UC2: Chronic Disease Management

Similar documents
Building a healthy legacy together. Presentation by Shelley Lipon, Executive Regional Director, Canada Health Infoway to ICTAM October 28, 2009

Comprehensive Protocol Feasibility Questionnaire

New Medicine Service (NMS) data definitions

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION II: CLINICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW

Ambulatory Interoperability - Proposed Final Criteria - Feb Either HL7 v2.4 or HL7 v2.5.1, LOINC

Schedule C1. Community Pharmacy Anti-Coagulation Management Services

Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel

NIPCO Patient Care Disease State Management Program Template

Definition of Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology for Hospitals Approved by the HIMSS Board of Directors April 24, 2009

BCBSM Physician Group Incentive Program

Subject: Member Pre-Authorization Page 1 of 5

UPDATE ON MEANINGFUL USE. HITECH Stimulus Act of 2009: CSC Point of View

HL7 A Quick Introduction

The Role of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in the US Drug Safety System

Floyd County Public Schools 140 Harris Hart Road NE Floyd, VA 24091

Computer Provider Order Entry (CPOE)

Patient Electronic Access Modified Stage 2: Objective 8

Medication Safety Action Bundle Adverse Drug Events (ADE) All High-Risk Medication Safety

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts Meaningful Use in 2016 The Patient Engagement Stage

(3) The limitations and exclusions listed here are in addition to those described in OAR and in each of the Division chapter 410 OARs.

Overview of Current and Future Coding. PSTAC May 18, 2010 Presentation Prepared by: Shelly Spiro

Re: HHS-OS HIT Policy Committee: Request for Comment Regarding Stage 3 Definition of Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs)

Health Management Information Systems: Computerized Provider Order Entry

the BE Technical Report

THE MEANING OF MEANINGFUL USE CHANGES IN THE STAGE 2 MU FINAL RULE. Angel L. Moore, MAEd, RHIA Eastern AHEC REC

Patient Centered Medical Home. History of PCMH concept. What does a PCMH look like? 10/1/2013. What is a Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH)?

Kern County s Health Care Coverage Initiative Network Structure: Interim Findings

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CHANNEL ISLANDS COURSE MODIFICATION PROPOSAL

COMPUTERIZED PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY (CPOE)

Care Management Policies

Global standards and interoperability in Australian healthcare

STAGE 2 PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR. Tim Proctor Users Conference 2017

June 25, Barriers exist to widespread interoperability

2011 Measures 2013 Objectives Goal is to guide and support care processes and care coordination

Via Electronic Submission to:

Medication Administration Through Existing Vascular Access

Disease State Management Clinics: A Pharmacist Perspective

Institute of Distance Learning

Draft 11/3/2017. Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

Practice Tools for Safe Drug Therapy

The Value of Interoperable Health Information Technology

ARRA New Opportunities for Community Mental Health

Patient-Centered Specialty Practice (PCSP) Recognition Program

NEW PATIENT INFORMATION

NCPDP Work Group 11 Task Group: RxFill White Paper on Implementation Issues

PCMH 2014 Recognition Checklist

Option Description & Impacts First Full Year Cost Option 1

TITLE: Processing Provider Orders: Inpatient and Outpatient

Medication Administration Through Existing Vascular Access

HIE/HIO Organizations Supporting Meaningful Use (MU) Stage 2 Goals

Coastal Medical, Inc.

The History of Meaningful Use

(b) Self-determination and participation. The resident shall have the right to:

Optimizing pharmaceutical care via Health Information Technology:

Course Descriptions for PharmD Classes of 2021 and Beyond updated November 2017

Prescriptive Authority for Pharmacists. Frequently Asked Questions for Pharmacists

LSU Ophthalmology ILH EPIC User Guide

Meaningful Use - Modified Stage 2. Brett Paepke, OD David Wolfson Marni Anderson

Appendix 4 CMS Stage 1 Meaningful Use Requirements Summary Tables 4-1 APPENDIX 4 CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

APPROACHES TO ENHANCING THE QUALITY OF DRUG THERAPY A JOINT STATEMENT BY THE CMA ANDTHE CANADIAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION

APPENDIX 2 NCQA PCMH 2011 AND CMS STAGE 1 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS

Rights and Responsibilities of Patients and Family Members

Medical Management Program

DISPENSING BY REGISTERED NURSES (RNs) EMPLOYED WITHIN REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES (RHAs)

Nova Scotia Drug Information System

Eligible Professionals (EP) Meaningful Use Final Objectives and Measures for Stage 1, 2011

The results will also be used for public reporting for MN Community Measurement on mnhealthscores.org.

