Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network

Similar documents
Scoring Methodology FALL 2016

Scoring Methodology SPRING 2018

Sandra Trotter, MBA, MPHA, CPHQ PATIENT SAFETY PROGRAM LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN S HOSPITAL STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

Clinical Operations. Kelvin A. Baggett, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. SVP, Clinical Operations & Chief Medical Officer December 10, 2012

Scoring Methodology FALL 2017

Performance Scorecard 2013

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated September 2012

Program Summary. Understanding the Fiscal Year 2019 Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Page 1 of 8 July Overview

HIMSS Davies Enterprise Application --- COVER PAGE ---

The Heart and Vascular Disease Management Program

Keenan Pharmacy Care Management (KPCM)

Olutoyin Abitoye, MD Attending, Department of Internal Medicine Virtua Medical Group New Jersey,USA

What the blue star means for you A guide to the Aexcel specialist performance network

GREAT BOARDS. IHI Calls on Boards to Lead on Quality and Safety

2015 Executive Overview

Improving Nursing Home Compare for Consumers. Five-Star Quality Rating System

Community Health Excellence (CHE) Grant Program Application Guide

A comprehensive reference guide for Aetna members, doctors and health care professionals Aetna Institutes of Quality facilities fact book

HOSPITAL QUALITY MEASURES. Overview of QM s

SIMPLE SOLUTIONS. BIG IMPACT.

Community Health Needs Assessment Three Year Summary

Programs and Procedures for Chronic and High Cost Conditions Related to the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2012 DATA PUBLISHED 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

SCORING METHODOLOGY APRIL 2014

Strategic Plan. Becoming the Preferred Academic Medical Center of the 21st Century ONEUABMedicine.org/AMC21

NORTHWESTERN LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL. Scorecard updated May 2011

New Jersey State Department of Health and Senior Services Healthcare-Associated Infections Plan 2010

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.2 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.3 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Provider Peer Grouping Modification of Hospital Total Care Analysis Pre-Report Dissemination Meeting

Medical Management. G.2 At a Glance. G.3 Procedures Requiring Prior Authorization. G.5 How to Contact or Notify Medical Management

Medicare Value Based Purchasing August 14, 2012

NEW JERSEY HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2014 DATA PUBLISHED 2016 TECHNICAL REPORT: METHODOLOGY RECOMMENDED CARE (PROCESS OF CARE) MEASURES

Additional Considerations for SQRMS 2018 Measure Recommendations

Star Rating Method for Single and Composite Measures

Tips for PCMH Application Submission

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: APPENDICES TO MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES, CHAPTER 4654

(202) or CMS Proposals to Improve Quality of Care during Hospital Inpatient Stays

Competitive Benchmarking Report

Medicare Quality Based Payment Reform (QBPR) Program Reference Guide Fiscal Years

QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. Molina Healthcare has defined the following goals for the QI Program:

Facility State National

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Program Measures for Acute Care Hospitals - Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Payment Update

National Patient Safety Goals & Quality Measures CY 2017

Introduction. Singapore. Singapore and its Quality and Patient Safety Position 11/9/2012. National Healthcare Group, SIN

State of the State: Hospital Performance in Pennsylvania October 2015

General information. Hospital type : Acute Care Hospitals. Provides emergency services : Yes. electronically between visits : Yes

Safety Grade Review Instructions SPRING 2018 SAFETY GRADE REVIEW PERIOD (FEBRUARY 20 MARCH 9, 2018)

Kaiser Permanente QUALITY OVERVIEW OVERALL RATING : 3.4 COMPANY AT A GLANCE. Company Statistics. Accreditation Exchange Product

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

Jumpstarting population health management

Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement in the Ophthalmic ASC

Total Cost of Care Technical Appendix April 2015

CMS Quality Program- Outcome Measures. Kathy Wonderly RN, MSEd, CPHQ Consultant Developed: December 2015 Revised: January 2018

OVERVIEW OF THE SPRING 2018 LEAPFROG HOSPITAL SAFETY GRADE

Safety Grade Review Instructions FALL 2018 SAFETY GRADE REVIEW PERIOD ( SEPTEMBER 18 OCTOBER 8, 2018)

Minnesota Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System: Appendices to Minnesota Administrative Rules, Chapter 4654

Better to Best Quality Excellence Achievement Awards. Recognizing Illinois Hospitals Leading in Quality and Innovation COMPENDIUM

June 22, Leah Binder President and CEO The Leapfrog Group 1660 L Street, N.W., Suite 308 Washington, D.C Dear Ms.

