SPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS

Similar documents
Investigator Roles and Responsibilities in Clinical Device Trials

FDA Inspectional Process in Clinical Research An FDA Perspective. Annette Melendez, MPHsN Investigator Office of Biological Products Operations

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRES S

BIMO Program Update an operational perspective

Postmarketing Drug Safety and Inspection Readiness

FDA Inspection Readiness

WARNING LETTER. an both of which were sponsored by. (formerly ). The products

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

How to Prepare for Federal Inspections and What to Expect

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

: study utilizing trieib)(4) b)(4) I I""-", _

Session 3 FDA Audits and Findings

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & Hl'NIAfV SERVICES Public Hcaffh Scn-ice WARNING LETTER

Documenting the Story of a Clinical Trial: Concept to CAPA. Lori T. Gilmartin Gilmartin Consulting LLC

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 3%3&4

+.,m 7. yw ~ ~ & DEC FEDERAL EXPRESS

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

Inspections and Study Monitoring

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Chapter 48 - Bioresearch Monitoring

Regulatory Binder Checklist for FDA-Regulated Sponsor/Sponsor-Investigator Studies

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges. September 23, 2015 Northwestern University IRB Brown Bag Session

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges

Preparing for and responding to an FDA Inspection Frank Estala Kathy James Clara Vorpahl Anna Taranova

Audits/Inspections Be Prepared for Anything

MANAGEMENT OF PROTOCOL AND GCP DEVIATIONS AND VIOLATIONS

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

Successful FDA Inspections at Investigative Sites for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Biologics

Version 1.1, 6/30/2016 Guidance for Abbreviated IDE Requirements

Essential Documents It s Not Just a Binder!

HIC Standard Operating Procedure. For-Cause Audits of Human Research Studies

Public Input for Changes to Reportable Events Policy

Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings

Self-Monitoring Tool

The GCP Perspective on Study Monitoring

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Research and Development Office

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

MDUFA Performance Goals and Procedures Process Improvements Pre-Submissions Submission Acceptance Criteria Interactive Review

managing or activities.

SOP-QA-28 V2. Approver: Prof Maggie Cruickshank, R&D Director Approver: Prof Steve Heys, Head of School

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Title: Investigator Responsibilities. SOP Number: 1501 Effective Date: June 2, 2017

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

Margaret Huber, RN, CHRC Compliance Consultant Office of Research Compliance

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CANCER RESEARCH PROGRAM POLICY

VCU Clinical Research Quality Assurance Assessment

AN OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL STUDY TASKS AND ACTIVITIES

Standard Operating Procedures

Take a Course of Action.

Via Federal Express IVARNING LETTER

FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANCE PROGRAM GUIDANCE MANUAL PROGRAM

. s%rwcu ~,+ *+ % %vd3a 7 Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and

Audit and Inspection

Prepared by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Protocol Development and Regulatory Compliance Department

FDA s Clinical Trial Inspections in China Including FDA Overall Goals

Roles & Responsibilities of Investigator & IRB

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Good Documentation Practices. Human Subject Research. for

Good Clinical Practice. Lisa de Blieck MPA CCRC Clinical Trials Coordination Center

LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH SERVICE Human Subject Protection Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Effective Date: April 2014 Revision: September 29, Executive Chair, Co-Chairs, NSHA REB Members, REB Office Personnel, Researchers.

PROMPTLY REPORTABLE EVENTS

1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

*Applicable to: Beaumont Health. Document Type: Policy

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Reporting Serious Breaches in Clinical Research

4.2. Clinical Trial Monitor (or Monitor): The person responsible for monitoring the data on behalf of the sponsor or contract research organization.

