Arkansas Medicaid. Non-Emergency Transportation (NET) Survey Results

Similar documents
Arkansas Medicaid. TEFRA Survey Results

ARKANSAS MEDICAID. Beneficiary Satisfaction Survey Results

Independent Assessment of the Florida Medicaid NET Program

Scope of Service Transportation (Specialized Transportation)

Provider Service Expectations Transportation Services SPC 107 Provider Subcontract Agreement Appendix N

Non-Emergency Medical Transportation

Appendix B: WIC Provider Survey Results and Analysis

Non-Emergency Medical Transportation

1. Non-Emergent Transportation Providers

Arkansas Organized Care Model

State Grant for Assistive Technology Program - RSA-664 North Dakota State Plan for FY (submitted FY 2012) H224A120034

2018 Modified Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Professionals (EPs)*

VILLAGE OF OAK BROOK REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL LAST-MILE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES JANUARY 2018

Florida Medicaid Non-emergency Transportation Beneficiary handbook

Oklahoma Health Care Authority. ECHO Adult Behavioral Health Survey For SoonerCare Choice

Wisconsin Hospitals FAQ

Annual Program Evaluation Management Report

UnitedHealthcare Community Plan 2016 Long Term Care Member/Responsible Party Satisfaction Survey

King County Regional Support Network

LEGISLATIVE REPORT NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH TRANSFORMATION CENTER (TRANSFORMATION INNOVATIONS CENTER) PROGRAM DESIGN AND BUDGET PROPOSAL

Executive Director s Report: Customer Experience Update

Other languages and formats

Yeap Transport Pte Ltd EtonHouse School Bus Transport Registration Form (Broadrick)

Paula Stone Deputy Director, DMS, DHS

THE ROLE OF THE OMBUDSMAN IN LTC

Step 4: To schedule a ride or check the status of your application call RIDEASSIST at Press Option 2#

Using Transportation Voucher Programs to Support Low-Wage Earners and Workers with Disabilities (October 30, 2008 Session) Follow-up Q and A

A Guide to Accessing Quality Health Care

Making the Most of Your Florida Medicaid and ibudget Services

Participant Satisfaction Survey Summary Report Fiscal Year 2012

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2015

Arkansas Department of Human Services

TRANSLINK REIMBURSEMENT GUIDE

notice of public hearing

Application for a 1915(c) Home and Community-Based Services Waiver

Comprehensive Child and Family Assessment & Wrap-Around CCFA/WA Fiscal Year 2013

Texas Department of Transportation Page 1 of 71 Public Transportation. (a) Applicability. The United States Congress revised 49

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2016 Executive Summary

Quality Management Report 2018 Q1

Arkansas Provider E-News

Objectives for Financial Control over Grant Programs

WELCOME TO THE MEDICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM! (MATP)

The Settlement Home Transitional Living Program. Application Form

Department of Behavioral Health

Sutter-Yuba Mental Health Plan

Title VI Program. Date Adopted: June 2009-Revised November 2013 Updated May I. Title VI Program Statement

The Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System (SQRMS)

Karen Kimsey, Deputy Director, Complex Care & Services Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services National Association of Medicaid Directors

PROVIDER NEWSLETTER ARTC18-H Arkansas Total Care, Inc. All rights reserved.

SURVEY REPORT. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board STATE OF THE COMMUTE. From the Metropolitan Washington DC Region

Guide to Accessing Quality Health Care Spring 2017

Provider Service Expectations Personal Emergency Response System (PERS) SPC Provider Subcontract Agreement Appendix N

Mission Statement. Core Values

BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT MAJOR SERVICE CHANGE TO 595 EXPRESS SUNRISE - FORT LAUDERDALE. A Title VI Service Equity Analysis

Provider Enrollment 2014 HP - Fiscal Agent for the Arkansas Division of Medical Services

EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION

(1) The consumer is enrolled in the PASSPORT program;

Transforming Care for Vulnerable Populations:

CONTENTS 17

Fordingbridge. Hearts At Home Care Limited. Overall rating for this service. Inspection report. Ratings. Requires Improvement

