Transportation Funding. Clint Mueller, ACCG Legislative Director /

Similar documents
Georgia Trauma Commission. Six Immediate Goals

NOTICE OF TERMINATION

First in Safety and Service Our highest priority is to strive to be a high performance organization that is effective, efficient and accountable for

Prepared by: The Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development The University of Georgia Athens, GA. GEORGIA The Peach State

DISTRICT B MANAGER: Cathy Bahadur 2 Peachtree Street, 32 nd Floor Atlanta, Georgia Mobile: 404/ Office: 404/ Fax: 404/

Scott E. Bennett, P.E. Director. Arkansas Asphalt Pavement Association

Helpful Telephone Numbers and Web Sites

Georgia DOT Local Maintenance Improvement Grant Program. Todd Long, P.E., Deputy Commissioner

GEORGIA HEALTHCARE COVERAGE PROJECT

Funding the Federal-Aid Highway Program

Community Alternatives... What is Medicaid?... Community-based (waiver) Services...

PILOT STUDY Grant COMMUNITY-ACADEMIC RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS GRANTS PROGRAM REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS 2015

Georgia Nonprofit Employment

A THRIVING MIDDLE GEORGIA

$5.2 Billion Transportation Funding Deal Announced, includes $1.5 Billion for Local Streets and Roads

2005 Georgia Farm Gate Value Report

MORPC Executive Committee Members. Joe Garrity, Senior Government Affairs Coordinator

WELCOME TO THE KALAMAZOO AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Middle Georgia Regional Leadership Champions Program. A Program of the Middle Georgia Regional Commission APPLICATION DEADLINE: JANUARY 24, 2018

Scott E. Bennett, P.E. Director. Arkansas Society of Professional Lobbyists

Synopsis of Revised Changes to DCA s Rules for Developments of Regional Impact

1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION

Lorie Tudor, P.E. Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer. Alma Area Chamber of Commerce

S T R A T E G I C N A T I O N A L S T O C K P I L E

HB2 Update October, 2014

LAP Manual 7-1 February 2014 Compliance Assessment Program Requirements

75th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2933 SUMMARY

Middle Georgia Regional Plan Stakeholder Involvement Program

Update on Transportation Funding and Potential Sources for Additional Revenue. June 19, 2017

Road Funding in Indiana

RTAC Quarterly Report Quarter: Q Date: 5/11/18. EMS Region 1 RTAC Chair Jaina Carnes RTAC Coordinator Jaina Carnes

The Atlanta Region s Transit Programs of Projects

Inmate Statistical Profile

Inmate Statistical Profile

ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

S E N A T E F I S C A L O F F I C E I S S U E B R I E F 2016-S RhodeWorks FEBRUARY 2, 2016

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Jonesboro Exchange Club

Act 13 Impact Fee Revenues Frequently Asked Questions

NC General Statutes - Chapter 58 Article 87 1

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Legislative Program

GDOT & Federal-Aid Highway Financing

County of Fairfax, Virginia

IC Chapter 2. State Grants to Counties for Community Corrections and Charges to Participating Counties for Confined Offenders

Transportation. Fiscal Research Division. March 24, Justification Review

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

POLICIES, RULES AND PROCEDURES

Issue Paper: Capital Outlay. Issue Paper: Capital Outlay

Department of Transportation Governor s FY 2015 and FY 2016 Recommendations. Department of Transportation

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

THE 411 ON FEDERAL & STATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING - FHWA

6. HIGHWAY FUNDING Introduction Local Funding Sources Property Tax Revenues valuation County Transportation Excise Tax

Dear Community Partner,

2016 GEORGIA WORKFORCE REPORT. Published by Compdata Surveys & Consulting on behalf of the Georgia Hospital Association

Child Abuse Reporting:

State Education Finance Study Commission Issue Paper: Capital Outlay

WHERE S THE MONEY? Waging Effective Capital Campaigns. Florida Educational Facilities Planners Association Summer Conference 2013