Investigator Site File Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS INTERNATIONAL DEVICE STANDARD

University of Colorado Denver Human Research Protection Program Investigator Responsibilities for the Protection of Human Subjects

DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: August 5, 2008

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REPORTING UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS INCLUDING ADVERSE EVENTS

Hertfordshire Hospitals R&D Consortium Incorporating West Herts Hospitals NHS Trust and East & North Herts NHS Trust

Clinical Research Professionals

Sponsor Responsibilities. Roles and Responsibilities. EU Directives. UK Law

Standard Operating Procedure. Essential Documents: Setting Up a Trial Master File. SOP effective: 19 February 2016 Review date: 19 February 2018

Training components for GCP. inspectors in PMDA. Tomonori Tateishi, MD, PhD Office of Conformity Audit, PMDA

Regulatory Inspections

Initially Submitted on 11/24/2009 Final Submission By Test6 CA on 11/24/2009 1:51 PM Approval By student13 student13 on 11/24/2009 1:52 PM Attendees

University of South Carolina. Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events Guidelines

2015 Annual FDA Medical Device Quality System Data. Inspections, FDA Form 483 Observations, and Warning Letter Citations

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 710. Good Clinical Practice AUDIT AND INSPECTION. NNUH UEA Joint Research Office. Acting Research Services Manager

Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

STUDY TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES ORIENTATION FOR NEW CLINICAL RESEARCH PERSONNEL MODULE 2

GCP Inspection by PMDA

QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES. Athena Thomas-Visel. Clinical Quality Consultant QUALITY TIPS FOR CLINICAL SITES

ONADE s Data Quality Review

Document Title: Site Selection and Initiation for RFL Sponsored Studies Document Number: 026

Transcription:

SPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Office of Compliance Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Doreen Kezer, MSN, CPC

Topics For Discussion What is good clinical practice? Role and responsibilities of a sponsor-investigator FDA inspections Suggestions for conducting a quality study 2

Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Principles/guidelines for conducting a study Ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording, and reporting trials 3

Sponsor-Investigator Dual Role An individual who both initiates and actually conducts the study Dual Responsibilities Sponsor and Investigator 4

Sponsor 5

Sponsor Responsibilities Select qualified investigators Provide them with information they need to conduct study Ensure IRB approval is obtained CFR 812.40 6

Sponsor Responsibilities (cont) Ship investigational device only to qualified investigator Maintain device accountability records Submit reports to IRBs and FDA 7

Sponsor Responsibilities (cont) Select qualified monitors Ensure proper monitoring Ensure investigator compliance 8

Monitor An individual designated by a sponsor or contract research organization to oversee the progress of an investigation. Must be qualified by training and experience to monitor the investigation 21 CFR 812.3(j) & 21 CFR 812.43(d) 9

Purpose of Monitoring Protect human subjects Ensure reliability of the data Compliance of investigator with: Protection of human subjects Protocol Applicable regulations 10

Monitoring Does the sponsor-investigator need to ensure adequate monitoring of the investigation at his/her own site? 11

YES 12

Investigator Agreement Contract between the sponsor and clinical investigator Establishes roles and responsibilities of the clinical investigator 13

Sponsor Records Correspondence with other investigators, IRBs, and FDA Signed investigator agreements Adverse device effects Device accountability Any other records 14

Sponsor Records (Device Accountability) Records: Shipment and disposition of devices including: Name and address received Type and quantity Batch number or code Disposition of device Any returns Batch number or code 15

Documentation If it is not documented it did not occur! 16

Summary of Required Reports Type Report To FDA To all Reviewing IRBs Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects 17 To Other Investigational Sites X X X Withdrawal of IRB approval X X X Withdrawal of FDA approval X X X Investigator List X Annual Progress Report X X X Recall and Device Disposition X X X Final Report X X X Use of Device Without Informed Consent X Significant Risk Determination X X X Protocol Amendments X X X Protocol Deviations X X Other Reports requested by FDA or IRBs X X

Investigator 18

Investigator Responsibilities Obtain IRB approval prior to enrolling any subjects Obtain and document informed consent Follow the protocol 19

Investigator Responsibilities (cont) Implant/use device only in/on subjects enrolled on study Ensure adverse effects (AEs) are appropriately documented and reported Maintain adequate records 20

Investigator Records Records of receipt, use, and disposition of device Any relevant observations related to the study 21

Investigator Responsibilities -Study Deviations Document dates and reasons for any deviations from the study protocol. Obtain prior approval from the sponsor, IRB, and FDA for changes or deviations from the investigational plan. Emergency deviations must be reported to the sponsor and IRB within 5 days. 22

Adverse Effect (AE) Any adverse medical occurrence that may or may not be related to the investigational device. All adverse events should be documented 23

Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) Any serious adverse effect that is possibly caused by or related to the investigational device: Not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree, or Any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device. 21 CFR 812.3(s) 24

Investigator Responsibilities-AEs and UADEs Maintain records of all AEs (anticipated or unanticipated) Report Unanticipated AEs to sponsor and IRB within 10 working days Follow the sponsor s requirements for reporting and recording of AEs and UADEs 25

FDA Is Coming! 26

OBJECTIVES BIMO PROGRAM Protect human research subjects from undue hazard or risk To ensure the quality and integrity of data submitted in support of device applications. 27

FDA INSPECTORS 28

Who Do We Inspect? COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS: CP 7348.811 - Clinical Investigator (CI) CP 7348.810 - Sponsor/Monitor/CRO CP 7348.809 - Institutional Review Board (IRB) CP 7348.808 - Good Laboratory Practices (Nonclinical Laboratories) Located at: http://www.fda.gov/ora/cpgm/default.htm#bimo 29

Types of Inspections (Devices) Routine: Pre-Market Applications (PMAs) (devices) Surveillance Directed: Investigate problems that have been identified at the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) stage Investigate complaints that have been reported to the FDA Compliance follow-up for previous deficiencies For Cause: Investigate complaints that have been reported to the FDA Usually unannounced 30

Inspection Classification NAI No action indicated VAI Voluntary action indicated OAI Official action indicated 31

Preparing for Sponsor Inspection Mock inspection (practice) Inspector may call 2-5 days ahead to announce routine inspection Inspection typically last 2-3 days (longer if necessary) Have available A person knowledgeable about the study A place to review records with access to a photocopier Have available and organized All study documents Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) 32

What Do We inspect? Sponsor Protocol (original & revisions) Investigator Agreements Sponsor/IRB/FDA/CI Correspondence Device distribution records Monitoring plan 33

What Do We inspect? Sponsor (cont) Training records Case report forms (CRFs) Adverse event records Data line listings 34

Common Sponsor Deficiencies Inadequate monitoring Failure to secure investigator compliance Inadequate device accountability Failure to obtain FDA/IRB approval 35

Preparing for CI Inspection Mock inspection (practice) Inspector may call 2-5 days ahead to announce routine inspection Inspection typically last 2-3 days (longer if necessary) Have available A person knowledgeable about the study A place to review records with access to a photocopier Have available and organized All study documents Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) 36

What Do We Inspect? Clinical Investigator Protocol Informed Consent Forms Case Report Forms Hospital records CI Progress Reports Sponsor/IRB/FDA correspondence Radiological Files Laboratory Reports Device Accountability Records Monitoring Logs SOPs Adverse Events Protocol Deviations 37

Common CI Deficiencies Failure to follow investigational plan/regulations Protocol deviations Inadequate subject protection/ic Inadequate device accountability Lack of FDA &/or IRB approval prior to the conduct of the investigation 38

Inspection Conclusion Inspector will conduct an exit interview with management A Form FDA 483-Inspectional Observations may be issued if significant deviations from the regulations were noted Opportunity to respond to observations 39

How Not to Respond to a 483 Failure to maintain complete, current and accurate case histories. Response: "It's all about dotting all the i's and crossing all t's. How many nit-picky inconsequential things could they find? It's very unfair, unfounded and unjust. "They came in here looking for something negative, and the only things they could find were clerical things and that is sad." 40

How Not to respond to a 483 Failure to adequately supervise the conduct of the study. Response: I am not, nor ever have been involved with any data collection or entry in any study. If my life depended on it, I could not access data. I do not know how. I do not know which patients are enrolled in the current FDA study. 41

How Not to Respond to a 483 Failure to ensure that the current, IRB-approved version of the informed consent was executed by each of the subjects in the study. Response: Virtually all of the serious documentation problems appear to have been the work of a single research coordinator who was delinquent in fulfilling her assigned study duties. She has been fired. 42

How Not to Respond to a 483 During the time the IRB approval had lapsed, you enrolled and performed study surgery on at least three subjects. Response: I obtained verbal IRB approval for the three patients cited on a case by case basis. 43

How Not to Respond to a 483 Device Accountability: Response: Regarding device control and accountability, you clearly then see, I can t participate in, and have no responsibility over it. The FDA investigator insisted that any device tracking is my responsibilitywhich is ludicrous and lacking in common sense. 44