Arkansas Department of Human Services

Quality Assurance in Minnesota 2007

Guide to Accessing Quality Health Care Spring 2017

Oregon s Health System Transformation & The Innovator Agent Role

STAR Kids Update. Medicaid and CHIP Division Texas Health and Human Services Commission. August 2016

MTA Flint Your Ride Plus

Frequently Asked Questions About IRIS and Family Care Organizations

Information Memorandum

Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Project

Community Alternatives Program for Disabled Adults/CAP/DA. Antoinette Allen-Pearson Joanna Isenhour December 14, 2015

Scope of Service Home Delivered Meals

Volunteers of America of Oklahoma Job Description. Developmental Disabilities Program Coordinator or assigned House Manager

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on O L I C Y

Brittany Turner, 2015 PharmD Candidate 1 Justin Campbell, PharmD 2 Katie McKinney, PharmD, MS, BCPS 2

STRATEGIES FOR INCORPORATING PACE INTO STATE INTEGRATED CARE INITIATIVES

Medicaid and Special Education Transportation Services

Measures That Matter: Simplifying Clinical Quality

FEDERAL FUNDS ARE FLOWING: WHO'S GETTING WHAT, WHERE AND WHY?

1115 Waiver Renewal Tribal Consultation June 23, New Mexico Human Services Department

February October Health Care Spending Trends in New York State

Rich Fitzgerald County Executive. Welcome! Thank you for your interest in using the Medical Assistance Transportation Program (MATP).

Please refer to the page(s) as listed below for the contact number of the Community Transport operator(s) serving each respective parish listed:

Humana At Home-Star Member Talking Points

Maternal and Child Health Services Title V Block Grant for New Mexico Executive Summary Application for 2016 Annual Report for 2014

Transportation Provider Forum

DRUG MEDI-CAL ORGANIZED DELIVERY SYSTEM (DMC-ODS) PERFORMANCE METRICS. (version 6/23/17)

Yale University 2017 Transportation Survey Report February 2018

ArPath: Advancing Electronic LTSS Systems in Arkansas

Comment Template for Care Coordination Standards

MAXIMUS Webinar Series

Traffic Enforcement. Audit Report. August City of Austin Office of the City Auditor

HealthPartners Inspire (SNBC) Overview

OFFICIAL NOTICE DMS-2003-A-2 DMS-2003-II-6 DMS-2003-SS-2 DMS-2003-R-12 DMS-2003-O-7 DMS-2003-L-8 DMS-2003-KK-9 DMS-2003-OO-7

Non-Emergency Transportation. SoonerRide. Discharge Manual

Inspecting Informing Improving. Patient survey report ambulance services

Independent Living Services - ILS Ayrshire Housing Support Service Cumbrae House 15A Skye Road Prestwick KA9 2TA

Patient Experience Report: NHS Cambridgeshire and Peterborough CCG Health Care NHS Trust

City Year Secret Shopper Program

Medicaid Managed Specialty Supports and Services Concurrent 1915(b)/(c) Waiver Program FY 17 Attachment P7.9.1

Oregon Health Authority Key Performance Measures Biennium

Transcription:

Arkansas Medicaid Non-Emergency Transportation (NET) Survey Results 2017

Non-Emergency Transportation (NET) The State of Arkansas Division of Medical Services (DMS) has contracted with AFMC, to survey beneficiaries who have received transportation services under the Non-Emergency Transportation waiver. This beneficiary satisfaction survey asks questions about beneficiaries experiences scheduling a ride with their transportation broker, the quality of the rides, and how well the Non- Emergency Transportation system met any special needs they had. The information received will help DMS determine which services beneficiaries use and how beneficiaries evaluate the Non-Emergency Transportation program and its services. Data collection occurred from September to December 2017. This is the 13th year for the Non-Emergency Transportation Survey. 1