Transit Operations Funding Sources

Top Challenges: M&A, Infrastructure Funding, Contracting Out, Regulatory Burdens

Lower-Emission School Bus Program Replacement Component Heavy-Duty Engine Incentive Program

San Francisco Transportation Task Force 2045

EMS and Trauma Systems Funding Programs House Committee on Public Health March 27, 2008

Comparison of Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Programs and other Federal Assistance to Disadvantaged Communities in EPA Region 4

VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY

Bulletin Requirements for Warrant Articles, Motions, Orders and Votes

Falling Forward: A Guide to the FAST Act

STIP. Van Argabright November 9, 2017

POLICIES RELATING TO FEDERAL HIGHWAY FUNDING

Georgia Transportation Infrastructure Bank (GTIB)

GAE SPELLING BEE CONSULTANTS/COMMITTEE

Navigating MAP 21. Securing Federal Funding for Community Walking & Biking Projects

APPROPRIATIONS Facilities and Capital Outlay

TRANSPORTATION. The American County Platform and Resolutions

Economic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads HRTAC Overview Kevin B. Page Executive Director

Table 1: AGGREGATE DATA, BY FORMULA PROGRAM 1 Information Requested Example Please Insert Your Data in This Column

February 2004 Report No

Bureau of Rail Freight, Ports and Waterways Grant Program Policy

Nicole Galloway, CPA

BeWell SHBP-Sponsored Screening Events listed by Date. Last Day to Schedule an Appointment

BeWell SHBP-Sponsored Screening Events listed by County. Last Day to Schedule an Appointment. Session Date

FISCAL FEDERALISM. How State and Local Governments Differ from the National Government

Guidelines for the Major Eligible Employer Grant Program

CANYON COUNTY TENTATIVE OPERATING BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2017 CANYON COUNTY PUBLIC BUDGET HEARING AUGUST 31, :00 P.M.

Summary of House, Senate, and Conference Committee Budget Actions

Federal Financing of Transportation in Texas

APPENDIX 5. Funding Plan

9. REVENUE SOURCES FEDERAL FUNDS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Transportation and the Federal Government

2015 Georgia Workforce Report. Published by Compdata Surveys on behalf of the Georgia Hospital Association

Training Dates Financial Deadlines Programmatic Dates

MERCATUS ON POLICY. How to Fix Roads and Bridges without Increasing the Fuel Tax: Reform Federal Highway Policy and Use the Savings for Roads

Intentional blank page. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

THE. ATLANTA REGION S Transit Programs Of Projects

Guidelines for the Virginia Investment Partnership Grant Program

Georgia Vital Statistics

Formal STIP Amendment

Inmate Statistical Profile

Telecommuting or doing work

ATTACHMENT B. Opportunities to Implement Measure M Through New and Expanded State and Federal Transportation Funding Programs

SMART SCALE Policy Guide

Transcription:

Transportation Funding Clint Mueller, ACCG Legislative Director cmueller@accg.org / 404.522.5022

Overview Transportation Funding Act of 2015 (HB 170) Single County TSPLOST Regional TSPLOST Questions

HB 170 The passage of HB 170 during the 2015 legislative session sought to add $800-900 million in new funding for transportation purposes by doing the following: Converted state sales tax on motor fuel to an excise tax Added a highway impact fee for heavy trucks Added a $5 per night hotel/motel fee Added a $200-300 alternative fuel vehicle fee Repealed the electric car tax credit and the jet fuel exemption No exemptions for state or local governments for these new fees & taxes.