How Not to Respond to a 483 Failure to adequately supervise the conduct of the study. Response: thought things were going fine but things were not getting done matters diverted my attention a partner embezzled a quarter of a million dollars An employee embezzled money, then her husband crashed the entire clinical practice computer losing months of data Excessive strife between employees and my family members Two year separation from my wife then a divorce 45

How Not to Respond to a 483 Clinical investigator responses: I don t intend to continue with this research project or do I ever intend to participate in another FDA research project.if this is the same as disqualification, then consider myself disqualified. My eyes have been opened to the fact that life is too short and this is something I need to eliminate from my life. From now on, I will follow the book to a tee. 46

How Not to Respond to a 483 Clinical investigator responses: I can t get off the boat. I don t know how you want me to respond when you ask for documentation of corrective action plans. It s like being on a boat, sailing in the ocean, it is drifting, and I can t get off. I have already spent 2,000 dollars to a person that has not given me a single document. I am currently being treated for depression and for me to worry about this issue would be counter productive for my health. 47

How Not to Respond to a 483 Clinical investigator responses: We are unavailable to review with a member of your staff regarding the impossibility of perfection with every detail of a complicated documentation system for which many of the deficiencies are truly trivial and inconsequential when placed in context. 48

SPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS Ex-China Drug Regulator to Be Executed By AUDRA ANG Associated Press Writer Published May 29, 2007, 6:15 AM CDT BEIJING -- China's former top drug regulator was sentenced to death Tuesday in an unusually harsh punishment for taking bribes to approve substandard medicines, including an antibiotic blamed for at least 10 deaths. 49

A Written Response Should Include: An evaluation of the extent of the problem Assessment of the root cause of the problem Any corrective actions Not just a statement that you will correct them, but plan to correct, implementation, training and assessment of correction Supporting documentation Any preventive actions to prevent recurrence of the problem in future studies 50

Example Response Case Report Forms (CRFs) were incomplete in that the information needed to determine study eligibility was missing. A SOP has been developed and implemented to assist with documentation practices for determining study eligibility. A copy of the procedure is attached. This SOP contains a form that will be completed by a member of the study team and confirmed and signed by an investigator prior to any subject being enrolled in the study. All study personnel have been trained on this new procedure and it was implemented on -----. After 3 months eligibility documentation practices will be evaluated to determine if this corrective action assists with ensuring all information is documented to determine eligibility. 51

Helpful Hints: Keep files organized at all times Keep ALL correspondence sponsor, IRB, monitors, study subjects letters, faxes, e-mails, memos, phone contacts Know your IRB s requirements 52

Helpful Hints: Know the sponsor s adverse event reporting requirements Know the protocol: Inclusion/exclusion criteria, study windows, study procedures Know each study staff member s roles and responsibilities the PI is ultimately responsible 53

Helpful Hints: Keep all test article accountability records: Shipping receipts, enrollment logs, dispensing logs 54

Helpful Hints: Have written procedures: SOPs, Quality Policy, training procedures, job descriptions Have a Corrective and Preventive Action Plan 55

Documentation If it is not documented it did not occur! 56

BIMO REGULATIONS (All Products) 21 CFR 50: Protection of Human Subjects 21 CFR 54: Financial Disclosure 21 CFR 56: Institutional Review Boards 21 CFR 58: Good Laboratory Practice for Non-Clinical Laboratory Studies 57

BIMO REGULATIONS (Devices) 21 CFR 807: Premarket Notification 21 CFR 809: In Vitro Diagnostic Products 21 CFR 812: Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) 21 CFR 814: Pre-Market Approval Applications (PMA) 21 CFR 820: Quality Systems Regulations 58

For More Information: FDA Home Page www.fda.gov Center for Devices and Radiological Health www.fda.gov/cdrh/ Device Advice www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice CDRH BIMO site www.fda.gov/cdrh/comp/bimo.html FDA Good Clinical Practices www.fda.gov/oc/gcp/default.htm Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Main Pagew FDA Consumer Magazine www.fda.gov/fdac/ 59

SPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS THANK YOU! QUESTIONS? Doreen Kezer doreen.kezer@fda.hhs.gov 60