INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE

Similar documents
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS

ICH Topic Q4B Annex 6 Uniformity of Dosage Units General Chapter. Step 3

Transmission to CHMP December Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation December 2008

Quality Risk Management ICH Q9

ICH STEERING COMMITTEE October 24-29, 2009 St. Louis, MO, USA SUMMARY

International trend on medical device regulatory convergence

Recent Development of ICH GCG

Why do we need an addendum to ICH E6?

PMDA EPOCH Toward 2020

GCP Inspection by PMDA

Role and Vision of PMDA

...FREEDOM TO EXPLORE YOUR REGULATORY NEEDS

FINAL STATUS DOCUMENT

ICH Regulators Forum. Dr Peter Arlett EU

The place of the Certification procedure in 2017 in the EU regulatory framework and beyond. Prague, 19 September 2017

Responsible medication processes ( pharmaceutical care ) and good pharmaceutical practices for improved patients quality of life and batter healthcare

Points to Consider regarding the Notification and Publication of Package Insert Language

Q11 Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances--Questions and Answers

Addendum to ICH E6 (R2)

Annual Work Programme 2018

Portland, Oregon, USA (Portland Marriott Downtown Waterfront Hotel)

E14 Clinical Evaluation of QT/QTc Interval Prolongation and Proarrhythmic Potential for Non-Antiarrhythmic Drugs

Consideration on Global Harmonization

BASG / Austrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency Institute Assessment & Analytics Traisengasse 5, A-1200 Vienna

Remediation, Resolution and Outcomes

Commission Guidelines for the implementation of the Clinical Trials Regulation NTA Ethics Oslo

IPEC- Americas Ongoing Projects

ECHA and the implementation of REACH,CLP and other tasks

1. Introduction, purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE

EDQM roadmap for electronic submissions

Guidance for applicants requesting scientific advice

Brussels, 12 June 2014 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 10855/14. Interinstitutional File: 2012/0266 (COD) 2012/0267 (COD)

Trends in the development of regulatory systems by the example of ICH countries

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2011/18/EU

USP 797: A FOCUS ON ANTIMICROBIAL RISK LEVEL KAREN MILKIEWICZ, PHARMD

Farm Data Code of Practice Version 1.1. For organisations involved in collecting, storing, and sharing primary production data in New Zealand

Automated Dose Dispensing (ADD) Guidelines:. Best Practice for the ADD Process, and Care and Safety of Patients

NOTE BY THE TECHNICAL SECRETARIAT

1. Introduction, purpose of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Technical Report No. 68 Risk-Based Approach for Prevention and Management of Drug Shortages

DRAFT OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0018(COD) of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

Understanding USP 797

Study Guide for Emergency Care Clinicians. (Version /09/2014)

USP <797> does not apply to the administration of medications.

IMDRF Project: List of international standards recognized by IMDRF management committee members

Guidance for registered pharmacies preparing unlicensed medicines

Guidance for the Tripartite model Clinical Investigation Agreement for Medical Technology Industry sponsored research in NHS Hospitals managed by

Regional Update ASEAN PPWG

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office

Annual report of the Good Clinical Practice Inspectors Working Group 2016

Procedure for handling applications for authorisation and review reports under REACH

2012 Academy Seminar - Thessaloniki, Greece DOs and DON Ts in setting up a new facility. 21 April 2012, Barbara Wimmer,

1 The EU Harmonised technical ectd guidance version 4.0

2011 Call for proposals Non-State Actors in Development. Delegation of the European Union to Russia

Guidelines for new FOCAL POINTS

Work plan for GCP Inspectors Working Group for 2018

Market Access for Food Supplements: EHPM Country Profiles. Mr Patrick Ahern Director General EHPM

PREVENT YOUR DIETARY SUPPLEMENT LABORATORY FROM BECOMING A COMPLIANCE RISK. Marian Boardley 2013

The Pharmaceutical Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the EMA

Radiopharmaceuticals. Quality - Safety - GMP Requirements. 5-6 February 2014, Vienna, Austria

Medical devices briefing for patients: Patient safety in the new Regulation

Definitions: In this chapter, unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency

