Defense Consortia A Proven Way to Rapidly Develop and Deploy New Armament Capability in Today s Environment

Similar documents
DoD Ordnance Technology Consortium (DOTC) Information Brief

DOTC ENTERPRISE OVERVIEW

2018 NDIA Armament Systems Forum COMMITMENT. &SOLUTIONS Act like someone s life depends on what we do.

2011 Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective

The Munitions Power Maze: OSD, JMP, JFTP, & More Paul Butler

Ammunition Enterprise Cross-Service Update

Defense Mobility Enterprise and National Advanced Mobility Consortium

2011 Ground Robotics Capability Conference. OSD Perspective

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ENABLING ARMAMENTS ACQUISITION MODERNIZATION

Picatinny BRAC 05 Information Briefing for ICAP

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 21 R-1 Line #102

U.S. DoD Insensitive Munitions Program. Anthony J. Melita

Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Program

AMRDEC UPDATE. Date: February 7, Dr. Juanita M. Harris, SES. IAW DoD Directive , insert appropriate distribution statement

Management Emphasis and Organizational Culture; Compliance; and Process and Workforce Development.

UNCLASSIFIED. LandWarNet Army Request for IT (ARFIT) Information Exchange Forum (IEF)

Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) Management Office. Mr. Randal Gaereminck, Director 16 October 2017

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Project Manager Close Combat Systems

Empower, unburden and protect the Warfighter by providing superior armaments solutions that dominate the battlefield.

How to Do Business with the CWMD Consortium. December 18, 2017

HOW TO WORK WITH MTEC

Project Director Joint Services (PD JS) 2017 Munitions Executive Summit. PM Panel Brief

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Requirements Analysis and Maturation. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM) Atlantic

Technology Demands on the Future Industrial Base

2017 NDIA Munitions Executive Summit. COL M. Gutierrez, Project Manager, Maneuver Ammunition Systems MAR 2017

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Subj: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY POLICY ON INSENSITIVE MUNITIONS

Missile Defense Agency SBIR/STTR Program

2017 Munitions Executive Summit

Flight Controlled Mortar (FCMortar) for Precision Urban Mortar Attack (PUMA)

PM Close Combat Systems Briefing for: Precision Strike Association. June 2009

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Weapons and Munitions - Eng Dev

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (User Equipment) (SPACE) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

Heartland Security 2007 Conference & Exhibition SBIR/STTR Betsy Lulfs Program Director

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

JANUARY 2018 (21 work days) FEBRUARY 2018 (19 work days)

Army Small Business Innovation Research Program Christopher S. Rinaldi, P.E. Program Manager

Flight Controlled Mortar FCMortar

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Physical Security Equipment (PSE) Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E)

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARDEC Armaments & Munitions Technology Thrusts

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Munitions Executive Summit. OSD Perspective. February 7, Anthony J. Melita

Technical Data (an Output of Systems Engineering) in the Context of the LCMC

A Common Interface Language For U nm anned System s Technology to the Warfighter Quicker

DELIVERING FUTURE ARMAMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) Challenges & Opportunities

An Overview. HEMS Harsh Environment Mass Spectrometry Symposium Sarasota, Florida September 2005

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

DoD Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap

Corporate Services Employment Report: January Employment by Staff Group. Jan 2018 (Jan 2017 figure: 1,462) Overall 1,

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #164

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Consolidated Afloat Network Ent Services(CANES) FY 2012 OCO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000

NDIA Armaments Division 2015 Activity and Status Report. 1-3 June Hanover Marriott Whippany, New Jersey

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #86

Systems Engineering & LRASM

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

TITLE II RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, EVALUATION

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO. Quantity of RDT&E Articles

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

Cryptologic & Cyber Systems Division Contract/Acquisition Forecast

Item UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (IUID) JRIB July 2005

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Mr. James Hondo Geurts Deputy Director for Acquisition United States Special Operations Command

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BIG DARBY ACCORD. Proposals Due by October 25, 2004

Retaining Lethality Overmatch Through Science & Technology

USTRANSCOM. USTRANSCOM Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Joint Deployment and Distribution Enterprise. 15 April Mr.

Small Business Programs Office (SBPO) Susan Nichols Program Director

Future Combat Systems Industry Day Briefing

Future of Logistics Civil Augmentation Program

Beyond Phase II Conference RIF Overview

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND ADVANCED PLANNING BRIEFING TO INDUSTRY

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)

Commercial Solutions Opening Innovation in Contracting

First Announcement/Call For Papers

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

2016 Major Automated Information System Annual Report

Joint Insensitive Munitions Technology Program Overview

DoDI ,Operation of the Defense Acquisition System Change 1 & 2

01. Grants, Cooperative Agreements and Other Transactions

US Army Combined Arms Center SOLDIERS AND LEADERS - OUR ASYMMETRIC ADVANTAGE. Synthetic Training Environment (STE) STE Update to PALT

