University of Houston Procurement Process for Non-Construction and Non- Renovation Contracts Costing More than $1 Million

Similar documents
UH SYSTEM PURCHASING GUIDELINES

RFP B Program Administrator

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS G ELLUCIAN (Datatel) COLLEAGUE CONVERSION TO MS SQL AND RELATED UPGRADES PROJECT

Request for Proposals. For RFP # 2011-OOC-KDA-00

PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 17, 2018

PROCUREMENT AND PROPERTY SERVICES P. O. Box NACOGDOCHES, TX REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP NUMBER REALTOR-2016

THE RFP PROCESS. Back to the Basics

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY REGARDING:

Below are five basic procurement methods common to most CDBG projects:

ADDENDUM # /JSW Professional Engineering Services to Test, Adjust, and Balance HVAC Systems

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES

STANDARD PROCEDURE Number: S410.10

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For East Bay Community Energy Technical Energy Evaluation Services

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY (DC WATER) REQUEST FOR QUOTE RFQ 18-PR-DIT-27

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) AIRPORT ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT MINOT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Request for Qualifications No. RFQ Pay Card for Payroll Services. for. Seattle Public Schools. Submittal Deadline: Date: April 6, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS MASON COUNTY AIRPORT TXDOT CSJ NO. 1714MASON

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK SERVICES

RFQ A-07 / FOR FF&E CONSULTING AND COORDINATION SERVICES FOR VARIOUS MEASURE B BOND PROJECTS

TOPIC: CONTRACTS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SECTION 17.0 PAGE 1 OF 38 EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 1, 2017 REVISION #4: MARCH 1, 2017

UNC School of the Arts Procurement & Contracting Essentials. The Guide to Successful Contracts and Procurements at UNCSA

WESTMINSTER SCHOOL DISTRICT NUTRITION SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FRESH PRODUCE 17/ For: July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019

DOAS State Purchasing Toolbox GA Fiscal Management Conference September 23, 2013

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Design-Build of General Aviation Terminal Building. RFP# AIR/17-012, page 1

UCLA Policy 740: Purchasing Goods and Services

Request for Qualifications Construction Manager

Request for Proposal (RFP)

SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE

Addendum No. 2 April 15, 2015 Architectural Design Services Requirements Contracts Request for Qualifications Project No.

ANNUAL REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Design Related Consulting & Support Services

201 North Forest Avenue Independence, Missouri (816) [September 25, 2017] REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL GRADUATION CAPS AND GOWNS

Design-Build Procurement Overview Manual. Alternative Project Delivery

Welcome to the City of Chicago. Department of Procurement Services

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

RFP FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

LABAVN LOS ANGELES BUSINESS ASSISTANCE VIRTUAL NETWORK ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS

How To Do Business With Orange County Public Schools. Procurement Services 445 W. Amelia Street Orlando, FL

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Athletic Facility Architectural Services

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Request for Qualifications. Construction Management at Risk Services - William J. Rish Recreational Park Improvements RFQ-REDM17/ ADDENDUM #1

ON-THE-JOB TRAINING REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RESPONDENTS ORIENTATION/TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SESSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS July 8, 2013

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS

Request for Qualifications Construction Manager at Risk Contract

SECTION 9: FORMAL PROCEDURES

Allegany County, MD Request for Proposal: Printing Services for Destination Guide

Request for Qualifications No. RFQ Professional Services Consultants. for. High School Professional Development. for. Seattle Public Schools

Wayne County Community College District District Office Building 801 W. Fort Street Fourth Floor Purchasing Conference Room Detroit, MI 48226

Sole Source/ Proprietary Request Form

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, Inc. Request for Proposals #18-01 RGGI Auction Services Contractor. June 18, 2018

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

OHIO TURNPIKE AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION

Pre-RFP Issuance Document Explanation of Document Status Notes Bid and Proposal Checklist (requires signature during various steps of the process)

KDOT Procurement Guidelines for STP/CMAQ Funded Planning, Education, and Outreach Projects Effective 10/1/12

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES OFFICE OF CHILD WELFARE

Pre-Bid Conference RCC Employee Parking Lot Contract Number /22/18

EFFICIENCY MAINE TRUST REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR VIDEO SERVICES EM Date Issued: August 31, Closing Date: September 30, 2016

TORNILLO ISD REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR 2016 BOND PROJECTS RFQ NO

Board of Regents State of Iowa. For CONSULTING SERVICES FOR A SEARCH TO IDENTIFY CANDIDATES FOR THE NEW PRESIDENT FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) Community Center and Pool Design. City of Fircrest Department of Parks and Recreation, Fircrest, Washington

TABLE OF CONTENTS JEFFERSON - CYPRESS RIVER AIRPORT TXDOT CSJ NO. 1819JFRSN

WEST VIRGINIA HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY COMMISSION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS VERIFICATION AND DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RFP #19007.