2017 LEAPFROG TOP HOSPITALS

Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) Metrics Data to Change Clinical Practice Abigail R. Blackmore, MSN, RN Pamela W.

Performance Scorecard 2009

The Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms. Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2017 Leapfrog Hospital Survey

K-HEN Acute Care/Critical Access Hospitals Measures Alignment with PfP 40/20 Goals AEA Minimum Participation Full Participation 1, 2

Patient Identifiers: Facial Recognition Patient Address DOB (month/day year) / / UHHC. Month Day Year / / Month Day Year

Best Practices. SNP Alliance. October 2013 Commonwealth Care Alliance: Best Practices in Care for Frail and Disabled Medicare Medicaid Enrollees

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) The Harvard Pilgrim Independence Plan SM

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

The Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms. Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2018 Leapfrog Hospital Survey

Understanding HSCRC Quality Programs and Methodology Updates

N ATIONAL Q UALITY F ORUM. Safe Practices for Better Healthcare 2006 Update A CONSENSUS REPORT

PATIENT SAFETY KNOWLEDGEBASE. How to prepare for a Survey

Acute Care Workflow Solutions

Partnership for Patients The Innovation Center Perspective

TOWN HALL CALL 2017 LEAPFROG HOSPITAL SURVEY. May 10, 2017

AF4Q and TCAB: An Introduction

Critical Care, Critical Choices: The Case for Tele-ICUs in Intensive Care

MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT. MemberChoice FORMULARY MANAGEMENT MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT (MTM) SPECIALTY DRUG MANAGEMENT

The 5 W s of the CMS Core Quality Process and Outcome Measures

Why Shepherd? Shepherd Center Patients. Here s How We Measure Up: Shepherd Patient Population

Medicare Value Based Purchasing Overview

OHA HEN 2.0 Partnership for Patients Letter of Commitment

THE AMERICAN BOARD OF PATHOLOGY PATIENT SAFETY COURSE APPLICATION

CME Disclosure. HCAHPS- Hardwiring Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. Accreditation Statement. Designation of Credit.

Banner Health Friday, February 20, 2015

August 1, 2012 (202) CMS makes changes to improve quality of care during hospital inpatient stays

Welcome to the HSAG HIIN Initiative

Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. Reliable design. collaboration trust respect innovation courage compassion

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN HOSPITAL AND CLINICS DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACY SCOPE OF PATIENT CARE SERVICES FY 2017 October 1 st, 2016

Accreditation, Quality, Risk & Patient Safety

Healthcare- Associated Infections in North Carolina

Long-Term Services and Supports Study Committee: Person-Centered Medicaid Managed Care

PATIENT SAFETY OVERVIEW

A physician s guide to Aexcel

INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR OXFORD COVERAGE REIMBURSEMENT PART I OXFORD HEALTH PLANS OXFORD HEALTH PLANS (NJ), INC.

PATIENT SAFETY OVERVIEW

Overview of the Spring 2016 Hospital Safety Score March 7, Missy Danforth, Vice President of Hospital Ratings, The Leapfrog Group

Quality Measurement Approaches of State Medicaid Accountable Care Organization Programs

Report on Feasibility, Costs, and Potential Benefits of Scaling the Military Acuity Model

Critical Access Hospital Quality Improvement Activities and Reporting on Quality Measures: Results of the 2007 National CAH Survey

NQF s Contributions to the Nation s Health

Transcription:

Quality health plans & benefits Healthier living Financial well-being Intelligent solutions Understanding Patient Choice Insights Patient Choice Insights Network SM www.aetna.com Helping consumers gain better insights into health care costs and quality 00.03.450.1 C (3/12)

Aetna is proud to make available the Patient Choice Insights network, an innovative network option in Minnesota. The Patient Choice Insights network features a unique open access tiered network that can help you make informed choices about your care. In the Patient Choice Insights network, providers are analyzed on cost and quality measures and then ranked into three tiers. The lower the tier, the better they have performed on the measures; making it easy for you to find and choose providers that deliver greater overall value. With Patient Choice Insights, you have the freedom of choice and the information you need to maximize your health care dollars. You are free to access any provider in the network in any tier. Aetna is the brand name used for products and services provided by one or more of the Aetna group of subsidiary companies, including Aetna Life Insurance Company and its affiliates (Aetna). 2

