals. February 2007

Electronic Systems Forecast Page 3 Background. In 1982, the Harris Corp and Raytheon were awarded contracts to build six full-scale engineering development prototype USC-38 satellite terminals. By 1986, Raytheon had emerged as the victor of this competition. Low-rate initial production of the USC-38(V) began in 1990 when Raytheon was awarded an $83.7 million contract for the production of 21 units. Full production approval was granted in the spring of 1993. Raytheon supplied an additional 60 USC-38(V) terminals to equip surface ships, submarines, and shore sites under a $75.7 million contract modification. These terminals operate with both MILSTAR and EHF communications packages on Fleet satellites. In April 2000, Defense Daily reported that the U.S. Navy had exercised first-year production options for the delivery of a replacement SATCOM system for the USC-38(V): the LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM terminal. The first contract for the USC-38(V) replacement was awarded in 1998. This FOT replaces legacy LDR Funding Program Review U.S. FUNDING, NAVY terminals. Approximately 89 LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM terminals were ordered: 63 to be used aboard ships, 10 for shore stations, and 16 designed for submarines. The number was not firm at contract award because the cost of installing the terminals on older ships had not been determined. Deliveries began in March 2002. The Navy also purchased MDR appliqués for older terminals and those installations were completed in 2003. In the U.S. Navy s FY06/07 procurement budget estimates, the production of USC-38 terminals is shown to continue through May 2006. NMT to Replace USC-38 Two contracts were awarded in November 2003: one to Raytheon and one to Harris Corp for the development of a Navy Multi-band Terminal (NMT). This terminal replaces several current SATCOM terminals used by the U.S. Navy. Approximately 300 NMT units are to be produced by 2010. Prior Prior FY05 FY05 FY06 FY06 FY07 FY07 QTY AMT QTY AMT QTY AMT QTY AMT Satellite Com Sys EHF Terminals USC-38- Ship 286 509.8 AE 2.2 AE 1.3 0 0 USC-38-Shore 70 106.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MDR Appliqués -Ship 61 35.8 FY08 FY08 FY09 FY09 FY10 FY10 FY11 FY11 QTY AMT QTY AMT QTY AMT QTY AMT EHF Terminals USC-38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 All $ are in millions. Source: Department of the Navy FY07 Budget Estimates: Justification of Estimates, February 2006, Other Procurement, Navy AE = ancillary equipment only

Page 4 Electronic Systems Forecast Contracts/Orders & Options Award Contractor ($ millions) Date/Description Raytheon 56.0 Apr 2000 The U.S. Navy exercised first-year production options for the delivery of approximately 89 LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM terminals: 63 to be installed on ships, 10 at shore stations, and 16 to be used aboard submarines. Deliveries began in April 2001 and ended in May 2002. Raytheon 26.9 Mar 2004 The U.S. Navy exercised a production option for the delivery of approximately 41 NESP EHF SATCOM terminals. Deliveries were to be completed by May 2006. Raytheon 14.5 Sep 2005 The U.S. Navy was awarded a not-to-exceed, cost-plusincentive-fee contract for a two-phase effort for the design, development, test, production, and requisite training of a military X-band kit for the EHF LDR/MDR FOT submarine and Virginia class variants. This contract includes options which, if exercised, would bring the cumulative value of this contract to an estimated $25 million. Work will be performed in Marlborough, MA, and is expected to be completed by September 2007 (September 2009 if all options are exercised). Raytheon Services Technical 31.6 Jun 2006 U.S. Navy contract for logistics support of the USC-38 satellite communications system. Work is expected to be completed by June 2011. (N00104-06-D-ZD31) Timetable Year Major Development 1982 Engineering and development contracts awarded to Harris Corp and Raytheon 1986 Raytheon emerges as the victor of USC-38 competition 1990 LRIP of the USC-38(V) begins 1993 Full-rate production approved 2000 Contract for approximately 89 USC-38 LDR/MDR FOTs awarded 2004 Contract for approximately 41 USC-38 LDR/MDR FOTs awarded 2005 Contract for X-band kits for the USC-38 LDR/MDT FOT awarded 2006 Final USC-38 LDR/MDR FOT to be delivered and installed 2011 End of logistics support for the USC-38 Worldwide Distribution/Inventories The only known customer of the USC-38 is the United States Navy. According to Department of the Navy FY07 budget estimates, the last USC-38 terminal was scheduled to be delivered in May 2006. Forecast Rationale Raytheon Technical Services was recently awarded a $31.6 million logistics support contract for the USC-38 satellite communications system. Work under the contract is to be completed by 2011. February 2007

Electronic Systems Forecast Page 5 NMT to Replace USC-38 In June 2005, the Deputy Chief Engineer for Navy AEHF Communications stated that all USC-38 terminals will be phased out and replaced with Navy Multi-band Terminals (NMTs). Competing contracts for NMT development were issued in November 2003 to Raytheon and Harris Corp. A NMT Critical Design Review (CDR) was conducted in early 2005, and a contract for the engineering, manufacture, and development of the NMT is expected to be awarded in June 2007. Since the NMT program leverages other technologies, this program should avoid costly delays and overruns. The NMT program should ultimately prove successful, and anything other than a minor buy of USC-38 terminals appears unlikely. Ten-Year Outlook ESTIMATED CALENDAR YEAR O&M FUNDING (in millions US$) Designation or Program High Confidence Good Confidence Speculative Thru 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Raytheon Technical Services USC-38 LDR/MDR EHF SATCOM United States Navy Logistics Contract 3.15 6.31 6.31 6.31 6.31 3.15.00.00.00.00.00 28.39 Total 3.15 6.31 6.31 6.31 6.31 3.15.00.00.00.00.00 28.39