University of Maryland-Baltimore County

Similar documents
NSSE 2017 Selected Comparison Groups Ohio University

Western Carolina University

Indiana University Northwest

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance

College Profiles - Navy/Marine ROTC

University of Alaska Fairbanks

U.S. Psychology. Departments

DOCTORAL/RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS RECEIVING FULBRIGHT AWARDS FOR

Ethnic Studies Asst 55, ,755-2, ,111 4,111

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance ACTUARIAL SCIENCE

REPORT ON THE STATUS OF FACULTY SALARIES AT KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY

Selected Comparison Groups August Ferris State University

Rutgers University-Camden

NSSE 2013 Selected Comparison Groups

Ethnic Studies Asst 54, ,315-3, ,229 6,229. Gen Honors/UC Asso 64, ,402-4, ,430 24,430

CONNECTICUT: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM

NSTC COMPETITIVE AREA DEFINITIONS. UIC Naval Service Training Command (NSTC), Great Lakes, IL

Colleges/Universities with Exercise Science/Kinesiology-related Graduate Programs

Its Effect on Public Entities. Disaster Aid Resources for Public Entities

Dashboard. Campaign for Action. Welcome to the Future of Nursing:

SUMMARY - Peer Group Selection

U.S. Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association

Employment Outcomes, New York / Metro NYC Law Schools

Table 2 Overall Heterodox-Adjusted Rankings for Ph.D.-Granting Institutions in Economics

Illinois Higher Education Executive Compensation Analysis

MapInfo Routing J Server. United States Data Information

US News and World Report Rankings Graduate Economics Programs Ranked in 2001

2017 Competitiveness REDBOOK. Key Indicators of North Carolina s Business Climate

CAIR Conference Anaheim, CA, Nov. 6-9, 2012

2015 Major Field Test Comparative Data Guide Major Field Test for Physics

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

Appalachian State University L500030AppStUBlkVinyl. University of Alabama L500030AlabmaBlkVinyl. Arizona State University L500030ArizStBlkVinyl

Single Family Loan Sale ( SFLS )

Figure 10: Total State Spending Growth, ,

Compensation Data Colleges & Universities Participant List

APPENDIX c WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICES OF THE UNITED STATES

Summer II. Fall I. Spring I Yr Yr Yr Boston MA May 17-Aug 17 x Sep 13- Dec 15 x Jan 17-Apr 26

Current Medicare Advantage Enrollment Penetration: State and County-Level Tabulations

Online Job Demand Up 255,000 in December, The Conference Board Reports

CHAPTER CHAPTER DUES CANDIDATE & NEW REGULAR RETIRED DESIGNEE DUES

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION FACULTY SALARIES

Online Job Demand Up 169,000 in August, The Conference Board Reports

Use of Medicaid MCO Capitation by State Projections for 2016

Institutions Ineligible for AREA Grants April 2016 March 2017

Tuition, Fees, and Room & Board Rates Academic Year

Key Vocabulary Use this space to write key vocabulary words/terms for quick reference later

U.S. Patents Awarded in 2005 Top 20 Universities

Online Job Demand Down 83,200 in October, The Conference Board Reports

North Carolina Central University Contact Information for Filing Student Complaints

FEDERAL R&D FUNDING BY STATE

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5952. Online Job Ads Increased 195,600 in May

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5990. Online Job Ads Increased 229,700 in December

Online Job Demand Up 106,500 in November, The Conference Board Reports

The Conference Board Reports Online Job Demand Drops 507,000 in December

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5985. Online Job Ads Increased 137,100 in November

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5942. Online Job Ads Increased 102,000 in March

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5996. Online Job Ads Increased 1,200 in January

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #6029. Online Job Ads Increased 170,800 in July

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5967. Online Job Ads Decreased 125,900 in August

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5963. Online Job Ads Decreased 157,700 in July

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5980. Online Job Ads Increased 81,500 in October

Fiscal Year Tuition and Fee Comparisons for UNC Peer Institutions

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5486

University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities. Organizational Charts

Online Labor Demand up 232,000 in June

Soil, Water, and Plant Testing Laboratories United States and Canada

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #6016. Online Job Ads Decreased 69,300 in April


1 of 5 3/19/ :07 AM

CILogon & InCommon & Federated Identity. Jim Basney

TROJAN SEXUAL HEALTH REPORT CARD. The Annual Rankings of Sexual Health Resources at American Colleges and Universities. TrojanBrands.

Candidate Application

State Institution Program Type Degree

FBI Field Offices. Louisville Division Room Martin Luther King Jr. Place Louisville, Kentucky (502)

Saudi Government Scholarship Program - USA. Statistical Presentation For Student Enrollment in US Universities As of February 2007

2011 Nurse Licensee Volume and NCLEX Examination Statistics

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5862

Listed below are the states in which GIFT has registered to solicit charitable donations and includes the registration number assigned by each state.

