Episode Payment Models Final Rule & Analysis

Similar documents
Episode Payment Models:

Advancing Care Coordination Proposed Rule

The Pain or the Gain?

Making CJR Work for You. A Roadmap for Successful Implementation of Medicare Bundles

4/9/2016. The changing health care market THE CHANGING HEALTH CARE MARKET. CPAs & ADVISORS

Quality Provisions in the EPM Proposed Rule. Matt Baker Scott Wetzel

CPAs & ADVISORS. experience support // ADVANCED PAYMENT MODELS: CJR

MEDICARE COMPREHENSIVE CARE FOR JOINT REPLACEMENT MODEL (CCJR) Preparing for Risk-Based Outcomes of Bundled Care 8/12/2015.

Alternative Payment Models: Trends and Tactics for Success

CJR Final Rule: Policy Changes and Strategies for Bundled Payment Success

Redesigning Post-Acute Care: Value Based Payment Models

The New World of Value Driven Cardiac Care

Quality Provisions in the EPM Final Rule. Matt Baker Scott Wetzel

MEDICARE UPDATES: VBP, SNF QRP, BUNDLING

PREPARING FOR RISK-BASED OUTCOMES OF BUNDLED CARE

Learning Objectives. CMS Plans to Transform Healthcare. Leveraging CDI to Improve Performance Under Alternative Payment Model (APM) Methodology

HOSPITALS & HEALTH SYSTEMS: DATA-DRIVEN STRATEGY FOR BUNDLED PAYMENT SUCCESS 4/19/2016. April 20, 2016

Data-Driven Strategy for New Payment Models. Objectives. Common Acronyms

Furthering the agency s stated intention to pay for value over volume,

MEDICARE FFY 2017 PPS PROPOSED RULES OVERVIEW OHA Finance/PFS Webinar Series. May 10, 2016

Questions and Answers on the CMS Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Readiness Kit

PAYMENT INNOVATION: Real Examples of Client Implementation. Craig Tolbert & Michael Wolford

The IRF PPS FY 2017 Final Rule: What It Portends for Our Future

Summary of U.S. Senate Finance Committee Health Reform Bill

What 2017 Holds for Medicare Value-Based Transformation: Finalization of the Advancing Care Coordination Rule and Much More

Comparison of Bundled Payment Models. Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4. hospitals, physicians, and post-acute care where

CMS AMI and CABG Bundled Payment Initiative AMGA HF Collaborative December 13, 2016

Quality, Cost and Business Intelligence in Healthcare

Succeeding in Value-Based Care CareConnect Journey

Moving the Dial on Quality

Surgical Directions

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Bundled Payments to Align Providers and Increase Value to Patients

Summary and Analysis of CMS Proposed and Final Rules versus AAOS Comments: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR)

4/26/2016. The future is not what it used to be. Driving Transformation for Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) Understand Redesign Align

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

Partners in the Continuum of Care: Hospitals and Post-Acute Care Providers

Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013)

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR): Understanding the CMS Mandatory TJR Bundling Webinar

Medicare, Managed Care & Emerging Trends

A Brave New World: Lessons Learned From Healthcare Reform. Brandy Shumaker, MBA, LPTA, LNHA Regional Vice President HealthPRO/Heritage

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

CJR Model Update: December 2017 Final Rule and Interim Final Rule with Comment

Value Based Care in LTC: The Quality Connection- Phase 2

Alternative Payment Models and Health IT

Health System Transformation. Discussion

The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovations: Programs & Initiatives

Swapping, Kickbacks, Fair Market Value: Risks for a Post-Acute Provider

Post-Acute Care Networks: How to Succeed and Why Many Fail to Deliver JULY 18, 2016

Medi-Pak Advantage: Reimbursement Methodology

What s Next for CMS Innovation Center?

