Washington State Emergency Cardiac & Stroke System of Care. Sample proof of concept Report Cardiac Measures

Similar documents
2018 Mission: Lifeline EMS Detailed Recognition Criteria, Achievement Measures and Reporting Measures

Mission: Lifeline and GWTG-CAD (Coronary Artery Disease)

Multidisciplinary Process Improvement Building Relationships

NCDR 13 Annual Conference. ACTION Registry-GWTG Workshop #1. Disclosures Dr. Fonarow, MD, FACC, FAHA. Objectives 2/28/2013.

Duke Life Flight. Systems of Care for Time Dependent Emergencies. Disclosures. Disclosures 9/19/2017

STEMI SYSTEM RECEIVING CENTER STANDARDS AND DESIGNATION

San Joaquin County Emergency Medical Services Agency

Contra Costa County Emergency Medical Services. STEMI System Performance Report

Mission: Lifeline Hospital Accreditation Webinar. June 21, :00PM 3:00PM CST

STEMI Receiving Center Designation Process

How to Establish a Multi Hospital STEMI Transfer System

Contra Costa County Emergency Medical Services. STEMI System Performance Report

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Caring for the STEMI Patient:

Two Hospitals-One Heart: World Class Heart Care through Multi-Disciplinary Collaboration

Integrating EMS into Rural Systems of Care. John A. Gale, MS National Conference of State Flex Programs July 24, 2013

SIMPLE SOLUTIONS. BIG IMPACT.

Objective Measurement

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

Aligning Hospital and Physician P4P The Q-HIP SM /QP-3 SM Model. Rome H. Walker MD February 28, 2008

PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to establish requirements for designation as a STEMI Receiving Center (SRC) in San Joaquin County.

GET WITH THE GUIDELINES-STROKE UPDATE. Abby Fairbank, MPH Senior Director, Quality & Systems Improvement American Heart Association

Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council Regional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Facility & EMS Heart Alert Agencies

STEMI RECEIVING CENTER

Arkansas Stroke Registry (ASR) Update Dave Vrudny, Arkansas Stroke Registry Program Manager. May 16, 2012

STEMI ALERT! Craig M. Hudak, MD, FACC,FACP 24 January 2015

National Assessment of Clinical Quality Programs. Introduction. National Assessment of Clinical Quality Programs. Demographics

TIME CRITICAL DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM

1/9/2017. Systems of Care in EMS: An Integrated System of Cardiac Care. Describe systems-based response to time-sensitive clinical conditions

MBQIP Measures Fact Sheets December 2017

SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL and TRAUMA CENTER

The STEMI ALERT Packet

Regulatory Compliance Update

Hospital Compare Quality Measures: 2008 National and Florida Results for Critical Access Hospitals

The Medicare Beneficiary Quality Improvement Project (MBQIP) Monthly Performance Improvement Call

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

East Texas Gulf Coast Regional Trauma Advisory Council Regional Advisory Council - R (RAC-R)

Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Measures (Calendar Year 2012 Discharges - Revised)

Implementing AHA Quality Improvement Programs: Get With the Guidelines

FACT SHEET Summary of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) and Heart Failure (HF) Changes for 1/1/12+ Discharges

Implementing & Improving Upon A STEMI System

CathPCI Version 4.3: How are we doing so far? OR How we are doing so far. Tony Hermann, RN, MBA, CPHQ

EP15: Describe and demonstrate interdisciplinary collaboration using continuous quality and process improvement.

Proposed Meaningful Use Incentives, Criteria and Quality Measures Affecting Critical Access Hospitals

Quality Care Amongst Clinical Commotion: Daily Challenges in the Care Environment

Birmingham Regional EMS System STEMI System Plan

HIT Incentives: Issues of Concern to Hospitals in the CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Stage 2 Rule

Rural-Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

MOC Part IV: Your Guide to Making it Happen.

KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER

Resuscitation Centers of Excellence: Designation Process Rev January 2010

Flex Monitoring Team Briefing Paper No. 29 Developing Regional STEMI Systems of Care: A Review of the Evidence and the Role of the Flex Program

Trauma Service Area - B (BRAC) Regional Stroke Plan

Stroke Coordinator Boot Camp

Patient Engagement HCAHPS. HCAHPS Composite 4. HCAHPS Composite 5. Cleanliness of Hospital Environment. Communication about Medicines

Ambulance Operations Procedure Appropriate Hospital Access for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients. National Ambulance Service (NAS)

Lake Health Systems Nurse Reference Guide

Region III STEMI Plan

American College of Cardiology Patient Navigator Program Focus MI National PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

STEMI System of Care Policy

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and Beyond

An Overview of the. Measures. Reporting Initiative. bwinkle 11/12

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

Quality Matters. Quality & Performance Improvement

Case Study: Acute PREDICT

RACE COORDINATOR MEETING. North Carolina Mission: Lifeline and RACE CARS. Moving STEMI and Cardiac Arrest Care into the Future

South Central Region EMS & Trauma Care Council Patient Care Procedures

Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2012

Decreasing Mortality in Head Strike Patients on Anticoagulants with a Head Strike Protocol

National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual

Outpatient Quality Reporting Program

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HEALTH AGENCY

Q & A with Premier: Implications for ecqms Under the CMS Update

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND AFFILIATED ENTITIES ONGOING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION POLICY (OPPE)

Heart attack care in Ireland 2014

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION II: CLINICAL SYSTEMS REVIEW

An Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Model of Care for Stroke Patients

Benchmark Data Sources

Digitizing healthcare Digital Innovation Forum Henk van Houten Chief Technology Officer, Philips

EMS Engagement Communication Tools and Strategies for Coordinating Patient Care

Polling Question. Polling Question. Taking Education to the Healthcare Team In-situ Simulation in Acute MI Care as a Model for Team-focused CME

Hospital Outpatient Quality Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: January, 2018

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Quality Measures Are You Ready?

Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program

Summary. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare and Medicaid Programs

Stroke System-of- Care Plan. Mississippi State Department of Health

An 8-Step Approach to Involving Your Team in Performance Improvement. James E. Tcheng, MD, FACC Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Evaluation of Telestroke Services

Quality and Health Care Reform: How Do We Proceed?

WebEx Quick Reference

ACC State Chapters Best Practice Guide. Working with States on Clinical Data Requests

MBQIP Quality Measure Trends, Data Summary Report #20 November 2016

EMS System for Metropolitan Oklahoma City and Tulsa 2017 Medical Control Board Treatment Protocols

PPS Performance and Outcome Measures: Additional Resources

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

PSC Certification: What really happens

ACTION Registry-GWTG. NCDR13 Updates 3/22/2013. ACTION Cumulative Records Submitted Q Q Q Q Q3 Records Submitted

Getting Started: How to Operationalize Performance Measures for Your Acute Stroke Ready Hospital

Transcription:

Washington State Emergency Cardiac & Stroke System of Care Sample proof of concept Report Cardiac Measures COAP IN 2011

COAP IN 2011

Washington State Emergency Cardiac & Stroke CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE System of Care Sample proof of concept Report Cardiac Measures Click to edit Master title style Julie McDonald, RN, BSN, CPHQ Chair, ECS Data Committee Chair, COAP Management Committee Director Clinical Analytics, Providence Regional Medical Center, Everett

Quality Improvement Protection The programs of the Foundation for Health Care Quality have been approved by the WA State Department of Health as Coordinated Quality Improvement Programs (CQIP) under: RCW 43.70.51 A CQIP may share information and documents with one or more other CQIPs or committees or boards and shall not be subject to the discovery process

Emergency Cardiac & Stroke (ECS) System of Care COAP was asked to assist with helping to create a system of measurement using available data sets, which would meet the requirements for participation NCDR CathPCI data base + NCDR Action (ARG) data base together provide the essential data elements needed for this system of measurement COAP & Armus created a special report from these combined data sets which measures the outcomes specified by the ECS Technical Advisory Committee and which will meet the requirements for participation In order to provide this service to its members and to the state, all hospitals not currently participating in CathPCI will need to join. Data collection will not change, and will continue to be provided through COAP. All hospitals wishing to take advantage of this special reporting option as a way to meet the requirements for their cardiac level I or II status will also need to join Action/ARG..

