Investigator Roles and Responsibilities in Clinical Device Trials

Similar documents
SPONSOR-INVESTIGATOR ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN DEVICE TRIALS

BIMO Program Update an operational perspective

FDA Inspection Readiness

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges. September 23, 2015 Northwestern University IRB Brown Bag Session

Solutions for GCP Compliance Challenges

Session 3 FDA Audits and Findings

FDA Inspectional Process in Clinical Research An FDA Perspective. Annette Melendez, MPHsN Investigator Office of Biological Products Operations

FDA Medical Device Regulations vs. ISO 14155

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 3%3&4

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Postmarketing Drug Safety and Inspection Readiness

: study utilizing trieib)(4) b)(4) I I""-", _

How to Prepare for Federal Inspections and What to Expect

WIRBinar. How to Survive an FDA Inspection. Upcoming Trainings: Contact Us: (360)

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research - Compliance Central with FDA Center Compliance Directors: Part 1

WARNING LETTER. an both of which were sponsored by. (formerly ). The products

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & Hl'NIAfV SERVICES Public Hcaffh Scn-ice WARNING LETTER

Chapter 48 - Bioresearch Monitoring

Inspections and Study Monitoring

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

Audits/Inspections Be Prepared for Anything

Essential Documents It s Not Just a Binder!

FDA s Clinical Trial Inspections in China Including FDA Overall Goals

Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES WARNING LETTER. (b) (4) clinical investigation (Protocol entitled A Phase II, Multicenter,

WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRES S

Healthcare Facility Regulation

+.,m 7. yw ~ ~ & DEC FEDERAL EXPRESS

2015 Annual FDA Medical Device Quality System Data. Inspections, FDA Form 483 Observations, and Warning Letter Citations

NOTICE OF INITIATION OF DISQUALIFICATION PROCEEDINGS AND OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN (NIDPOE) LETTER

STUDY INFORMATION POST-IRB APPROVAL FDA DEVICE (IDE) SPONSOR AND INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITY (21 CFR 812)

... f%odand DrugAdministration via Federal Express 2098 Gaither Road

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Margaret Huber, RN, CHRC Compliance Consultant Office of Research Compliance

Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Common Findings

Record or Document Type Retention Period Relevant Legal Citation(s) IRB Records: Training Records;

SAINT AGNES MEDICAL CENTER CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTER Fresno, California. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Institutional Review Board

Standard Operating Procedures

WARNING LETTER. Dear Dr. Wright : DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Notice of Initiation of Disqualification Proceeding And Opportunity to Explai n

The HIPAA Privacy Rule and Research: An Overview

TITLE: Reporting Adverse Events SOP #: RCO-204 Page: 1 of 5 Effective Date: 01/31/18

CLINICAL LABORATORY IMPROVEMENT AMENDMENTS OF 1988: HOW TO ASSURE QUALITY LABORATORY SERVICES

EXEMPT RESEARCH. 1. Overview

HIPAA & Research Overview for the Privacy Board March 22, UAMS HIPAA Office Vera M. Chenault, JD

NN SS 401 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR SITE SELECTION AND QUALIFICATION

An Update on FDA s Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies Proposed Rule

% *++V,m Food and Drug Administration WARNING LETTER

Via Federal Express IVARNING LETTER

LaTonya M. Mitchell District Director, Denver District Director Office of Regulatory Affairs Office of Global Regulatory Operations & Policy U.S.

ADVANCED PLASTIC SURGERY, PLLC. NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES

Toward Greater Scientific Rigor

Successful FDA Inspections at Investigative Sites for Clinical Trials of Drugs and Biologics

DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Document issued on: August 5, 2008

Preparing for and responding to an FDA Inspection Frank Estala Kathy James Clara Vorpahl Anna Taranova

. s%rwcu ~,+ *+ % %vd3a 7 Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: AUDIT SERVICES. Issue Date: February 13 th, Due Date: March 22 nd, 2017

Human Subject Regulations Decision Charts

1. Department of Defense (DoD) Human Subjects Protection Regulatory Requirements

The SOP applies to all human subject research falling under the purview of the University of Missouri Institutional Review Board.

