COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY REENTRY COURT PROGRAM (DISTRICT: ALL)

Similar documents
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM. DATE: September 28, Board of Supervisors TO:

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Plan. Assembly Bill 109 and 117. FY Realignment Implementation

WRITTEN TESTIMONY SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS SMITH, MSSW TEXAS CRIMINAL JUSTICE COALITION

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership. Public Safety Realignment Act

New Directions --- A blueprint for reforming California s prison system to protect the public, reduce costs and rehabilitate inmates

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109)

6,182 fewer prisoners

Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia

Probation Department BUDGET WORKSHOP. Alan M. Crogan, Chief Probation Officer

Consensus Report of the Arkansas Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections

Marin County STAR Program: Keeping Severely Mentally Ill Adults Out of Jail and in Treatment

COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONDS TO INCREASED GANG ACTIVITY

Chairman Wolf, Ranking Member Fattah and Members of the Subcommittee,

Tarrant County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Program. Michael S. Carona, Sheriff~Coroner Orange County Sheriff s s Department

Testimony of Michael C. Potteiger, Chairman Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole House Appropriations Committee February 12, 2014

Steven K. Bordin, Chief Probation Officer

TARRANT COUNTY DIVERSION INITIATIVES

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

5/25/2010 REENTRY COURT PROGRAM

GENESEE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE 2017 PROGRAM BUDGET

Community Transition Center: A Collaborative Approach to Offender Reentry

*Chapter 3 - Community Corrections

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency Behavioral Health Services Fiscal Year Mental Health Board Report

RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROBATION DEP ARTME Serving Courts Protecting Our Community Changing Lives

Agenda: Community Supervision Subgroup

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER Matthew Foley

IC Chapter 2. State Grants to Counties for Community Corrections and Charges to Participating Counties for Confined Offenders

Addressing the needs of inmates with mental illness and/or substance abuse disorders. Taking the Sequential Intercept Model to the Next Level

JANUARY 2013 REPORT FINDINGS AND INTERIM RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS. Legislative Budget Board Criminal Justice Forum October 4, 2013

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT. Data Collection Efforts

Justice Reinvestment in Indiana Analyses & Policy Framework

Factors Impacting Recidivism in Vermont. Report to House and Senate Committees April 21, 2011

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PROGRAM MONTHLY STATUS REPORT

Washoe County Department of Alternative Sentencing

FY2017 Appropriations for the Department of Justice Grant Programs

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Agenda Monday, February 12, :30 pm

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Biennial Report of the Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments Fiscal Year

Funding at 40. Fulfilling the JJDPA s Core Requirements in an Era of Dwindling Resources

April 16, The Honorable Shirley Weber Chair Assembly Budget, Subcommittee No. 5 on Public Safety State Capitol, Room 3123 Sacramento CA 95814

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 to FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015

Harris County Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Harris County Sequential Intercept Model

Prisoner Reentry and Adult Education. With our time together, we propose

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Enhancing Criminal Sentencing Options in Wisconsin: The State and County Correctional Partnership

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY, ROOM 335, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA AGENDA ITEM

How to make the Affordable Care Act work for you

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Criminal Justice Division

FY18 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program

FROM SENTENCING TO INCARCERATION TO RELEASE A BLUEPRINT FOR REFORMING CALIFORNIA S PRISON SYSTEM

Meeting Minutes Thursday January 17, 2013 Stanislaus County Probation Department Training Room

STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM AND REVOCATION RATES

Overview of Recommendations to Champaign County Regarding the Criminal Justice System

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SPOUSAL ABUSER PROSECUTION PROGRAM PROGRAM GUIDELINES

CITY OF SACRAMENTO. April 16, 2001 Ref: 4-43

Eau Claire County Mental Health Court. Presentation December 15, 2011

Incarcerating nearly 60,000 inmates in state prison facilities

COORDINATOR OF SPECIALTY DOCKETS AND GRANTS

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

The Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Initiative

Grants. The county budget system contains three grant funds that are effective over three different grant periods:

RE: Grand Jury Report: AB109/AB117 Realignment: Is Santa Clara County Ready for Prison Reform?