Emergency Cardiac & Stroke (ECS) System of Care Grant funding from the Department of Health has been provided to COAP to assist with the ECS data project COAP will use that grant funding to pay for 2012 membership in CathPCI and Action/ARG for all hospitals not currently enrolled. Enrollment must occur before September in order to take advantage of this Please pick up your hospital specific enrollment packet at the back of this room before you leave the conference today. Further information will be sent following the conference. Contact Kristin Sitcov with questions.

Recommended Measures for Cardiac* Hospital/EMS Measures Time on scene Percent of AMI patients who arrived by EMS Percent of AMI patients for which pre arrival notification from EMS was received Percent of AMI patients who get any reperfusion (PCI or lytics) Percent door to balloon in 90 minutes Percent door to needle in 30 minutes Time from onset to 911 call (activation) Time from first medical contact to treatment (EMS or first hospital if transferred in; arrival at first hospital if self transport) Time from onset to treatment Outcomes (died in hospital, discharged alive, discharge location) CMS AMI Core Measures Function at 3 months (wish list or study) Cardiac arrest measures to be determined * Source: Emergency Cardiac & Stroke Technical Advisory Committee State Level Measure (Collected by DOH from CHARS and Vital Statistics) Hospitalizations (AMI, out of hospital cardiac arrest) Length of stay Discharge status Mortality 30 day readmission (future) 30 day mortality (future) One year mortality (future) Suggested Local/Regional Level Measures/Data Points Call receipt at first PSAP to actual dispatch Time in transfer hospital Percent of AMI for which ECG performed prehospital Accuracy of pre hospital ECG

Proof of Concept Report Data Sources: COAP/CathPCI data AR G (ACTION) data Draft ECS System of Care Report

Hospital A Hospital B Hospital C Hospital D

Hospital A Hospital B Hospital C Hospital D

c c

Data Tables

Process Timelines (will be reported by site as well) Critical Process Timelines: Non-Transfer In Patients Receiving Hospital Report, Q1-Q2 2011 Aggregate National Number of Records 420 Q1 2010 Eligible Cases Rate (Minutes) 4407 Pre-Hospital ECG (Arrival by EMS) Symptom Onset to Device Activation 66 229.8 130 Symptom Onset to FMC 65 134.5 50 FMC to ECG 72 6.7 6 ECG to ED Arrival 72 35.8 22 ED Arrival to ED Out 47 29.9 24 ED Out to Cath Lab Arr. 47 5.1 5 Cath lab Arr. To Dev Activation 72 26.8 23 ECG after Arrival (Arrival by EMS) Symptom Onset to Device Activation 13 337.9 145 Symptom Onset to FMC 13 221.9 54 FMC to Arrival 15 45.5 30 Arrival in ED to ECG 14 7.4 4 ECG to ED Out 9 34.6 29 ED Out to Cath Lab Arr. 9 4.6 5 Cath lab Arr. To Dev Activation 15 25.5 23 ECG after Arrival (Arrival by POV) Symptom Onset to Device Activation 20 254.2 177 Symptom Onset to ED Arrival 20 154.1 111 ED Arrival to ECG 22 12.0 6 ECG to ED Out 21 59.3 32 ED Out to Cath Lab Arrival 21 6.6 5 Cath lab Arrival to Dev Activation 22 27.6 23 229.8 0 100 200 300 0 100 200 300 Bars are not displayed when there are no eligible patients in the time frame. Additionally, specific time intervals with median of 0 are not plotted. EMS = Emergency Management System POV = Personal Occupancy Vehicle FMC = First Medical Contact ED = Emergency Department 337.9 254.2 Aggregate Average Times 0 100 200 300 Symptom Onset to FMC FMC to ECG ECG to ED Arrival ED Arrival to ED Out ED Out to Cath Lab Arr. Cath lab Arr. To Dev Activation Symptom Onset to FMC FMC to Arrival Arrival in ED to ECG ECG to ED Out ED Out to Cath Lab Arr. Cath lab Arr. To Dev Activation Symptom Onset to ED Arrival ED Arrival to ECG ECG to ED Out ED Out to Cath Lab Arrival Cath lab Arrival to Dev Activation Reference: American Heart Association - Mission Lifeline; Duke Clinical Research Institute - Duke University Medical Center

