MSG-140 Urban Combat Advanced Training Technology (UCATT) Live Simulation Standards

Similar documents
Lessons Learned from the MSG- 128 Study on Incremental Implementation of NATO Mission Training through Distributed Simulation Operations

21st ICCRTS C2-in a Complex Connected Battlespace. Operationalization of Standardized C2-Simulation (C2SIM) Interoperability

20th ICCRTS. C2, Cyber and Trust

C2- Simula*on Interoperability for Opera*onal Hybrid Environments

Adding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048

Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference C. Laroque, J. Himmelspach, R. Pasupathy, O. Rose, and A.M. Uhrmacher, eds

Australian Contribution to International Simulation Standards Development

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

Technological Advances in TDL Training. Mike Smith - BAE Systems AeI

Spring 2014 SISO Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM)

C2SIM Systems and in Use/Coalitions Assembled

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

The Swedish Armed Forces Operational Challenges for Command and Control

MSG-079 C-BML Workshop Farnborough UK, Feb Coalition Battle Management Language 2009 Experimentation

COL Mike Flanagan Project Manager Training Devices

MANPACK300 DEPLOYING THE FUTURE IN LIVE TRAINING

Evaluating the Proposed Coalition Battle Management Language Standard as a Basis for Enhanced C2 to M&S Interoperability

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

A d. e P. nc e. a A. M d. e G. - P h ase 2 - M e d. r the ADF

NATO MSG-085 Standardisation for C2-Simulation Interoperation: Autonomous Air Operations Experiments

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Sea Viper Maritime Missile Defence

The Integral TNO Approach to NAVY R&D

Integrating National C2 and Simulation Systems for BML Experimentation

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Non-System Training Devices - Eng Dev FY 2012 OCO

Joint Staff J7 / Deputy Director for Joint Training

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview

Subj: MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND TASKS OF NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE COMMAND

UNCLASSIFIED. Cost To Complete Total Program Element P857: Joint Deployable Analysis Team (JDAT)

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) first collaborative PESCO projects - Overview

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Joint Operational Effects Federation (JOEF) Briefing to CBIS

JADE An Experiment in Distributed Simulation Based Joint Tactical Training

Australian/US Collaborative Development of Joint Meta- FOM for Coalition Training in Synthetic Environments

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO

Mr. Dale Whittaker. Director, International Programs

Capability Integration

Modeling, Simulation & Training Services

A Framework For Strategic Military Capabilities In Defense Transformation

EPSRC Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the portfolio of Centres for Doctoral Training (CDT s) Updated January 2011

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Synthetic Training Environment (STE) White Paper. Combined Arms Center - Training (CAC-T) Introduction

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 1 of 7 R-1 Line #31

Mobile Subscriber Equipment (MSE) Operations

Mr. Dale Whittaker. Director, International Programs. Distribution A: Approach for Public Release

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2013 OCO

Support to Operations Assessment in the 1 German/Netherlands Corps

Business Opportunities in Network Services and IT Infrastructure

Enhancing Multinational Force Capability through Standardization and Interoperability

Secure LVC Advanced Training Environment (SLATE)

F-35 Lightning II A New Generation of Fighter

Workshop on NATO s BMD Integration Test Bed: Enhancing the BMD ITB with additional functionalities

Test and Evaluation in Acquisition of Capabilities

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

C2SIM Systems and in Use/Coalitions Assembled

Extensible Battle Management Language

Delegations will find attached the declassified sections of the above-mentioned document.