Town of Derry, NH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL AUDITING SERVICES

DOING BUSINESS WITH THE. Orange County Board of County Commissioners. Orange County Procurement Division

OREGON VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION

MISSISISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY Request for Proposals (RFP) MSU #18 03 Communications as a Service Solution

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INSPECT, SAMPLE, AND TEST FOR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL AND MONITOR ABATEMENT PROJECTS PUBLICATION

ATTENTION DESIGN FIRMS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR Catering & Event Management Services at Carl M. Levin Public Dock and Terminal

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: AUDIT SERVICES. Issue Date: February 13 th, Due Date: March 22 nd, 2017

EFFICIENCY MAINE TRUST REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR Forward Capacity Market Support Services RFP NUMBER EM

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority BID # ADDENDUM NO.3

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: Community Activity Implementation for USAID Sharekna Project to Support Youth and Empower Local Communities

Georgia Institute of Technology Technology Fee Funding Proposal Request Process

Chabot-Las Positas Community College District

COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS #2075. For. Student Refund and Financial Aid Disbursement Payments

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Request for Proposal for Digitizing Document Services and Document Management Solution RFP-DOCMANAGESOLUTION1

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP): D2D LOCAL SUPPLIER CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM

Attention Design Firms

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

2018 Pipelines Engineering Services Boerne Stage Road, West Avenue, and Highway 90 & General McMullen

Request for Proposals. Community Needs Assessment Primary Data Collection: Surveys Focus Groups Photovoice RFP

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) K430 INITIATIVE 502 CONSULTING SERVICES. To request this information in alternative formats call (360)

The First Microfinance Bank Afghanistan (FMFB-A)

Request for Proposal(s) Training Business Intelligence with Operational Integration Services

Small Business Reserve Procurement for the UMBC Pest Management Service Contract RFP #BC K. Pre-Proposal Meeting April 27, 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Gainesville City School System

Colquitt Regional Medical Center

SCHOOL BOARD ACTION REPORT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR Network Penetration and Vulnerability Testing

Addendum 2 to DOH Immunizations Marketing Campaign. This addendum serves as notice of the following answers provided by the Department:

HOW TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE STATE. State of Louisiana Office of State Procurement

BIDS MAY BE SUBMITTED BY OR TIME RECORDED MAIL DELIVERY (UPS, FEDEX)

Workshop Synopses. Classes include:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) THIS IS NOT AN ORDER

Transcription:

1. UH System Board of Regents (BOR) approval must be obtained for the Chancellor to negotiate and execute a non-construction or non-renovation revenue or expense contract that is anticipated to cost (or generate revenue) more than $1 million over the life of the contract, including any extensions or renewals (BOR Policy 55.01). While BOR approval must be obtained before UH signs a contract or issues a PO, the procurement process to select a vendor may occur before or after BOR approval. The BOR must re-approve the contract if it will exceed 25% of the amount previously approved. 2. Purchasing determines the appropriate procurement process. The most common types of procurement processes for large contracts are as follows: a. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Primarily used for professional services where the vendor is selected solely based on their qualifications. RFQs are normally posted on the Electronic State Business Daily (ESBD) for at least 21 calendar days. b. Request for Proposals (RFP) Used for consulting contracts, revenue contracts, and other contracts where a variety of criteria are used to select the best value vendor, including price or revenue, quality of product or service, vendor s experience and reputation, ability of vendor s product or service to meet the university s needs, and other factors considered important in the selection process. RFPs are usually posted on the ESBD for at least 21 calendar days. c. Request for Offer (RFO) Like a RFP, except used for information technology contracts involving hardware, software, and/or services. RFOs are usually posted on the ESBD for at least 21 calendar days. d. Invitation to Bid (ITB) Used when purchasing a specific commodity (usually furniture or equipment) and price is the only criteria used to select a vendor, assuming the vendor can deliver exactly what is needed in the timeframe indicated in the ITB. ITBs are usually posted on the ESBD for 14 calendar days. e. Sole Source The UH department requesting the commodity or service knows exactly what they need and the chosen vendor is the only vendor who can provide that commodity or service. Price is not a consideration in selecting the vendor. The requesting department must complete a Sole Source Justification Form that indicates which product feature, vendor expertise, or other reason no other vendor can provide the commodity or service needed. If there is any doubt about the sole source justification, Purchasing will require a competitive procurement process. 3. If the department submits a Sole Source Justification Form to Purchasing and Purchasing agrees with it, Purchasing will sign the Sole Source Form and submit it along with an award recommendation memo to the Vice Chancellor for Administration & Finance (A&F VC). Purchasing will copy Internal Audit on the memo to the A&F VC. If Purchasing does not agree with the Sole Source Form, Purchasing will ask the department to revise the form or tell the department that a formal solicitation process (RFQ, RFP, RFO, or ITB) is required. 4. If Purchasing recommends the Sole Source purchase to the A&F VC and the A&F VC approves it, the contract or PO can be signed or issued following Board approval. If the A&F VC does not approve the Sole Source, Purchasing will tell the requesting department that a formal solicitation (RFQ, RFP, RFO, or ITB) is required. Updated May 10, 2016 Page 1