Mission-Based Test & Evaluation Strategy: Creating Linkages between Technology Development and Mission Capability

MEDIA CONTACTS. Mailing Address: Phone:

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface Ship Torpedo Defense FY 2012 OCO

KC-46A Tanker DoD Budget FY2013-FY2017. RDT&E U.S. Air Force

Program Manager Training Systems PM 203

Enlisted Professional Military Education FY 18 Academic Calendar. Table of Contents COLLEGE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING (CDET):

Transcription:

2014 NDIA Joint Armament Forum Defense Consortia A Proven Way to Rapidly Develop and Deploy New Armament Capability in Today s Environment Presented by: Mr. Gary A. Schneider Chairman, NAC Executive Committee Co-Chairman, DOTC Executive Committee May 13, 2014 2014 Joint Armaments FORUM, EXHIBITION and TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION Phoenix, Arizona May 12-15 2014

What is a Defense Consortium Defense Consortia are collaborative partnerships between Government, Industry and Academia entities that are formed to advance innovative technologies that will enhance National Defense and Homeland Security capabilities. Some Defense Consortia have been commissioned by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (OUSD(AT&L)) with the support of the Office of Land Warfare and Munitions. Defense Consortia are available for use by DoD Laboratories, Program Offices, and other Government Agencies to conduct research, development, and prototype test and evaluation of new technologies that can provide increased capability. Defense Consortia Support OSD Better Buying Power 2.0 - Streamlined Management and Process

Defense Consortia Existing Today DoD Ordnance Technology Consortium Armament System Technologies Originally established in 2000; converted to the multi-service DOTC in 2002 Operating under a 2014, $700M, 7-year Other Transaction issued by ACC-NJ Robotics Technology Consortium Robotic Systems Technologies Established in 2008, program management moved from OSD to TARDEC Operating a under 2008, $170M, 7-year Other Transaction issued by ACC-NJ Vertical Lift Consortium Vertical Lift Aviation Technologies Established in 2010; transitioned program management from OSD to AMRDEC Operating under a 2010, $20M, 5-year, Other Transaction issued by ACC-NJ Consortium for Energy, Environment and Demilitarization Established in 2010; sponsored by Federal Center for CEED and ACC-NJ Operating under a 2013, $100M, 3-year Other Transaction issued by ACC-NJ System of Systems Security Consortium Agnostic Technology Solutions Originally established in 2004; first OTA issued in April 2009 Operating under a 2012, $100M, 3-year Other Transaction issued by ACC-NJ

Typical Consortia Contracting Process DOTC Program Office through Army Acquisition Center - NJ W15QKN-09-9-1001 Section 845 Other Transaction Agreement NAC Executive Committee through Consortium Management Firm - ATI DoD Uses Other Transaction Agreement to Contract with the NAC NAC Uses its Management Firm ATI to Sub-Contract with NAC Members All Proposals are Routed Through ATI to Ensure Response is Compliant Government Sponsors Evaluate Proposals Submitted and Make Source Selections All awards made to NAC member organizations are done so on a full-and-open competition basis

Benefits of Using Other Transactions U.S. Government Industry and Academia Reduced Acquisition lead time One-stop technology shopping Access to broad spectrum of traditional and non-traditional contractors Full and open competition throughout Source selection integrity preserved Full control over use of sponsor s funds Ability to incrementally fund projects Open dialogue with Contractor is permitted up until proposal submittal Technically acceptable proposals placed in basket awaiting funding for 3 years Relief from FAR provisions IRAD funds can be used to fund projects Enables industry/academia planning for technology development investments Enhanced collaboration between the Government, Industry and Academia Reduced B&P costs with use of White Papers before proposal preparation Higher visibility into USG requirements Open dialogue with the Government is permitted up until proposal submittal Technically acceptable proposals placed in basket awaiting funding for 3 years

The DoD Ordnance Technology Consortium DOTC One of the Most Successful Defense Consortia in History! Established to facilitate Government, Industry and Academic collaboration in the field of armament research, development, engineering and prototype testing of advanced armament technologies for insertion into future and legacy systems to ensure Warfighter technological superiority on the battlefield

DOTC/NAC Enterprise Evolution GFY 01 45 Active NWEC Members 3 Government Members 48 Proposal Submitted 17 Initiatives Selected $5.4 Million Awarded GFY 13 248 Active NAC Members 10 Government Members 294 Proposal Submitted 71 Initiatives Selected $244 Million Awarded NOV 2007 DOTC Moves to Single Point Contracting Methodology DEC 2002 USD(AT&L) Establishes DOTC as DoD Laboratory Initiative DEC 2008 Added Enabling Technologies Focus Area SEP 2011 Added Protection and Survivability Focus Area NOV 2013 National Small Arms Technology Consortium (NSATC) Merges with NWEC/DOTC; NWEC changed to NAC AUG 2000 NWEC Formed to Partner with the ARDEC, ARL and NOS-IH JUL 1999 Industry Day Briefings to Establish Government, Industry and Academic Partnership Today -- 219 Active Projects in 10 Technology Focus Areas -- $646.0 Million on Contract