Providers are placed into tiers consumers choose based on value Tier 1 ($) Higher overall value Provider has performed better on cost and quality measures Tier 2 ($$) Tier 3 ($$$) Accessing the network The Patient Choice Insights network is offered in select Minnesota and several bordering counties in North Dakota and western Wisconsin. 1 Outside the Patient Choice Insights service area, members have access to Aetna s National Provider Network. You can access the Patient Choice Insights Provider Directory online at www.aetna.com/docfind/custom/pcinsights. The online directory includes the most up-to-date information on the physicians, hospitals and other health care professionals and facilities that participate in the network. You can use the directory to search by location, provider name, tier level and more. What the tiers represent The tiers offer a quick way for you to identify providers that have demonstrated their ability to deliver value high quality, cost-effective care. The lower the tier the better the provider has performed on the selected Patient Choice cost and quality measures. Refer to your coverage document for detailed information about the benefit levels available through your specific plan. 1 The Patient Choice Insights and SelectCare networks are made available to Aetna by Medica and its affiliates. Medica is a registered service mark of Medica Health Plans. 3

How providers are evaluated Each year, providers in the Patient Choice Insights network are analyzed using an award-winning process that factors in a combination of cost and quality performance measures.2 The process, developed in collaboration with network providers, varies based on the type of provider primary care, specialty care or hospital. Calculating costs Primary care providers Are grouped with their affiliated health care organizations. Using claims data, the total cost of care is calculated for each organization. The analysis considers the price of all the services they provide to their patients as well as the price of the medications, specialists, hospitals and other facilities they use to care for their patients. The cost information is then adjusted to account for differences in the patients they treat such as age, gender and the presence of more than one health condition and/or other complications. 3 The process creates a level playing field in which organizations that care for patients with greater medical needs can be compared to other organizations. he Patient Choice tiering process was awarded one of the first Driving Value in Health Care Award in 2006 from The Leapfrog Group and the National Business T Coalition on Health. 3 Patient Choice uses the ACG Risk Adjustment System developed by The Johns Hopkins University. 2 4

Specialty care providers Are evaluated on their quality and cost of care. The quality and cost of care is measured relative to other providers with the same specialty. When applicable, the costs associated with their use of other health care facilities such as ambulatory surgery centers and hospitals are also incorporated. Hospitals Are evaluated on the cost of their case-mix adjusted admissions. That means each hospital s patient demographics, clinical characteristics and mix of treatment opportunities are factored into the equation. The resulting cost information allows hospitals to be compared relative to one another. Measuring quality Before joining the Patient Choice Insights network, providers go through a rigorous credentialing process that reviews their education, training and qualifications. This helps to ensure your access to quality care. Going a step further, Patient Choice Insights providers are grouped with their affiliated clinic or organization and evaluated on a variety of quality measures. The measures are adjusted based on the type of provider. Primary care providers and specialty providers Are measured on their quality and service practices. Information is collected about the programs and systems that they have in place that can lead to better quality and improved outcomes including their use of: Technology and information systems Quality improvement activities and programs Service capabilities In addition, primary care providers are measured on health outcomes and care processes as well as service and satisfaction levels (as reported by their patients) in the areas listed below. Results of this analysis are published in the Patient Choice Insights Clinic Comparison Guide available online at www.aetna.com/docfind/custom/pcinsights. Asthma Coronary artery disease Diabetes Preventive care Depression Hypertension Hospitals Are evaluated according to their performance on several national quality and safety initiatives listed below. Results of this analysis are published in the Patient Choice Insights Hospital Guide and Facility Pricing Catalog available online at www.aetna.com/docfind/custom/pcinsights. The Leapfrog Group s Hospital Survey Institute for Healthcare Improvement s 5 Million Lives Campaign/Improvement Map The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services IHI Improvement Map Hospital Compare Results Each quality measure is weighted according to several factors including, potential effect on care processes and/or outcomes and whether it is a nationally accepted guideline or standard. Providers are scored on the quality measures resulting in a corresponding quality credit. For more details about the quality measures used, see the chart on the following page. Establishing tiers The tiers are designated at a clinic/facility level. The best performing providers are placed in the best tiers. Here s how it works: Primary care providers and hospitals Each provider s quality credit is factored into their total cost of care. For hospitals, the quality credit is factored into their case-mix adjusted unit price. The providers are arrayed and preliminary lines are drawn at the 33rd and 66th percentile. The array is then analyzed for natural breaks or clusters. Large breaks that occur either below or above the lines, may result in an adjustment to a tier level. The process is similar for both primary care providers and hospitals. Specialty care providers The quality credit results for all providers are analyzed, and quality benchmarks are established relative to other providers within the same specialty. This information combined with the provider s relative cost are used to determine the tier level. For example, to achieve tier 1 status, a provider must be competitively priced and meet or exceed the established quality credit benchmark. As a result of this annual review process, a small percent of providers may change tiers. The changes take effect on January 1 of each year. 5

