Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

Similar documents
Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

April Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

March Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report

Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District. Printed on recycled paper

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT CENTENNIAL TRAINING SITE COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VOLUNTEER TRAINING SITE - SMYRNA SMYRNA, TENNESSEE

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT AIRPORT TRAINING AREA BOISE, IDAHO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT HUNTER ARMY AIRFIELD SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

May Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SNAKE CREEK TRAINING SITE MIRAMAR, FLORIDA

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT IDAHO FALLS TRAINING SITE BONNEVILLE COUNTY, IDAHO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT WALLY EAGLE DROP ZONE LOVELAND, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT RAMEY LOCAL TRAINING AREA AGUADILLA, PUERTO RICO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT VAIL TREE FARM LOCAL TRAINING AREA CENTRALIA, WASHINGTON

July Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT SAN JUAN NATIONAL FOREST TRAINING AREA DOLORES, COLORADO

FINAL OPERATIONAL RANGE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PHASE I QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT REPORT LIEUTENANT COLONEL HERNAN G

Managing Range Condition Assessments: The Army s Operational Range Qualitative Assessment Program

Range Environmental Vulnerability Assessment

Public Lands Committee Briefing

MARCH Updated Guidance. EPCRA Compliance for Ranges

Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

FINAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS (EE/CA) LAND USE CONTROLS FORT BLISS, TX MILITARY MUNITIONS RESPONSE PROGRAM

Quantifying Munitions Constituents Loading Rates at Operational Ranges

Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress for FY 2015

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

FY2016 SIEVERS-SANDBERG USARC

CRS Report for Congress

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Appendix D: Restoration Budget Overview

Solutions to Unique Challenges in Sustaining the Navy s Readiness at San Clemente Island Ranges

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the United States

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Military Munitions Support Services (M2S2) Overview

EPA. Used or Fired Munitions and Unexploded Ordnance at Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Military Ranges

DOD MANUAL DOD MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE (MR) IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES

Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)

Foreword. Mario P. Fiori Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment)

CESAJ-PM (Cong) March 2015

Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress

FY2013 LTA - MARION ENGR DEPOT EAST

Environmental Restoration Program

ASTSWMO Annual Meeting October 25, 2006

Report for Congress. Defense Cleanup and Environmental Programs: Authorization and Appropriations for FY2003. Updated January 13, 2003

FY2016 AFRC FORT WADSWORTH

Meeting Minutes April 26, Project: Former Camp Butner Restoration Advisory Board (RAB)

Navy Operational Range Clearance (ORC) Plans Improve Sustainability A Case Study

EPA. Used or Fired Munitions and Unexploded Ordnance at Closed, Transferred, and Transferring Military Ranges

Army. Environmental. Cleanup. Strategy

Wildland Firefighting

MMRP Sites (Final RIP/RC): Five-Year Review Status:

EXPLOSIVES SAFETY SUBMISSION

Naval Facilities Engineering Command - Atlantic Vieques, Puerto Rico. Status Report for the Vieques Restoration Advisory Board. Through December 2008

Appendix I: Native Americans

RANGE CONDITION ASSESSMENT FIVE YEAR REVIEW FOR NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, DAHLGREN RANGES DAHLGREN, VIRGINIA JUNE 2016

Defense Environmental Funding

ATTORNEY GENERAL Environmental Protection Division. An Inventory of Its Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant Files

STATEMENT OF MR. RAYMOND F. DUBOIS, JR. DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

U^J. INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN. Prepared by the U.S. Army Environmental Center March 1999

Final RANGE CONDITION ASSESSMENT (RCA) DECISION POINT 1 RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

DoD and EPA Management Principles for Implementing Response Actions at Closed, Transferring, and Transferred (CTT) Ranges

Subj: EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW, OVERSIGHT, AND VERIFICATION OF MUNITIONS RESPONSES

FY2016. FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY Base Realignment & Closure Installation Action Plan

Defense Environmental Restoration Program/Formerly Used Defense Sites Program, NC

U.S. ARMY RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD. and TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GUIDANCE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. DoD Executive Agent for the Unexploded Ordnance Center of Excellence (UXOCOE)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTSVILLE CENTER, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1600 HUNTSVILLE. ALABAMA 3S

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

Environmental Baseline Survey for Naval Weapons Station Concord

Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) FY 2012 OCO

Former Five Points Outlying Field

MCO C465 AUG MARINE CORPS ORDER From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 8 P-1 Line #33

MMRP Site Inspections at FUDS Challenges, Status, and Lessons Learned

Draft No Further Action Proposed Plan for RVAAP-019-R-01 Landfill North of Winklepeck Munitions Response Site

Introduction DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS. Introduction Funding Conservation Restoration. Compliance. Prevention. Pollution. Forward.