5. Purchasing will work with a primary contact in the department (Project Manager) to prepare a formal solicitation (RFQ, RFP, RFO, or ITB). The Project Manager is responsible for providing a detailed description of services to be provided and/or product specifications, as well as the criteria to be used in the evaluation process for RFQs, RFPs, and RFOs. Purchasing is responsible for ensuring that the solicitation document includes all standard terms and conditions contained in university solicitations, determining if a HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) will be required (when subcontracting is probable), and reviewing the entire solicitation document for clarity, consistency, and reasonableness. 6. Purchasing completes a Subcontracting Probability Form to determine if a HSP will be required for the solicitation. The Form is signed by the responsible Buyer and a representative from HUB Operations and is saved in the Purchasing share drive folder for the solicitation. 7. Purchasing ensures the requirements of the solicitation are clearly stated in the solicitation document, such as the submission, content, and format of proposals, Execution of Offer, HSP, General Information Questionnaire, and/or other stated requirements of the solicitation. 8. Purchasing asks the Project Manager if they are aware of any information that was shared with a potential respondent in the past year that might give the respondent a competitive advantage in responding to the solicitation. If the Project Manager is aware that such information was shared, Purchasing will include this information in the solicitation document so that all respondents will have access to the same information. 9. Purchasing assigns a solicitation number for internal tracking purposes. 10. Purchasing posts the solicitation document on the ESBD for the required period of time (at least 14 calendar days for ITBs and at least 21 calendar days for RFQs, RFPs, and RFOs). 11. Purchasing sends a broadcast email notification with a link to the solicitation to registered vendors on the CMBL, local trade organizations, and any vendors recommended by the Project Manager. 12. Purchasing sends an electronic copy of the solicitation and ESBD posting (website link) to the Project Manager and Internal Audit after posting. 13. Purchasing prepares attendance sheet for pre-submittal meeting (if any), leads meeting, and collects questions at the meeting. 14. Purchasing communicates information to vendors, receives questions from vendors (if any), coordinates with Project Manager to address questions received, issues official addenda after questions deadline and prior to submittal due date. (Note: RFQs, RFPs, and RFOs normally include Q&As but ITBs usually do not because they are more straightforward. Purchasing and the Project Manager will determine if Q&As are needed for the solicitation.) 15. Purchasing receives, opens, and reads aloud the name of the respondents. The responsible Buyer completes a Bid Opening Form, which lists the responses received and opened, and the time and date of the opening. The responsible Buyer signs and dates the Bid Opening Form and scans a copy into the Purchasing share drive folder for the solicitation. (The Bid Opening Form is used for responses to ITBs, RFPs, RFO, and RFQs.) 16. If a HSP was required by the solicitation, Purchasing prepares a HSP Compliance Review Form for each response to document whether the HSP was prepared in good faith. Updated May 10, 2016 Page 2