General Administration GA STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Document Development and Change Control

BIMO SITE AUDIT CHECKLIST

Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors. Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research

ANNUAL POST-EMPLOYMENT CERTIFICATION & NOTIFICATION TO SENIOR OFFICIALS OF POST-GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIONS UNDER 18 U.S.C.

Document Title: Informed Consent for Research Studies

c+!!!! # -) NW DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH& HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration CBER Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested

Effective Date: April 2014 Revision: September 29, Executive Chair, Co-Chairs, NSHA REB Members, REB Office Personnel, Researchers.

Document issued on: July 8, 2010

Patient Consent Form

Page 2- Alan Rapoport, M.D.

Research Audits PGR. Effective: 12/04/2013 Reviewed: 12/04/2015. Name of Associated Policy: Palmetto Health Administrative Research Review

CLOSE OUT VISIT REPORT (NO CRF TO MONITOR)

Senior Care Pharmacy Wichita

The Queen s Medical Center HIPAA Training Packet for Researchers

FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COMPLIANCE PROGRAM GUIDANCE MANUAL PROGRAM

Training components for GCP. inspectors in PMDA. Tomonori Tateishi, MD, PhD Office of Conformity Audit, PMDA

BASSIN CENTER FOR PLASTIC SURGERY. Dr. Roger Bassin NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES

TOWN AUDITING SERVICES

Audits, Administrative Reviews, & Serious Deficiencies

A self-assessment for GxP and HIPAA concerns

Londonderry Finance Department

LifeBridge Health HIPAA Policy 4. Uses of Protected Health Information for Research

Dr. R. Sathianathan. Role & Responsibilities of Principal Investigators in Clinical Trials. 18 August 2015

Self-Monitoring Tool

Good Clinical Practice: A Ground Level View

The Clinical Research Center Research Practice Manual. Guideline for Study Document and Data Handling RPG-08. Guideline. Purpose.

Privacy Rule Overview

I. Preamble: II. Parties:

SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. HIPAA Privacy Training

BE-595M Homework Assignment Due: 3/3/08

Notice of Privacy Practices for Protected Health Information

Rhode Island Commerce Corporation. Rules and Regulations for the Innovation Voucher Program

Clinical Research Seminar

Unofficial copy not valid

Compliance Policy C-FMS Clinical Research Project Approval Application

4 ( DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH& HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

Study Start-Up SS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR PRE-STUDY SITE VISIT (PSSV)

Town of Derry, NH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL AUDITING SERVICES

Transcription:

Investigator Roles and Responsibilities in Clinical Device Trials A Total Product Lifecycle Approach to Medical Device Development: Responsibilities and Opportunities The Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research Li Ka Shing Center for Learning and Knowledge September 28-29, 2010

Sonali P. Gunawardhana M.P.H., J.D., LL.M. Regulatory Counsel Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Office of Compliance Division of Bioresearch Monitoring

Disclaimer The contents of this presentation are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the views and/or policies of the Food and Drug Administration or its staff as per 21 CFR 10.85. 3

Device Clinical Research Regulations 21 CFR 50: Protection of Human Subjects 21 CFR 54: Financial Disclosure 21 CFR 56: Institutional Review Boards 21 CFR 58: Good Laboratory Practice 21 CFR 812: Investigational Device Exemptions

CDRH BIMO INSPECTIONS Fiscal Years 2005-2009 400 300 332 336 323 301 305 200 100 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

CDRH BIMO INSPECTIONS Fiscal Years 2005-2009 Entity 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Sponsor 73 53 40 57 59 CI 180 200 183 155 163 IRB 48 59 92 88 79 GLP 31 24 8 1 4

FY09 Investigator Deficiencies Follow investigational plan, investigator agreement, or protocol Document case hx/device exposure Obtain adequate informed consent Record and report protocol deviations Control of investigational device Report UADEs

FY09 Sponsor Deficiencies Monitor study Secure investigator compliance Obtain signed Investigator Agreement Provide information to properly conduct study Maintain current investigator list Inform investigators, FDA, or IRB