Engineering bachelor s degrees recovered in 2008

The American Legion NATIONAL MEMBERSHIP RECORD

Final Award Listing

For further information: Frank Tortorici: / board.org Release #5458

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5806. Online Labor Demand Dropped 104,500 in April

FDP Expanded Clearinghouse Participants (as of February 8, 2018)

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5931

For further information: Carol Courter / Release #5916

TABLE 3c: Congressional Districts with Number and Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to-Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

DEMOGRAPHIC BREAKDOWN of CONFERENCE ATTENDEES

By Brian L. Yoder, Ph.D.

Radiation Therapy Id Project. Data Access Manual. May 2016

The following Final Actions were taken by the CCNE Board of Commissioners at its meeting on April 28-30, 2015.

Sears Directors' Cup Final Standings

TABLE 3b: Congressional Districts Ranked by Percent of Hispanics* Living in Hard-to- Count (HTC) Census Tracts**

FIELD BY FIELD INSTRUCTIONS

By Brian L. Yoder, Ph.D.

Application for Retired Member Status

50 STATE COMPARISONS

Online Labor Demand Rises 164,600 in August

States Roles in Rebalancing Long-Term Care: Findings from the Aging Strategic Alignment Project

2015 Major Field Test Comparative Data Guide Major Field Test for Political Science

Transcription:

Selected Comparison Groups August 2008

Reviewing Your NSSE 2008 Selected Comparison Groups Report NSSE participants are able to customize their Institutional Reports by tailoring up to three comparison groups. In May and June of 2008, your institution was invited to select comparison groups via the "Report Info Form" on the Institution Interface. This Selected Comparison Groups Report summarizes how your institution selected its comparison groups and lists the institutions within them. NSSE reports display results for each institution alongside three comparison group columns. Institutions have the option to customize each column or select a recommended default group of institutions. NSSE comparison groups may be customized in several ways. Contacts may identify specific institutions from the list of all current-year NSSE participants, create the list using institutional criteria, or begin with institutional criteria, then add or remove specific institutions to refine the comparison group. If an institution does not select a customized comparison group, NSSE provides default comparison groups which we have found to provide relevant comparisons for most institutions. If your institution opted for any of the default groups, they are: Comparison Group 1 - For institutions not participating in a NSSE consortium, this group contains current-year NSSE institutions in the same geographic region and sector (private/public). For consortium institutions, this groups contains results for the other consortium members and is not customizable. Comparison Group 2 - All other current-year U.S. NSSE institutions sharing your institution's Basic Carnegie Classification. Comparison Group 3 - All other current-year U.S. NSSE institutions (Canadian participants are also included in this group for Canadian institutions) The terms "comp. group 1," "comp. group 2," and "comp. group 3" correspond to the selected comparison group locations in the institutional reports. In NSSEville's example below, comp. group 1 is "Mid East Public", comp. group 2 "Carnegie Class" and comp. group 3 "NSSE 2008". Your Institution's Comp. Group 1 Comp. Comp. Responses or Consortium Group 2 Group 3 NSSEville State compared with: 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences a. b. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions Made a class presentation Variable CLQUEST CLPRESEN NSSEville State Mid East Public NSSE 2008 Benchmark Class Mean a Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size c Mean a Sig b Size Effect Effect Effect c ACL ACL Carnegie Class In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=very often FY 2.84 2.65 ***.23 2.62 ***.27 2.74 **.12 SR 3.27 2.90 ***.43 2.91 ***.41 3.03 ***.27 FY 2.33 2.09 ***.33 2.08 ***.33 2.21 ***.15 SR 2.85 2.62 ***.27 2.65 ***.24 2.77 *.10 The Selected Comparison Groups report consists of a summary page that details when and how your comparison groups were selected (or if you received the default due to not completing the Report Info Form) and three sections that provide comparison group details for each of the three report columns. Comp. Group Name Comparison group name in your reports. Comparison Group 1 Details This report displays the 2008 comparison group 1 institutions for NSSEville State University. The institutions listed below are represented in the 'Mid East Public' column of the Respondent Characteristics, Mean Comparisons, Frequency Distributions, and Benchmark Comparisons reports. Your institution did not identify a comparison group 1. The default group includes all institutions in your geographic region and sector (public/private). SELECTED PEER GROUP CRITERIA a Basic 2005 Carnegie Classification(s): Carnegie - Undergraduate Instructional Program(s): Carnegie - Graduate Instructional Program(s): How Group was Selected Indicates whether your group was drawn from a list, built based on criteria, or is the default group. Institution Names The name, city and state of the comparison institutions are listed for your review. Carnegie - Enro llment Profile (s): Carnegie - Undergraduate Profile(s): Carnegie - Size and Setting(s): Sector(s) (public/private): 1 Undergraduate enrollment(s): Locale(s): Geographic Region(s): 2 State(s): Barron's admissions selectivity ratings(s): COMPARISON GROUP 1 INSTITUTIONS Binghamton University (State University of New York) Binghamton NY Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania Bloomsburg PA Cheyney University of Pennsylvania Cheyney PA Selection Criteria If criteria were used to build your comparison group, they are listed here. The criterion codes are explained on the Comparison Group Selection Criteria Codelist.

