FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT AIRPORT TRAINING AREA BOISE, IDAHO

Similar documents
FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT IDAHO FALLS TRAINING SITE BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SNAKE CREEK TRAINING SITE MIRAMAR, FLORIDA

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT CENTENNIAL TRAINING SITE COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT WALLY EAGLE DROP ZONE LOVELAND, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VOLUNTEER TRAINING SITE - SMYRNA SMYRNA, TENNESSEE

April Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VAIL TREE FARM LOCAL TRAINING AREA CENTRALIA, WASHINGTON

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT RAMEY LOCAL TRAINING AREA AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO

March Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SAN JUAN NATIONAL FOREST TRAINING AREA DOLORES, COLORADO

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

FINAL Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT LIEUTENANT COLONEL HERNAN G

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

July Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

Managing Range Condition Assessments: The Army s Operational Range Qualitative Assessment Program

Range Environmental Vulnerability Assessment

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

FY2016 SIEVERS-SANDBERG USARC

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION. No Further Action AIR FORCE MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM MUNITIONS RESPONSE SITE CHARACTERIZATION

GIS Mapping of Army Real Property Land Data

City of Oakland Park

WARFIGHTER TRAINING ON MRTFB RANGES A SUCCESS STORY

FINAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) LAND USE CONTROLS FORT BLISS, TX MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM

CESAJ-PM (Cong) March 2015

The DEP has four main regulations that relate to pipeline construction.

Environmental Baseline Survey for Naval Weapons Station Concord

New Draft Section 408 Policy Document EC

The Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure. - An Overview - JSEM US Army Installation Geospatial. US Air Force GeoBase

Leading Louisiana Baton Rouge G.I.S.

Wildland Firefighting

Fort George G. Meade and secure DoD facility former Mortar Range Site User Training Guide

US Army Corps of Engineers. Section 408 Overview. Regulatory Workshop July 22, Kim Leonard/Kevin Lee BUILDING STRONG

ASTSWMO Annual Meeting October 25, 2006

Idaho Water Resources Research Institute

Cleanup Successes and Challenges. James D. Werner Director, Air & Waste Management Division

HYDROGRAPHER II Range B55/B75 BOD 07/25/18

EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES LAND USE CONTROLS TO RESTRICT USE OF GROUNDWATER. For

Tri-Service Environmental Risk Assessment Working Group

YUROK TRIBE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

1 San Diego, CA One Corps Serving The Army and The Nation

U^J. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN. Prepared by the U.S. Army Environmental Center March 1999

Using GIS to Measure the Impacts of Encroachment on Training & Testing for the US Army

4.6 NOISE Impact Methodology Factors Considered for Impact Analysis. 4.6 Noise

Record of Decision Group 3 Del Rey Oaks / Monterey, Laguna Seca Parking, and Military Operations in Urban Terrain Site Munitions Response Areas

Restoration Advisory Board. Tonight s Agenda

Create an account to get started build your profile, create or upload resumes and apply for jobs.

Construction Site TPDES Inspector Workshop. Erik Hobson EPSIII/Resource Protection and Compliance

ARMY AGR VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT HUMAN RESOURCE OFFICE 4794 FARMAN ST., BLDG 442 BOISE, IDAHO JFHQ-ID/J1HR 2 July 2010

U.S. ARMY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD. and TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GUIDANCE

U.S. Army Civilian Personnel Evaluation Agency

ROCKY MOUNTAINS COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT FIVE TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT. between

SITE SURVEY SUMMARY SHEET FOR DERP-FUDS SITE NO. J09CAO84400

In God We Trust, All Others Must Bring Data. Installation Geospatial Information and Services in DoD

Defense Environmental Restoration Program/Formerly Used Defense Sites Program, NC

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

Guide to the Survey Log Sheet Version 4.1

Impact Area: Zulu Impact Area. General Instructions

Introduction to ARCADIS Tim Llewellyn Project Manager. Imagine the result

Homeland Security Infrastructure Program

Military Munitions Response Program Site Inspection Camp Bullis, Texas. Courtney M.S. Ingersoll

Bruce Goff, Barb Giacomini, Noah Stewart, and Larry Dean Anteon Corporation San Diego, CA USA.

4Cultural Resources. Promote mission-supporting re-use of historic properties. Manage and maintain cultural resources in a sustainable manor

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Overview

King County Flood Control District 2017 Work Program

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List

A Model for Ethical Decision Making:

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION

Meeting Minutes April 26, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

FREEWAT modeling platform: software architecture and state of development Iacopo Borsi TEA SISTEMI SpA

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States

MEETING MINUTES JOINT SERVICE RESERVE COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD (STATE OF MARYLAND) 07 June 2016

APPENDIX C MMR LAND USE REQUIREMENTS

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH STREET SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GA

Direct Component Project Evaluation Form

WRP Natural Resources Committee s Southeastern Arizona/New Mexico (SoAZ/NM Project)

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Raystown Lake Master Plan Revision. Stakeholders Meeting February 8, 2018

Construction Industry

MILITARY TRAINING. DOD Needs a Comprehensive Plan to Manage Encroachment on Training Ranges GAO. Testimony

Submitted by: Sage Policy Group, Inc. On behalf of:

FINAL DECISION DOCUMENT

References. AR 15-6, (Boards, Commissions and Committee Procedures for Investigating officers and Boards of Officers)

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS SCCOG REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

RELEASE NOTES. Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas (point locations and boundaries) Version 3.0 May 5, 2017

Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress for FY 2015

UNITED STATES FORCES, KOREA Regulation 10-2 UNIT #15237 APO AP Organization and Functions INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AND BASE OPERATIONS