Biennial Report of the Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments Fiscal Year

DOC & PRISONER REENTRY

H.B Implementation Report

The Primacy of Drug Intervention in Public Safety Realignment Success. CSAC Healthcare Conference June 12, 2013

Justice-Involved Veterans

WINDSOR COUNTY, VERMONT DUI TREATMENT DOCKET (WCDTD) FOR REPEAT OFFENSE IMPAIRED DRIVING CASES

Performance Incentive Funding

Proposal for Prosecutor s Substance Abuse Diversion Program

TIER I. AB-451 (Arambula) Health facilities: emergency services and care

2016 Council of State Governments Justice Center

Building Healthy and Safe Communities

Chapter 13: Agreements Overview

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 214

Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of U.S. Department of Justice Fact Sheet

Defining the Nathaniel ACT ATI Program

Introduction. Jail Transition: Challenges and Opportunities. National Institute

Deputy Probation Officer I/II

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

Closing the Revolving Door: Community. National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 2, 2011

San Francisco Adult Probation Department. Fiscal Year Annual Report

Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide

Rod Underhill, District Attorney

Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 449

The Florida Legislature

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION. CURRENT POPULATION PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2012 to FISCAL YEAR 2021

Criminal Justice Review & Status Report

Criminal Justice Division

Pennsylvania Sexual Offenders Assessment Board Transition Report December 1, 2010

complex criminal activity. Detectives assigned to the Special Enforcement Unit (SEU) and Butte Interagency

ATTACHMENT 2B STATE OFNEW JERSEY RECOVERY ACT: EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT FORMULA PROGRAM BUDGET NARRATIVE

D. Presentation or Announcement of Proclamations and Awards

Medicaid Expansion + Reform: Impact for Trust Beneficiaries. March 8, 2018

Texas Department of Criminal Justice

ALTERNATIVES FOR MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS

Transcription:

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM GREG COX First District DIANNE JACOB Second District PAM SLATER-PRICE Third District RON ROBERTS Fourth District BILL HORN Fifth District DATE: October 12, 2010 TO: Board of Supervisors 02 SUBJECT: SUMMARY: Overview It has become increasingly clear to law enforcement, the Courts, legislature, and the public that many criminal offenders rotate in and out of State prisons, presenting a significant public safety and public health risk to the residents of California. Historically, felons released from California state prison to parole supervision recidivate and return back to prison at a rate of 70 percent within the third year of release, the vast majority with substance abuse and mental health issues. In an earlier effort to proactively contend with the community impacts posed by the revolving door of recidivism, on June 13, 2006 (2), and April 13, 2010 (4), the Board approved and provided support for innovative efforts that increase offender accountability and combat the impacts of recidivism. Recently, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) implemented Senate Bill x3 18 which among several other public safety reforms, enacted a system of non-revocable parole, expanded incentive credits for inmates, and allowed for the creation of reentry courts. The San Diego County District Attorney, Sheriff, Probation Department, Public Defender and Health and Human Services joined with the Superior Court, and the San Diego Police Department to respond to these changes in the law and to collaborate on a local reentry initiative. This collaborative worked to secure an award of a grant to the local Superior Court for $1,500,000 from the California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA), funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), to operate a reentry court to serve approximately 250 non-violent Parolees over a two year period. We continue to seek additional grants and awards for reentry services and are currently in negotiations with the CDCR for resources to expand the reentry court. This request is to authorize the acceptance of a grant award from the Superior Court to the Health and Human Services Agency of $1,174,367, amend the related expenditure contracts that distribute a portion of the grant funds to other participating community- Documentum Version 3.1

based agencies, appropriate Public Safety Group s Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Fund Balance of $150,000 to the Probation Department to fund one Probation Officer, and to appropriate $2,350,000 of Public Safety Group s Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Fund Balance to fund future reentry services. Recommendation(s) SUPERVISOR GREG COX, SUPERVISOR RON ROBERTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BONNIE M. DUMANIS, AND SHERIFF WILLIAM D. GORE 1. Approve and authorize the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency, to accept American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds for the parolee reentry court program via the Superior Court in the amount of $1,174,367 for Fiscal Year 2010-11 through September 30, 2012. 2. In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, and Administrative Code Section 401, authorize the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to amend existing contracts to increase funding and to amend these contracts up to five years for reentry services, including but not limited to treatment, rehabilitation and referral services, subject to the availability of funds; and to amend the contract as required to reflect changes to services and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the District Attorney, Sheriff, Chief Probation Officer, Public Defender and the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency, as appropriate. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. 3. Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, or his designee(s), including the District Attorney, Sheriff, Chief Probation Officer, Public Defender and the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency, to complete and submit documentation necessary to apply for and receive funding from state and federal agencies and private organizations for programs supporting re-entry of offenders into San Diego county communities. For this limited purpose, waive the provision of Board Policy B-29 that requires prior approval of grant applications and acceptance of grant awards. If any of the grants and/or funding sources requires an increase in net General Fund costs, staff will return to the Board to request specific approval to accept the funds. 4. Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer, or his designee(s), including the District Attorney, Sheriff, Chief Probation Officer, Public Defender and the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency, to execute any agreements between the County of San Diego and state and federal agencies or private organizations providing re-entry funding and to enter into any related contracts, amendments, or extensions to provide reentry services - 2 -