HB 170 Overview of Bill Converted all state motor fuel taxes (4 % sales tax and 7.5 cent excise tax) to a state excise tax at a rate of 26 cents per gallon for gas and 29 cents per gallon for diesel Indexes the state excise tax based on Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) standards and Consumer Pricing Index (CPI) Establishes an alternative fuel vehicle fee for vehicles powered solely by electricity, natural gas, or propane of $200 per year for private use and $300 per year for commercial use Compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, and liquefied petroleum gas is exempted from the annual fee

HB 170 Establishes an annual highway impact fee of $50 for vehicles weighing 15,500-26,000lbs and $100 for 26,001 and above Repeals electric vehicle tax credit and jet fuel exemption Establishes a $5 per day hotel/motel fee Requires GDOT to provide a 10yr strategic plan to General Assembly Provisions of Local Impact Local sales and use taxes levied on motor fuel will no longer be collected on an average retail price of gas or diesel above $3 per gallon Effective July 1, 2015, the average retail price for gas is $2.35 and $2.549 for diesel

Fiscal Year 2016 GDOT Funding Sources INTERMODAL $92,060,635 OTHER FUNDS $93,537,703 HB 170 FEES $154,913,420 FHWA FUNDS $1,526,284,941 TOTAL MOTOR FUEL $1,605,915,300

Revenue Impact LMIG Law requires a min 10% appropriation by the State At 10% funding, every cent per gallon increase in state excise is expected to generate an additional $6m in LMIG funding HB 170 increased state excise ~ 7 cents per gallon which is ~ $42m in add l LMIG revenue (30% increase) Commitment made to double LMIG over the next couple of years Gas Cap Legislation provides for a cap of $3 for the average retail price of motor fuel Effective July 1, 2015, the average for gas is $2.35 per gallon, and $2.549 for diesel For example, if diesel had remained at $3.16, the projected impact would have been as follows: - ½ of 1 cent lost for every gallon sold on diesel based on a 3% local sales tax. - That s $50k for every 1m gallons sold in the jurisdiction

Local Maintenance & Improvement Grant (LMIG) 2017 LMIG reflects first increase as a result of HB 170 FY 2017 LMIG Program $165 million allocated for the 2017 program 30% increase over 2016 FY 2018 LMIG $179 million allocated for the 2018 Program 8% increase over 2017

Single County TSPLOST After July 1, 2017, all counties can levy so long as they are not in an existing TIA region. To qualify, county must already impose a regular SPLOST. Single County T-SPLOST can be levied up to 5 years at a fractional rate up to 1 percent in.05 percent increments if there is an intergovernmental agreement with the qualified cities within the county. If there is no intergovernmental agreement in place, the tax can be levied up to.75 percent. Requires a meet and confer w/ municipalities. Process for project list development similar to that of SPLOST. More than one Single County TSPLOST to be levied at the same time as long as the combined rate does not exceed 1 percent. No reduction in LMIG Match (remains at 30%)

Single County TSPLOST When there is an IGA between the county and all cities: Can levy a fractional rate up to 1% 30% of the projected revenues must be used on projects consistent with the Statewide Strategic Transportation Plan (SSTP): The SSTP is a policy document and does not include an exhaustive list of projects. For example, projects that would be considered consistent include interchange projects, safety projects, operational improvement projects, etc. Distribution between county and cities is based on the terms of the IGA

Single County TSPLOST When there is no IGA: Can levy a fractional rate up to.75% There is no 30% SSTP requirement The distribution formula between the county and its cities defaults to a formula based on the amount of expenditures made for transportation in the most recent 3 fiscal years The proportional amount is determined by dividing the average expended in previous 3 fiscal years by the aggregate average expended on transportation by county and all qualified municipalities during the same time frame Amounts include maintenance and operations Distribution amounts shall be certified by the state auditor

Single County TSPLOST FAQ How much money will be raised with a single county TSPLOST? Many counties use estimates generated by GA State University s Center for State & Local Finance & Fiscal Research Center and consultation with the Georgia Department of Revenue. Projections based on current SPLOST Collections are also valuable. How long will the single county TSPLOST last? The tax ceases to be imposed on the earliest of the following dates: On the final day of the maximum period of time (5 years) OR the end of the calendar quarter that the state revenue commissioner determines that the tax will have raised revenues sufficient to provide funds specified as the maximum amount of funds to be raised by the tax. Can one County partner or cooperate with another County? Proceeds of a Single County TSPLOST can only be expended ONLY within the special district (that is the county) in which it is levied. Two counties could each agree to levy the tax within their boundaries and each county expend the proceeds of its tax inside the county in which levied.

