Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure

Similar documents
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Measure: Patient name. Referring or transitioning healthcare provider's name and office contact information (MIPS eligible clinician only) Procedures

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Measure 2018 Performance Period

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: November 2013

Stage 2 Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 12 of 16 Date issued: May 2013

MIPS Program: 2018 Advancing Care Information Category

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Health Information Exchange Objective Stage 3 Updated: February 2017

Advancing Care Information Performance Category Fact Sheet

MIPS Program: 2017 Advancing Care Information Category (formerly known as Meaningful Use) Proposed Rule Guide

HIE Success - Physician Education Series

Stage 3 and ACI s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Advancing Care Information- The New Meaningful Use September 2017

2017 Transition Year Flexibility Advancing Care Information (ACI) Category Options

Sevocity v Advancing Care Information User Reference Guide

MIPS Scoring: Explanation and Estimation 2/7/2017 and 2/10/2017

General Comments. AMIA Response to Proposed 2015 Edition EHR Certification Criteria Page 2 of 29 RE: RIN 0991-AB93

Sevocity v Improvement Activities User Reference Guide

Beyond Meaningful Use: Driving Improved Quality. CHCANYS Webinar #1: December 14, 2016

May 7, Submitted electronically via:

MACRA and MIPS. How Medicare Meaningful Use and PQRS are Changing

2017/2018. KPN Health, Inc. Quality Payment Program Solutions Guide. KPN Health, Inc. A CMS Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) KPN Health, Inc.

Kate Goodrich, MD MHS. Director, Center for Clinical Standards & Quality. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 6, 2016

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MACRA Frequently Asked Questions

2016 MEANINGFUL USE AND 2017 CHANGES to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for EPs. September 27, 2016 Kathy Wild, Lisa Sagwitz, and Joe Pinto

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program

Decoding the QPP Year 2 Quality Measure Benchmarks and Deciles to Maximize Performance

Copyright. Last updated: September 28, 2017 MicroMD EMR Objective Measure Calculations Manual: Performance Year 2017

Under the MACRAscope:

Meaningful Use Under MIPS

FAQ s from TRAKnet webinar MIPS/MACRA: The most up-to-date information and what you need to know in TRAKnet to comply in 2017

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

MACRA and the Quality Payment Program. Frequently Asked Questions Edition

The Healthcare Roundtable

Using Updox to Succeed with MIPS

RED SIGNAL REPORTSM RADIOLOGY. August 2018 Vol. 1 No. 1. Claims Data Signals & Solutions to Reduce Risks and Improve Patient Safety.

John Quinn HL7 CTO. (with content contributed by Bob Dolin, MD HL7 Chair Elect) IHIC Kyoto, Japan, May

Quality Data Model (QDM) Style Guide. QDM (version MAT) for Meaningful Use Stage 2

CMS Quality Payment Program: Performance and Reporting Requirements

Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 Final Rule with Comment

U.S. Health and Human Services Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT

MIPS eligibility lookup tool (available in Spring 2018):

ecw and NextGen MEETING MU REQUIREMENTS

Meaningful Use CHCANYS Webinar #1

June 27, CMS 5517 P Merit-Based Incentive System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule

Copyright All Rights Reserved.

Eligible Professional Core Measure Frequently Asked Questions

The Quality Payment Program Overview Fact Sheet

2017 Transition Into Value Based Care

Disclaimer This webinar may be recorded. This webinar presents a sampling of best practices and overviews, generalities, and some laws.

Michelle Brunsen & Sandy Swallow May 25, , Telligen, Inc.