SUMMARY - Comparison Group Selection This page provides an overview of how your three NSSE 2008 comparison groups were selected. These groups were either (a) submitted by your institution through the Report Info Form located on the NSSE Institution Interface or (b) defaults assigned because your institution did not complete the Report Info Form. Included below are the date the groups were submitted, the method used to pick them, the column labels your institutional contact provided for each group, the number of institutions in each group, and a short description of the group written by the contact at the time of submission. The following pages list the institutions selected for each comparison group. COMPARISON GROUP 1 SELECTION Date Submitted: 5/16/08 Selection Method: Comparators for this column were picked from a list of NSSE2008 participants. Column Label: Sci Tech Peers Number of Institutions: 11 The Reason Your Institution Provided For Choosing This Group: Originally, this list was based on IPEDS completions, those with % bachelor's degrees in SCI TECH of 25% or more (FY2002 Completions). This comprised 30% of the DRE public institutions. Given the tech bust, we now are going with the top 30% of schools ranked by % sci tech for FY 2006 completions (this is basically the same set of peers as the first group). We then select those institutions from this group that participated in NSSE. COMPARISON GROUP 2 SELECTION Date Submitted: 5/16/08 Selection Method: Institution-level criteria used to build this comparison group Column Label: Public R/H & R/VH Number of Institutions: 57 The Reason Your Institution Provided For Choosing This Group: Past comparison groups were the Public Doctoral Research Extensive (Carnegie 2000). We chose both Research/High and Research/Very High to approximate the past DREs. COMPARISON GROUP 3 SELECTION Date Submitted: 5/16/08 Selection Method: DEFAULT GROUP - Institution Selected Column Label: NSSE 2008 Number of Institutions: 714 The Reason Your Institution Provided For Choosing This Group: Page 1 of 1

Comparison Group 1 Details This report displays the 2008 comparison group 1 institutions for. The institutions listed below are represented in the 'Sci Tech Peers' column of the Respondent Characteristics, Mean Comparisons, Frequency Distributions, and Benchmark Comparisons reports. You selected specific institutions from a list of NSSE 2008 participants. COMPARISON GROUP 1 INSTITUTIONS Auburn University Auburn University AL Clemson University Clemson SC Colorado State University Fort Collins CO Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA Iowa State University Ames IA Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS Rutgers University-New Brunswick/Piscataway New Brunswick NJ University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign IL University of Toledo Toledo OH University of Vermont Burlington VT University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI. Page 1 of 1

Comparison Group 2 Details This report displays the 2008 comparison group 2 institutions for. The institutions listed below are represented in the 'Public R/H & R/VH' column of the Respondent Characteristics, Mean Comparisons, Frequency Distributions, and Benchmark Comparisons reports. Custom group was selected using institutional characteristics. COMPARISON GROUP 2 INSTITUTIONS Auburn University Auburn University AL Binghamton University (State University of New York) Binghamton NY Clemson University Clemson SC Colorado State University Fort Collins CO Florida International University Miami FL Florida State University Tallahassee FL Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA Georgia State University Atlanta GA Indiana University Bloomington Bloomington IN Iowa State University Ames IA Kent State University Kent OH Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS Missouri University of Science & Technology Rolla MO Montana State University-Bozeman Bozeman MT New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark NJ North Carolina A&T State University Greensboro NC Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ Ohio University Athens OH Penn State University - University Park University Park PA Rutgers University-New Brunswick/Piscataway New Brunswick NJ Rutgers University-Newark Newark NJ South Dakota State University Brookings SD Stony Brook University Stony Brook NY SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse NY The University at Albany, SUNY Albany NY The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL The University of Tennessee Knoxville TN The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington TX The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX The University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX The University of Texas at El Paso El Paso TX University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo NY University of Central Florida Orlando FL University of Colorado Denver Denver CO University of Delaware Newark DE University of Florida Gainesville FL University of Georgia Athens GA. Page 1 of 2

COMPARISON GROUP 2 INSTITUTIONS University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu HI University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign IL University of Iowa Iowa City IA University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst MA University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Minneapolis MN University of Mississippi University MS University of New Orleans New Orleans LA University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC University of Oklahoma Norman OK University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg MS University of Toledo Toledo OH University of Vermont Burlington VT University of Virginia Charlottesville VA University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison WI University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee WI Utah State University Logan UT Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA Western Michigan University Kalamazoo MI Wichita State University Wichita KS Wright State University Dayton OH. Page 2 of 2

Comparison Group 3 Details This report displays the 2008 comparison group 3 institutions for. The institutions listed below are represented in the 'NSSE 2008' column of the Respondent Characteristics, Mean Comparisons, Frequency Distributions, and Benchmark Comparisons reports. Your institution selected the default group of all U.S. NSSE 2008 institutions COMPARISON GROUP 3 INSTITUTIONS ALL U.S. NSSE 2008 INSTITUTIONS View list at http://nsse.iub.edu/nsse_2008/2008-colleges.cfm Page 1 of 1