Fulton County TSPLOST Fulton County was the first Georgia county to pass a Single County TSPLOST referendum November 8, 2016 ballot. City of Atlanta TSPLOST and a City of Atlanta MARTA sales tax also passed.

Single County TSPLOST Counties considering a Single County TSPLOST: Athens-Clarke Bulloch (May, 2018) Colquitt Dade Decatur Haralson Putnam Spalding Walker

Transportation Investment Act (TIA) Regional TSPLOST River Valley Project List Total Projects: 23 Projects Under Construction: 7 Projects Completed: 2 Project Funds Budgeted (2011 Dollars): $410,754,730 Total Expenditure to Date: $69,742,698 Central Savannah River Project List Total Projects: 84 Projects Under Construction: 32 Projects Completed: 21 Project Funds Budgeted (2011 Dollars): $728,259,334 Total Expenditure to Date: $108,998,145 Heart of Georgia Altamaha Project List Total Projects: 764 Projects Under Construction: 96 Projects Completed: 308 Project Funds Budgeted (2011 Dollars): $334,975,267 Total Expenditure to Date: $64,964,817

Regional TSPLOST Counties can self-start the process by adoption of a resolution from a majority of the counties in the region Regions are the current Regional Commission boundaries County decision (no city action required to start process) Majority of counties initiate process, region will proceed Regional Roundtable - 2 representatives from each County (County Commission Chairman and a Mayor) Task: Establish Criteria, approve Final Investment List, call for the Election Rate can be fractional up to 1 percent (in.05% increments) 75% to investment list projects (minimum 30% to STIP projects) 25% discretionary money that goes back to each individual county Tax can be levied up to 10 years Lower LMIG match - 10% (non Regional T-SPLOST counties must match 30%)

Regional Transportation Sales Tax Process Majority of Counties pass resolution to initiate TIA process City Representatives on the Roundtable Selected Roundtable Sets Criteria for Projects Elects Executive Committee Cities, Counties and MPOs submit projects to DOT DOT determines what meets region s criteria- Unconstrained Project list Executive Committee reviews all projects- Constrained Investment List Public Meetings Roundtable approves Final Investment List Calls for Vote Election

Regional TSPLOST Regions Considering a Regional TSPLOST - May, 2018: Middle Georgia Region Baldwin County Crawford County Houston County Jones County Macon-Bibb County Monroe County Peach County Pulaski County Putnam County Twiggs County Wilkinson County Southern Region Atkinson County Bacon County Ben Hill County Berrien County Brantley County Brooks County Charlton County Clinch County Coffee County Cook County Echols County Consolidated Government Irwin County Lanier County Lowndes County Pierce County Tift County Turner County Ware County

Regional vs. Single County TSPLOST HB 134 clarifies that after January 1, 2018, a Regional T-SPLOST and a Single County TSPLOST cannot be on the ballot at the same time. For the November 7, 2017 election, both a Single County TSPLOST and a Regional TSPLOST can be on the same ballot. The law is unclear as to what happens if both referendums passed. It may be possible that a Single County TSPLOST and a Regional TSPLOST tax can be collected at the same time if the single county TSPLOST is imposed first, or, if prior to January 1, 2018, both are on the same ballot. The law is unclear. After January 1, 2018, a county would only be allowed to put a Single County TSPLOST on the ballot if the Regional TSPLOST process had not begun in that county s region. The Regional TSPLOST process begins when a majority of the County Boards of Commissioners in the region passes a resolution calling for the Regional TSPLOST process to begun.

Advantages/Disadvantages of Regional vs. Single County TSPLOST Regional: 25% discretionary money goes back to each individual county. Ease of funding projects across county lines Lower LMIG match: 10 % vs. 30% Other Considerations: Retail County vs. Non-Retail County Duration of tax 10 years vs. 5 years

Questions?