Sponsor-Investigator Inspections 31 Inspections of Sponsor- Investigators performed during FY 2008 and 2009 11 Warning Letters Issued = 35%

Inspection Classification 2, 6% 13, 42% NAI VAI OAI 16, 52% N = 31

Most Frequent Investigator Violations 9/11 Failure to follow investigational plan & FDA regs 8/11 Failure to maintain records 7/11 Failure to obtain informed consent in accordance with Part 50

Most IMPORTANT Violations Overall IDE Violations Failure to submit IDE [812.20] Failure to submit IDE supplement [812.35(a)] Monitoring Violations Failure to ensure proper monitoring [812.40] *10/11 Warning Letters had one, or both of these violations

Compliance Tools Untitled/Warning letter Re-inspection Informal conference 3rd party audits Rejection of site data Disqualification CI, IRB, or GLP Invoke Application Integrity Policy Revoke marketing permit Civil Money Penalties Seizure Injunction Prosecution

CDRH BIMO Warning Letters 35 30 1 3 25 8 3 5 4 20 15 4 8 4 GLP IRB Sponsor CI 10 20 18 19 16 4 5 9 0 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

Example Of An Inadequate Response: You enrolled and performed study surgery on at least eight subjects prior to IRB approval.

Example Of An Inadequate Response: 20 out of 25 subjects Case Report Forms (CRFs) were incomplete because information needed to determine study eligibility were missing and not available in source documents.

Example Of An Inadequate Response: Failure to adequately supervise the conduct of the study.

Example Of An Inadequate Response: Failure to properly monitor the study.

Example Of An Inadequate Response: Failure to conduct the study in accordance with the investigational plan.

Notice Of Initiation Of Disqualification Proceedings And Opportunity To Explain Applies to Clinical Investigators Some clinical investigators may have already received a Warning Letter but in some cases violations discovered on the first inspection are serious enough for the Center to issue the NIDPOE.

Disqualification Of Clinical Investigators A NIDPOE letter informs the recipient clinical investigator that FDA is initiating an administrative proceeding to determine whether the clinical investigator should be disqualified from receiving investigational products pursuant to the Food and Drug Administration's regulations. Generally, FDA issues a NIDPOE letter when it believes it has evidence that the clinical investigator repeatedly or deliberately violated FDA's regulations governing the proper conduct of clinical studies involving investigational products or submitted false information to the sponsor.

Notice Of Initiation Of Disqualification Proceedings And Opportunity To Explain Consent Agreements List specific responsibilities of the Clinical Investigator in terms of coming into compliance. Can last for a specific amount of time or can be an agreement the disqualification is permanent. Can be viewed as a tool to bring the Clinical Investigator into compliance which in turn serves as a way to educate the Clinical Investigator as to their regulatory responsibility for the current and future clinical trials.

Notice Of Initiation Of Disqualification Proceedings And Opportunity To Explain What does disqualification mean for the clinical investigator? Their name is added to a list on the FDA website that indicates that they are disqualified from participation in any type of clinical trial. Generally it means that they have incurred legal fees and it can open them up to more eminent liability. Some might feel that it has had a negative impact on their reputations.

Notice Of Initiation Of Disqualification Proceedings And Opportunity To Explain What does disqualification mean for the Sponsor? The data from the disqualified clinical site can not be used in their submission. (Monetary and Ethical considerations) Sponsor is responsible for oversight of all clinical investigators so there might be some serious issues in terms of monitoring which can lead to further regulatory action.

References CDRH Homepage www.fda.gov/cdrh CDRH Learn http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/cdrhlearn/ Device Advice www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice Notice of Initiation of Disqualification Proceedings and Opportunity to Explain www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/foi/electronicreadi ngroom/ucm092185.htm

Contact Information Sonali P. Gunawardhana, M.P.H., J.D., LL.M. Regulatory Counsel Office of Compliance Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Ave. Building 66, Room 3452 Silver Spring, MD 20993 Phone: (301) 796-5635 Fax: (301) 847-8136 sonali.gunawardhana@fda.hhs.gov