TITLE: Spouses/Family Members of Service Members at Risk for PTSD or Suicide. Fairfax, VA 22030

Similar documents
TITLE: Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain and Comorbid Conditions in Veterans

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Veterans Medical Research Foundation San Diego, CA 92161

TITLE: The impact of surgical timing in acute traumatic spinal cord injury

Addressing the Health Concerns of VA Women with Sexual Trauma. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Defense Health Care Issues and Data

TITLE: Vitamin D and Related Genes, Race and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

TITLE: Development and Validation of a Theory Based Screening Process for Suicide Risk

Mission Assurance Analysis Protocol (MAAP)

ý Award Number: MIPR 3GD3DT3083 Total Eye Examination Automated Module (TEAM) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Colonel Francis L.

White Space and Other Emerging Issues. Conservation Conference 23 August 2004 Savannah, Georgia

TITLE: Emergency Preservation and Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest from Trauma (EPR-CAT)

Improving the Quality of Patient Care Utilizing Tracer Methodology

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Integrated Comprehensive Planning for Range Sustainability

TITLE: Early ICU Standardized Rehabilitation Therapy for the Critically Injured Burn Patient

Independent Auditor's Report on the Attestation of the Existence, Completeness, and Rights of the Department of the Navy's Aircraft

Panel 12 - Issues In Outsourcing Reuben S. Pitts III, NSWCDL

The Fully-Burdened Cost of Waste in Contingency Operations

Military Health System Conference. Putting it All Together: The DoD/VA Integrated Mental Health Strategy (IMHS)

ASAP-X, Automated Safety Assessment Protocol - Explosives. Mark Peterson Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board

AFRL-VA-WP-TP

Fiscal Year 2011 Department of Homeland Security Assistance to States and Localities

712CD. Phone: Fax: Comparison of combat casualty statistics among US Armed Forces during OEF/OIF

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC

Wildland Fire Assistance

The Effects of Multimodal Collaboration Technology on Subjective Workload Profiles of Tactical Air Battle Management Teams

Bronx, NY PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Cerberus Partnership with Industry. Distribution authorized to Public Release

PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland

Opportunities to Streamline DOD s Milestone Review Process

AWARD NUMBER: W81XWH TITLE: Care Planning for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Dr.

The Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) OUSD(AT&L)/International Cooperation

Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) Online Training Overview. Environmental, Energy, and Sustainability Symposium Wednesday, 6 May

Integrity Assessment of E1-E3 Sailors at Naval Submarine School: FY2007 FY2011

Implementation of Prolonged Exposure in the Army: Is Consultation Necessary for Effective Dissemination?

Social Science Research on Sensitive Topics and the Exemptions. Caroline Miner

A Scalable, Collaborative, Interactive Light-field Display System

DDESB Seminar Explosives Safety Training

Shadow 200 TUAV Schoolhouse Training

US Coast Guard Corrosion Program Office

USAF Hearing Conservation Program, DOEHRS Data Repository Annual Report: CY2012

User Manual and Source Code for a LAMMPS Implementation of Constant Energy Dissipative Particle Dynamics (DPD-E)

Harnessing the Power of MHS Information Systems to Achieve Meaningful Use of Health Information

terns Planning and E ik DeBolt ~nts Softwar~ RS) DMSMS Plan Buildt! August 2011 SYSPARS

Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited

ALLEGED MISCONDUCT: GENERAL T. MICHAEL MOSELEY FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF, U.S. AIR FORCE

U.S. Military Casualty Statistics: Operation New Dawn, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom

Defense Acquisition Review Journal

Laboratory Accreditation Bureau (L-A-B)

Screening for Attrition and Performance

United States Military Casualty Statistics: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

United States Army Aviation Technology Center of Excellence (ATCoE) NASA/Army Systems and Software Engineering Forum

For the Period June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014 Submitted: 15 July 2014

Battlemind Training: Building Soldier Resiliency

DOD Native American Regional Consultations in the Southeastern United States. John Cordray NAVFAC, Southern Division Charleston, SC

Water Usage at Forward Operating Bases

Biometrics in US Army Accessions Command

CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: Landstuhl Regional Medical Center Germany

Military Health System Conference. Psychological Health Risk Adjusted Model for Staffing (PHRAMS)

AFRL-ML-WP-TP

National Guard and Army Reserve Readiness and Operations Support

Tim Haithcoat Deputy Director Center for Geospatial Intelligence Director Geographic Resources Center / MSDIS

Research to advance the Development of River Information Services (RIS) Technologies

Award and Administration of Multiple Award Contracts for Services at U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Need Improvement

Military Health System Conference. Public Health Service (PHS) Commissioned Corps

Engineered Resilient Systems - DoD Science and Technology Priority

Electronic Attack/GPS EA Process

Cold Environment Assessment Tool (CEAT) User s Guide

Chief of Staff, United States Army, before the House Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Readiness, 113th Cong., 2nd sess., April 10, 2014.