Who was Surveyed All Medicaid beneficiaries who utilized Non-Emergency Transportation program services between Jan. 1 and June 30, 2017, were eligible to participate. From this group, AFMC mailed surveys to 2,011 randomly selected Medicaid beneficiaries. After excluding beneficiaries with undeliverable addresses, 1,653 beneficiaries received a survey. How Many Responded AFMC received surveys from 626 beneficiaries before the cutoff date. Of those, 590 were eligible for analysis, resulting in a final analyzable rate of 35.7 percent. 2

Overall Quality and Satisfaction 2017 Survey participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with the following on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being worst possible and 10 being best possible. The scores below represent an average of all responses received. Scheduling a ride 8.32 Quality of ride 8.28 Non-Emergency Transportation program 8.37 Of the beneficiaries who responded, the percentage of beneficiaries indicating a high degree of satisfaction (a score of 8 or higher): Scheduling a ride 74.4% Quality of ride 72.8% Non-Emergency Transportation program 73.4% 3

Self-Reported Utilization Rates Percentage of respondents who reported: Got a ride (in past 12 months) 98.4% Got frequent rides (four or more rides in 12 months) 70.7% Needed help from the driver getting in and out of the vehicle 33.8% Have a hearing impairment 8.0% Used a wheelchair or other equipment 25.1% Rode weekly to appointments 18.2% 4

Access and Availability of Services 94.4% of respondents reported little or no problem getting the driver to help them get in and out of the van or car. 92.5% of respondents reported little or no problem getting a ride because of hearing impairment. 96.2% of respondents reported little or no problem getting a van that could make room for their equipment or meet any other special needs. 88.2% of respondents reported little or no problem getting rides to and from their regularly scheduled appointments. 5

Ease of Getting a Ride 83.0% of respondents reported they usually or always were able to schedule a ride with one phone call. 81.2% of respondents reported they never or sometimes needed their doctor s approval in order to schedule a ride. 97.7% of respondents reported that they never or sometimes had trouble scheduling a ride because they spoke a different language. 6

Timeliness and Reliability 87.8% of respondents reported their driver usually or always showed up at their home on time to take them to their scheduled appointment. 86.6% of respondents reported their driver never or sometimes dropped them off for their appointment too early (more than 30 minutes). 95.8% of respondents reported their driver never or sometimes dropped them off late for their appointment. 79.6% of respondents reported they never or sometimes waited more than 30 minutes to be picked up after their appointment was over. 84.4% of respondents reported that their driver usually or always picked them up after their appointment to take them home. 7

Courtesy of Staff 90.8% of respondents agreed that the transportation staff always or usually treated them with courtesy and respect when they called to get a ride. 91.6% of respondents agreed that the transportation staff always or usually treated them with courtesy and respect during the ride. Safety 93.7% of beneficiaries surveyed said that the driver usually or always drove safely. 92.2% of beneficiaries surveyed said that the driver usually or always made sure riders wore seat belts. 8

About AFMC AFMC provides utilization review and quality assurance services for Non-Emergency Transportation and other waivered managed care programs. Community-based and clinically oriented, AFMC works collaboratively with health care plans, providers, facilities and physicians to identify opportunities for improvement and encourage innovation in health care. AFMC strives to ensure health care quality in a meaningful and effective way by initiating quality improvement projects and disseminating information about best practices. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: AFMC 1020 W. 4TH ST., SUITE 300 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 501-375-1200 TOLL FREE: 1-888-987-1200 FAX: 501-375-1201

AFMC DEVELOPED THIS MATERIAL UNDER CONTRACT WITH THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF MEDICAL SERVICES. WE ARE NOT PROVIDING LEGAL OR PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE. WE MAKE NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, ON ANY SUBJECT INCLUDING COMPLETENESS AND FITNESS OF THE INFORMATION FOR ANY PURPOSE. THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS MATERIAL IS CONSISTENT WITH DHS POLICY AS OF SEPTEMBER 2017. IF ANY ARKANSAS DHS POLICY CHANGES MADE AFTER SEPTEMBER 2017 ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THIS MATERIAL, THE POLICY CONTROLS. ARKANSAS DHS IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH TITLES VI AND VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. REVISED MAY 2018