A Case Study for the Naval Training Meta-FOM (NTMF): Analyzing the Requirements from MAGTF FOM

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

NATO MSG-048 Coalition Battle Management Initial Demonstration Lessons Learned and Way Forward

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE A: Distributive Interactive Simulations (DIS) - Eng Dev FY 2013 OCO

Cyber Operations in the Canadian Armed Forces. Master Warrant Officer Alex Arndt. Canadian Forces Network Operations Centre

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Figure 1: UK MTDS CCD linkages

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

NDIA Air Targets and UAV Division Symposium. LTC Scott Tufts 4 October 2012

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 15 R-1 Line #32

OPNAVINST N9 16 Jun Subj: CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING STRATEGY

Current and future standardization issues in the e Health domain: Achieving interoperability. Executive Summary

Concept. of the. NATO Security Force Assistance Centre of Excellence

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

NIAG Study on Modelling and Simulation Support to Peace Support Operations (PSO)

U.S. Army Modeling and Simulation Office. Overview

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) FY 2012 OCO

SERIES 1100 UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INTELLIGENCE (USD(I)) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION (ASD(NII))

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Single Integrated Ground Picture

Notification of Intent 555B Croatia Project IFB-CQ B-HRV

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) MAY 2009 APPROPRIATION / BUDGET ACTIVITY RDT&E, DEFENSE-WIDE / 7

Lockheed Martin Corporation Integrating Air & Missile Defense

T he National Health Service (NHS) introduced the first

ARMY RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R-2 Exhibit)

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item No. 3 Page 1 of 15

LTG Richard Formica U.S. Army Retired Vice President, CALIBRE Systems

Use of Simulations in Support of the Multi-Sensor Aerospace-Ground Joint ISR Interoperability Coalition (MAJIIC) Project

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #71

Test and Evaluation of Highly Complex Systems

[ Command & Control systems ] member of ICZ GROUP

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #161

155 Third Generation Maritime Fire Support (155 TMF) Robert McClure BAE Systems Global Combat Systems

Transcription:

MSG-140 Urban Combat Advanced Training Technology (UCATT) Live Simulation Standards

Mr Mark Chamberlain, CEng, FIET Leader, Live Training Programme DE&S, UK MoD UCATT Secretary Capt Sander Cruiming Staff Officer Knowledge, Innovation & Policy Royal Netherlands Army SISO UCATT PDG Chair

Background Early 2000 two NATO studies observed that: urban areas will continue to increase in number and size and are likely to become focal points for unrest and conflict. The physical and human complexity of this environment presents unique challenges for a NATO commander which are not adequately addressed by those military capabilities designed for open environments Training was recommended as an area that needed to be improved

Urban Ops: the most complex environment Cyberspace Littoral Riverine Surface Subsurface

Justification of our mandate NATO AMSP-01(C): The MS3 recognises, however, that much more work is required before open M&S standards enable the targeted interoperability of live training systems both with other live systems or with virtual or constructive simulations

Overall mission of UCATT To identify and standardise the interfaces that allow interoperability of different systems for Live Training focusing on the urban environment and to maintain our delivered products. To allow the customer to: Train in an international context Choose components instead of systems To allow industry to: Compete on new markets Focus on their strengths

Why standardise? Training is the new operations Deterrence is back - NATO Review Magazine

UCATT-LSS members MSG-140 UCATT LSS

UCATT structure - overview NAAG NMSG SISO Team of Experts MSG-032 UCATT-1 MSG-063 UCATT-2 UCATT-3 MSG-098 UCATT Architecture MSG-140 UCATT LSS UCATT PDG/PSG MSG-099 UCATT Standards 2002 2003 2007 2011 2013 2015 2018 Military community

UCATT-1 (2003 2007) Use Cases Terminology List of user requirements Initial development of the Functional Architecture Urban training Site register UCATT-1 report

Use case 0: national training on national site Operational system 1 DO1 Operational system 2 EXCON SYSCON O/C DO2

Use case 1: multinational force on national site Operational system 1 DO1 Operational system 2 EXCON SYSCON O/C DO2

Use case 2: Use other nations training facility and staff Operational system 1 DO1 Operational system 2 EXCON SYSCON O/C DO2 Option 1: they only bring training equipment for their operational systems

Use case 2: Use other nations training facility and staff Operational system 1 DO1 Operational system 2 EXCON SYSCON O/C DO2 EXCON SYSCON O/C Option 2: they also bring excon equipment (interfacing option a)

Use case 2: Use other nations training facility and staff Operational system 1 DO1 Operational system 2 EXCON SYSCON O/C DO2 EXCON SYSCON O/C Option 3: they also bring excon equipment (interfacing option b)