Financial Policy & Financial Reporting. Jay Andrews VP of Financial Policy

Succeeding in a New Era of Health Care Delivery

Value Based Care: Trends for Boston Chicago Houston Los Angeles Miami San Francisco Washington, DC

3/16/2016. Swapping, Kickbacks, Fair Market Value: Risks for a Post-Acute Provider. AKS designed to prevent improper referrals, which can lead to:

The Challenges and Opportunities in Using Data Bundled Payment, Care Improvement

Structuring Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacements Collaborator Agreements

PROPOSED POLICY AND PAYMENT CHANGES FOR INPATIENT STAYS IN ACUTE-CARE HOSPITALS AND LONG-TERM CARE HOSPITALS IN FY 2014

Maximizing Success in a Bundled Payment Environment

Post-Acute Care Networks: How to Succeed and Why Many Fail to Deliver JULY 18, 2016

Reinventing Health Care: Health System Transformation

FY 2014 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar

Medicare P4P -- Medicare Quality Reporting, Incentive and Penalty Programs

agenda Speaker Introductions Audience Poll Understanding Bundled Payments Importance of Physician Alignment Best Practices for Physician Engagement

The Future of Delivery System Reform in Medicare: Assessing the Evidence and Looking Ahead

HEALTH CARE REFORM IN THE U.S.

Quality Based Impacts to Medicare Inpatient Payments

The Current State of CMS Payfor-Performance. HFMA FL Annual Spring Conference May 22, 2017

Regulatory Advisor Volume Eight

Bundled Payments. AMGA September 25, 2013 AGENDA. Who Are We. Our Business Challenge. Episode Process. Experience

Post-Acute Care. December 6, 2017 Webinar Louise Bryde and Doug Johnson

Our comments focus on the following provisions of the Proposed Rule:

Medicare Value-Based Purchasing for Hospitals: A New Era in Payment

Updates from CMS: Value-Based Purchasing, ACOs, and Other Initiatives The Seventh National Pay for Performance Summit March 20, 2012

paymentbasics The IPPS payment rates are intended to cover the costs that reasonably efficient providers would incur in furnishing highquality

Distribution of Post-Acute Care under CJR Model of Lower Extremity Joint Replacements for MS-DRG 470

CMS in the 21 st Century

The Future of Healthcare Delivery; Are we ready?

What is Value-Based Care

Risk Sharing in Medicare: Can it Work for You?

Mastering the Mandatory Elements of the Affordable Care Act. Melinda Hancock Walter Coleman

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

Bundled Payment Primer

October 3, Dear Dr. Conway:

1/14/2013. Emerging Healthcare Issues: How Will They Impact Hospital Reimbursement? EMERGING HEALTHCARE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

PHCA Webinar January 30, Latsha Davis & McKenna, P.C. Kimber L. Latsha, Esq.

Health Care Evolution

Retrospective Bundles

Bundled Payments KEY CAPABILITIES. for working with the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

HACs, Readmissions and VBP: Hospital Strategies for Turning Lemons into Lemonade

2013 Health Care Regulatory Update. January 8, 2013

Healthcare Leadership Council: John Perticone Golden Living 3/9/2016

THE ALPHABET SOUP OF MEDICAL PAYMENTS: WHAT IS MACRA, VBP AND MORE! Lisa Scheppers MD FACP Margo Ferguson MT MSOM

Future of Quality Reporting and the CMS Quality Incentive Programs

Delivery System Reform The ACA and Beyond: Challenges Strategies Successes Failures Future

Payment Methodology. Acute Care Hospital - Inpatient Services

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2016

Transcription:

Episode Payment Models Final Rule & Analysis February 15, 2017

Agenda Overview Changes from Proposed Rule Categorization of Episodes Episode Attribution Reconciliation Quality Performance Cardiac Rehab Incentive Program Data Analysis Q&A

Overview Mandatory All hospitals in selected MSAs must participate Few exclusions (CAHs and BPCI participants in the same DRGs) Surgical Hip/Femur Fracture (SHFFT): DRGs 480-482 Cardiac AMI DRGs 280-282 PCI DRGs 246-251 with AMI diagnosis CABG DRGs 231-236 Modifies CJR to align with EPM Effective July 1, 2017 4.5 years (July 1, 2017- December 31, 2021)