5. Establish appropriations of $150,000 in the Probation Department for salaries and benefits for the Reentry Court program based on Public Safety Group s Fiscal Year 2009-10 fund balance available. (4 VOTES) 6. Approve the request to add one staff year (one position) in Fiscal Year 2010-11 in the Probation Department to perform tasks relating to offender supervision and authorize the Department of Human Resources to appropriately classify the position. 7. Establish appropriations of $2,350,000 in the District Attorney s Office management reserves to support programs promoting reentry and re-integration of offenders into San Diego County communities based on Public Safety Group s Fiscal Year 2009-10 fund balance available. (4 VOTES) Fiscal Impact District Attorney: The funds for this request are not included in the Fiscal Year 2010-12 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will provide resources of $2,350,000 to support future programs promoting reentry and re-integration of offenders into San Diego County communities. The funding source is the Public Safety Group s Fiscal Year 2009-10 fund balance available. There will be no additional staff years. Probation Department: The funds for this request are not included in the Fiscal Year 2010-2012 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in costs and revenue of $150,000 in Fiscal Year 2010-2011. The funding source is the Public Safety Group s Fiscal Year 2009-2010 fund balance available. This amount will cover the cost of one additional staff year. Health and Human Services Agency: The funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2010-2012 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in costs and revenue of $1,174,367. The funding source is a grant from the San Diego Superior Court from ARRA funds provided by CalEMA. There will be no change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff years. Business Impact Statement Advisory Board Statement BACKGROUND: The California budget crisis has forced the state to address how to effectively reduce prison overcrowding, recidivism, and related costs. The California prison system was built to house 80,000 inmates but currently holds 165,000. As a result, in January 2009, a federal three-judge panel acknowledged that California prison overcrowding was in violation of the Constitution of the United States of America and ordered the early release of an estimated 38,000 to 46,000-3 -

inmates. A request has been made for the U.S. Supreme Court to review the three-judge panel s ruling. California s prison problems are also tied to recidivism. When parolees commit crimes, they not only burden the state s overtaxed prison system, they create new victims and compromise public safety. California s recidivism rate is 70 percent, the nation s highest. Inmates from San Diego County represent about 7.5 percent of California's prison population and approximately 8,000 offenders were released back to our community during 2009. Prosecuting, incarcerating and supervising these offenders cost taxpayers millions of dollars. Ninety-five percent of offenders sent to prison return to San Diego County communities. The actions taken by the state as a result of the fiscal reality of the state budget crisis, coupled with a court-ordered reduction in the prison population, will increase the number of offenders in communities. It has also created an emergence of a movement in favor of treating, rather than incarcerating non-violent offenders and a host of other public safety reforms. In October 2009, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill x3 18, authored by Senator Denise Ducheny (D-San Diego), which allows for the expansion of specialty courts, specifically reentry courts for parolees to receive highly-structured supervision, treatment and offender accountability rather than being returned to prison for violations that may be related to those needs. Studies have demonstrated that many crimes committed by offenders are rooted in alcohol and drug addictions. When untreated inmates with addictions are released back into communities, they usually return to their friends, their habits and their crimes. Senate Bill x3 18 also enacted a system of summary or non-revocable parole for certain parolees. Individuals who are placed on non-revocable parole will only be returned to prison if they are arrested for and convicted of a new offense. They will also not be eligible for the specialty courts provisioned under the new law, and thus become the responsibility of local law enforcement. Parolees on the non-revocable parole do remain subject to warrantless searches by the police. Currently, there are approximately 900 individuals on non-revocable parole in San Diego County. Anticipating the local impacts to public safety and public health of the justice system reforms, on April 13, 2010 (4), at the recommendation of District Attorney Bonnie M. Dumanis; the Board authorized Ratification and Application for Federal Grants For Offender Reentry Services which provided support for innovative efforts to combat the impacts of recidivism. The San Diego County District Attorney, Sheriff, Probation Department, Public Defender and Health and Human Services Agency (San Diego County Reentry Partners), joined with the Superior Court and San Diego Police Department to collaborate on a reentry initiative. The reentry initiative focuses on cost effective, evidence based strategies that leverage the interdependencies of government and the community in holding offenders accountable and safeguarding public safety and public health. Studies by the nation's leading criminal justice research agencies have shown that drug treatment with accountability in concert with other services and programs, is a more cost effective way to deal with drug offenders and prevent future crimes. Understanding the importance of reducing - 4 -