Annex 2 to the HMA esubmission Roadmap: Implementation of mandatory use of ectd format for regulatory submissions

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency GRANT DECISION FOR AN ACTION. Decision Nr

Regional Update ASEAN PPWG

Overview ICH GCP E6(R2) Integrated Addendum

Jeanne Moldenhauer (c) Jeanne Moldenhauer

Questions and answers on the procedure of PIP compliance verification at EMA, and on paediatric rewards

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 February 2015 (OR. en)

Update on FDA-EMA QbD Pilot

PHARMACY SERVICES / MEDICATION USE

42nd DIRECTING COUNCIL 52nd SESSION OF THE REGIONAL COMMITTEE

Software Regulation and Validation

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Completing E2B(R3) Compliance in Total Safety 7

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Preparation of the final technical report

European network of paediatric research (Enpr-EMA)

Progress Report in 2016

International Medical Device Regulatory Harmonization. Reality or Fantasy?

Legislations and Policies in Jordan/ Related to Health and Pharmaceuticals April 19, 2018

ICH ASSOCIATION 2016 ANNUAL REPORT

Assessment of patient, consumer and healthcare professional organisations compliance with EMA eligibility criteria

& Agalloco Associates

TARGETED SUPPORT TO ENHANCE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CARIFORUM-EU EPA

Scientific and Regulatory Advice by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) Guidance for Applicants (Revision 9 1 )

NSF Dietary Supplement Complete Service Offering. Experts in supplement auditing, consulting, testing and training.

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Rules of Procedure of the Assembly

esubmission roadmap v2.0: Industry viewpoint

Horizon ERA-NET Cofund actions

European network of paediatric research (EnprEMA)

Final Draft Agenda Sixteenth meeting of the Forum for Exchange of Information on Enforcement (Forum-16) October 2013

Reflection Paper on Medicinal Product Supply Shortages Caused by Manufacturing/GMP Compliance Problems. Outcome of 10 September 2012 Workshop

Biocidal product regulation the changes to come

Patient Registry Initiative- Strategy and Mandate of the Cross-Committee Task Force

DG(SANCO)/ MR

MARKET SCOPING MISSION INFORMATION CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES NOVEMBER 2018, JAPAN

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED TRIPARTITE GUIDELINE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS ON TEST FOR PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION: SUB-VISIBLE PARTICLES GENERAL CHAPTER Q4B ANNEX 3(R1) Current Step 4 version dated 27 September 2010 This Guideline has been developed by the appropriate ICH Expert Working Group and has been subject to consultation by the regulatory parties, in accordance with the ICH Process. At Step 4 of the Process the final draft is recommended for adoption to the regulatory bodies of the European Union, Japan and USA.

Q4B Annex 3(R1) Document History Code History Date Q4B Annex 3 Approval by the Steering Committee under Step 2 and release for public consultation. 1 November 2007 Q4B Annex 3 Approval by the Steering Committee under Step 4 and recommendation for adoption to the three ICH regulatory bodies. 5 June 2008 Current Step 4 version Q4B Annex 3(R1) Integration of the Health Canada Interchangeability Statement under Section 4.5 after approval by the Steering Committee. 27 September 2010

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS ON TEST FOR PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION: SUB-VISIBLE PARTICLES GENERAL CHAPTER ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline Having reached Step 4 of the ICH Process at the ICH Steering Committee meeting on 5 June 2008, this guideline is recommended for adoption to the three regulatory parties to ICH (This annex was revised -R1- to include the Interchangeability Statement from Health Canada on September 27, 2010) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. Q4B OUTCOME... 1 2.1 Analytical Procedures... 1 2.2 Acceptance Criteria... 1 3. TIMING OF ANNEX IMPLEMENTATION... 1 4. CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION... 1 5. REFERENCES USED FOR THE Q4B EVALUATION... 2 i