Decision Support Project Team. Fall 2010

Objectives and Implementation Plan for a Managed Care Curriculum

Building photos courtesy of LLT Building Corporation

New Alignments in Data-Driven Care Coordination & Access for Specialty Products: Insights from the DIMENSIONS Report

September 16 th, Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852

Medication Management: Is It in Your Toolbox?

Michigan s Statewide Health Information Network

POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Wayne State University. Student Handbooks linear feet. 5 manuscript boxes.

Benefits Evaluation Experiences at Canada Health Infoway

European IVD Regulations and Risk Based Classification. An Overview for Global Quality Professionals

Roll Out of the HIT Meaningful Use Standards and Certification Criteria

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Advancing Care Information Performance Category Transition Measure 2018 Performance Period

ecw Integration PIX, XACML, CCD with Basic Clinical Event Notifications Project Scope Definition

Consolidated Health Informatics (CHI) Briefing to HITSP Panel

IMPORTANT UPDATE. June 2017 December, 2017 June, 2018 December, 2018 June, 2019 December, 2019

NUCLEAR MEDICINE PRACTITIONER COMPETENCIES

TECHNICAL MANUAL OPERATOR, UNIT, AND DIRECT SUPPORT MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR TENT, EXTENDABLE, MODULAR, PERSONNEL (TEMPER)

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

Section 7. Medical Management Program

PRISM Collaborative: Transforming the Future of Pharmacy PeRformance Improvement for Safe Medication Management

Enhancing E Prescribing and Medication Adherence in the CT Medicaid Population

Healthcare Referral Program Mutual Patient Care/API

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures

CMS-3819-F Condition of participation: Reporting OASIS information. (a) Standard: Encoding and transmitting OASIS data. An HHA must encode

COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE SUCCESSES IN PRIMARY CARE

Crosswalk - Requirements for Foodborne Illness Training Programs Based on Standard 5

HOME HEALTH CARE PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION

Cantonment General Hospital Delhi Cantonment Board Delhi Cantt. -10

List of Policies and Standard Operational Procedures (SOPs) for cell collection, processing and transplantation programmes

Final Meaningful Use Objectives for

SWAN Alerts and Best Practices for Improved Care Coordination

Transcription:

Document Number: HITSP 05 N 06 Date: September 17, 2005 UC2: Chronic Disease Management September 17, 2005 V1.0 Page 1 of 7

Table of Contents REVISION HISTORY... 3 DESCRIPTION:... 4 USE CASE SCOPE:... 4 STRATEGIC HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT GOALS:... 4 EXPECTED OUTCOMES:... 5 STAKEHOLDERS:... 5 INTEROPERABILITY SCENARIOS INCLUDE IN <<USE CASE NAME HERE>>:... 7 YEAR 1 SCOPE:... 7 Page 2 of 7

Revision History Version Number Description of Change Name of Author Date Published V1.0 Initial Draft Lori Fourquet 9/16/2005 V1.1 Initial Draft into ONCHIT UC Template Julie Holtzople 9/16/2005 Page 3 of 7

Overview of the Use Case Description: The Chronic Disease Management Use Case is intended to represent the long-term high level, comprehensive, components and general processes involved in the care of patients with chronic conditions requiring routine monitoring and intervention. This includes those defined by the IOM such as Diabetes and Cancer patients/survivors. Within this high level use case there are fundamental information sharing and communications required for routine care and the optimal implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Because patient care for chronic disease requires information exchange among a broad range of practitioners, diagnostic services, and pharmacies, the use case and scenarios primarily describe information movement. Use Case Scope: This use case is focused on enabling community care. This will describe process and mechanisms for the wide variety of information exchanges and communications. The specific information content to be transferred will be based upon existing information exchange standards defined by the SDOs, such as: HL-7, DICOM, NCPDP, ASTM, and ISO. Definition of information format and content for this use case is out of scope, except for the communication to the appropriate SDO of a need for such information standard (i.e. quality of life indicators). This use case will describe the information exchanges needed for direct patient care, as well as peripheral and supporting processes. Phase I of the project will be focused on direct patient care management scenarios, including provision access to patient medical summaries to the provider stakeholders within the community, and communication of clinical information exchanges/orders. Phase II will address supporting processes such as related clinical trials, epidemiology (quality, outcomes, efficacy measurement) and clinical practice guideline assessment. Strategic Healthcare Improvement Goals: This use case is focused on providing long term care for patients with chronic disease across multiple provider settings. It is expected that the successful implementation of this use case will: Improve the quality of life Improve patient health status Improve the quality of care, addressing the IOM Priority chronic conditions and measurements Improve the early detection of complicating conditions Reduce costs of care through community service channeling Page 4 of 7