S One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION

Los Angeles District

Community Relations Plan

FINAL DECISION DOCUMENT

HUNTSVILLE. Chief, Military Munitions Design Center Ordnance and Explosives Directorate. Center, Huntsville 21 November 2013

Missile Demil Execution

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ARMY. Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Budget Estimates JUSTIFICATION DATA SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS

Vol. 62 No. 29 Wednesday, February 12, 1997 p ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, and 270

Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) for the Northwest Training Range Complex (NWTRC). An EIS/OEIS is con

Construction Industry

Kansas AAP, KS Conveyance Progress Report

Fort George G. Meade and secure DoD facility former Mortar Range Site User Training Guide

Society of American Military Engineers 2008 Missouri River/TEXOMA Regional Conference

1 July Department of Defense Policy to Implement the EPA s Military Munitions Rule

Final No Further Action Proposed Plan for RVAAP-050-R-01 Atlas Scrap Yard Munitions Response Site

NAVFAC Headquarters Announces 2010 Drum-E Award Winners

State Perspective of DoD MMRP PA/SI Program

MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT (CESAJ-PM M/John Keiser)

AR No. IR No. EIELSON AFB ALASKA. Administrative Record Cover Sheet NOTES:

Military Munitions Support Services

Transcription:

FINAL Operational Range Assessment Program Phase I Qualitative Assessment Report U.S. Army Operational Range Assessment Program Qualitative Operational Range Assessments Prepared for: U.S. Army Environmental Command and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District Printed on recycled paper March 2009

ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS ARID-GEO ASROC bgs CERCLA CSM DNT DoD DODI DU E ESRI FY GW H HDSOC HMX HNAD HWAAP HWAD IRP LS M MCOC MMRP NG OB/OD ORAP PETN ppb PU RCRA RDT&E RDX SW TNT U.S. USACE USACHPPM USAEC USAEHA Army Range Inventory Database-Geodatabase Anti-Submarine Rocket Below Ground Surface Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Conceptual Site Model Dinitrotoluene Department of Defense Department of Defense Instruction Depleted Uranium Ecological receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes E designation.) Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Fiscal Year Groundwater pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes GW designation.) Human receptors identified. (This refers to range grouping; pathway designation always precedes H designation.) High Desert Special Operations Center Cyclotetramethylenetetranitramine Hawthorne Naval Ammunition Depot Hawthorne Army Ammunition Plant Hawthorne Army Depot Installation Restoration Program Limited Source Munitions used. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes applicable pathway.) Munitions Constituents of Concern Military Munitions Response Program Nitroglycerin Open Burn / Open Detonation Operational Range Assessment Program Pentaerythritoltetranitrate Parts per Billion Pathway unlikely or incomplete. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes PU designation.) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine Surface water pathway identified. (This refers to range grouping; M designation always precedes SW designation.) Trinitrotoluene United States United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine United States Army Environmental Command United States Army Environmental Hygiene Agency v

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency UXO Unexploded Ordnance WP White Phosphorus ºF Degrees Fahrenheit vi