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF PHARMACOPOEIAL TEXTS FOR USE IN THE ICH REGIONS ON TEST FOR PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION: SUB-VISIBLE PARTICLES GENERAL CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION This annex is the result of the Q4B process for Test for Particulate Contamination: Sub-Visible Particles. The proposed texts were submitted by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG). 2. Q4B OUTCOME 2.1 Analytical Procedures The ICH Steering Committee, based on the evaluation by the Q4B Expert Working Group (EWG), recommends that the official pharmacopoeial texts, Ph.Eur. 2.9.19. Particulate Contamination: Sub-visible Particles, JP 6.07 Insoluble Particulate Matter Test for Injections, and USP <788> Particulate Matter in Injections can be used as interchangeable in the ICH regions subject to the following condition: 2.1.1 Instrument calibration and system suitability measurements should follow regional good manufacturing practice (GMP) requirements. 2.2 Acceptance Criteria Except for nominal 100-milliliter (ml) parenteral products, the acceptance criteria are interchangeable. At the 100-mL nominal volume, the criteria specified in JP are more stringent than those in the other two pharmacopoeias; therefore, the criteria are not interchangeable in all three regions at that volume. 3. TIMING OF ANNEX IMPLEMENTATION When this annex is implemented (incorporated into the regulatory process at ICH Step 5) in a region, it can be used in that region. Timing might differ for each region. 4. CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 4.1 General consideration: When sponsors or manufacturers change their existing methods to the implemented Q4B-evaluated pharmacopoeial texts that are referenced in Section 2.1 of this annex, any change notification, variation, and/or prior approval procedures should be handled in accordance with established regional regulatory mechanisms pertaining to compendial changes. 4.2 FDA consideration: Based on the recommendation above, and with reference to the conditions set forth in this annex, the pharmacopoeial texts referenced in Section 2.1 of this annex can be considered interchangeable. However, FDA might request that a company demonstrate that the chosen method is acceptable and suitable for a specific material or product, irrespective of the 1

Test for Particulate Contamination: Sub-Visible Particles General Chapter origin of the method. For nominal 100-mL parenteral products, the FDA considers testing criteria from all three pharmacopoeias as interchangeable. 4.3 EU consideration: For the European Union, the monographs of the Ph. Eur. have mandatory applicability. Regulatory authorities can accept the reference in a marketing authorisation application, renewal or variation application citing the use of the corresponding text from another pharmacopoeia as referenced in Section 2.1, in accordance with the conditions set out in this annex, as fulfilling the requirements for compliance with the Ph. Eur. Chapter, Particulate Contamination: Sub-visible Particles: 2.9.19., on the basis of the declaration of interchangeability made above. For nominal 100-mL parenteral products, the EU considers testing criteria from all three pharmacopoeias as interchangeable. 4.4 MHLW consideration: The pharmacopoeial texts referenced in Section 2.1 of this annex can be used as interchangeable in accordance with the conditions set out in this annex. Details of implementation requirements will be provided in the notification by MHLW when this annex is implemented. 4.5 In Canada, any of the texts cited in section 2.1 of this annex and used in accordance with the conditions set out in this annex can be considered interchangeable. For nominal 100 ml parenteral products, Health Canada considers the testing criteria from all three pharmacopoeias to be interchangeable. 5. REFERENCES USED FOR THE Q4B EVALUATION 5.1 The PDG Stage 5B sign-off document: Japanese Pharmacopoeial Forum, Volume 13, Number 3 (August 2004). 5.2 The pharmacopoeial references for Particulate Matter for this annex are: 5.2.1 European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.): 5th Edition (official on January 2005) Particulate Contamination: Sub-visible Particles (reference 01/2005: 20919); 5.2.2 Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP): 6.07 Insoluble Particulate Matter Test for Injections as it appears in the JP Fifteenth Edition (March 31, 2006, The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 285). The method was changed in September 2007 to correct a sentence in the introduction as underlined in the text that is provided by MHLW which is appended; 5.2.3 United States Pharmacopeia (USP): <788> Particulate Matter in Injections, Revision Bulletin, April 4, 2007.

Test for Particulate Contamination: Sub-Visible Particles General Chapter 3

Test for Particulate Contamination: Sub-Visible Particles General Chapter

Test for Particulate Contamination: Sub-Visible Particles General Chapter 5