recidivism, San Diego County was at the forefront of reentry and on June 13, 2006 (2) the Board initiated the state s first and only comprehensive, multidisciplinary, evidence-based reentry program. Implementation of San Diego County s Senate Bill 618 (SB 618) Reentry Program Multiagency Plan introduced evidence-based practices to prepare offenders for a more successful reentry into their communities. The San Diego SB 618 Prisoner Reentry Program enrolled its first candidate in 2007, and currently has over 560 active participants and early indications of a recidivism rate of about 20 percent. The state spends, on average, $47,000 per year to house an inmate. Treatment for the same inmate on average ranges from $5,000 to $15,000 per year, and may generate potential savings to taxpayers. Leveraging the lessons learned from the SB 618 program and the efforts of the reentry initiative collaborative, the Superior Court was awarded a $1,500,000 grant from the CalEMA, using funds derived from the ARRA, for the operation of the San Diego Parolee Reentry Court (Reentry Court) to serve approximately 250 participants over a two year period. Approximately $1.1 million of the award will be used by the Health and Human Services Agency to provide treatment, rehabilitative and referral services for the reentry court participants with the remaining amount to be used for court services. Public Safety Group fund balance will be used for salary and benefits for one probation officer who will perform tasks related to offender supervision. If the funding for this position is not renewed, the position will be deleted. Reentry court participants will enter the Reentry Court program with the development of a case plan that addresses the rehabilitation needs of the participant. The participant will follow a four phase plan that requires regular drug tests, scheduled reentry court appearances and individual growth in treatment/employment/school/pro-social activities. It is anticipated that successful participants will graduate from Reentry Court during a 12 to 18 month period. Modeled after drug court, the reentry court intends to build upon existing reentry programs and collaborative court practices to establish a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional approach that responds to past challenges, current opportunities and prospective strategies to ensure safer communities. Like drug court, reentry court is designed to help people with addictions facing criminal charges get through treatment and recover from their addiction. Their basic premise is to leverage the authority of the criminal justice system to keep participants in treatment. Consistent with the goals of the Legislature and CalEMA grant award, the goals of the Parolee Reentry Court are to: (1) reduce parolee recidivism, (2) reduce revocation of parole, (3) utilize evidence-based rehabilitative programming, and (4) collect relevant data regarding participant progress and overall program success and promote public safety. With your approval to accept this grant we are taking the necessary steps to make reentry court a reality and continue to protect the residents of San Diego County. This is yet another stride in dealing with offenders that may benefit from treatment and rehabilitation instead of continuing the revolving door to prison even further. We must continue to work together in the future to identify additional sources of funding. We continue to seek additional grants and awards for reentry services and are currently in negotiations with the California Department of Corrections - 5 -

and Rehabilitation for resources to expand Reentry Court. It is anticipated that this expansion would serve an additional 100 parolees annually for a three year period. Linkage to the County of San Diego Strategic Plan The actions recommended by this letter will advance the Safe and Livable Communities initiative in the County of San Diego Strategic Plan to improve public safety by implementing a plan to prepare non-violent felony offenders for successful reentry into the community. Respectfully submitted, GREG COX Supervisor, First District RON ROBERTS Supervisor, Fourth District BONNIE M. DUMANIS District Attorney WILLIAM D. GORE Sheriff ATTACHMENT(S) - 6 -

AGENDA ITEM INFORMATION SHEET REQUIRES FOUR VOTES: [X] Yes [] No WRITTEN DISCLOSURE PER COUNTY CHARTER SECTION 1000.1 REQUIRED [] Yes [X] No PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOARD ACTIONS: April 13, 2010 (4), Chief Administrative Officer, District Attorney & Chief Probation Officer: Ratification and Application for Federal Grants For Offender Reentry Services. June 13, 2006 (2), Implementation of San Diego County SB 618 Reentry Program Multiagency Plan. BOARD POLICIES APPLICABLE: B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenues Contracts- Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery A-87, Competitive Procurement BOARD POLICY STATEMENTS: In accordance with Board Policy B-29, the District Attorney certifies that the grant funded programs in this request would be worthy of expenditure of County funds in the absence of external funding. These programs are instrumental in curtailing the cycle of recidivism into the state prison system. Additionally, a waiver of B-29 s provision requiring prior approval of grant applications and acceptance of grant awards is requested in order to allow San Diego County Reentry Partners to seek and obtain grants. A-87, Competitive Procurement - Recommendation #2 is extending existing contracts; therefore, approval to waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87 is requested. MANDATORY COMPLIANCE: ORACLE AWARD NUMBER(S) AND CONTRACT AND/OR REQUISITION NUMBER(S): ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Greg Cox, Supervisor, First District Ron Roberts, Supervisor, Fourth District District Attorney s Office Sheriff s Department - 7 -

OTHER CONCURRENCE(S): Health and Human Services Agency Probation Department Public Defender Purchasing and Contracting CONTACT PERSON(S): Michelle Bush Arlene K. Smith Name Name 619-531-4393 619-531-3082 Phone Phone 619-271-1351 619-271-1351 Fax Fax D-421 D-421 Mail Station Mail Station Michelle.bush@sdcda.org Arlene.smith@sdcda.org E-mail E-mail - 8 -