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States (U.S.) Army is conducting qualitative assessments at operational ranges to meet the requirements of Department of Defense policy and to support the U.S. Army Sustainable Range Program. The operational range qualitative assessment (hereinafter referred to as Phase I Assessment) is the first phase of the U.S. Army Operational Range Assessment Program (ORAP). This Phase I Assessment evaluates the operational range area at Hawthorne Army Depot (HWAD) to assess whether further investigation is needed to determine if potential munitions constituents of concern (MCOC) are or could be migrating off-range at levels that may pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. In conducting the Phase I Assessment, MCOC sources, potential off-range migration pathways, and potential off-range human and ecological receptors are evaluated as appropriate. HWAD encompasses 149,402.60 acres of Mineral County, in west-central Nevada, enclosing three sides of the town of Hawthorne. HWAD is bounded by the Gillis Mountains on the northeast, Garfield Hills on the southeast, Excelsior Mountains on the south, and Wassuk Mountains on the west. The current mission of HWAD is to receive, issue, store, and dispose of conventional ammunition. The installation provides training activities, special mission assignments, as well as support for the High Desert Special Operations Center. In addition to training activities, the installation has been and currently is used for the testing of various types of ordnance. HWAD has an operational footprint consisting of 20 operational ranges covering 35,788.71 acres 1 : seven live-fire ranges; one maneuver training area; one dudded impact area; nine research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) impact areas; and two open burn / open detonation (OB/OD) ranges. The two OB/OD ranges are addressed under separate Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Part B permits. As such, these ranges are programmatically excluded from this Phase I Qualitative Assessment as the conditions of their permit already address potential migration of munitions constituents. One of the live-fire ranges is a skeet range, which is managed and operated by the town of Hawthorne for recreational use only and is, therefore, also programmatically excluded from this assessment. Additionally, there are 10 sites located within operational range areas that are being assessed under the Installation Restoration Program and, therefore, programmatically excluded from the ORAP. Potential MCOC sources at HWAD consist of current and historical firing lines, firing points, impact areas, and localized areas surrounding targets, and backstops, as well as buried munitions debris. In general, potential MCOC from primary source areas may impact soil. MCOC in soil found at source areas have the potential to migrate off-range via surface water, groundwater, and the food chain. Surface water / sediment source media also exist based on historical munitions being directly deposited into Walker Lake. No potential source-receptor interactions were determined to have an adverse effect or pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment based on surface water, sediment, fish tissue, and groundwater sampling data. Additionally, no off-range receptors are identified down gradient within the extent of ephemeral washes. 1 The total operational range area was derived from the Operational Use Area (total range area) acreage as reported in Army Range Inventory Database-Geodatabase (2005). ES-1

The 17 operational ranges evaluated at HWAD are categorized as Unlikely (e.g., Referred, Inconclusive, or Unlikely). Unlikely Five-Year Review Seventeen ranges at HWAD are categorized as Unlikely, totaling 32,390.48 acres. These ranges consist of six live-fire ranges, one maneuver training area, one dudded impact area, and nine RDT&E impact areas. Ranges where, based upon a review of readily available information, there is sufficient evidence to show that there are no known releases or source-receptor interactions off-range that could present an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment are categorized as Unlikely. Ranges categorized as Unlikely are required to be re-evaluated at least every five years. Re-evaluation may occur sooner if significant changes (e.g., change in range operations or site conditions, regulatory changes) occur that affect determinations made during this Phase I Assessment. The two OB/OD ranges and the skeet range are programmatically excluded from this Phase I Assessment. Table ES-1 summarizes the Phase I Assessment findings. ES-2

Table ES-1: Summary of Findings and Conclusions for Hawthorne Army Depot Category Unlikely Total Number of Ranges and Acreage Source(s) Pathway(s) 17 operational ranges; 32,390.48 acres Current impact areas / historical impact areas and buried munitions debris Current impact area / historical impact area and buried munitions debris Current firing lines, firing points, impact areas, localized areas surrounding targets, and backstops / historical firing points, impact areas, and buried munitions debris No source limited or no military munitions use Surface water (on-range groundwater discharge to Walker Lake) and food chain Groundwater (surficial aquifer) and food chain Surface water (ephemeral washes) and groundwater (underlying alluvial aquifer) Human Receptors Recreational users of Walker Lake Recreational users of Walker Lake Users of down gradient domestic and public use wells Not evaluated (no source identified) Ecological Receptors Lahontan cutthroat trout Lahontan cutthroat trout None identified Conclusions and Rationale five-year review. Due to surface water, sediment, and fish tissue sampling at Walker Lake. five-year review. Due to surface water, sediment, and fish tissue sampling at Walker Lake. five-year review. No ecological receptors identified and groundwater sourcereceptor interaction unlikely to pose unacceptable risk to human health. five-year review. No source was identified. ES-3