Use case 3a: Distributed combined training Operational system 1 DO1 Operational system 2 EXCON SYSCON O/C DO2 Operational system 3 DO3 Operational system 4 EXCON SYSCON O/C DO4

UCATT-2 (2007 2011) Evolution of the Functional Architecture Interoperability demonstration 15-16 SEP 2010, Marnehuizen, NLD Validation of use cases UCATT-2 report Decision made to continue to UCATT-3

Proof of concept demonstration 2010, Marnehuizen (NLD) MSG-140 UCATT LSS

UCATT-3 (2011 2015) UCATT-3 (and onwards) is the delivery and maintenance phase of UCATT UCATT UCATT-3 SISO Split into two subgroups Architecture: focus on user requirements for each interface Standards: produce a first UCATT Standard MSG-098 UCATT Architecture MSG-099 UCATT Standards UCATT PDG Adoption of SISO processes in accordance with NATO policy

UCATT family of standards MSG-140 UCATT LSS

Functional interfaces versus implementation I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 Long range radio DO to DO Laser Short range radio IR- Short Range Reserved Reserved Reserved EXCON to EXCON Fire Control unit interface E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 E10 E11 E12 x x x x Serial interface between TES and Radio modem x x x I11 Long Range Radio DO / EXCON x x x I12 Ethernet NC to EXCON x x x

UCATT-3 Distinction between functional interfaces (E) and physical interfaces (I) First standard E1/I2: UCATT interface standard for laser engagement Validation of use cases UCATT-3 reports (MSG-098 and MSG- 099) SISO Product Nomination Delivery of SISO-REF-00-059-2015 UCATT Ammo table

Choices for E1/I2 First standard E1/I2: UCATT interface standard for laser engagement MSG-099 propose to select on of the following codes as baseline for laser code interoperability CoSIM OSAG 2 Totally new unknown MSG-099 did not promote: MILES laser safety, ballistic simulation NCL Code efficiency, Player ids

Delivered SISO products to date MSG-140 UCATT LSS

MSG-140 UCATT-LSS (Live Simulation Systems) Maintenance of delivered products through UCATT SISO Product Support Group Laser standard -> NATO STANREC/STANAG Development of Compliance Test Plan for the Laser Standard (SISO PSG) Recognition of the increasing use of LVC to deliver training output (e.g. synthetic wrap) Marketing and promotion of delivered SISO products Continuation of work on two new interfaces

Current standardisation activity: Player to EXCON (E4) EXCON to External systems (E8) UCATT does not necessarily seek to create new standards but investigates potential best-fit candidates among existing SISO and/or IEEE standards For example: HLA, RPR-FOM and DIS are being investigated as potential candidates for E8 USB, RS-232, Ethernet, CAN and RS-485 are potential candidates for E4 C-BML, MSDL and C2-SIM are considered potential candidates for E6 and E7 (C4I) UCATT seeks to deliver change requests to best-fit standard support groups, in order to optimize those standards for live training.

How do the UCATT activities translate to practice today? Defence procurements is demanding a NATO UCATT standard in their requirements; The UCATT Standard for Laser Engagement already enables full interoperability for uninstrumented/home base exercises; Industry are moving towards the laser standard and are developing multicode capabilities to deal with legacy equipment; US 7 th Army (JMRC Hohenfels/Grafenwöhr) is moving away from MILES and towards the UCATT laser standard; Fixed CTC augmentation by mobile assets are easier to engineer; Several instrumented (multi-national) exercises have been executed based on the UCATT principals and concepts, e.g.: FTX Noble Ledger 2014 (NATO Response Force certification exc) GER-NLD-AUT combined training in GÜZ Altmark; UK TTESIK on Salisbury Plain (CUBIC-Saab) MSG-140 UCATT LSS

The benefit of UCATT to the live simulation community MSG-140 UCATT LSS

UCATT, being the only NATO MSG and the only PDG within SISO with a focus on live simulation has become a focal point and go-to advisory group in respect of live simulation MSG-140 UCATT LSS

QUESTIONS? MSG-140 UCATT LSS