Report Documentation Page

Army Modeling and Simulation Past, Present and Future Executive Forum for Modeling and Simulation

HOWARD G. WHITE, TIMOTHY TOBIK, RICHARD MABRY Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions Directorate AFRL/MNMF Eglin AFB, FL

Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Rapid Reaction Technology Office. Overview and Objectives. Mr. Benjamin Riley. Director, (RRTO)

2011 USN-USMC SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COMPACFLT

The Army Executes New Network Modernization Strategy

Concept Development & Experimentation. COM as Shooter Operational Planning using C2 for Confronting and Collaborating.

USAF TECHNICAL TRAINING NAS Pensacola Florida Develop America's Airmen Today --- for Tomorrow

SPECIAL REPORT Unsurfaced Road Maintenance Management. Robert A. Eaton and Ronald E. Beaucham December 1992

Military Health System Conference. Behavioral Health Clinical Quality in the MHS : Past Present and Future

2011 Military Health System Conference

Evolutionary Acquisition an Spiral Development in Programs : Policy Issues for Congress

Technical Considerations for Alamo Lake Operation

Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom

Report Documentation Page

The Affect of Division-Level Consolidated Administration on Battalion Adjutant Sections

Marine Corps' Concept Based Requirement Process Is Broken

Determining and Developing TCM-Live Future Training Requirements. COL Jeffrey Hill TCM-Live Fort Eustis, VA June 2010

February 8, The Honorable Carl Levin Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate

DoD Scientific & Technical Information Program (STIP) 18 November Shari Pitts

THE GUARDIA CIVIL AND ETA

Lessons Learned From Product Manager (PM) Infantry Combat Vehicle (ICV) Using Soldier Evaluation in the Design Phase

C-Band Working Group Update. Steve O'Neal AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 2/20/13

WEATHER. User's Manual. January 1986 CPD-52. Generalized Computer Program. US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

The Security Plan: Effectively Teaching How To Write One

Information Technology

Contemporary Issues Paper EWS Submitted by K. D. Stevenson to

Environmental Trends Course Cultural Resources

Re-Engineering Healthcare Integration Programs (REHIP)

The Military Health System How Might It Be Reorganized?

Transcription:

AWARD NUMBER: W81XWH-10-2-0113 TITLE: Spouses/Family Members of Service Members at Risk for PTSD or Suicide PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Keith D. Renshaw, Ph.D CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 REPORT DATE: October 2015 TYPE OF REPORT: Annual PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision unless so designated by other documentation. 1

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) October 2015 Annual 01 Oct 2014-30 Sep 2015 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Spouses/Family Members of Service Members at Risk for PTSD or Suicide 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER W81XWH-10-2-0113 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) Keith D. Renshaw, Ph.D. Email: krenshaw@gmu.edu 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, MD 21702-5012 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT The purpose of the study is to gain new knowledge about the experiences of family members of service members who are experiencing symptoms of PTSD or severe depression. The study is multi-method, with an initial qualitative phase (Phase 1), and a follow-up longitudinal, quantitative phase (Phase 2). During Year 5, the revision of the approach and recruitment was approved by USAMRAA/TATRC on 10/23/2014. This prompted IRB revisions, the final versions of which were approved by GMU IRB on 12/2/2014 and by AHRPO by 12/17/2014. Multiple recruitment efforts quickly yielded all desired participants in the male soldier/female spouse group for Phase 1. However, participants in the other two groups (female soldier/male spouse; single soldier/parent) have been much more difficult to recruit. A total of 2 female soldier/male spouse dyads have been enrolled, with no single soldier/parent dyads. Based on the recruitment difficulties and impending end of the project, TATRC officials (Michelle Lane and Kate Nassauer) recommended that we focus on engaging as many dyads in these two groups as possible for Phase 1 for the remainder of the project period. 15. SUBJECT TERMS PTSD; Suicide; Marriage; Family 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified c. THIS PAGE 18. NUMBER OF PAGES Unclassified Unclassified 7 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON USAMRMC 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code) Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18 2

Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction. 4 2. Keywords. 4 3. Overall Project Summary... 5 4. Key Research Accomplishments 5 5. Conclusion 6 6. Publications, Abstracts, and Presentations...N/A 7. Inventions, Patents and Licenses N/A 8. Reportable Outcomes.. 6 9. Other Achievements N/A 10. References... 7 11. Appendices. N/A 3