Los Angeles District

NON-PROFIT CORPORATION FORMED IN 2011 BUSINESS AND CIVIC LEADERS WITH AFFINITY FOR JB MDL

Ordnance Holdings, Inc. (OHI)

Transcription:

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT AIRPORT TRAINING AREA BOISE, IDAHO MARCH 2008 Prepared for: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT P.O. Box 1715 Baltimore, Maryland 21203 and UNITED STATES ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL COMMAND Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010 Prepared by: MALCOM PIRNIE, INC. 300 E. Lombard Street Suite 610 Baltimore, Maryland 21202

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States (U.S.) Army is conducting qualitative assessments at operational ranges to meet the requirements of Department of Defense policy and to support the U.S. Army Sustainable Range Program. The operational range qualitative assessment (hereinafter referred to as Phase I Assessment) is the first phase of the U.S. Army Operational Range Assessment Program. This Phase I Assessment evaluates the operational range area at Airport Training Area to assess whether further investigation is needed to determine if potential munitions constituents of concern (MCOC) are or could be migrating off-range at levels that may pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. In conducting the Phase I Assessment, MCOC sources, potential off-range migration pathways, and potential off-range human and ecological receptors are evaluated as appropriate. Airport Training Area is an Idaho Army National Guard (ARNG) facility that encompasses approximately 1,868 acres in Ada County, Idaho. The installation is located approximately three miles south of downtown Boise on property owned by the City of Boise. According to the Army Range Inventory Database-Geodatabase from 2006, the installation includes three maneuver areas and one personnel/equipment drop zone encompassing 1,847 acres. The remaining 21 acres consist of cantonment area and an Idaho Air National Guard pistol range. The pistol range is not designated as operational in the Army Range Inventory Database-Geodatabase (2006) and is not used by the Idaho Army National Guard;, therefore, it is not included in this Phase I Assessment (Idaho ARNG Project Officer pers. comm., 2007). A review of available records and background data, as well as interviews with installation personnel, indicated that the ranges at Airport Training Area have never been used for training involving livefire military munitions. According to the Range Facility Management Support System (RFMSS) data, the only documented use of military munitions on Airport Training Area from December 2002 through November 2005 was a total of 200 rounds of 5.56-millimeter (mm) and 7.62-mm blank ammunition fired during 2005. Information regarding military munitions use prior to December 2002 was gathered from interviews with installation personnel. Although the RFMSS data only indicates blank rounds were used, installation personnel indicated pyrotechnics were also occasionally used on site (Idaho ARNG Project Officer pers. comm., 2007). Training currently conducted at Airport Training Area consists primarily of drivers training and an orienteering course. Because current and historical training activities involve only the use of blanks and limited pyrotechnics, there are limited sources of MCOC. The four operational ranges at Airport Training Area are categorized as Unlikely. Unlikely Five-Year Review Four ranges at Airport Training Area are categorized as Unlikely, totaling 1,847 acres. These ranges consist of three maneuver areas and one personnel/equipment drop zone. Ranges where, based upon a review of readily available information, there is sufficient evidence to show that there are no known releases or source-receptor interactions on ranges that could present an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment are categorized as Unlikely. Ranges categorized as Unlikely are required to be re-evaluated at least every five years. Re-evaluation may occur sooner if significant changes (e.g., change in range operations or site conditions, regulatory changes) occur that affect determinations made during this Phase I Assessment. Table ES-1 summarizes the Phase I Assessment findings. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. ES - 1

Table ES-1: Summary of Findings and Conclusions for Airport Training Area Category Unlikely Total Number of Ranges and Acreage Four operational ranges; 1,847 acres Source(s) Limited source only small arms blanks and minimal pyrotechnics use Pathway(s) Human Receptors Ecological Receptors Not evaluated (limited source identified) Conclusions and Rationale Re-evaluate during the fiveyear review. Limited source was identified. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. ES - 2

ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS o F ARID-GEO amsl ANG ARNG bgs CSM DoD DODI E EMO GIS GW H JIC LS M MCOC mm N/A ORAP PU RFMSS SW U.S. USACE USACHPPM USAEC USEPA USGS WSRP WWII degrees Fahrenheit Army Range Inventory Database-Geodatabase Above Mean Sea Level Air National Guard Army National Guard Below Ground Surface Conceptual Site Model Department of Defense Department of Defense Instruction Ecological receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes E designation.) Environmental Management Office Geographic Information System Groundwater pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes GW designation.) Human receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes H designation.) Joint Installation Command Limited Source Munitions used. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes applicable pathway.) Munitions Constituents of Concern Millimeter Not Applicable Operational Range Assessment Program Pathway unlikely or incomplete. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes PU designation.) Range Facility Management Support System Surface water pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes SW designation.) United States United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine United States Army Environmental Command United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Geological Survey Western Snake River Plain World War II Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. iv

G:\ORAP\Installations\Idaho\ID NG\Airport Training Area\GIS\MXDs\Figure_1-1.mxd ³ 184 Boise [_ tu 20 Gowen Field Boise Air Terminal 84 Aiport Training Area Installation Installation Boundary Gowen Field Boundary Military Range Use Operational Area Other than Operational Area Hydrology Stream Intermittent Stream Local Road Canal Water Body 0 2 Miles Qualitative Operational Range Assessment Figure 1-1 General Airport Training Area Location Data Sources: AEC, ORIS, June 2006 ESRI, StreetMap USA, 2005 Date:...March 2008 Prepared By:... Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Prepared For:... U.S. Army Contract Number:.W912DR-05-D-0004