Helping you choose wisely Patient Choice Insights helps you understand the differences that exist in care delivery. Considering a provider s tier designation, enables you to make smart choices about your care and get the best value for your health care dollar. If you have any questions about either the Patient Choice Insights network, please call the Member Services phone number on your ID card. Learn more about the quality measures. Primary care providers Providers are evaluated in the areas of asthma, diabetes, coronary artery disease and preventive care. The information is collected using a tool developed by MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation that has been modified specifically for this program. The assessment considers: Outcomes which refer to measurable evidence of quality care such as lab results, frequency of exams and adherence to known best practices. Processes which refer to disease management protocols and tracking mechanisms for identifying patients who need to be screened or seen for follow-up. Service which refers to patient satisfaction with their care and accommodation to their special needs. Primary care and specialty care providers Providers are evaluated on various aspects of their organization s infrastructure, programs and capabilities including: Use of electronic medical records Use of electronic prescribing tools Process to electronically track ordered tests until completed and patient notification Responsiveness to patient complaints Implementation of clinical guidelines Active quality improvement committee Quality improvement program includes cost-of-care and performance issues Metrics used to compare physicians clinical performance to one another Metrics used to compare clinic s clinical performance to other clinics Process for tracking, analyzing and preventing adverse incidents 30-day infection rates (specialty care only) 6

Hospitals Providers are evaluated on the following measures: The Leapfrog Group s Hospital Survey Results The Leapfrog Group is a coalition of public and private organizations that collects and publishes information about hospital safety and quality in the following categories: Physicians enter patient prescriptions and other orders into computers linked to error prevention software. Intensive care unit (ICU) is appropriately staffed by trained ICU specialists called intensivists. Hospital has put in place 13 practices that can have a major affect on the safety of patients in health care settings such as timely clinical information for other caregivers and patients and identification and mitigation of safety risks and hazards. Hospital has proven outcomes or extensive experience with several high-risk procedures/ conditions. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement s 5 Million Lives Campaign/Improvement Map This campaign aims to engage hospitals in implementing 12 changes in care that are proven to improve patient care and prevent avoidable deaths. Patient Choice Insights collects information each hospital s level of implementation on the following: Deploying rapid response teams at the first sign of patient decline and before a catastrophic cardiac or respiratory event in patients who are progressively failing outside the intensive care unit Preventing adverse drug events by reconciling patient medications at every transition point in care Delivering reliable, evidence-based care for acute myocardial infarction to prevent deaths from heart attack Preventing surgical site infections by reliably delivering the correct perioperative antibiotics at the proper time Preventing central line infections by implementing a series of interdependent, scientifically grounded steps Preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia by implementing a series of interdependent, scientifically grounded steps Preventing harm from high-alert medications initially focusing on anticoagulants, sedatives, narcotics and insulin Reducing surgical complications by implementing changes in care recommended by the Surgical Care Improvement Project Preventing pressure ulcers by using science-based guidelines. Reducing Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Auereus (MRSA) by implementing scientifically proven infection control practices Delivering reliable evidence-based care for congestive heart failure to reduce readmissions Getting boards on board by implementing processes to help hospital board of directors become more effective in accelerating care improvements Testing the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections Linking quality and financial management: Strategies to engage the Chief Financial Officer and provide value for patients For IHI Improvement Map Hospitals are assessed on their level of implementation regarding 70 different processes in 3 areas: Leadership Support care processes Patient care processes Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) Hospital Compare Results CMS collects a variety of information about how well hospitals care for patients with certain conditions or procedures and what patients thought about the quality of their care. The following measures were incorporated into the tiering process: Heart attack mortality rates Heart failure mortality rates Infection reporting Pneumonia Surgical Care Patient satisfaction: Percentage of patients that would recommend the hospital to friends; HCAPS 7

Patient Choice Insights. A tiered network offered by Aetna. Providers are independent contractors and are not agents of Aetna. Provider participation may change without notice. Aetna does not provide care or guarantee access to health services. Health information programs provide general health information and are not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician or other health care professional. Information is believed to be accurate as of the production date; however, it is subject to change. For more information about Aetna plans, refer to www.aetna.com. www.aetna.com 2012 Aetna Inc. 00.03.450.1 C (3/12)