Improve preventive care and on-going screening Improve the efficacy of care and cost cost/quality analysis over time Enable new medicine approaches (i.e. patient education) Improve specialty-based values, which will vary by disease Expected Outcomes: Enabling system interoperability for chronic disease management is expected to: Accomplish the strategic healthcare goals described above Improve the quality of life for patients with chronic disease Improve the feedback loop between the patient and care providers Improve patient safety Improves quality of practice Reduce clinical errors Reduce duplication, resulting in cost savings Reduce the cost of healthcare Reduce utilization of the expensive parts of the system Improve the efficiency of the healthcare process Increase patient involvement in their care Enable the aggregation of data to address the discovery and improvement of processes, data driven decision support, public health policies, and clinical practice guidelines Affect Medico-legal impact of reduced missed opportunities, and improved capabilities for risk management strategy Reduce lawsuits Stakeholders: The following is a list of the stakeholders for this use case: 1. Patient Care Providers a. Primary Care Physician and supporting staff b. Primary Care Clinics and supporting staff c. Laboratory providers d. Pharmacists and supporting staff e. Radiologists and supporting staff f. Healthcare specialists g. Ancillary practitioners (e.g. Home care, Therapists) h. Hospital and Emergency providers and supporting staff 2. Public Health: a. Tumor Registry b. Public Health Registries/Source data 3. Pharmaceutical Industry: a. Clinical trials Page 5 of 7

b. post-marketing surveillance c. Drug efficacy d. Capture of adverse drug events 4. Quality/Patient Safety: a. Clinical practice guidelines b. Opportunities for intervention c. Compliance monitoring d. HEDIS 5. Patient: a. Personal Health Record/Journaling (problems, allergy, meds, hx, lab data series, glucose/exercise/weight measures, specialty data monitoring over time) 6. Information Management Systems including those involved in: a. Document/Information Sharing systems b. Information Transfer (e-prescribing, Referral, Lab, public health, medical summary transfers) c. Hosp/ED visits/discharges d. Immunization tracking e. Prescriptions for information f. Decision support g. Scheduling h. patient communications i. reminders/recall j. Social service management k. Education l. Nutrition m. Support groups n. Information updates, o. Case Management preventive care, p. billing/eligibility/cost information and transaction systems q. Security systems (Privacy protection of patient records, Multiple Provider authentication/access control, Policy mapping) Page 6 of 7

Interoperability Scenarios include in <<Use Case Name Here>>: The following scenarios will be part of this use case: ID Number Name Scenario I UC2S1 Diabetic Patient Management Scenario Scenario II UC2S2 Cancer Patient Management Scenario Scenario III UC2S3 Practitioner Access to Patient Medical Summary (from Primary care, specialist, Lab, Emergency Department/Acute Care, home care, Physical Therapy, Long Term Care) Scenario IV UC2S4 Patient Referral (to Patient Medical Summary delivery to (Primary care, specialist, Lab, Emergency Department/Acute Care, home care, Physical Therapy, Long Term Care) Scenario V UC2S5 Electronic Transfer of Patient Assessment and Clinical Orders (lab, prescription, specialist reports, radiology, follow-up, treatment) Scenario VI UC2S6 Scheduling for routine and assessment care (appointment request, schedule, reminders) Scenario VII UC2S7 Public Health Report Submission (e.g. Tumor Registry, Public Health Registry Source Data) Scenario VIII UC2S8 Clinical Trials Scenario IX UC2S9 Post-marketing surveillance Scenario X UC2S10 Drug efficacy Scenario XI UC2S11 Capture of adverse drug events Scenario XII UC2S12 Quality/Patient Safety - Clinical practice guidelines Scenario XIII UC2S13 Quality/Patient Safety - Opportunities for intervention Scenario XIV UC2S14 Quality/Patient Safety - Compliance monitoring Scenario XV UC2S15 Quality/Patient Safety HEDIS Scenario XVI UC2S16 Integration of Personal Health Records/Journals Year 1 Scope: The following scenarios will have completed implementation guidelines published during Year 1: 1. UC4S1 Diabetic Patient Management Scenario 2. UC4S2 Cancer Patient Management Scenario 3. UC4S3 Practitioner Access to Patient Medical Summary 4. UC4S4 Patient Referral 5. UC4S5 Electronic Transfer of Patient Assessment and Clinical Orders Page 7 of 7