Composite Adherence (will be reported by site as well) Overall Composite Adherence Receiving Hospital Report, Q1 Q2 2011 Achievement Measures 1 Aggregate Adherence Score (Correct Care) 3 National Q1 2010 Adherence Score (Correct Care) 4 Overall Mission Lifeline Composite Score 93.9% 94.7% Acute Therapies: 1 Arrival to Primary PCI <= 90 min 94.4% 91.2% 2 FMC to Primary PCI <= 90 min 61.2% 56.5% 3 Reperfusion Therapy 83.8% 93.9% 4 Aspirin at Arrival 97.5% 98.9% Discharge Therapies: 5 Aspirin at Discharge 97.9% 98.6% 6 Beta Blocker at Discharge 95.7% 97.4% 7 Statin at Discharge 94.5% 98.5% 8 ACE inhibitor/arb at Discharge in LVSD 78.9% 89.4% 9 Adult Smoking Cessation Counseling 98.4% 98.3% 1 AR G Mission Lifeline receiving center patients have nine Achievement measures for which they may be eligible 2 Total number of treatment opportunities among eligible patients within the reporting timeframe 3 The ratio of total received therapies for all patients at a single site or aggregate of sites out of the total number of opportunities for all patients at that site or aggregate of sites. (Number of times care matches guideline recommendations / Number of guideline opportunities ) 4 The ratio of total received therapies in the previous quarter for all patients in receiving centers in the nation, out of the total number of opportunities for all patients in the nation. (Nation Among all admissions from receiving hospitals in ACTION Registry GWTG) Reference: American Heart Association Mission Lifeline; Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center

Aggregate Denominator # Missing Means of Transport to First Facility 553 2 Pre arrival First Medical Contact Date and Time, IF Means of Transport to First Facility = 2 (Ambulance),3 (Mobile ICU) or 4 (Air) 316 2 Transferred From Outside Facility 553 0 Arrival at Outside Facility Date and Time, IF Transferred From Outside Facility = 1 (Yes) 133 3 Transfer From Outside Facility Date and Time, IF Transferred From Outside Facility = 1 (Yes) 133 2 Arrival Date and Time 553 0 Onset Date and Time 553 111 First ECG Obtained (Pre Hosptial or After First Hosptial Arrival) 553 2 First ECG Date Time 553 6 Location of First Evaluation 553 186 Transferred out of Emergency Department Date and Time, IF Location of First Evaluation = 1 (Yes) 256 3 PCI 553 0 Cath Lab Arrival Date and Time, IF PCI = 1 (Yes) 364 0 First Device Activation Date and Time, IF PCI = 1 (Yes) 364 0 PCI Indication, IF PCI = 1 (Yes) 364 0 Non system Reason for Delay in PCI, IF PCI_Indication = 1 (Immediate primary PCI for STEMI) 137 9 Reperfusion Candidate, IF Discharge Date < 04/01/11 (there is no parent and data should not be missing); IF Discharge Date 04/01/11 and STEMI/STEMI Equivalent = 1 (Yes); (data should not be missing if new Parent STEMI/STEMI Equivalent = 1 (Yes)) 342 62 Primary PCI, IF Discharge Date < 04/01/11 then Primary PCI will not be in the Denominator or # Missing as field did not exist; IF Discharge Date >= 04/01/11 and Reperfusion Candidate = 1 (Yes) 99 0 Thrombolytics, IF Reperfusion Candidate = 1 (Yes) 174 0 Thromboytic Therapy Date and Time, IF Thrombolytics = 1 (Yes) 8 0 Non System Reason for Delay (Thrombolytic Therapy), IF Thrombolytics = 1 (Yes) 8 0 Sample Missing Data Report (will be reported by site as well) Missing Data Report for Action Composite and Timeline Metrics, Q1 Q2 2011