Respondents may be asked to clarify or correct information in the HSP or provide missing documentation. However, if the responsible Buyer and a HUB Operations representative agree that the HSP was not created in good faith, the HSP will be rejected and the respondent s response will be considered non-responsive. Both Purchasing and HUB Operations sign and date the HSP Compliance Review Form and scan a copy to the solicitation folder of the Purchasing share drive. 17. Purchasing prepares a Solicitation Requirements Checklist for the solicitation that includes all of the mandatory requirements (e.g., HSP, Execution of Offer, and any other stated requirements), lists all of the respondents, and indicates whether each respondent complied with each requirement. The responsible Buyer will sign and date the Solicitation Requirements Checklist. Purchasing will consider all responses that are not in compliance with any of those requirements to be nonresponsive. The Purchasing Director (or higher authority) will also sign and date the Solicitation Requirements Checklist to verify they agree with the Buyer s decision. Purchasing will scan a copy of the Solicitation Requirements Checklist in the solicitation folder of the Purchasing share drive. 18. Purchasing emails Internal Audit a copy of the Subcontracting Probability Form, Bid Opening Form, HSP Compliance Review Forms, and the Solicitation Requirements Checklist for their review. 19. Purchasing requests Finance System Operations to create a folder on SharePoint and to grant SharePoint access to evaluation committee members. (Note: Evaluation committees consist of at least seven employees who independently evaluate and score each qualified response and sends their evaluations directly to Purchasing. Committee members may not discuss vendor proposals with anyone or collaborate with each other.) 20. Purchasing uploads original solicitation, addenda, pre-qualified responses, evaluation matrix, and evaluation instruction sheet into SharePoint. Prior to uploading the evaluation matrix to SharePoint, another Purchasing staff member will review the formulas in the matrix for accuracy, in addition to the person in Purchasing who prepared the matrix. Both the preparer and reviewer will initial the matrix indicating their review. 21. Purchasing delivers one (1) set of original hard copies of responses to Project Manager and another set of originals are kept within Purchasing for open records requests and to comply with record retention procedures. 22. Purchasing sends SharePoint logon instructions and instructions on completing evaluation documents to committee members. 23. Purchasing requests clarification from respondents on their submittal, if needed. 24. Purchasing collects and receives completed evaluations from committee on or before the specified evaluation due date. 25. Purchasing compiles individual committee evaluation score sheets and prepares evaluation summary. Another Purchasing staff member will review the calculation of all technical and non-technical scores and the combined committee evaluation scores for accuracy, in addition to the person in Purchasing who prepared the evaluation summary. Both the preparer and reviewer will initial the evaluation summary to indicate their review. Updated May 10, 2016 Page 3

26. Purchasing coordinates with Project Manager for shortlist interview recommendation, if needed. (Note: The Project Manager will determine if vendor interviews are needed. If not needed, go to step 36.) 27. Purchasing sends shortlist selection recommendation memo to Internal Audit for review and interview questionnaire, team evaluation summary after interview, and emails from the committee members with their scores attached. 28. Shortlist recommendation memo is sent to A&F VC for review and approval. Additional documents to include with the memo are the official solicitation and team evaluation summary. Internal Audit is copied on this email. 29. A&F VC copies Internal Audit on email reply to Purchasing regarding the shortlist recommendation. 30. Purchasing sends shortlist notification emails to respondents for interview, and regret notifications to non-shortlist respondents after receiving approval from A&F VC. 31. Project Manager creates interview questionnaire, coordinates internal scheduling of committee members to attend shortlist interviews, and notifies Purchasing of available interview time, date, and location. If Project Manager revises the evaluation criteria for shortlist interviews to be more specific, Purchasing will notify the shortlisted vendors, evaluation committee, and Internal Audit in writing before the interviews begin. 32. Purchasing releases interview schedule and questionnaire to shortlist respondents. 33. Purchasing attends all shortlist interviews to ensure the integrity of the interview selection process (i.e., only committee members and one or more representatives from Purchasing will be allowed to attend the interviews). 34. Purchasing receives completed evaluations from committee members after interviews and on or before the evaluation deadline. 35. Purchasing compiles individual committee evaluation score sheets and prepares the interview evaluation summary. Another Purchasing staff member will review the calculation of all technical and non-technical scores and the combined committee evaluation scores for accuracy, in addition to the person in Purchasing who prepared the evaluation summary. Both the preparer and reviewer will initial the evaluation summary to indicate their review. 36. Purchasing coordinates with Project Manager for final selection recommendation. 37. Purchasing sends final selection recommendation memo to Internal Audit for review and interview questionnaire, team evaluation summary after interview, and emails from the committee members with their scores attached. 38. Purchasing sends final selection recommendation memo to A&F VC for review and interview questionnaire, and team evaluation summary after interview. Internal Audit is copied on this email. 39. A&F VC copies Internal Audit on reply email to Purchasing s final selection recommendation memo. 40. Purchasing sends notification email to finalist for contract negotiation, and regret notifications to non-finalists after receiving approval from A&F VC. Updated May 10, 2016 Page 4

41. Purchasing prepares for open records requests, if any. Updated May 10, 2016 Page 5