Active Government Participants CRANE DAHLGREN INDIAN HEAD Army Staff PM- CSW

DOTC/NAC Success Stories

XM395 120 mm Guided Mortar Projectile Advanced Precision Munition Initiative (APMI) Development Strategy: To support an Urgent Warfighter requirement, PD GPMMS used DOTC as a key enabler to rapidly develop, demonstrate, and deploy leap ahead precision capabilities for the maneuver commander. Phase 1: Oct 2009 Mar 2010 Competitive Design Maturation & Demonstration Phase 2: Apr 2010 Mar 2011 Qualification to Urgent Material Release (UMR) Start of Limited Procurement Phase 3: Mar 2011 Aug 2011 New Equipment Training and Fielding Developed and in the hands of the Warfighter in less than 18 months

Energetic Material Availability Initiative Benzinger TATB Process Facilitation at Holston Acquisition Strategy: Responding to an urgent need to indigenously manufacture TATB, which has been out of production in the U.S. since 1999, the DoD, DoE, PM-Ammo and other Services used DOTC to regain an organic capability Phase 1: Nov 2009 May 2011 Competitive Demonstration Between ATK & BAE Phase 2: May 2011 Nov 2012 Down Select to BAE for Process Validation Process Validation Conducted and Completed Phase 3: Feb 2013 Present Plant Commissioned and Production Begins Process developed; facility commissioned; and, material delivered in less than 27 months

Joint Services Pyrotechnic Initiatives Potassium Perchlorate Replacement Initiative Development Strategy: To support a DoD wide requirement, PD Pyrotechnics used DOTC as a key enabler to rapidly synthesize, develop, test and deploy environmentally friendly energetic formulations to replace Potassium Perchlorate in multiple munitions. Phase 1: Oct 2005 Sep 2010 Energetic Synthesis and Formulation Development Phase 2: Oct 2006 Sep 2011 Prototype Development and Energetic Material Qualification Board (EMQB) Certified. Phase 3: Oct 2007 Sep 2013 Full up end item qualification testing, ECP and Initial Production Developed and in the hands of the Warfighter for Multiple Munitions

AI3 Development & Demonstration Program Accelerated Improved Intercept Initiative (AI3) Development Strategy: To support an Urgent Warfighter requirement, PD C-RAM used DOTC to implement a competitive acquisition approach that would provide a system that fully met requirements as quickly and cost effectively as possible. Phase 1: Sep 2011 Oct 2011 Solicitation, Draft RFP and Industry Day Phase 2: Nov 2011 Jan 2012 Proposals, Tech Evaluation, Source Selection, and Contract Award Phase 3: Feb 2012 Aug 2013 Prototype Development, Lab Testing, and Live Fire Test RFI, System Development, and first flight in less than 24 months

Summary and Conclusions What Can Defense Consortia Do For You? Reduce development cycle times, risks, and costs Eliminate onerous Federal Acquisition Regulations Provide access to broad spectrum of new technology Allows Contractors to use IRAD funding on your programs Gives easy access to Non-Tradition Contractor technologies Facilitates Government, Industry and Academia Collaboration

Questions and Answers

Points of Contact NAC Management DOTC Program Management Office Mr. Gary A. Schneider Co-Chair DOTC Executive Committee Chairman, NAC Executive Committee Phone: (480) 829-9336 Mobile: (602) 312-5665 E-mail: gsacorp@earthlink.net Mr. Tony Melita NAC Executive Director Mobile: (703) 338-0294 E-mail: melitaconsulting@gmail.com Mr. Donald A. Geiss Jr. DOTC Program Director Phone: (973) 724-3386 Mobile: (973) 534-4582 E-mail: donald.a.geiss.civ@mail.mil Mr. Don Palathinkal DOTC Technology Manager Phone: (973) 724-4231 Mobile: (973) 886-7484 E-mail: don.j.palathinkal.civ@mail.mil Mr. Devin Swanson DOTC Junior Technology Manager Phone: 973-724-9576 E-mail: devin.d.swanson.civ@mail.mil Ms. Darlene Hopler DOTC Financial Analyst Phone: 973-724-4007 E-mail: darlene.e.hopler.civ@mail.mil http://www.nac-dotc.org Ms. Lynda Ru DOTC Technology Manager Phone: (973) 724-4288 Mobile: (973) 294-2195 E-mail: lynda.ru.civ@mail.mil Ms. Lia Sosa (CTR) DOTC Technology Manager Phone: (973) 724-4110 Mobile: (856) 701-7615 E-mail: lia.k.sosa.ctr@mail.mil Ms. Krystina Palumbo DOTC Administration Officer Phone: (973) 724-2046 Mobile: (973) 270-4082 E-mail: krystina.m.palumbo.civ@mail.mil