Overview 90 day episode bundles Begin with acute care stay Episodes/bundles include initial inpatient acute stay plus all Medicare FFS Part A and Part B covered services for 90 days post-discharge Some exceptions for CMS identified unrelated services/diagnoses All providers continue to receive FFS payments as usual FFS payments are retrospectively reconciled to targets Hospitals own the bundles At risk for Medicare spending in excess of targets Rewarded for Medicare spending below targets Quality metrics must be met Gainsharing with physicians and partner providers is allowed

EPM Beneficiaries Beneficiaries included Medicare FFS as primary payer (no MA coverage) Enrolled in both Part A and B the during the entire episode Does not have ESRD Medicare coverage Not covered under United Mine Workers of America health plan Not aligned to: Next Gen ACO Comprehensive ESRD Care Initiative ACO with downside risk MSSP Track 3 Not already in any BPCI model episode

Final Rule Updates EPMs PR EPMs FR Selected MSAs 67 for SHFFT; 98 for CAD TBD 67 for SHFFT; 98 for Cardiac Target Structure by DRG Waivers Risk Sharing (Financial Arrangements) By DRG with chaining AMI stratification for CABG readmission DRG CABG stratification for index admission with AMI or MCC SNF Waiver on or after April 1, 2018; not available for CABG or SHFFT Adds the ability to collaborate with CAHs and ACOs By DRG Same Same Same Same Data Availability Summary and Claims upon request Same

Final Rule Updates Targets Discount Hospital Specific vs. Regional Baseline Treatment of reconciliation payments and repayments Episode cancellation EPMs PR PY 1: No downside risk 3% PY 2-5 3% Adjusted for quality performance PY 1,2 1/3 Region; 2/3 Hospital PY 3 2/3 Region; 1/3 Hospital PY 4,5 100% Region 3 Year Baseline CY 2013-2015; updated every other year Included in update of baseline When beneficiary dies during anchor stay or if beneficiary initiates any BPCI episode at any time during an EPM episode EPMs FR PY 1: Same PY 2: Voluntary downside risk 3% PY 3-5: 3% Adjusted for quality performance Same Same Same When beneficiary dies at any point during episode or if beneficiary initiates any BPCI episode at any time during an EPM episode

Final Rule Updates Targets VBP, HAC, Readmissions Wage Adjustment Prospective Operating and Capital EPM FR Adjusted out of both targets and performance Adjusted out of individual claims at provider specific level; added back at attributed hospital, 70% labor share Announce prior to start of each quarter; changing Oct.1 and Jan.1 of each CY Includes operating and capital payments EPMs PR Same Same Same Same

Final Rule Updates - Limits Stop-Loss Limits Stop-Gain Limits Episode level stoploss EPM PR Year 1: N/A Year 2: 5% Year 3: 10% Years 4-5: 20% Additional protections for Rural, SCH, MDH, RRC Year 1-2: 5% Year 3: 10% Years 4-5: 20% 2 SD of regional mean by target category EPMs FR Year 1: N/A Years 2-3: 5% Year 4: 10% Year 5: 20% Additional protections for Rural, SCH, MDH, RRC Same Same

Final Rule Updates - Quality SHFFT Measures EPM PR TKA Complications, HCAHPS, Voluntary Patient Reported Outcomes EPMs FR Same Cardiac Measures Quality Performance AMI: Mortality, Excess Days Acute Care, HCAHPS, Voluntary hybrid mortality; CABG: Mortality, HCAHPS Quality Composite Score: Performance + Improvement+ Voluntary Measure Must meet a minimum score on composite measure for reconciliation; Discount percentage varies by score. Addition CABG: Composite CABG voluntary data submission Same