March 28, Dear Dr. Yong:

Advancing Care Information Measures Data Validation Criteria. Reporting Requirement: Yes/No or Numerator/Denominator

Meaningful Use 2016 and beyond

Vendor Plan Share, Panel Discussion: Clinical Data Exchange by leveraging the EHR

Quality Data Model December 2012

Consolidated CDA Basics. Lisa R. Nelson, Lantana Consulting Group

Re: Voluntary 2015 Edition Electronic Health Record (EHR) Certification Criteria; Interoperability Updates and Regulatory Improvements

Quality Innovation Network-Quality Improvement Organization (QIN-QIO) April Update

ONC Policy Overview. Session 66, February 21, Elise Sweeney Anthony, Director of Policy, ONC

Quality Payment Program Year 2: 2018 MIPS Participation. An Introductory Guide for CRNAs in 2018

Preparing for the 2018 EHR Medicaid Incentive Payment Program

Agenda. Surviving the New Program Requirements and the Financial Penalties Under MIPS 9/9/2016. Steps to take to prepare for MIPS

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

Moving MACRA-MIPS Forward: Role by Role

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; Medicare Access

Medicaid Electronic Health Records Meaningful Use. Lisa Reuland, Program Manager October 15, 2015

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

MACRA Quality Payment Program

Midmark White Paper The Connected Point of Care Ecosystem: A Solid Foundation for Value-Based Care

Promoting Interoperability Performance Category Fact Sheet

CHIME Concordance Analysis of Stage 2 Meaningful Use Final Rule - Objectives & Measures

WHITE PAPER. Taking Meaningful Use to the Next Level: What You Need to Know about the MACRA Advancing Care Information Component

Ambulatory Interoperability - Proposed Final Criteria - Feb Either HL7 v2.4 or HL7 v2.5.1, LOINC

Test Procedure for (c) Maintain up-to-date problem list

The History of Meaningful Use

Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program -- Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017

CMS QRDA Category I Implementation Guide Changes for CY 2018 for Hospital Quality Reporting

2016 PQRS and VBM for Anesthesia and Pain Management

SVS QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES COMMITTEE (QPMC) New Member Orientation

AAWC ALERT Call for Action from Physicians

Meaningful Use Modified Stage 2 Roadmap Eligible Hospitals

MACRA Open Call December 5 th, 2016

Copyright Scottsdale Institute All Rights Reserved.

Here is what we know. Here is what you can do. Here is what we are doing.

Quality Payment Program: The future of reimbursement

June 25, Barriers exist to widespread interoperability

Meaningful Use: Review of Changes to Objectives and Measures in Final Rule

The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Survival Guide. August 11, 2016

Midmark White Paper Building Your Connected Point of Care Ecosystem. Point Of Care Ecosystem Series Part Four

during the EHR reporting period.

MACRA Implementation: A Review of the Quality Payment Program

March Data Jam: Using Data to Prepare for the MACRA Quality Payment Program

Transcription:

Quality Payment Program Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Measure Objective: Measure: Health Information Exchange Send a Summary of Care For at least one transition of care or referral, the MIPS eligible clinician that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or health care clinician (1) creates a summary of care record using CEHRT; and (2) electronically exchanges the summary of care record. Reporting Requirements NUMERATOR/DENOMINATOR NUMERATOR: The number of transitions of care and referrals in the denominator where a summary of care record was created using CEHRT and exchanged electronically. DENOMINATOR: Number of transitions of care and referrals during the performance period for which the MIPS eligible clinician was the transferring or referring clinician. Scoring Information BASE SCORE/PERFORMANCE SCORE/BONUS SCORE Required for Base Score (50%): Yes Percentage of Performance Score (up to 90%): up to 10% Eligible for bonus score: No Note: Eligible clinicians must earn the full base score in order to earn any score in the Advancing Care Information performance category. In addition to the base score, eligible clinicians have the opportunity to earn additional credit through a performance score and the bonus score.