INTRODUCTION This project focuses on marriages/romantic relationships and family relationships of service members with significant risk for PTSD and/or suicidality. Social support is one of the strongest buffers against PTSD (Brewin, Andrews, & Valentine, 2000; Ozer, Best, Lipsey, & Weiss, 2003), and relationship difficulties have been cited as the most common trigger of suicides in service members over the past several years (Keuhn, 2009). Thus, a healthy interpersonal environment is key for service members who may be struggling with behavioral health problems. Unfortunately, spouses of service members or veterans with symptoms of PTSD or depression have significantly elevated levels of psychological and interpersonal distress (Monson, Taft, & Fredman, 2009). It also appears quite likely that parents and other close relatives of service members with PTSD or depression experience significant distress, but there currently are almost no empirical data about relatives other than spouses or children. Based on the clear interaction between individual psychological problems in service members and their interpersonal environment, the ultimate objective is to gather data that will inform the future design of interventions for relatives of service members that will increase relatives resilience and, consequently, their ability to provide support for service members. The purposes of this project are to: (1) identify the primary needs of relatives of high-risk (PTSD/depression) service members, and (2) identify potential distress and resilience mechanisms in these relatives. The original research project proposed two phases. Phase 1 employs individual interviews to (a) better understand the needs of romantic partners and (b) begin to identify needs of other types of family members (e.g., parents), who are rarely the focus of research. Phase 2 was to employ longitudinal assessment of service members and partners/relatives using interview and self-report measures to (a) validate information gathered in Phase 1 and (b) examine the longitudinal associations among service members psychological functioning and the family environment. This information will, in turn, be used to identify primary targets for family intervention that can increase partners /relatives resilience and improve service members psychological functioning. Due to recruitment difficulties, efforts are now focused solely on Phase 1, per directives from TATRC. PTSD Suicide Marriage Family KEYWORDS 4

OVERALL PROJECT SUMMARY Please note that tasks below refer to the newly approved SOW from the approved NCE (23 OCT 2014). Task 1a. COMPLETED. Approval for all revised procedures were obtained on 17 DEC 2014. Task 1b. COMPLETED. Manual revision was completed prior to IRB submission. Task 1c. COMPLETED. Training was completed in DEC 2014. Task 1d. COMPLETED. Eligibility screens were prepared and ready in early JAN 2015. Task 2a. PARTIALLY COMPLETE. Eleven female spouses/partners were enrolled for Phase 1 interviews. Only two male spouse/partners were enrolled. No parents/other relatives were enrolled. Task 2b. PARTIALLY COMPLETE. RAs completed interviews for all enrolled participants (13). Task 2c. PARTIALLY COMPLETE. Supervision meetings were held as needed, based on interview frequency and protocol issues. Task 2d. PARTIALLY COMPLETE. Transcripts were created for all interviews conducted. Task 3a. PARTIALLY COMPLETE. Open coding is underway. Task 3b. INCOMPLETE. Axial and selective coding cannot begin until open coding is complete. Task 3c. INCOMPLETE. Report relies on completed coding. Tasks 4-7. All remaining tasks are in relation to Phase 2. KEY RESEARCH ACCOMPLISHMENTS Approval of revised Phase 1 protocol. Completed enrollment for male soldier/female partner dyads. 5

CONCLUSION Despite approval of revised procedures, recruitment of female soldier/male partner dyads and single soldier/parent dyads remains difficult. Extensive efforts continue to be made to fill these groups (e.g., contacting BOSS groups, individual Blue Star Mothers chapters, national non-profits, individual installations, colleagues with connections to units, press releases, interviews with news outlets, guest blogs on popular social media sites, contacts at MEDCOM, FRGs). We will continue these extensive efforts with the goal of enrolling as many dyads as possible. In the past, there are often certain outlets that prove highly fruitful (e.g., nearly 100 eligibility screens completed by male soldiers/female partners after a posting on Army Wives 101). Thus, we hope to have similar success at some point with one or more outlets for other dyads. None. REPORTABLE OUTCOMES 6

REFERENCES Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J. D. (2000). Metaanalysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748-766. Keuhn, B. M. (2009). Soldier suicide rates continue to rise: Military, scientists work to stem the tide. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 1111-1113. Monson, C. M., Taft, C. T., & Fredman, S. J. (2009). Militaryrelated PTSD and intimate relationships: From description to theory-driven research and intervention development. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 707-714. Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., & Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 52-73. 7