No More Chaining

Hospital Attribution For Transfers

Reconciliation Performance Period Episode Count (a) Performance Period Episode Target $ (b) Total Performance Target $ (a*b) Total Actual Performance $ (c) Reconciliation Amount $ ([a*b]-c) Price DRG and Stratifier AMI 281 w/o CABG Readmission 100 $24,000 $2,400,000 $2,200,000 $200,000 AMI 280 w/o CABG Readmission 10 $40,000 $400,000 $550,000 -$150,000 Hospital A Total 110 $24,455 $2,800,000 $2,750,000 $50,000 Providers continue to bill and will be paid as usual First reconciliation will take place 3 months after the end of the first performance year. Final reconciliation will take place 12 months later to ensure all claims runout is captured Same process for years 2 through 5

Quality Composite score methodology Based on each hospital s performance compared to the nation Hospitals earn points for each measure Measure scores are individually weighted Transparency Data is reported on Hospital Compare 30-day preview period

Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payments Encourages the use of Cardiac Rehab and Intensive Cardiac Rehab following AMI or CABG Effective: July 1, 2017 December 31, 2021 90 MSAs: 45 MSAs overlap with EPM HCPCS codes: 93797,93798,G0422,G0423 Physician claim with POS code 11 or Outpatient claim Visits 1-11: $25 per visit, 12 th + visit $175 per visit; paid retrospectively on an annual basis

Analysis

Data Source CYs 2013-2015 Medicare SAF Inpatient PPS including capital Hospital outpatient PPS Home health PPS Skilled nursing facility PPS Inpatient rehab PPS Hospice DME (5% national sample extrapolated) Physician and other Part B services (5% national sample extrapolated) Regional benchmarks Census Region Wage adjusted to hospital wage index Cells<11 redacted per CMS Data Use Agreement

Exclusions Beneficiaries Medicare Advantage enrollees Those without both Part A and Part B Medicare ESRD enrollees Deaths during the episode Payment adjustments Medicare Indirect Medical Education (IME) Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Value Based Purchasing Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program penalty Hospital-Acquired Conditions penalty

Estimated Impact AMI model: AMI MS-DRGs 280-282 and those Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) MS-DRGs 246-251 also containing AMI diagnosis codes CABG model: MS-DRGs 231-236 SHFFT model: MS-DRGs 480-482

Estimated Impact Target CY 2013-2015 baseline experience trended to 2015 dollars High cost episodes trimmed at 2 standard deviations of regional mean 2/3 hospital baseline average, 1/3 regional baseline average (100% region for small volume hospital) 3% reduction applied to average Hospital payments CY 2015 High cost episodes trimmed at 2 standard deviations of regional mean Due to claim run-out 2015 reflects approximately 7 months of anchor admissions (episodes); volume annualized

Comparative Reports Hospital payments CY 2015 average by model (AMI, CABG, SHFFT) Average Payment NOT trimmed for high cost episodes Volume annualized Regional payments CY 2015 average by model (AMI, CABG, SHFFT) Average Payment NOT trimmed for high cost episodes Volume annualized Case mix adjusted to match hospital episode mix Hospital wage index applied

Comparative Reports

Comparative Reports Numerator = total episode costs by claim type Denominator Units = claims or days for SNF or visits for Home Health Denominator Total Episodes (230 in this example)

Comparative Reports 80% of Episode 35% of Episode

Comparative Reports Regional Average minus 3%: $55,600 Average PAC spend $12,200 Hospital would need to reduce average by ~ $3,000 to break even

Comparative Reports Why is my anchor admission average more than the region s? More inpatient acute high cost outliers than the region

Additional Data Resources Evaluating the Risks and Opportunities of Bundled Payment Programs Tuesday, February 28 th @ 3p EST Registration link: https://datagen.webex.com/mw3100/mywebex/def ault.do?siteurl=datagen&service=6

Contacts Kelly Price Vice President and Chief of Healthcare Analytics (518) 431-7629 kprice@hanys.org Darcie Hurteau Director, DataGen Group (518) 431-7695 dhurteau@hanys.org Susan McDonough Senior Director, KeySTATS National (518) 431-7710 smcdonou@hanys.org 27