Regulatory References For further discussion, please see the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) final rule: 81 FR 77228. In order to meet this objective and measure, MIPS eligible clinician must use the capabilities and of CEHRT at 45 CFR 170.315 (b)(1) through (b)(3) and (a)(6) through (a)(8). Certification and Standards Criteria Below is the corresponding certification and criteria for electronic health record technology that supports achieving the meaningful use of this measure. Certification Criteria* (1) Transitions of care (i) Send and receive via edge protocol (A) Send transition of care/referral summaries through a method that conforms to the standard specified in 170.202(d) and that leads to such summaries being processed by a service that has implemented the standard specified in 170.202(a)(2); and (B) Receive transition of care/referral summaries through a method that conforms to the standard specified in 170.202(d) from a service that has implemented the standard specified in 170.202(a)(2). 170.315(b)(1) Care Coordination (C) XDM processing. Receive and make available the contents of a XDM package formatted in accordance with the standard adopted in 170.205(p)(1) when the technology is also being certified using an SMTP-based edge protocol. (ii) Validate and display (A) Validate C-CDA conformance system performance. Demonstrate the ability to detect valid and invalid transition of care/referral summaries received and formatted in accordance with the specified in 170.205(a)(3) and 170.205(a)(4) for the Continuity of Care Document, Referral Note, and (inpatient setting only) Discharge Summary document templates. This includes the ability to:

(1) Parse each of the document types. (2) Detect errors in corresponding document-templates, sectiontemplates, and entry-templates, including invalid vocabulary and codes not specified in the adopted in 170.205(a)(3) and 170.205(a)(4). (3) Identify valid document-templates and process the data elements required in the corresponding section-templates and entry-templates from the adopted in 170.205(a)(3) and 170.205(a)(4). (4) Correctly interpret empty sections and null combinations. (5) Record errors encountered and allow a user through at least one of the following ways to: (i) Be notified of the errors produced. (ii) Review the errors produced. (B) Display. Display in human readable format the data included in transition of care/referral summaries received and formatted according to the specified in 170.205(a)(3) and 170.205(a)(4). (C) Display section views. Allow for the individual display of each section (and the accompanying document header information) that is included in a transition of care/referral summary received and formatted in accordance with the adopted in 170.205(a)(3) and 170.205(a)(4) in a manner that enables the user to: (1) Directly display only the data within a particular section; (2) Set a preference for the display order of specific sections; and (3) Set the initial quantity of sections to be displayed.

(iii) Create. Enable a user to create a transition of care/referral summary formatted in accordance with the standard specified in 170.205(a)(4) using the Continuity of Care Document, Referral Note, and (inpatient setting only) Discharge Summary document templates that includes, at a minimum: (A) The Common Clinical Data Set. (B) Encounter diagnoses. Formatted according to at least one of the following : (1) The standard specified in 170.207(i). (2) At a minimum, the version of the standard specified in 170.207(a)(4). (C) Cognitive status. (D) Functional status. (E) Ambulatory setting only. The reason for referral; and referring or transitioning provider's name and office contact information. (F) Inpatient setting only. Discharge instructions. (G) Patient matching data. First name, last name, previous name, middle name (including middle initial), suffix, date of birth, address, phone number, and sex. The following constraints apply: (1) Date of birth constraint (i) The year, month and day of birth must be present for a date of birth. The technology must include a null value when the date of birth is unknown. (ii) Optional. When the hour, minute, and second are associated with a date of birth the technology must demonstrate that the correct time zone offset is included.

(2) Phone number constraint. Represent phone number (home, business, cell) in accordance with the adopted in 170.207(q)(1). All phone numbers must be included when multiple phone numbers are present. (A) (3) Sex constraint. Represent sex in accordance with the standard adopted in 170.207(n)(1). *Depending on the type of certification issued to the EHR technology, it will also have been certified to the certification criterion adopted at 45 CFR 170.314 (g)(1), (g)(2), or both, in order to assist in the calculation of this meaningful use measure. Standards Criteria 170.202(a) 170.202 (2)(b) 170.202 (2)(c) 170.205(a)(1) Patient Summary Record ONC Applicability Statement for Secure Health, Version 1.0 ONC Applicability Statement for Secure Health, Version 1.2 (b) Standard. ONC XDR and XDM for Direct Messaging Specification ONC and Security Specification (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Health Level Seven Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) Release 2, Continuity of Care Document (CCD) (incorporated by reference in 170.299). Implementation specifications. The Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) Summary Documents Using HL7 CCD Component HITSP/C32 Additional certification criteria may apply. Review the ONC 2015 Edition Final Rule for more information.